Just when you think DOJ can’t get any dirtier– New motion just filed by defense in Proud Boys trial accusing DOJ of using an FBI informant to spy on and infiltrate the defense team […]
DC US Attorney Matthew Graves’ office notified defense team TODAY that a defense witnesses has been an FBI informant since the BEGINNING of the case thru start of trial.
“The CHS participated in prayer meetings with…the defendants’ families.”
The Most Interesting Man In The World
One Flu Out Of The Wuhan Nest
#3 Jim Jordan breaks down how Dr. Anthony Fauci funded gain-of-function research; and how Fauci's emails indicate his distress when he learned that COVID-19 might have originated from his funding of the Wuhan lab, as well as his efforts to conceal the situation. pic.twitter.com/9usUvFPhXZ
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) March 6, 2023
The J6 Tapes
[w]hen you see what Carlson’s team has put together over the past two weeks of combing through thousands of hours of video, you will be struck by how different the reality was inside the building that day compared to the J6 committee’s deceptively edited primetime dramas, produced by a former ABC News president for maximum emotional impact.
For instance, Carlson’s team says the J6 committee added audio to silent CCTV footage, inserting screams and other crowd mayhem sounds, to make it seem more ominous. The bookmarks on the video trove show the J6 committee had access to the same footage yet chose to show America only what suited its divisive narrative.
When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal
Garland is so caught. What a lying POS.
— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) March 2, 2023
When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal
J6: It’s going to turn out that they set this whole thing up, isn’t it?
When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal
The FBI Director straight up lying on camera when questioned about the #twitterfiles pic.twitter.com/ZALq5eqw81
— Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) March 1, 2023
When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal
The Red Scare is back and it is going blue.
I testified this week in Congress on the Twitter Files and how they suggest what I have called “censorship by surrogate” or proxy.
The files show dozens of FBI and government employees actively seeking the censorship of citizens and others for their viewpoints. In my testimony, I warned that this was reminiscent of the McCarthy period where the FBI played a role in the establishment of blacklists for socialist, communists, and others. I encouraged Congress not to repeat its failures from the 1950s by turning a blind eye to such abuse.
This view was amplified by former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, who became persona non grata for her anti-war sentiments in Congress. She was later labeled a “Russian asset” by Hillary Clinton, who has refused to support that scurrilous claim of a former member.
For years, the Democrats pushed a Russian collusion theory that collapsed. It was later disclosed that the Clinton campaign hid and then lied about funding the infamous Steele Dossier. Nevertheless, people like Carter Page were falsely accused of being Russian agents and critics labeled as Russian apologists. Ironically, the FBI was warned that the dossier appeared to be the result of Russian disinformation and relied on a presumed Russian agent.
If anything, my warning of McCarthy-like attacks and measures seemed to be taken more as a suggestion than an admonition by some. Soon after the end of the hearing, MSNBC contributor and former Sen. Claire McCaskill appeared on MSNBC to denounce the member witnesses (Sen. Chuck Grassley, Sen. Ron Johnson, and former Rep. Gabbard) as “Putin apologists” and Putin lovers.
This probably doesn’t need to be said, but for the few who might not have realized it yet – we’ve been dragged into Ukraine to fight not Russia, but a Democrat proxy war with Trump.
When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal
A former FBI special agent delivered an emotional testimony before the House Subcommittee on Weaponization Thursday, telling lawmakers that she had resigned from the bureau after it had become “politically weaponized.”
Nicole Parker, a former FBI special agent who served in the bureau from 2009 until 2022, reflected on her career, saying that she had felt she had been making an “impactful difference.”
“Every day, I woke up and embraced being an FBI Special Agent. Until things changed,” she said, adding that the FBI’s “trajectory transformed.”
Video here. (begins at 1:38:18 mark)
Related! So bad that FBI Headquarters pulled it: The FBI’s Richmond Division would like to protect Virginians from the threat of “white supremacy,” which it believes has found a home within Catholics who prefer the Latin Mass.
Double Mastectomy at 15
“And the wounds have never healed.”
Trust the “experts”.
New FBI Headquarters To Be Twice The Size Of Pentagon
The Libranos: The Rot Runs Deep
Now is the time at SDA when when the dots start to connect.
January 27th: CRA head says it ‘wouldn’t be worth the effort’ to review all ineligible pandemic payments
February 3rd: At least 49 federal employees fired for getting COVID-19 CERB benefits while they were employed
Survey Says
When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal
The FBI’s raid on Mar-a-Lago reveals the deep-state cabal and their corrupt media partners deployed no fewer than 10 of the same tradecrafts used to push the Russia-collusion hoax. And with that, history is repeating itself with the same corrupt plot.
Related: Kevin McCarthy just absolutely destroyed a reporter who questioned his decision to remove Schiff and Swalwell from the intel committee.
The Most Interesting Man In The World
.@mirandadevine on one of Hunter Biden's emails:
"It reads like a classified document. There's information in there that's not readily available." pic.twitter.com/k8kljgZ0em
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) January 25, 2023
When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal
It was a life-or-death call. The Chinese government had been systematically picking off American spies in China, dismantling a network that had taken the CIA years to build. A mole hunt was underway, and the former officer, Jerry Chun Shing Lee, was the prime suspect.
The FBI could have arrested him on the spot for possessing classified information. But inside a secretive government task force, investigators argued against it, former U.S. officials recalled.
@wretchardthecat: Guess who (wait for it…) ran the investigation?
When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal
The FBI agent who helped kickstart Operation Crossfire Hurricane and created more than two years of panic over Russia collusion has been arrested today for … wait for it
When The FBI Does It, That Means That It’s Not Illegal
DAVOS WATCH: Director of FBI Christopher Wray says “the level of collaboration between the private sector and the government, especially the FBI has made significant strides”
It’s Different When They Do It
Uh oh, someone really, really wants him gone.
The White House and Justice Department (DOJ) reportedly agreed to hide President Joe Biden’s classified document scandal from the American people until it leaked to the press, despite their repeated claims of transparency.
Not only did the White House and DOJ try to obscure the scandal from public view, but they also refused to divulge that the second trove of classified documents were already unearthed at Biden’s home in Wilmington when CBS News first contacted the White House about the initial leak of classified documents apparently illegally stored at the Biden Penn Center, according to the Washington Post: “Early on, Biden’s attorneys and Justice Department investigators both thought they had a shared understanding about keeping the matter quiet,” the Post admitted, noting the Biden administration’s attempt to conceal revelations of the second trove of stashed documents.
It’s Different When They Do It
Still more classified documents found in Biden home;
“Seriously,” folks! Biden takes classified-info “seriously,” by which he apparently means he likes stashing it around the house in places even he can’t recall.
This comes shortly after the White House heavily implied that Biden’s attorneys had conducted a thorough search, too. Maybe it’s time for an FBI team to conduct their own, eh? […]
This raises another question, too. The spread of these materials in the Wilmington home makes it clear that someone was making use of them at some point. Otherwise, the classified material would have remained in the boxes in which they were initially packaged from Biden’s vice-presidential term. That’s not “inadvertently misplacing” material, but intentional retention and unauthorized uses of classified material.
And that makes the obvious questions even more acute. What did the classified information contain, and what was Biden’s interest in it? Who else accessed this material, and for what purpose? How much more is there to find?
They want him gone: Joe Biden Did Have Documents Classified as ‘Top Secret’