Category: Drill, Baby, Drill

Mischief Is Important

If I was running the industry that serves as perennial whipping boy for Liberals, I’d screw over their manufactured “price drop at the pumps” campaign stunt, too.

Poilievre promises an energy corridor to the coasts

Poilievre’s key energy policy: a National Energy Corridor for pipe, power and rail. Here’s his speech, verbatim.

The reality is, we largely have a such a corridor already from Moose Jaw to a third of the way through Ontario. It’s Quebec and New Brunswick that are the issue.

And just a couple hours after Poilievre spoke, we recorded this with Andrew Scheer:

Pipeline Online Podcast, Ep. 6: Andrew Scheer on a National Energy Corridor and a whole lot more, including tariffs, Clean Electricity Regulations and coal-fired power.

Don’t Mess With Mandan

BBC;

A North Dakota jury has found Greenpeace liable for defamation, ordering it to pay more than $660m (£507m) in damages to an oil company for the environmental group’s role in one of the largest anti-fossil fuel protests in US history.

Texas-based Energy Transfer also accused Greenpeace of trespass, nuisance and civil conspiracy over the demonstrations nearly a decade ago against the Dakota Access Pipeline.

The lawsuit, filed in state court, argued that Greenpeace was behind an “unlawful and violent scheme to cause financial harm to Energy Transfer”.

Greenpeace, which vowed to appeal, said last month it could be forced into bankruptcy because of the case, ending over 50 years of activism.

h/t Ken

All things energy in Sask budget

All things energy in Saskatchewan Budget 2025

Pipeline Online combed through the budget so you don’t have to.

The biggest item for oil and gas is a new program meant to re-invigorate old, low producing wells by doing re-entries and drilling new legs on them of at least 500 metres. It will be interesting to see what the adoption of this program will be. I sure didn’t see it coming.

The story also does some digging into the goal of 600,000 or even 1 million barrels of oil production per day, and what the budget forecasts, which is essentially flat until 2029. There’s a big discrepancy  there. Guess I better get back to working on my Reaching for a Million series and pump the ministry full of ideas before the next budget cycle.

On Friday I will publish the NDP response.

Both Sask Party and NDP are saying the same on steel

EVRAZ pipe mill. Photo by Brian Zinchuk

Today Pipeline Online is publishing in-depth stories from the NDP and Sask Party on last week’s steel tariffs from President Donald Trump. Both parties produced remarkably similar calls to action. Steel is critical for oil infrastructure and production, especially with regards to pipelines. Most of the major pipelines built in Western Canada saw their pipe come out of Regina, but it’s been some time since that mill has produced any pipeline pipe. And now, steel production itself is under threat of tariffs.

NDP on steel tariffs: Pipelines, rail and power transmission

Sask Party on steel tariffs: ports, pipes and rail

The photos you’ll see in the stories are from an exclusive tour I took of the mill in 2009. It was nearly impossible for me to get that access back then, so I haven’t asked for it since. And really, not much will have changed, other than the fact the pipe-making side of the mill has been dormant for a long time now. I’m hearing that workers on the pipe side are or have scattered to the winds. While I’m not certain of that, if true means institutional knowledge to make that pipe is being lost by the day. It’s a live question if we could bring it back into full production of a quality pipe product in a reasonable time?

Consider this – both the Alberta and Saskatchewan governments have made it policy to seek to double their respective oil production. To do so means we would need to effectively double the entire network of Enbridge, Keystone, Express, and Trans Mountain Pipelines. And that’s only for oil – never mind gas. There’s nowhere else in western Canada that can produce that pipe of that scale. We would need to run EVRAZ 24/7/365 at max capacity to accomplish that, and it would likely take decades. We can’t afford to lose it. Because if we do, we’d probably need to bring in pipe from China or possibly Mexico. Seriously.

Heads up: the guest for the Pipeline Online Podcast on Tuesday at 1 p.m. CST will be former Alberta Energy Minister Sonya Savage. You can watch on X, LinkedIn or Facebook.

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pipelineonlineca

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pipelineonlineca

Twitter: https://twitter.com/Pipeline_Online

Here’s the promo.

 

 

Nuclear supply chain being developed in Saskatchewan, tariffs

Westinghouse in SK, Part 3: Westinghouse signs MOUs with six Saskatchewan companies

BIG NEWS: Westinghouse in SK, Part 3: Westinghouse signs MOUs with six Saskatchewan companies. When they say modular, they mean modular.

Despite Thursday’s partial tariff reprieve, Saskatchewan still cutting off US alcohol sales and procurement. This story is moving so fast, I had to update it twice before publishing. It might be out of date by Friday morning.

South Bow says tariffs could create challenges in its marketing segment (this is the spin-off company from TC Energy that operates Keystone Pipeline)

ROK Resources releases 2025 budget guidance, CEO discuss possible tariff impacts

How to potentially bankrupt a province

Brian Zinchuk: How much might building SMRs cost Saskatchewan Hint: it’s not cheap.

This is a major piece talking about the costs that could be incurred building small modular reactors. Those costs could be unobtainable, which is why coal is back on the table in a big way.

The numbers come from the Tennessee Valley Authority, who already operate three nuclear plants and is the largest utility in the US. They plan on building the same model of reactor.

Also:

Moe proclaims pipeline projects “pre-approved,” Smith joins in.

I’m not sure how a provincial government can pre-approve something it has no regulatory power over.

About that pipeline…

Keystone XL pipe, in 2011, that was never used. Photo by Brian Zinchuk

Trump calls once again for Keystone XL pipeline to be built

There is no project. There is no company behind it. TransCanada split into two companies. The team scattered to the winds. There is no pipe, and if there is any left, do not let it be put into the ground because it’ll be so rotten it’ll leak like a sieve. And there’s no one making pipe these days at Evraz, although such a project would surely be welcome there.

And why they hell would we lock even more into the American market at a forever discount? If we’re going to build pipe, build it to tidewater.

OR – is this they key to getting Trump to back off on tariffs?

Navigation