47 Replies to “The New Segregated Economy”

    1. If your vaccinated and afraid to catch the virus from me, your a moron.
      Isn’t that what you’ve been vaccinated for?
      Gotta love the media spin…

        1. Then it’s not a vaccine, is it, you pathetic basement-dwelling friendless fuckup? It’s a placebo intended to divide the human race like every other leftist policy, if not something worse.

          Maybe you should try sex or something. Seriously, it’s WAY better than heroin or whatever it is you’re using daily to kill off brain cells by the handful. But – and this is important so pay attention – you have to get permission first, incel motherfuck.

        2. See folks, UnMe just made sense with a factitious comment. Everybody must know that the only way the “vaccines” can work is if everybody is “vaccinated”. s/

      3. It’s called immunization for a reason.

        But reason has no.place in the statist induced pandemic panic.

      4. Actually if you are vaccinated and afraid to catch the virus from me you may actually secretly understand at some level that the vaccines are NOT a cure and NEVER claimed to fully prevent, merely reducing the chances of catching and intensity of the Fauci Flu.

        Yet you still went and got one and are now happily listening to talk about a booster. Well done. Congrats for following orders.

        To think you could have completely removed the risk of getting a blood clot as well as all the risks of death that our Experts casually tell us are nothing to worry about (in Australia Jab related deaths are acceptable because when you jab millions then of course a couple of hundred are also going to die from something unrelated in the same time period. The Australia TGA honestly say this in their reports!) and could have avoided the ‘Adverse Events’ that are reported by about 1 in 250 Jab victims.

        (my workmate’s wife had an Adverse Event. She went into Intensive Care. Taking the Jab is a RISK.)

        There is evidence to suggest that the Jab will actually INCREASE the risk of getting Fauci for the first 4 or so weeks, before reducing the risk for about 3 to 4 months before fading out to zero protection (hence the booster talk, so our Experts AGREE with this last point) at about the 5 to 6 month part.

        So, if the Jab has a non zero chance to give you fatal blood clots, and a chance to make you sick, and might mess with your menstrual cycle (another thing they are quick to hush up rather than discussing rationally) and might make you more likely to get The Virus before fading out to zero protection and ‘Time for Booster’ in six months time, then why would you not just reduce all that excess risk and just not get the Jab?

        Sure, the Un-Jabbed might get the Fauci, but so might you at almost equal rates and the Un-Jabbed completely avoid all the other proven health risks.

        If Fauci is allowed to constantly change his version of events, then surely the rest of us are allowed to change our understanding of best health practice. Saying “We internationally all agreed to Vax EVERYONE and we are sticking to the plan regardless” is moronic.

        1. Fauci the Fraud when asked about evidence that natural immunity is 6+ times better protectiion that the vax.
          He had no answer.

    2. Unions don’t need the jab, Illegals don’t need the jab, Congress don’t need the jab. Just those dirty bitter clingers and Deplorable bastards.

      1. Neither does staff/employees at:
        The Whitehouse
        CDC
        NIH
        FDA
        Congress
        The Senate
        Pfizer
        Moderna
        J&J
        The people barking out the mandates and the companies making the shit.

    2. This guy who hates being right (has nothing to worry about) is making some big mistakes in his data analysis, starting with the assumption that the vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups are basically the same. This is known to be untrue. If you assume that the more unhealthy you are, the more likely you are to get vaccinated, for example, and that health changes by age group, what does that do to his analysis? Also, why are infection rates in the 30-39 group so skewed to the unvaccinated and the 40-49 group so skewed in the opposite direction, yet the 50-59, 60-69 and 70-79 groups less heavily skewed than the 40-49 group, ending in the 80+ that get covid less often if they are vaccinated? Does something happen at age 40-49 that slowly disappears as you age, disappearing when you turn 80?

      The data only considers week 32-35 – 3 weeks. Why not consider the aggregate of all weeks – from 1 to 35 and show that aggregate against week 1-32? This would show a trend. This reflects the stationarity of data. Without it there is no trend, just variance of data, which is meaningless on its own.

      Imagine if we went to the train station and you wanted to count the number of people by age group getting on the train. On SEP-04-2021 from 10:00 to 11:00 this is the data. What does it prove? Not much on its own. But the guy who hates being right would tell you that a “worrisome” shift in transportation trends was happening.

      Your friend who hates being right, probably doesn’t hate it very often. If you cherry-pick data all you find are cherries.

      1. This scenario can be explained Dr Geert Vanden Bossche.

        Essentially, the longer one has been dosed, the least effective it becomes, and voila, the dosed get sick.

        These experimental jabs are a slow moving train wreck. Get Prepared! We are on the verge of a mass event of jabbed overwhelming hospitals. Hope the totalitarians enjoy their brief arrogant reign, of being scolds,” Pandemic of the Unvaxxed”. Not for long, scolds, not for long!

        https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/

        1. Your link is very interesting Dan, but a misdirection on what I was saying. The link from Edward was to a coo-coo-clock of misinformation.

          If I understand the fine Dutch doctor, his very excellent point 3 of his “The Last Post” was exactly what I was saying (although he is far more eloquent) – that pandemic waves hit different age groups at different times. You cannot make any conclusion from a snapshot in time because things are constantly changing and resetting, which is what the coo-coo-clock doomsday machine missed.

          But the good doctor is not entirely correct. If you apply his thoughtful analysis to the 1918 flu pandemic, it did not start with the elderly and work its way progressively toward the young as the good doctor suggests the current pandemic is doing.

          https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/why-did-1918-flu-kill-so-many-otherwise-healthy-young-adults-180967178/

          It may well be that the current pandemic is making its way progressively from the old to the young. But that is not because of the vaccine. In fact it is evidence the vaccine is working as the younger are less vaccinated by percentage and they are now getting sicker in greater numbers. Who knows? This is the problem with generalizations and conclusion jumping. You’re wrong and wrong and wrong until you’re right. I feel the good doctor will be right and right and right until he’s wrong. Then you will hear the infamous “well things are different now”.

        2. Always be cautious of a person who only references themselves when giving outside evidence for their “expert” opinion.

  8. Reminds me of when Obamacare was instituted and employers were going to be required to provide health insurance to any employee who worked 30 hours a week or more. And guess what happened? A whole bunch of people suddenly were working 29 hours a week.

    Then there was the whole issue of good luck finding medical providers who would accept Obamacare plans, especially the lower-tier plans. Health insurance does not equal health care, so there also was a whole bunch of people who were forced to get insurance on the Obamacare exchanges at exorbitant costs and it was worthless because they couldn’t find providers, even in major metro areas. The “If you have a doctor, you can keep your doctor” was a straight-out lie.

  9. We did this with the over 50 rule. When you have 50 or more employees a whole shit-load of rules start to apply, including having fire extinguishers at every exit and having a map of every exit at every fire extinguisher, and having to explain to everyone new to the building how to evacuate in the event of a fire. If you have 49 employees – no such rules apply.

    I was in Vancouver several times on business and the companies I visited explained what to do in the event of an earthquake. One day, in an iconic Vancouver building, the elevator dropped several floors suddenly and the girl who had explained the earthquake rules was badly injured. Oddly there were never any elevator safety instructions – before or after.

    1. We did this with the over 50 rule.

      I heard that when Rotten Rachel Knothead was in charge, that number was 5 or, maybe, 10. That’s right: for a handful of people, there had to be a safety committee, which met regularly, safety drills, and so on.

      Then again, this is the same premier whose government tried to impose fixed working hours on farming operations and restrict what farm kids could do.

    2. One has to wonder what Macron thinks he’s doing. One famous French king said the throne of France was worth a mass. Our modern French king thinks a mask is worth the throne of France.

      Unless, of course, he has bigger plans and paymasters.

  11. Byedin-Heiress has just committed a MONUMENTAL error in judgement. They are counting on the majority of the country being frightened, double-masked, Karen’s. We’re not. This entire bullshit vaccination-discrimination policy is going to hit a brick wall at 90mph!

    Byedin-Heiress thought this reckless, unconstitutional, policy would take America’s mind off his shamefully bungled Afghanistan retreat. Instead, this crap will focus America on the MONUMENTAL mistake we made by allowing the 2020 election to be stolen. Byedin-Heiress is doomed. I will be surprised if he makes it to 2021.

    1. Biden has scored on himself. Illegals do not have to vaccinate, Unions do not have to vaccinate, Congress do not have to vaccinate.

      1. Rules for thee but not for me.
        Lockdowns, masks for thee but no for me.
        The collectivist clarion call.
        Lead and elite are nowhere near the same.
        Science for thee but not for me.
        Accountability, facts, opinions, liberty.
        Those too.

        The US Declaration of Independence states government’s obligation is to protect individual rights, not assign them. When they fail to do so the people have an obligation to overthrow such tyranny.

        If liberty is to survive here and there we must shake off our statist shackles or come under the thumb of totalitarians.

        That is the inevitable end of progressivism.

      2. With respect to Congress and the federal judiciary, it’s called the Constitution. Biden only has say over those who work for the Executive Branch. For those who work for the federal judiciary, a blanket jab mandate would be Chief Justice John Roberts’ call. Congress? The Attending Physician has a lot of sway, but the House and Senate run their own shops and there’s only so much Pelosi and Schumer can do. For example Pelosi’s mask mandate doesn’t exist in the Senate. A lot of it is individual offices making decisions as to how to handle things with respect to employees.

  13. The globalist left used to dream of a “general strike” that would end capitalism overnight. All the proletariat had to do was refuse to show up for work, and the Jew-capitalists would be forced to acquiesce to the abolition of private property in no time, for want of anybody to exploit.

    The globalists are about to get what their great-grandparents thought they wanted and choke on it—a workers’ and peasants’ movement they don’t and can’t control.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation