22 Replies to “If Women Ran The World”

  1. Dear Progress Action Fund:
    Quit trying to help. No, I take that back. Go help Trump.
    Sincerely, Kamala

  2. Democrats … the Party of … GROOOOOSSSSSSS … nobody really gives a shit about your loneliness dude. Not even your ollllllld white male Republican Congressman.

    1. ‘get the kleenexes’
      l anticipated some sort of new rom com tear jerker starring oh, say, rachel from disney.
      well. hmmph. different kind of ‘jerking’ over there on the left.
      is that whats meant by ‘left handed’?

      1. #Metoo … I was thinking tear jerker … not pud jerker. Kate does it again with her giant brain. BTW … they say sex is governed mostly by the mind, not the apparatus… just a little factoid.

    1. That’s OK by me, Maikeru. I’ll start to worry when they are fighting for the right to arm bears.

  7. They should have had the guy sitting in church, pounding it, that would have gelled big time with dimoKKKraps.

    Just how stupid are these kkklowns???

  9. if they did we would still be living in caves and wondering when the the next lightning strike would arrive to give us fire.

  10. The 28th Amendment – Congress shall pass no laws respecting the right to beat one’s meat.
    One of my favorites along with the 69th Amendment.

  13. To paraphrase Philip Roth, the imagination of the satirist is powerless against what he can see in tomorrow’s Twitter feed. Some further thoughts:

    ASSUMING THIS IS REAL (which I have a hard time believing – can anyone confirm?), this is hands down, the most bizarre, b-a-n-a-n-a-s, flailingly desperate – not to mention intellectually-muddled (see my comments below) – political ad I’ve even seen.

    This ad – again, assuming it is even real and not a comedy bit – is giving me déjà vu for something that happened to me all the time in undergrad seminars and sometimes law school (although the law school admission process tended to weed the clowns who would pull this stunt out): I would say, argue for Proposition X and then some classmate who fancied herself more clever than she actually was – and sorry ladies, but they were almost inevitably female – would pipe up huffily saying effectively, “you are arguing for Proposition X – and either implicitly or explicitly – arguing AGAINST Proposition Y but can’t you see that Proposition X and Proposition Y ARE EXACTLY THE SAME, and thus you are guilty of a gross intellectual inconsistency (and ergo, a complete idiot!)”

    I’ve played this clip several times this morning and insofar as I can discern things, the gross intellectual inconsistency this ad says Republicans (and by implication, undecided voters) are guilty of is not understanding that (i) abortion – not mentioned here but implied – is basically the functional (male) equivalent of jacking off to porn – i.e., a private, semi-taboo act that the state has no business regulating; and (ii) the state’s prohibiting men wanking to porn is functionally THE SAME THING as the state putting restrictions on abortion which again it is implies, is no different that masturbating (or – speaking of masturbation – in Louis CK’s famous analogy, “taking a shit.”)

    Although reasonable people can different on the specifics of abortion and the laws governing such (and Canadian politicians of virtually all stripes are moral cowards here in not even talking about the issue), once one realizes – and I’m not going out on a limb here ladies – that masturbation and abortion are NOT function equivalents (something my undegrad classmates with no conception of nuance where incapable of discerning), the whole premise of this ad simply collapses.

    I will let Louis CK take it from here:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBbC2krBopw

    1. Wow! I hadn’t seen that bit before.
      Louis CK is definitely the bravest comedian doing stand up today.

  14. The Dems have neither a specific bill nor a specific congressman to point to as proof of concept.
    It’s a complete Strawman argument with no real-world underlying reality.

    Where are the Democrat policies that they’re going to implement if they win?
    You know, the better policies that they haven’t implemented in the past 4 years?

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation