33 Replies to “Flag Shaggers”

  2. “Magic Dirt” cuck.

    Look up: Race realism

    Diversity is white genocide in a pretty multicolored dress.

    1. Very likely it is: after 1066 the ruling class was French, and they brought their cuisine with them. Unlikely French Fries are at all French, and bear in mind that name is never used in the UK – they are chips! I also suspect the French would be horrified to be associated with French Toast

      1. The case might made that roast beef was Norman and not French cuisine as Normandy was settled by Vikings pledging allegiance to Charles of West Francia. So was England conquered by the French or by the Vikings indirectly?

        1. “Roast Beef” originated from the Anatolian farmers around the Caucuses that first domesticated the beef.

          1. I think he’s talking about the way roast beef has traditionally been cooked and served in England having come from the way the French did it. Of course in both places it has changed over time, and it had become a bigger deal for the English than for the French.

      2. Wasn’t it in “Hereward the Wake” that there was a discussion of the transformation of gruff Anglo-Saxon terms for animals into refined French terms for their meat?

  6. Every once in a while, there is a chance to vote for someone who will make a true difference. Barry Goldwater was likely once such that the USA had, and they declined that chance. The scale of poor choices only becomes apparent with the passage of time. The first Trudeau, now very obviously, was the end of this entire country.

    There appears to be no real choice in Canada, like what this guy is presenting to the voters of London. We can have the Liberal Party, O’Toole’s Liberal Party, Singh’s Liberal Party, the Green Liberal Party. There is Mad Max, who is running a party that is clearly not just another Liberal Party, but Liberal Party functionaries from all the various Liberal Party versions attack that one. There is this Maverick Party, that I will be in a Zoom meeting with, tonight at 7pm about the Carlton Trail Eagle Creek riding association. Their literature though, honestly reads like “we will be the western centric Liberal Party version, and you can trust us fer sure!”.

    I have yet to see someone who is simply honest. Canada, is done. Separation is the only option for the west. There is no fixing Canada, there is nothing to be had through negotiation. It will be difficult. It will be a fight. There will be casualties and financial ruin. It is the only way. We can have freedom, or we can keep our pensions and other entitlements. Like all Ponzis, the money is long gone, but you can lie to yourself for as long as you want to. There will never be a payout.

    Someone needs to step up, and just tell everyone what they need to hear. Not what CBC wants us to hear.

    All the parties, Mad Max included, are offering largely the same generalities. More pensions, more healthcare, no responsibilities, more rules, more programs, more regulations, more safety, more taking care of everyone, more departments. No one, anywhere, has less on offer.

    2. You missed when the end of Canada came about. It was Deff the Thief. He screwed up so badly that the likes of Pearson and the Turd became the perpetual government. And yes I lump Joe, Brian and Steve in with them.

    3. “There is Mad Max, who is running a party that is clearly not just another Liberal Party”

      You’re sorta’ right. Mad Max isn’t running another Liberal Party.

      Maxime is running a party that isn’t even a party. It’s a Cult. Without Maxime it’s literally nothing.
      Did you notice that the ‘People’s Party’ had one seat and lost it? The voters of Beauce turfed Maxime Bernier.

      Beauce is an historically Conservative riding in Quebec, which is a Leftwing province.
      Now imagine your Mad Max not having the CPC candidacy of Beauce in the first place.
      He never would’ve been elected at all. All he would be is a cult leader.
      Which he is.

      1. Well said! Cult is a good way to put it. Coulda had Max….not a chance. Canadians are willing to tolerate but not accept. Max represents those who would do neither. The porcine genus will develop drag coefficient before the likes of Max would become PM in this country. A minor group of grumpy, intransigent conservative leaning whiners needs somewhere to park their dumb asses though, so he is good for that.

      2. That’s silly. Mac’s party is no more a cult than the NDP or Bloc. While Max is the best known member of the PPC, supporters hold identifiable conservative and traditional values. It takes a while for any new party to get established. I expect support for PPC to grow because people are slowly realising that the current Liberal/Conservstive/NDP parties are built on lies and deception. Humans do not cause the climate to change, Canadians are not racists, and successful immigration rests on managing numbers and respecting the traditional framework on which the country has been built. We are not genociders or “settlers”. There are not 45 genders, etc. etc. Given the brainwashing we get from the Liberal Party, I believe the word “cult” far better describes them than the PPC. And if Canadians do not see the current problem with the direction in which the country is headed, you soon will not have a country.

        1. “That’s silly”

          No. You’re stupid.

          “It takes a while for any new party to get established.”

          No, it does not. Did the NDP or Bloc(your examples) get zero seats the first elections that they ran in?
          In the NDP’s 1972 election(first election) they won 31 seats.
          In the Bloc’s 1993 election(first election) they won 46 seats.
          In the PPC’s 2019 election(first election) Maxime Bernier entered the election with 1 seat and LOST the seat.
          There is NO COMPARISON!

          A real party with a responsible party leader would have resigned and called for a leadership vote and a party convention to select a leader. That did not happen. WHY?
          Because the PPC is a Cult that could not exist without Maxime Bernier.

          1. you are wrong about the NDP. I don’t know when they changed their name but they were in parliament 1n 1964/1965 to prop up the libs to bring the liberal flag of canada on us. Probably the start of the end of canada. Like the flag think about the symbol. A piece of dead foliage.

            Go WEXIT

          2. Oz shilling for the one of the Liberal Party versions, no surprise there.

            NDP started out as the CCF, they been contesting elections since 1935, founded 1932. Oz of course, is depending on ignorance so that his lies go unchallenged. Changed their name when they were accused of communist sympathies. Why are rebranding efforts so common from socialists.

            He goes immediately to the most common logical fallacy, ad hominem. He cannot attack any of the policies of the PPC, so he just starts calling names. “cult, cult, cult, not a real party”. You can follow Oz’s advice and lose yet another election. Or you can try something different. Maybe you would still lose, but repeating the same thing definitely guarantees it.

          3. “Oz shilling for the one of the Liberal Party versions”

            Kevin you’re a liar. Attacking Maxime’s cult is not shilling for an other party. I am done with Canada.

            “NDP started out as the CCF”

            I could say the same thing about Maxime’s PPC. It started out as the CPC. At least Maxime Bernier did.
            If the CPC had not allowed Maxime to be a candidate in Beauce, none of us would even know that Jackwagon’s name.

            “He cannot attack any of the policies of the PPC”

            I won’t attack any of Maxime’s rhetoric. I agree with what Maxime says.
            I don’t agree that Maxime is a man of integrity or that his actions are those of a responsible leader.

            I call the PPC a cult because it is one.
            Real parties don’t start with a single man. They begin with a group of people who hold a convention at which they decide policy and a name for the party. Then they hold a leadership race and elect a leader.
            None of this happened with Maxime Bernier’s PPC.

            As I said on another thread, I could cite a litany of irresponsible actions by Maxime Bernier that would make him unfit for party leader or Prime Minister of a country.

          4. @Oz Your argument is not persuasive. You sound like a fanatic. I think Reformers only had only one seat initially. Regardless, you are certainly free to ignore the PPC, but I see them gaining ground as in many ways, they stand for traditional Canadian values. I think some people still support those.

          5. “I think Reformers only had only one seat initially.”

            Naw, how about 52 seats in their first election?! I’m not trying to convince stupid people of anything.

            “they stand for traditional Canadian values”

            They? Who is they? Mad Max is ‘they’ now is he? Maybe he should change his name to Sybil.

            Look LindaL, for the more than 150years of Canada’s existence the Liberal Party of Canada has been in power virtually the entire time punctuated sporadically with short interludes of sorta’ conservative government.
            When you use the phrase “Canadian values” you need to understand that Canadian values are Liberal values.
            That’s why Canada hates Alberta. Alberta is not on the same wavelength as Canada value wise.
            Oh, and you should look up the word cult. I do not think it means what you think it means, politically.

          6. Ooz, you’ve made it clear a long time ago, you have some serious mental issues, now go see yer Doctor and get a prescription for a mental health evaluation . You haven’t a clue as to what you are posting most of the time, McStupid

        2. ” It takes a while for any new party to get established. I expect support for PPC to grow because people are slowly realising that the current Liberal/Conservstive/NDP parties are built on lies and deception. ”

          Reform captured 4% of the popular vote in their first election, and that was considered pretty amazing at the time.

    4. The only PERSON in this Country worth Voting for: (Person)
      Pierre Polliviere.

      I have encouraged him to move West and join the MAVERICK Party. He is the ONLY Political conservative left in the Entire Country.

  8. I had occasion to work with an Irishman one time, who had been in Canada for at least 20 years…a very kind, thoughtful and all round decent, salt of the Earth sort of fellow who wouldn’t use foul language if you put a gun to his head. A real joy to work with.
    Of course all those niceties went out the window if the conversation was ever steered to England. I was fairly ignorant of Irish/English history before but was brought up to speed fairly quickly.
    Phew!!! Dude, relax. “I’ll button up this flange…just hang back and take it easy before you bust a vessel”.
    Fox made me think of him.

    1. Even America has a St. George. He died last year because he couldn’t breathe.

  10. Mr. Fox is right in a way, but he also seems to be dangerously wrong about Britain.

    He is right that people from different nations can migrate to a western nation and become fully part of the fabric of the nation, but he’s wrong to think that the heritage and history of the people who created that nation has nothing to do with their racial identity; and he wouldn’t imagine that of any non-western nation.

    If the people who lived in Turkey were Spaniards would it be Turkey, or Spain? Would Spain be the same place if they hadn’t been invaded by the Moors? Mr. Fox hasn’t asked himself these questions. In his jokey dismissal of English culture as originating outside England, he seems to be adhering to what is often called the “magic dirt” theory of nationhood.

    The reason this mindset dangerous is that in their desire to be welcoming to all races, people like this imagine that a nation is only a place, and that the customs and ideas that make it what it is just somehow evolved naturally because of where it is and what happened to it, but somehow *who* happened to it is irrelevant.

    Indian and Pakistani people, for example, have been part of the fabric of the British nation for hundreds of years, and should be welcomed and celebrated – but they only formed a small part of its cultural fabric, and if Britain was mostly populated by people from India, or Pakistan, it would be a different Britain.

    There are two equal and opposite errors you can fall into when it comes to considering race and nationhood: the first is to be a bigoted racial purist, and to believe that the only *true* representatives of a nation are those of its founding races. The second is to believe that a nation is just an idea, and that it can absorb any number of peoples from any background, and still be recognizable as that nation.

    In Canada we are going to discover over the next generation what the result of this thinking is. The French and British, (I’m including Scots and Irish) Christians who founded Canada are already a minority in every major city in Canada. In a very little time, they will no longer even be the largest minority in those places. What happens then? Whose ideologies, religious convictions, and concepts of liberty and good government will prevail? Who will be running things, and will we agree on how to run them?

    Britain will be facing that same reality very soon.

    Of course, Mr. Fox wants to be elected, so it would be silly of him to raise those questions in his campaign. It would be wise of him to consider them, though.

    1. The English aren’t English because they live in England. England is England because that’s where the English live.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation