sda2.jpg

November 25, 2009

The Sound Of All Hell Breaking Loose, JGL Edition

(Bumped)

Editor's note: for as much attention as the emails have received - and they are damning - it's the computer code that is revealing the real story behind the climate models. It includes corrupted and incomplete data, data manufacture and manipulation. programming failure, and program bias. The details are too lengthy and complex to include in this round-up post, but no commentary on this scandal is complete without a thorough examination of what is being uncovered in the CRU computer code files and documentation.

John Gormley Live and SDA - doing the job the CBC won't do! (link fixed) Segment here.

If you're arriving here new to the Climategate scandal, these links will help to bring you up to speed.

"The fix is in." Possibly the best summary yet of the corruption of peer review, at Real Clear Politics.

Let's go to the pub - even better than the first.

Climate Audit (currently on a mirror site as the original site server has been incapable of handling the traffic.) Original Climate Audit site (very technical).

Surface Stations temperature station auditing project - Is the U.S. surface temperature record reliable? In a word - no.

Watts Up With That? - Meteorologist Anthony Watts is your best bet for major breaking developments, explained in layman's language.

The CRU emails in a searchable format.

THe CRU emails in clipping format.

Charlie Martin at Pajamas Media has an extremely good analysis..




Hide the Decline! "Mike's nature trick" explained.

The Hockey Stick was never accurate--and CRU knew it

The Hockey Stick Peer Review Gauntlet

The Yamal Implosion - a saga uncovering wholesale data "cherry-picking" in an all out effort by CRU scientists to save the "hockey stick". It's long, but it's a must read.

The Harry_Read_Me.txt file - the world's most frustrated Fortran programmer, in his own expletives.

Data Destruction; East Anglia CRU "have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based."

Freedom of Information denied - "This is an attack on the heart of science,"

Beware The Scientific-Technological Complex

Powerline Blog series on the email archives.

Recent Canadian commentary

Stephen Taylor interviews Ross McKitrick

Ross McKitrick, Financial Post - "Flawed climate data"

Lorne Gunter, National Post - Cooking The Climate Books

Lorrie Goldstein, Toronto Sun - "'Botch after botch after botch'"

Douglas J. Keenan - The Wang Affair

As usual, their columnists are well ahead of the news department. What gives? I presume they're published out of the same building....

The SDA "The Sound Of All Hell Breaking Loose" series in chronological order, a loose compendium of links, quotes, and developments as they emerge across various sites on the net.

http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012684.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012685.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012690.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012694.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012696.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012698.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012709.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012711.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012729.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012736.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012738.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012747.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012764.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012794.html
http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/012912.html

Posted by Kate at November 25, 2009 10:08 AM
Comments

Are ANY Canadian papers following this topic?

Posted by: imapopulistnow at November 24, 2009 11:16 AM

Paging John Cross.....paging John Cross.....John, can we get your thoughts on this?

Posted by: pete at November 24, 2009 11:23 AM

That gold Kate, gold!

Posted by: Indiana Homez at November 24, 2009 11:25 AM

I love the smell of hockey sticks burning in the morning.
It smells of victory.

Posted by: cal2 at November 24, 2009 11:28 AM

http://www.petitionproject.org/instructions_for_signing_petition.php

If you are a scientist, go check this out. I printed mine off today.

Posted by: Kyla at November 24, 2009 11:33 AM

I have Emailed several of the regular writers at the Globe twice now asking when they will acknowledge this incredible story.

So far ... nothing.

They are under their desks hiding their sorry AGW believing faces.

Posted by: Abe Froman at November 24, 2009 11:35 AM

An Ottawa radio talk show this morning is reporting that the PM's office wants to hear from Canadians their opinions on what PMSH should do in Copenhagen.
Time to get typing SDA audience!!

You can contact the PM under the Government of Canada website. Be heard people!

Posted by: The Glengarrian at November 24, 2009 11:39 AM

This is more fun than watching a Jack Russel pup with a ball.

Armageddon Al, must be breaking out in hives

Posted by: robins111 at November 24, 2009 11:46 AM

Found out 2 things while listening to Gormley Live, first of all water rates are going up in Saskatchewan because get this ... They're not using enough water! And secondly, they use as much, if not more time advertising garbage as do the stations in the lower mainland. Advertising what, combines, harrows, binder twine and the likes? No, on line dating etc.. Couldn't find, or didn't have the patience to to wait for the story advertised here, or more likely, was technologically challenged in trying to do so.

Posted by: larben at November 24, 2009 11:46 AM

Looks like the WSJ link is bad? Goes to Air Vent instead.

Posted by: Null at November 24, 2009 11:47 AM

Write your MP's,folks. I'm sure they're aware of the CRU scandal,but we have to make sure they know that WE are too!

Posted by: dmorris at November 24, 2009 11:51 AM

I am emailing my MP immediately and giving my opinion on the matter. I will be expecting her to ask the PM to simply refrain from going to Copenhagen. Simple as that.

Posted by: biffjr. at November 24, 2009 12:01 PM

Rent seeking frauds.

Some excerpts from the leaked emails:

The University of Arizona's Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research's Gary Funkhouser, to Keith Briffa:

"I really wish I could be more positive about the Kyrgyzstan material, but I swear I pulled every trick out of my sleeve trying to milk something out of that..."

Michael Mann, the originator of the now thoroughly-discredited "hockey stick" graph Michael Mann, to Phil Jones:

"Trust that I'm certainly on board w/ you that we're all working towards a common goal. That is what is distressing about commentaries (sic) (yours from last year, and potentially, without us having had approprimate (sic) input, Keith and Tim's now) that appear to 'divide and conquer'. The skeptics happily took your commentary last year as reason to doubt our results! In fact, your piece was references in several commentaries (mostly on the WEB, not published) attacking our work. So THAT is what this is all about. It is in the NAME of the common effort we're all engaged in..."

Phil Jones to Gavin Smith:

"Your final sentence...about improvements in reviewing and traceability is a bit of a hostage to fortune. The skeptics will try to hang on to something, but I don't want to give them something clearly tangible. Keith/Tim still getting (Freedom Of Information) requests as well as MOHC and Reading. All our FOI officers have been in discussions and are now using the same exceptions not to respond —advice they got from the Information Commissioner....The FOI line we're all using is this: IPCC is exempt from any countries (sic) FOI—the skeptics have been told this. Even though we (MOHC, CRU/UEA) possibly hold relevant info the IPCC is not part our remit (mission statement, aims etc) therefore we don't have an obligation to pass it on.

Cheers

Phil

Posted by: EBD at November 24, 2009 12:02 PM

Thanks 'Kate'.

Posted by: Merle Underwood at November 24, 2009 12:13 PM

I received this reply from my email to the CBC Ombudsman

I write to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail, which I have shared with Jennifer McGuire, General Manager and Editor in Chief of CBC News, along with the request that your concerns be addressed.

Sincerely,

Vince Carlin
CBC Ombudsman


Here's my email to them


The CBC has not, as far as I know, had any item on the fraud that has been perpetrated by the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia whose files have just been made public. Shame.

Posted by: tranio at November 24, 2009 12:25 PM

Are ANY Canadian papers following this topic?

Yes the National Post, link to Terry Corcoran on the front page. If you don't subscribe to the NP, you should as they have had a continuous set of articles on AGW over some considerable time. If you subscribe to the G and M, cancel and tell them why.

Posted by: tranio at November 24, 2009 12:28 PM

The Red-Green Show presents: The Red-Green Carpet.

Liberal Citoyen Dionky + Green Lizard May.

But, Loyalty Citoyen won't talk:

"Nous avons cherché à parler à Stéphane Dion. Son attaché politique, après avoir contacté son chef, nous a indiqué qu'il n'y aurait aucun commentaire sur le sujet. « M. Dion n'a jamais commenté des sources anonymes, et ce n'est pas aujourd'hui qu'il va commencer, a mentionné Francesco Miele. Personne ne l'a approché, [...] et il demeure fidèle à son parti."


"Tapis rouge pour Stéphane Dion au Parti vert du Québec"
http://ruefrontenac.com/nouvelles-generales/93-politique/14181-parti-vert-stephane-dion-parti-liberal-jeanine-krieber

Posted by: maz2 at November 24, 2009 12:32 PM

BBC weatherman Paul Hudson sat on the emails for over a month, now admits.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/paulhudson/2009/11/climategate-cru-hacked-into-an.shtml

Posted by: chris at November 24, 2009 12:34 PM

If Al Gore hadn't invented the Interent nobody would know about this criminal scandal!

Posted by: Ghost of Ed at November 24, 2009 12:46 PM

I put my own take in context of the hockey stick paper Mann08.

http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/1324/

It's a little grumpier than the MSM.

Posted by: jeff id at November 24, 2009 12:51 PM

It's time for "moderate" scientists to step-up and denounce this fraud if there is such a creature.

oops, it looks like I've got my wires/topics crossed; or do I?

Posted by: Indiana Homez at November 24, 2009 12:54 PM

Kate`s link to Real Clear Politics....Climate Gate:The Fix Is In by Robert Tracinski is the best summary i have seen yet. He comes right out and says it is a outrite fraud and criminal! He is not afraid of liable.

Over the last several days i have sent several links including this one to my MP who i know personally and i am sure it has got through to Harper.

Posted by: Al W at November 24, 2009 12:56 PM

Good job on Gormley, Kate

Posted by: kdl at November 24, 2009 12:59 PM

Spelling!!!!! Outrite??? Outright...right on!

My bad...with all the excitement what can i say!

Posted by: Al W at November 24, 2009 1:01 PM

Kate, you have been busy - good work !! (Without a $Billion dollar subsidy)

Posted by: ron in kelowna ∴ at November 24, 2009 1:02 PM

It wasn't too bad. A lot of info to squeeze into a half hour, but I think I covered it pretty well.

Posted by: Kate at November 24, 2009 1:03 PM

Caught you on Gormley. Good job.

Posted by: Mark Peters at November 24, 2009 1:12 PM

The first lawsuit . . . maybe the CBC can report this. They love it when the big bad government gets sued.

'Chris Horner writing for The Americn Spectator reports that the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) has filed a lawsuit against NASA and Goddard Space Center demanding information they've withheld for three years:

Today, on behalf of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, I filed three Notices of Intent to File Suit against NASA and its Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), for those bodies' refusal - for nearly three years - to provide documents requested under the Freedom of Information Act.

The information sought is directly relevant to the exploding "ClimateGate" scandal revealing document destruction, coordinated efforts in the U.S. and UK to avoid complying with both countries' freedom of information laws, and apparent and widespread intent to defraud at the highest levels of international climate science bodies. Numerous informed commenters had alleged such behavior for years, all of which appears to be affirmed by leaked emails, computer codes and other data from the Climatic Research Unit of the UK's East Anglia University.

All of that material and that sought for years by CEI go to the heart of the scientific claims and campaign underpinning the Kyoto Protocol, its planned successor treaty, "cap-and-trade" legislation and the EPA's threatened regulatory campaign to impose similar measures through the back door."

Posted by: Fred at November 24, 2009 1:16 PM

re:JGL
You did good Kate. You came across as very well prepared.

Posted by: wingwalker at November 24, 2009 1:21 PM

Remember just a while back a whole raft of US Science associations sent a letter to all US Senators confirming their belief in AGW ?

http://tinyurl.com/ykchycd

So I wonder how many names from these organizations are also in Motley Cru Email distributions ?

Isn't it a criminal offense to knowing advise a US Senator using corrupt data and evidence?

A lot of Blue Dogs just found their escape hatch from Barry's Cap&Tax.

Posted by: Fred at November 24, 2009 1:23 PM

You have no idea the heat I've taken on this file and the personal price I've paid. That said before everyone gets too twisted you need to understand that this MO (pushing BS) is the STANDARD in most academic/bureaucratic disciplines.

Modern medicine vs traditional wellness. Nuclear industry vs cold fusion. Austrian economists vs Keynsians. Fiat currency vs gold standard. Deficit financing vs belt tightening. The war on drugs vs free choice and sovereign property rights over your body. Wall St. vs Main St. and on and on....

Bogus science is and has been used almost forever to provide advantage to insiders and to handicap outsiders. The AGW fraud is only a symptom of the widespread disease of scientific fraud.

The net of all this is best summed up by Antoine Bechamp's (contemporary of Pasteur, kind of a Tim Ball of medicine) famous line "The map is not the terrain". Bottom feeders long ago discovered that most homo sapiens have yet to figure that out and the creation of maps, which are merely modern versions of the medievel "crystal shperes" of celestial mechanics, is just as profitable today for maintaining the status quo as it was in the 1400s

Posted by: peter at November 24, 2009 1:30 PM

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17183

A truculent and nasty manner
Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren involved in unwinding “Climategate” scandal

By Dr. Tim Ball and Judi McLeod Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Lift up a rock and another snake comes slithering out from the ongoing University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit (CRU) scandal, now riding as “Climategate”.

Obama Science Czar John Holdren is directly involved in CRU’s unfolding Climategate scandal. In fact, according to files released by a CEU hacker or whistleblower, Holdren is involved in what Canada Free Press (CFP) columnist Canadian climatologist Dr. Tim Ball terms “a truculent and nasty manner that provides a brief demonstration of his lack of understanding, commitment on faith and willingness to ridicule and bully people”.

“The files contain so much material that it is going to take some time t o put it all in context,” says Ball. “However, enough is already known to underscore their explosive nature. It is already clear the entire claims and positions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are based on falsified manipulated material and is therefore completely compromised.

“The fallout will be extensive as material continues to emerge. Reputations of the scientists involved are already destroyed, however fringe players will continue to be identified and their reputations destroyed or sullied.”

While the mainstream media is bending into pretzels to keep the scandal under the rug, Climategate is already the biggest scientific scandal in history because of the global policy implications.

A throwback to the intro of the television series Dragnet, “Ladies and Gentlemen: “The story you are about to hear is true, only the names have been changed to protect the innocent”, the innocent in Climategate have already been thrown to the ravening wolves.

more at the link...


Cheers


Hans-Christian Georg Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North"

Posted by: Hans Rupprecht at November 24, 2009 1:31 PM


More goodness . . . the three simple reasons the Motley CRU Gang are criminals.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/three-things-you-absolutely-must-know-about-climategate/

Posted by: Fred at November 24, 2009 1:39 PM

Kate, good job on Gormley.

Posted by: Ken (Kulak) at November 24, 2009 1:42 PM

Al Gore is a certifiable sufferer of Extreme Leftist Mental Disorder;

http://www.thestar.com/news/sciencetech/environment/article/729836--oil-sands-threaten-our-survival-al-gore-warns?bn=1

Posted by: Bruce at November 24, 2009 1:45 PM

Ghost of Ed: "If Al Gore hadn't invented the Interent nobody would know about this criminal scandal!"

Never thought I'd say this, but THANK YOU ALGORACLE!!

Posted by: Louise at November 24, 2009 1:49 PM

A tip to your jar, young lady. I have used your links to prod the Wall Street Journal and Fox News to get serious about the climate change fiasco for over a year now. The information is also vital for jabbing the facts impaired left wing climate ideologues.

While we all know the left in concert with the press will stage an all out onslaught on the truth for some time to come, you have nearly single-handedly saved western civilization and I, for one, am grateful.

Posted by: Mazzuchelli at November 24, 2009 1:54 PM

"Are ANY Canadian papers following ..."

This is kind of funny that they are not, since it is a Canadian professor from the University at Guelph and a Canadian website http://www.climateaudit.org, which have been driving this in obscurity for years.

Posted by: Man in the Yellow Hat at November 24, 2009 1:57 PM

brian gray to "deep stroke"

Thanks for “e-mail.”
We have a reporter working on the story right now.
We do local news.
“Read” it in tomorrow’s newspaper.

--
Brian Gray
Online Editor, Toronto Sun
Phone: 416-947-2211
Online: torontosun.com
Twitter: thetorontosun
- Show quoted text -

Posted by: blanks at November 24, 2009 1:57 PM

Good over view on News Talk.
Next on NTR 650 is Mr. Ball after he digests the data.

And SDA says "Thank You Too" reader tip

This is interesting:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/19/breaking-news-story-hadley-cru-has-apparently-been-hacked-hundreds-of-files-released/

and the files:
http://ftp.tomcity.ru/incoming/free/

Posted by: ChrisinMB | November 19, 2009 9:34 PM

Posted by: No News is No News at November 24, 2009 2:01 PM

According to Google News, there have been 1,051 articles written about climategate, but nary a one from Canada with the likely exception of the CFP. Why?

Posted by: imapopulistnow at November 24, 2009 2:13 PM

Blog Conspiracy Theorists = 1
Media Mouth Pieces = 0

Posted by: No News is No News at November 24, 2009 2:28 PM

Canadian province joins EU target - COP15 United Nations Climate Change Conference Copenhagen 2009
http://en.cop15.dk/news/view+news?newsid=2684

Traitor: a person who commits treason by betraying his or her country.

Posted by: wingwalker at November 24, 2009 2:33 PM

This just happened in August 2009;

Greenpeace leader Gerd Leipold has been forced to admit that his organization issued misleading and exaggerated information when it claimed that Arctic ice would disappear completely by 2030, in a crushing blow for the man-made global warming movement.

Posted by: Bruce at November 24, 2009 2:37 PM

From the Cororan link:

"Another new paper by NCAR’s James Hurrell and others in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society reviews the “profound gaps,” “compromises,” “errors” and general failures and inadequacies in existing climate models. He calls for massive increases in computer power to resolve the issues. How much power? Scientists at the World Climate Conference in September, where the science gaps were explored, endorsed an earlier recommendation. “There is a compelling need for dedicated computational facilities that are 1,000 times to 10,000 times more powerful than available today.”"

Ok, so I spent about 2 hours looking at The Harry_Read_Me.txt. Can't really see how getting getting bigger shovels helps much ... unless, of course, if Ghia has demanded this before she reads those peer-reviewed papers.

Posted by: ∞² at November 24, 2009 2:38 PM


Greenpeace leader Gerd Leipold admitting to lying on Youtube;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC7bE9jopXE

Posted by: Bruce at November 24, 2009 2:39 PM

Junk Science is reporting this

http://www.junkscience.com/

Update: It has become fairly obvious this archive was not "hacked" or "stolen" but rather is a file assembled by CRU staff in preparation for complying with a freedom of information request. Whether it was carelessly left in a publicly accessible portion of the CRU computer system or was "leaked" by staff believing the FOIA request was improperly rejected may never be known but is not really that important. What is important is that:

1.There was no "security breach" at CRU that "stole" these files
2.The files appear genuine and to have been prepared by CRU staff, not edited by malicious hackers
3.The information was accidentally or deliberately released by CRU staff
4.Selection criteria appears to be compliance with an or several FOIA request(s)

Posted by: Kevin at November 24, 2009 2:39 PM

You can understand that many of the "believers" are going to have trouble accepting the the "deniers" were right and they were wrong and thus it will take a few days for them fess up.

But, when they do get over their embarrassment of being fooled, shouldn't they be elated with joy to find out the World isn't ending? Isn't this like finding out that the doctors deliberately lied and you don't really have terminal cancer? Shouldn't people be furious those who fooled them rather than at those who tried to tell them the truth?
Lots of questions yet to be answered.

Posted by: Trent at November 24, 2009 2:58 PM


Exactly Fred, if this doesn't kill cap&trade then it may very well bring to life Civil War II.

Damn Good Job Kate.


"I have only two men out of my company and 20 out of some other company. We need support, but it is almost suicide to try to get it here as we are swept by machine gun fire and a constant barrage is on us. I have no one on my left and only a few on my right. I will hold." --1st. Lt. Clifton B. Cates, Navy Cross, 2 Distinguished Service Crosses, (later Commandant), USMC, July 19, 1918 commanding 96 Company, 6th Marines, near the French town of Soissons.

Simper Fi.

Posted by: Ratt at November 24, 2009 2:59 PM

Is there a way to hear what Kate said on Gormley? Or a transcript?

Posted by: TJ at November 24, 2009 3:06 PM

Wikipedia already has a "damage control" definition for Climategate up.

Posted by: pete at November 24, 2009 3:09 PM

TJ, try this: http://www.newstalk980.com/shows/john-gormley/ondemand

Posted by: Louise at November 24, 2009 3:09 PM

Gormley show usually rebroadcasts in the evening.

Shows are also stored in the archives.

http://www.newstalk650.com/shows/john-gormley

My segment went from 11:30 - noon. Hour 4 isn't up yet, but I suspect it won't be long.

Posted by: Kate at November 24, 2009 3:13 PM

Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren involved in unwinding “Climategate” scandal

Lift up a rock and another snake comes slithering out from the ongoing University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit (CRU) scandal, now riding as “Climategate”.

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17183

Posted by: Bruce at November 24, 2009 3:18 PM

But, when they do get over their embarrassment of being fooled, shouldn't they be elated with joy to find out the World isn't ending? Isn't this like finding out that the doctors deliberately lied and you don't really have terminal cancer?
~Trent

No.
They won't be elated because they are going to look like schmucks to everyone they've been preaching to about how the "planet needs saving" from the pulpit that they built so high that they can't climb down without breaking their necks.

No.
It won't be like they have a reprieve from cancer, it'll be like being told that all the money they've invested in their AGW religion actually went into a paper shredder.

Posted by: Oz at November 24, 2009 3:18 PM

Jeff Id came over for a look at 12:51. You've got the blog o sphere by the tail Kate. Congratulations!

Posted by: RD at November 24, 2009 3:24 PM

Does this mean we can have our incandescent light bulbs back?

Posted by: Kathryn at November 24, 2009 3:24 PM

Thanks Kate and Louise for the info. Look forward to hearing what you had to say Kate!

Posted by: TJ at November 24, 2009 3:31 PM

Kate,

You would be on hour 3, JGL doesn't post the first or last half hour on demand. At least, they never use to.

Posted by: Trent at November 24, 2009 3:33 PM

I shall re-iterate my position:

Expecting the MSM to carry this story is as realistic as expecting the SS and Gestapo to assist in the overthrow of the German NAZI government circa 1944.

The MSM are co-conspirators.

Posted by: sasquatch at November 24, 2009 3:38 PM

All the money wasted on the climate change sham could have went to fund ____________.

You fill in the blank.

Posted by: No News is No News at November 24, 2009 3:48 PM

Agree, sasquatch. That's why they're dying. :)

Posted by: Mark Peters at November 24, 2009 3:50 PM

U.S. News aggregator Matt Drudge is giving Climategate marquis status with about 4 links up.

The U.S. Senate is best chance for driving a stake through this scam once and for all. The U.S. is the designated mega-patsy in every proposed global cap and trade/tax schemes.

Stop this scam in the U.S. senate and it's a global game-set-match.

Posted by: Bart F. at November 24, 2009 4:09 PM

Letter submitted to my MP posted below. Others may feel free to use, amend or edit for their own purposes.

Cheers...

~~~~~~~~~~~

Good afternoon, Mr. Kamp,

I write to you today in follow up to my two earlier communiqués, dated August 14th, and April 18th, both on the subject of Man Made Global Warming (hereafter referred to as AGW).

As no doubt your government is aware, a major story has been unfolding with respect to leaked information from the Climate Research Centre (CRU). Please note, my August letter to you was also on the topic of scientific "shenanigans" perpetrated by the CRU.

Now, it turns out, the leaked information proves beyond doubt that the CRU has been a cesspool of poor data, bad science, and a source of thuggery and intimidation against those who challenged the alarmist AGW dogma. As stated in my August letter, the CRU is one of the primary sources of information that the IPCC relies upon with respect to global warming (climate change, or whatever the meme of the month might be).

I write today for a couple of reasons.

1. This scandal out of the CRU provides a solid basis for the government of Canada to take no action at the upcoming conference at Copenhagen. Ideally, I would like to see Canada boycott the conference altogether. In any event, those of us who have for years doubted the claims of the AGW doom-mongers are now being vindicated. No policy, tax, energy, or otherwise, should be implemented based on this fraud.

2. Eliminate the CBC subsidy. This is a final straw for me. The public broadcaster has completely ignored this story since it broke last Thursday (four days ago). The CBC has long been a shill for anything pro-AGW, and has never provided fair and reasonable balance in the debate. However, to completely ignore this important and developing story clearly demonstrates that the CBC news department is anything but. It would be more clearly described as a propaganda instrument, promoting whatever progressive cause of the day is in vogue. I resent my tax dollars being used to prop up a fraud-supporting propaganda agency.

Thank you for your time.

Kindly,

Posted by: Colin from Mission B.C. at November 24, 2009 4:15 PM

AJ Strata is looking at the raw data, before it got fiddled.

http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11466

Posted by: mojo at November 24, 2009 4:16 PM

I have been sending numerous email to the MSM and the journalists employed by them.

Today I also decided to call my MP Russ Hiebert.

It was the first call they have received. They know absolutely nothing about it. (I have since sent the links to them)

Pick up the phones folks and get your MP or thier staff on the line if you have not already done so. Dont assume someone else will.

Posted by: ward at November 24, 2009 4:17 PM

Most of the British and American MSM (including the Guardian and CNN) have stories on this, some of them even somewhat objective. Canwest in Canada has some stories.

CBC and CTV-Globemedia are becoming Canada's Bobbsey Twins of Climategate denial. The omission is becoming so glaringly obvious, especially in light of moves by the U.S. senate, that it is scarcely believable.

It is a measure of the seamless integration of the climate alarmists and the journalists of CBC and CTV-Globemedia.

But it's hard not to empathize. Knowing one has been used is never fun.

Posted by: Bart F. at November 24, 2009 4:31 PM

TD Bank and Liberal Frank McKenna on Belmont Club?

No, but, here's Liberal McKenna's Green Machine*.
...-

"The Big Green Machine

Tim Flannery, chairman of the Copehagen Climate Council says the publication of documents taken from the British CRU suggesting some global warming data may have been manipulated only “reveals the depth to which climate skeptics will go to influence the course of events. … It does nothing to throw doubt on the climate science”. It is the last act of desperation by heretics standing in the way of the big green doctrine. But the main response to suspcions that the whole thing has been cooked up has been to simply ignore criticism and focus on enacting new taxes and obtaining further pledges. Efforts to place the world under a Green Framework are well underway and nothing is going to stop it now. Next stop: Copenhagen. The AFP reports:

the United States is to announce concrete targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions as pressure mounts on polluters to find a formula for success two weeks ahead of a crucial climate summit. …

An emissions target from the United States, the world’s number two polluter and wealthiest country, was essential for the success of the conference, according to United Nations climate chief Yvo de Boer. “The key issue here at the moment is the United States. My sense is Obama will be in a position to come to Copenhagen with a target and a financial contribution,” he said in Brussels on Monday.

The sole roadblock may be the American voter. The global warmists privately fear that the US Congress will stand in the way of providing any real teeth to the whatever concessions the Obama delegation is prepared to make at the Danish capital. The Americas Society held a public discussion attended by a number of insiders to assess what would happen next. According to Rubén Kraiem of Covington & Burling the Green allies in the US Congress had best push through the needed measures before 2010 because the prospects of success after the elections are small." (more)

http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/

*TDGreen McKenna:

TDBANK WOW ZONE
TD Bank - WOW ZONE. Love the Green Machine Bank .... Love the People's Bank ... Investing in literacy could create jobs, lower crime rate, says McKenna ...
www.squidoo.com


Posted by: maz2 at November 24, 2009 4:32 PM

Way to go Kate! You're contributing a lot to this story.

Posted by: sf at November 24, 2009 4:38 PM

http://www.newstalk980.com/audio/60-seconds-with-john-gormley/20091124-john-gormley-live-november-24-hour-4

Posted by: jcl at November 24, 2009 4:39 PM

"U.S. News aggregator Matt Drudge is giving Climategate marquis status with about 4 links up."

Posted by: Bart F. at November 24, 2009 4:09 PM


Canadian MSM - totally silent on the corrupt AGW scam but interestingly so are the two large Canadian news aggregators.

The deafening silence is the same professional muteness that enabled the corrupt Chretien /Martin Liberal government to rob the Canadian taxpayers for a decade with lucre stuffed brown envelopes in Quebec, for a decade.

Canadian MSM is plainly corrupt at the corporate core.

How will they cover Copenhagen?

Posted by: Joe Molnar at November 24, 2009 4:40 PM

Rutherford out of Calgary was interviewing an Alberta minister about this.

Although he and Adler are going hard on this and good for them, I'd like somebody to answer these questions:

The emails have revealed the CPU was attempting to adjust data to expectations of the IPCC, which included tactics to those who demand a credible peer review. If you follow the money, what would be the United Nations' motivation to use falsified data?

Whose credibility is more damaged — the CPU or the United Nations? Will the UN dare throw the CPU under the bus and if they do not stand for the pursuit of truth, will they throw the CPU under the bus?

Posted by: set you free at November 24, 2009 4:45 PM

Caught Kate on Gormley. Where do you even begin with the whole schmear? I thought you handled it well Kate. I went to the CBC site to see how they were pussyfooting around this. They controlled the content but people get to rate yes or no. The rational came out to play to-day. Comments supporting AGW and the e-mails being a plot weren't doing well when I was there. This is too big to ignore.

Posted by: Speedy at November 24, 2009 4:48 PM

One more link to add to your collection?

"Allen Barton interviews Myron Ebell (CEI.org) about the scandal sparked by e-mails indicating that the Climactic Research Unit (CRU), which warns of global warming, massaged data to fit its agenda. ("PJTV Daily") http://www.pjtv.com"

http://www.pjtv.com/video/PJTV_Daily/ClimateGate%3A_Leaked_Papers_Cast_Doubt_on_Climate_Science/2748/

Posted by: DavidH at November 24, 2009 4:50 PM

Sample comment from Belmont Club cited above.
...-

"3. Mongoose:

To state the obvious: This will be the first “target” among many. The object is to suck America dry and then leave her starving by the side of the road. What in heaven’s name did we undertake the long and hard travail of WW2 and the Cold War for? Just who “won” in the end?

Seriously, We must reach a watershed moment where the left is called out on their designs across the board and they are rejected, marginalized or jailed.

This “international consensus” of “climate change” power players cannot even add up to 3 million people, useful idiots aside. At their core, I bet they are less than 100k. It should be easy to crush them.

We must get past the illusion that they have the power over us we imagine that they do. No longer can we pussyfoot around with the left, international or otherwise. This has to stop. They now strike at our very hearts. “Environmental target” will ruin us. Letting foreign powers “set targets” is treason pure and simple.In a same world, this would be grounds for impeachment. It would be grounds for imprisonment.

What is wrong with the citizens of this Nation? Why are we so supine before such immoral and incompetent lunatics whose evil designs are so clear and transparent.

It just is beyond belief. The sheer insanity of it. The sheer stupidity of it.

This nation, this civilization, is being destroyed by a pack of spoiled, ill-educated, boomer brats who have not had so much as one productive hour in their lives. They could not successfully run a hotdog stand in Times Square if they had the only one in all of New York City. And ho they do hate us. How they just lust to destroy her. It is like watching a gang rape.

Obama is repeating what has gone on in the EU the last 15 years, and with disastrous results there. The tranzis are doubling down and going for broke.

It has nothing to do with “the environment” and everything to do with destroying the one impediment to their design of a new dark age where all live in slavery and poverty but themselves: The free p[eople of America. What monsters these people are."

http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2009/11/24/the-big-green-machine/#comments

Posted by: maz2 at November 24, 2009 4:56 PM

one of my favorite summaries of the code analysis . . .

http://borepatch.blogspot.com/2009/11/what-happens-when-you-run-climate.html

Pick an option :)

Posted by: Fred at November 24, 2009 4:59 PM

Now up on CBS. Wonder how long Canadian MSM can hold out?

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/24/taking_liberties/entry5761180.shtml

Mentions Canada - pulled from, I presume, the harry_read_me file:

One thing that's unsettling is that many of the assigned WMo codes for Canadian stations do not return any hits with a web search. Usually the country's met office, or at least the Weather Underground, show up – but for these stations, nothing at all. Makes me wonder if these are long-discontinued, or were even invented somewhere other than Canada!

Posted by: Jan at November 24, 2009 5:06 PM

Excellent job on the radio Kate. A breath of fresh air!

It's a fairly complex subject and I think you communicated it very clearly to Gormley's listeners.

Posted by: TJ at November 24, 2009 5:25 PM

Minnesotans For Global Warming has a new video out on Hide the Decline:

Hide the Decline

Posted by: greggcm at November 24, 2009 5:29 PM

Kate, I listened to you on Gormley's radio show and you were very good, nice point encapsulation.

Posted by: Oz at November 24, 2009 5:47 PM

Scientists "behaving badly" won’t influence UN climate conference - COP15 United Nations Climate Change Conference Copenhagen 2009

http://bit.ly/4NMREW

Posted by: wingwalker at November 24, 2009 5:53 PM

The WSJ link now works.
Here is a MSM newspaper saying:-
"However, we do now have hundreds of emails that give every appearance of testifying to concerted and coordinated efforts by leading climatologists to FIT THE DATA TO THEIR CONCLUSIONS while attempting to silence and discredit their critics. In the department of inconvenient truths, this one surely deserves a closer look by the media, the U.S. Congress and other investigative bodies."
It's a start.

Posted by: Rich at November 24, 2009 5:59 PM

What time was Kate on Gormley . . which hour/minute ??

Posted by: Fred at November 24, 2009 6:12 PM

Fred, Use Kate's (link fixed) Segment here at the top of the page. She's on at the beginning.

Great job Kate. You explained a complicated topic very clearly.

Posted by: Kathryn at November 24, 2009 6:20 PM

The Universe of Lies vs the Universe of Reality.

That's Rush's take on it.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_112409/content/01125108.guest.html

Posted by: set you free at November 24, 2009 6:22 PM

Very nice job on Gormley, Kate. Tough to cover in the time alloted but you did it justice.

Posted by: Jan at November 24, 2009 6:54 PM

maybe peter mansbridge'll need that chair after all...

Posted by: rzr at November 24, 2009 7:11 PM

Fred - that was a very good summary. :-)

Posted by: Jan at November 24, 2009 7:14 PM

PM Harper and Premier Stelmach are backing Mao Stlong's AGW fraud with our tax monie$.

Shameful.

Did you vote Conservative for this?

Have they not received the memo?
...-

"2nd UPDATE: Canada Backs Alberta Carbon-Emissions Pipeline

OTTAWA (Dow Jones)--The Canadian government announced funding Tuesday for the construction of the world's largest carbon-capture and storage pipeline in Alberta, the center of Canada's emissions-heavy oil sands industry.

The Canadian and Alberta governments pledged a total of C$558 million (US$528.1 million) to create the Alberta Carbon Trunk Line, a 240-kilometer pipeline beginning near Edmonton, Alberta, that will capture emissions from the energy industry and pump them beneath old oil fields for the dual purpose of re-pressurizing the declining fields and to prevent the emissions, seen as a key contributor to global warming, from entering the atmosphere."

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091124-716656.html

Posted by: maz2 at November 24, 2009 7:43 PM

New poll up at the Toronto Sun regarding climate scientists.

Posted by: Al W at November 24, 2009 7:43 PM

Again thanks for the hard work Kate keeping us up to date in the death. Of the once unassailable Global warming crusade.

Posted by: Revnant Dream at November 24, 2009 8:46 PM

U.S. News aggregator Matt Drudge is giving Climategate marquis status with about 4 links up.

Unless he suddenly started handing out titles of nobility, I think you mean "marquee"...

Posted by: mojo at November 24, 2009 8:49 PM

Why are the papers and the networks ignoring this story? The sooner they all go broke, the better... Even Stelmach still hasn't heard the news.... He is all giddy about his ridiculous carbon capture project being announced today.... For Christ's sake give it up. Quit wasting our money on bullshit...

Posted by: Altaguy at November 24, 2009 9:42 PM

The fight isn't over yet - the climate change folks have the bit between their teeth, and they can smell money and power. Having some of their bogus data exposed is just a pot hole on the highway to Glory.

Expect many more years of their insurgence before a rash of frosted glutes puts a final crimp in their plans.

Posted by: kakola at November 24, 2009 10:30 PM

One of the best ones I saw today was "Piltdown Mann"

Kind of sums the whole thing up.

Posted by: James at November 24, 2009 11:11 PM

Altaguy:

I thought the carbon capture was a ridiculous capitulation to the AGW lobby when it was announced.

But when you consider they are going to use this captured carbon to inject into the earth to extract more black gold - and do it with the applause of the greenies.....

Posted by: ward at November 24, 2009 11:35 PM

Biggest non-story yet!

Posted by: T at November 24, 2009 11:55 PM

Did MSM TV stations ever bothered to outline what the Copenhagen meeting would cost in money and freedoms lost to Canadians the draft is out for some time but didn't hear a word of it on TV.

Posted by: Yeti at November 25, 2009 12:04 AM

OK, T.

I'll give you the floor.

Please detail what is going down in the file named Harry_read_me.txt and why it should serve as an example of the pinnacle of commuter science - including data integrity, data structures, quality control, quality assurance, testing, code revision and how they apply to the .pro files, and documentation - and I'll post it unedited.

You know where to reach me.

Posted by: Kate at November 25, 2009 12:40 AM

If this were as big of story as claimed and such a conspiracy (and I have read all of the items and links posted) the mainstream media, whom you deplore on a regular basis, would be all over this story. At the behest of the major polluters, this story would receive international attention. It has not. It is a mere tempest in a teapot and ultimately will fade away without any consequences.

Posted by: T at November 25, 2009 8:56 AM

Not an answer, T.

Posted by: Kate at November 25, 2009 9:43 AM

Stop with the BS - T.
Kate made you a reasonable offer. Do it or move on.

Posted by: Ghost of Ed at November 25, 2009 10:09 AM

As you read through the emails and the code, keep the Scientific Method in mind and see where these "scientists" failed.

Posted by: Kathryn at November 25, 2009 10:13 AM

Sorry T, but this is a big story. It's all over the blogosphere. Lots of people are talking about it. The mainstream media is ignoring it because it makes them look stupid. They have been big backers of the whole AGW theory, and have repeatedly ignored all the warning signs. It's been EIGHT YEARS of cooling, and they're still running AGW stories! They stand to lose whatever credibility they still have once this massive fraud is fully exposed. Does the name Joseph Goebbels mean anything to you?

Posted by: pete at November 25, 2009 10:15 AM

I write statistical / mathematical software for a living. I'm faced with many of the same issues that climate researcher are faced with.

Software written by researchers is generally a horrendous mess, with little regard for basic software engineering methods. It sounds like the CRU is afflicted with this disease.

As an example, a programmer might keep trying to "fix" new software until it gives him the "expected" results, at which point he declares the software to be working. It doesn't really mean the software is working, of cousre, it only means that he has reinforced his own expectations.

If software is to be used for drawing scientific conclusions that have massive impact on us all, then the software must be written to the highest standards and be open to the public.

Posted by: rabbit at November 25, 2009 10:34 AM

It's Climaquiddick, dammit!

The Harry Read Me.txt file shows that this stuff can't be peer reviewed: the processes, data, and programs are undocumented and unknown, and therefore can't be re-run.

Posted by: Mississauga Matt at November 25, 2009 10:34 AM

I can say for sure that some of the plotting programs have been hacked and modified multiple times, lots of commented out code, if/then/else statements that do nothing, undocumented switches added (interesting names, too: cut1960?) and generally in a horrible state. Unbelievable.

Posted by: mojo at November 25, 2009 10:35 AM

Scientific method made easy:
(can't remember where I got this a while back)

Science is the process of crash testing ideas: a scientist does not coddle an idea, or design tests to make it work.
The scientist rams the idea into a brick wall head-on at 80mph, and knowledge is gained by examining the pieces.
If the theory is solid, the pieces are from the wall.

The AGW Alarmists hid their science from the world and produced nothing but claims based on rigged data sets which all can now see are not only deeply flawed, but methodologically unscientific.

Posted by: Oz at November 25, 2009 10:37 AM

T- your 'reasoning' of why this is a 'non-story' is a perfect example of the logical fallacy known as 'denying the antecedent'.

You wrote:
IF it's a big story, THEN the MSM would write about it.
It's NOT a big story; Thus, the MSM are not writing about it.

Your assumption that the definition of truth or scientific value is the MSM's writing about it, is invalid. The two cannot be logically or empirically linked.

Posted by: ET at November 25, 2009 10:38 AM

"Stop with the BS - T.
Kate made you a reasonable offer. Do it or move on."

Not gonna happen. The driveby sh*t disturber is simply playing the usual role of throwing the odd rock and ducking for cover.

The magnitude of the data manipulation and outright fraud is so immense that it cannot be dismissed or defended by even the chronically stupid.

Posted by: biffjr. at November 25, 2009 10:48 AM

biffjr, you haven't been to RealClimate lately, have you?

Posted by: pete at November 25, 2009 10:52 AM

i'm afraid t has you all by the short-hairs; his knock-out piece of evidence that this is a wee tempest? unlike the rest of you schmoes, he's actually "read" the actual links; if only the rest of you had thought of that; you wouldn't be so delusional

Posted by: rzr at November 25, 2009 10:57 AM

There are those who seek the truth and those who hide or obfuscate. Note the contrast.

From a PDF document entitled “Einstein’s Mistakes”

“…..for those of us who have made our share of scientific errors, it is mildly consoling to note that even Einstein made mistakes. Perhaps most important, by showing that we are aware of mistakes made by even the greatest scientists, we set a good example to those who follow other supposed paths to truth. We recognize that our most important forerunners were not prophets whose writings must be studied as infallible guides – they were simply great men and women who prepared the ground for the better understandings we have now achieved.”


Link
http://speakingoffaith.publicradio.org/programs/2009/mathandtruth/weinberg-einsteinsmistakes.pdf

From a Phil; Jone leaked email
… Even if WMO agrees, I will still not pass on the data. We have 25 or so years invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it. …

Posted by: Ghost of Ed at November 25, 2009 10:58 AM

And meanwhile, the CBC (while studiously avoiding any mention of CarbonGate) have a headline (in the entertainment section of all places) that says

"Enviro-Giants Al Gore and David Suzuki Swap Ideas For Our Future"

Who the hell put those two shysters in charge of our future?

Posted by: John Luft at November 25, 2009 11:00 AM

"it is the end of the global warming myth"

Well actually, No it's not! The only thing you rightards can glee about is the inconsistencies in the data collection and interpretation.

Personally I don't believe in man made global warming but you goombas don't have the data to refute it either.

Come to the edge...but it's too high and I might fall...Come to the edge...and he did...

Posted by: not stirred enough said at November 25, 2009 11:04 AM

In my above post at 10:58 I failed to note the quote is from physicist Steven Weinberg.
See Phil Jones, we all make mistakes, and some of us admit it.

Posted by: Ghost of Ed at November 25, 2009 11:05 AM

Not stirred enough, you're a fool.
Prove to me that something didn't happen.

Posted by: Ghost of Ed at November 25, 2009 11:08 AM

can't wait for a Harper majority to gut CBCpravda.

5 days of this story and it's off the CBCpravda agenda.

there will probably be some guest spots on the Mengele Suzuki /Al Gore show tonight for Dizzy Lizzy May and Borat Dion but not Lord Monk.

another CBCpravda driveby socialist funfest.

Posted by: cal2 at November 25, 2009 11:10 AM

"biffjr, you haven't been to RealClimate lately, have you?"

Actually, yes ... I have. What I read there is a lot of p*ssing and moaning about information being "illegally" obtained, correspondence being "unethically" distributed and emails being "taken out of context".

To put it in plain and simple terms, people got caught with their pants down and they don't know how to pull them up.

Posted by: biffjr. at November 25, 2009 11:16 AM

Personally I don't believe in man made global warming but you goombas don't have the data to refute it either.
~not stirred enough

AGW doesn't have to be refuted, it's been cooling for 11 years.
The theory, the computer models, predicted the temperature would climb from 1998 onwards.
EPIC FAIL.

We skeptics represent the status quo, that there IS NO ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING.

They have to make the case for change from the status quo.

We get to sit back and punch holes in the Alarmist case.
The Alarmists have failed to make their case, and now we see their data, the data they've been hiding for years, the base data that the whole alarm is predicated on, is FUBAR.

Posted by: Oz at November 25, 2009 11:18 AM

No, T, what is happening is that the genius' at the MSM are back down in their rabbit holes, hoping for a miracle - that somehow, somebody in the IPCC or the climate 'science' community provides them a spin that will rescue the whole mess.

In the meantime, if they don't keep quiet, they will prematurely influence the body politic.

It's just a waiting game. Eventually, the MSM will be forced to say something about this huge CRIME.

I will remind the 'professional' journalists out there that the virus is out there and thriving, and I am not talking about H1N1. These 'professional' journalists would do well to remember the Obama Joker poster phenomenon. Only this time, no joking is involved.

The MSM is silent because it is stunned, and not yet found a spin that it thinks will pull this turd back out of the AGW punchbowl.

Posted by: shaken at November 25, 2009 11:21 AM

It is becoming very clear. The media is responsible for this mother-of-all-frauds rising to the status of 'religious science'.

The media orgs are wearing this one, BIG time !!

Posted by: ron in kelowna ∴ at November 25, 2009 11:22 AM

I could finally download the broadcast early this morning without my download speed getting throttled halfway through, and I just have to say great job, Kate. John Gormley was great too - it's nice to hear a host who doesn't feel compelled to cut his guests off halfway through every sentence. Too bad we can't get him in Alberta.

I'm actually surprised by the lack of coverage in the news (as opposed to opinion) media, including the WSJ and the National Post. I'd really love to be a fly on the wall during editors' meetings to find out why they're making the decision to avoid the story. We're talking about potentially trillions of dollars over the next ten or twenty years, and a massive slowdown of economic growth based on fraudulent science. In what alternate universe is this not an enormously important news story?

Watched The National last night. Top story? Drop-side cribs. Six and a half minutes. Literally, six and a half minutes, top of the hour, on the dangers of drop-side cribs, followed by two attack stories on the Conservatives - the torture issue, and the New Brunswick MP's comments about Halifax bums, - and then a dog's breakfast of stories about various and sundry, but nothing about Warmergate. There was a story about some researchers who went to the South Pole to measure ice thickness: as the word "South Pole" was pronounced, the onscreen image was a shot of an expanse of water with giant fractured chunks of sea ice floating around.

At the South Pole...in the elevated middle of the *continent* of Antarctica.

Posted by: EBD at November 25, 2009 11:28 AM

"Enviro-Giants Al Gore and David Suzuki Swap Ideas For Our Future"

Yeah, it mainly includes how to decrease the density of your wallet and dramatically increase the density of theirs'. Enviro-giants indeed.

Posted by: kim at November 25, 2009 11:28 AM

History may show that this very issue was the final kick in the balls for the MSM.

Posted by: bob at November 25, 2009 11:28 AM

Sun media group, the NP, etc. The Center-Right of the national media... good on them.

None of the center-left rags have anything. TorStar, Glove and Pail, CBC, etc.

Posted by: Mark Peters at November 25, 2009 11:32 AM

"Enviro-Giants Al Gore and David Suzuki Swap Ideas For Our Future"

Yeah, the Lilliputians thought they were giants until they met Gulliver*.

*Gulliver = CRU Whistleblower Releases

Posted by: Oz at November 25, 2009 11:33 AM

ron in kelowna, EBD,other esteemed SDA'ers:

It has been said before the MSM are morphing into the LSM

LAME STREAM MEDIA


This non story status of this AGW mushroom cloud of fraud and obfuscation with respect to AGW, will only ensure that the LSM advertising revenues continue to plummet.

If there was ever a time for Kate to do a NOT WAITING FOR AN ASTEROID segment...

Ah, I get it, its not an asteroid its a bloody big the BLACK HOLE!!!

The LSM is so caught up in their own complicity in this global farce that it reflects badly on them, as they have served as AGW 'water carriers' for eons.

Cheers


Hans-Christian Georg Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North"

Posted by: Hans Rupprecht at November 25, 2009 11:36 AM

most of the MSM and vested interests are going to stay silent on this, and hope it blows over.

The problem is, most people who have drunk the koolaid are already on the plane to Jonestown.

Cognitive dissonance is one of the strongest forces in the world.

Posted by: hardboiled at November 25, 2009 11:39 AM

Hans R.. you just gave me an idea; obviously, bombarding the media with complaints isn't accomplishing anything. Take it to the next level, bombard the major advertisers in your particular catchment area. Bombard the major shareholders, put the Ad agencies on notice, ie, start applying top down heat.

Posted by: DaninVan at November 25, 2009 11:44 AM

As Kate pointed out a few days ago, this story won't go away. The LSM is slowly catching on. It always works that way. They can only hide it for so long. The story has legs.
The snowball is getting bigger and it's gaining momentum. It's not going to melt. It might help the polar bears survive as they drop from the sky.

Posted by: Ghost of Ed at November 25, 2009 11:52 AM

Al Gore was on Canada AM this morning. He's plugging a new book. He claims that climate change is already affecting people around the world. Technically, he's correct. When most of Africa became uninhabitable, around 400,000 years ago, people were forced to migrate to the ends of the earth. That process is still taking place, so really, you can't accuse Gore of outright lying.

When it comes to mechanical processes, which are at the center of this theory, I'll put my trust in the opinions of physicists, not climate scientists. Thousands of physicists have signed a well known petition against government intervention in this AGW movement. I've seen the link somewhere above. It's worth having a look. Edward Teller signed it. Not an opinion I'd take lightly.

Posted by: dp at November 25, 2009 11:54 AM

[ Ms. May, co-author of Global Warming for Dummies, is presumably unlikely to revise her work with the new title of “We Were the Dummies] Peter Foster

Peter (almost, heh) feels sorry for May and Monbiot - they have to go on stage and debate Bjorn Lomborg and Nigel Lawson. (a Munk Debate)

Must have been scheduled before * Climate Gate * hit the blogsphere last week.

google.com it (not .ca)

Posted by: ron in kelowna ∴ at November 25, 2009 11:56 AM

DaninVan: "Take it to the next level, bombard the major advertisers in your particular catchment area. Bombard the major shareholders, put the Ad agencies on notice, ie, start applying top down heat."
===========================
Good idea. Advertizers especially will respond to this kind of pressure. When the Non-Mother Corpse media starts to pay attention and give this story it's due, Mother Corpse will lose even more of their share of the audience. I would say, write the Corpse off. Don't contact them. Let them play catch-up. They'll wonder what hit them.

Posted by: Louise at November 25, 2009 11:58 AM

Oh yeah the cats outta the bag now isnt it?Id have to advise PM Harper to go to copenhagen armed to the teeth about this info.Lefty media outlets continue to get hammered about this.For once hackers actually did something good,and also need to do the time for breaking the law.Although i think we can afford to be a little lenient in this case.:D

Posted by: Joshua at November 25, 2009 11:59 AM

Wow. I tried to listen to the Gore/Suzuki/Gomeshi love-fest on CBC Radio One's The Q. I couldn't do it for more than about 15 minutes. I managed, somehow, to get a comment posted through the moderators on the Q comments page. I'm not the only one who's trying to burst the bubble there, but I'm not sure how much good it will do.

http://www.cbc.ca/q/blog/2009/11/whats_your_reaction_to_what_da.html#comment-2584651

Posted by: Another Calgary Marc at November 25, 2009 12:17 PM

Its not just the MSM.
Years ago I felt privileged to read Scientific American and National Geographic; you know, the enlightened periodicals used for informed discussion by the layman who was intellectually inquisitive.
I was reduced to mentally vomiting years ago when I realized these "mags" had not only drunk the AGW koolaid but had learned nothing from the pending "ice age" scenario they had succumbed to.
The advertising space said it all.
(waiting at an airport last week I picked up a SA and resisted the urge to tear it up in the store for security reasons. I needed to get that flight.)
There was never an analysis of how they got that wrong. Just a quiet move on mentality. They let me down again with this latest suppression of informed dissent.

This situation reminds me of someone who bought a used BMW. While they owned it it was the greatest thing they ever had. That is until they sold it, three months had passed and they had drank quite a bit of white wine. Only then did they tell me what a POS it was and how much they dumped into it and what they got for it.
They wouldn't tell the truth about it because they had to offload it to someone just like them to get some of their money back.

Denile is not just a river in Egypt. (Yes I know its denial )

Posted by: G at November 25, 2009 12:26 PM

Marc, you we're not alone - virtually all of the comments there are negative towards Gore & Suzuki.

And we are talking a CBC (filtered?) blog !!

Posted by: ron in kelowna ∴ at November 25, 2009 12:35 PM

From Kate's link to Stephen Taylor's interview with Ross McKitrick:

ST: Do you believe that it behooves the Canadian standing committee on the environment to do the same? Would you testify?

RM: Yes, and yes.
================================

Okay folks. Let those emails and snail mails to our elected representatives pile up so high they can't ignore it.

Posted by: Louise at November 25, 2009 12:35 PM

Good work, Kate, with compiling all the damning data.

NOW we can say the whole AGW/CC thing is discredited. No longer must we believe the Big Lies.

Time to tell the Chicken Littles to PFO!

Posted by: Canadian Sentinel at November 25, 2009 12:59 PM

I just received a E Mail from my MP Dr James Lunney and he confirms "the story is huge and they are following developments very closely"

Posted by: Al W at November 25, 2009 1:02 PM

I am confused. Tree ring data as a proxy for warming? Ok, so tree rings are bigger when it's warmer because there is more growth, that's a nice theory. But apparently the recent tree ring growth doesn't match up so well to temperature. So for periods when we have no data for temperature we use tree rings as a proxy, but for the period where we do have temperature data the tree ring data doesn't match so well, Hmm. Could it be that the rings are big now not because the temperature is warmer but because there is **gasp** more Carbon Dioxide available for plants? Maybe, just maybe, the tree rings aren't so much a proxy for temperature as they are a proxy for CO2 concentration. I don't know, I'm not a plant scientist or a paleoclimatoligist but I am concerned that some scientists with minimal understanding of plant science are using plants as temperature proxies.

Posted by: The Rat at November 25, 2009 1:02 PM

NOpenhagen!!

Posted by: Marko at November 25, 2009 1:17 PM

"T- your 'reasoning' of why this is a 'non-story' is a perfect example of the logical fallacy known as 'denying the antecedent'. " [ET]

The leftards are the new climate change deniers. Fitting.

Posted by: Sounder at November 25, 2009 1:28 PM

Sorry to rain on your parade,

but even though I really wish this climate gate story was front page news,
I am pretty sure the main stream media will spin it into something else and the story will die quietly...

Call me a pessimist but I'm a realist,

the main stream media still has a LOT of power and they use it very efficiently; they managed to get Obama elected.

Need I say more?

Posted by: Friend of USA at November 25, 2009 1:42 PM

"the main stream media still has a LOT of power and they use it very efficiently; they managed to get Obama elected. Need I say more?" Posted by: Friend of USA

I agree. I'm waiting for them to say the data exposed is "the unverified old stuff which is no longer used" and they have "debugged it all and that is what is being used today", "nothing to see here move along".

Posted by: Sounder at November 25, 2009 1:49 PM

Goreacle Report: AGW is now in O’denial phase.

Next* the O’phase:

“*This is his [AGW's] sole legacy: a massive post-traumatic stress disorder.”
…-

“RealClimate AGW site can’t stand the heat…Comments section turned off!!

146.Comments are now turned off. Unfortunately, the comments are now running about 10:1 insults and innuendo. Serious discussion seems to have largely died off. The last couple of posters did raise some reasonable questions, and I will respond to them after Thanksgiving. Meanwhile happy Thanksgiving to all the American readers (and to everyone else, for that matter).–Eric

I have been monitoring the blog RealClimate.org which is prominently mentioned in the East Anglia U email scandal. RealClimate was set up as a ‘rapid response’ site by the same ’scientists’ who are cooked the data and are trying to force feed CO2 reductions onto the world.

After the scandal broke, they were out right away decrying the criminal ‘hacking’ of the emails. Then they moved on to defending the ‘poorly worded’ emails by the scientists who gave us AGW theory. Yesterday they moved on to touting the ‘Copenhagen Diagnosis’ which is the alarmist view of icecaps melting, the seas rising, and the world baking.

Today they turned the comments off because they are out of BS and the ‘questions’ about the Copenhagen Diagnosis are getting very specific and they have no answers.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2394362/posts
…-

The O’phase:

“The “small people”, the “rank and file”, the “loyal soldiers” of the narcissist – his flock, his nation, his employees – they pay the price. The disillusionment and disenchantment are agonizing. The process of reconstruction, of rising from the ashes, of overcoming the trauma of having been deceived, exploited and manipulated – is drawn-out. It is difficult to trust again, to have faith, to love, to be led, to collaborate. Feelings of shame and guilt engulf the erstwhile followers of the narcissist. This is his sole legacy: a massive post-traumatic stress disorder.”

http://www.globalpolitician.com/25109-barack-obama-elections

Posted by: maz2 at November 25, 2009 1:50 PM

Well it's settled! the Science is in! There is no
for any further discussion, A.G.W. is a gigantic fraud in which the MSM has played Pimp for the Greenies. There are no suprises here, Earth day being Lenin's birthday. Good for Fox News. Time to gut CBC PM Harper.
Cheers Bubba

Posted by: Bubba Brown at November 25, 2009 2:00 PM

"What gives? I presume they're published out of the same building...."

What gives is that while the MSM is quite comfortable manipulating the "news" (steering things in a particular direction as did the CRU scientists), they do not yet have the nerve to censor a columnist. They would surely get caught out if they were doing that. They will get caught out anyway, because lack of coverage of a hot story that so many people know about already makes them look dishonest and unaccountable.

Posted by: LindaL at November 25, 2009 2:09 PM

"Copenhagen will be a negotiation about transferring billions of dollars of wealth from the developed world to the developing one, with no guarantees it will help the planet."

From Goldstein's column at The Sun.

I have one small disagreement with the author; the wealth is to be transferred from "developed" nations,to stagnant Nations, not "developing" Nations.

And with the new found wealth, read "bribes", the leaders of those Nations are not likely to develop any industry or educational facilities,as an educated electorate would quickly turf THEM out on their corrupt ears.

Damned good work,Kate. Thank you for all your efforts to expose AGW for the scam it IS.

Posted by: dmorris at November 25, 2009 2:09 PM

SDA makes it to Bishop Hill's blog as a reference. Good stuff.
http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/20/climate-cuttings-33.html

Posted by: Rich at November 25, 2009 2:11 PM

"Wow. I tried to listen to the Gore/Suzuki/Gomeshi love-fest on CBC Radio One's The Q." --

Did anyone else listen to this? I am wondering if there was any addressing the CRU issue. If not, Gomeshi must be VERY embarrassed. To be honest, I did not have the stomach to listen to this -- having once before listed to a CBC "phone in" re official bilingualism -- calls were heavily censored so it was totally saccharin and manipulative.

Posted by: LindaL at November 25, 2009 2:34 PM

Late to the party though I am, I will say that this should be everywhere. Forget what Michelle Obama is wearing or the cellophane Lady Gaga wrapped around her head. These lies have been the source of crippling policies. These scientists should be made to answer for what they did. So how about it, Mr. Gore?

Posted by: Osumashi Kinyobe at November 25, 2009 2:47 PM

One can hope that the Conservative Party of Canada doesn't use global warming as an excuse to raise taxes...ummm...too late.

I wonder what other countries are doing...

Battered Turnbull put on notice
MICHELLE GRATTAN
November 26, 2009

MALCOLM Turnbull is likely to face further destabilisation over summer after staring down his critics yesterday and narrowly defeating a move to put his leadership to a vote.

In another day of turmoil for the Liberals, Mr Turnbull fended off a move for a leadership spill by 48 votes to 35 - a close result that would have been reversed if seven MPs had voted the other way.

Some sources are now predicting that Victorian Liberal Andrew Robb, who dealt a devastating blow to Mr Turnbull on Tuesday when he turned against doing a deal on emissions trading, may seek to position himself early next year as a ''safe pair of hands'' alternative leader.

In a further show of disunity yesterday, three shadow parliamentary secretaries - senators Mitch Fifield, Brett Mason and Mathias Cormann - offered their resignations because they opposed the emissions trading legislation.

And 12 Liberals crossed the floor in the Senate during a series of votes related to the emissions trading bills. Despite this, Mr Turnbull now has the support of enough Liberals for the Government's scheme to be passed this week....

http://www.theage.com.au/national/battered-turnbull-put-on-notice-20091125-jrtb.html

Posted by: hardboiled at November 25, 2009 3:07 PM

(sigh)

Google news search:

Results 1 – 10 of about 143 for hadley CRU emails

Results 1 – 10 of about 340 for climategate

Results 1 – 10 of about 2,222 for climate emails (heavily laden with AGW koolaid)

Results 1 – 10 of about 9,351 for adam lambert. (0.13 seconds)

Time to warm up the 'ol email machine

Posted by: hardboiled at November 25, 2009 3:21 PM

climategate @ google .com
441,00 results

climategate @ google.ca
2,730,000 results

Yes, a few hours ago .ca had only hundreds of results here. The tally seems to jump all over the place.

Same with the search drop-down helper box thingy. Always changing.

Posted by: ron in kelowna ∴ at November 25, 2009 3:38 PM

shaken too much @Nov. 25th 11:04AM - "The only thing you rightards can glee about is the inconsistencies in the data collection and interpretation."

Well that, and then also the outright fraud.


Kate, I'm late to say so, but you were great on Gormley.

Posted by: Black Mamba at November 25, 2009 3:57 PM

The bottom line of AGW & 'global warming'?

China: Rich nations must cap pollution emissions
(AP) – 1 hour ago

BEIJING — China will seek binding pollution targets for developed countries and reject similar requirements for itself at an international climate summit next month, China's top climate envoy said Wednesday.

Yu Qingtai said it is unfair that all countries be required to play a role combating global warming since most of the environmental damage was caused by developed nations during their industrialization over the last 100 to 200 years...."

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hlFHlfH4ch0M4bTr15oijjInyyPgD9C6OO580

The good news is that this can only help delay any deals

Posted by: hardboiled at November 25, 2009 4:02 PM

Let us see now.

The 99 % of public mass media is ignoring this subject, as though it did not exist, though from past experience, it is common knowledge that the “journalists” have no time for fact checking, they only go with what is fed to them (Revkin, NYT) by the preachers on a particular subject.

Here comes Kate McMillan, doing her own research captures more facts (as far as can be known at this time) than 11 fact checkers from AP could ever do and publishes it on her own blog. Kate single handedly slaps the mass media “journalists” silly.

I would say from the distance it’s a slam dunk. An accomplishment that a
”journalist” would only dream about.

Your contribution on John Gormley was nothing short of magnificent.

Posted by: Lev at November 25, 2009 4:44 PM

MSM is busy doing dry by smears of our service memnbers, apparently heresay from a snivel servant via a possible Taliban detainee is the hot topic these days. The polical left deem heresay as the truth, poisoned the well against the truth and are happy to censor anyone who might speak the truth. If I have to read one more hatefilled post against Harper or our military members I might start bleeding from the eyes. We can't have MSM wrecking their history of ignoring real news in favour of liberal biased contrived news now can we?

Posted by: Rose at November 25, 2009 5:04 PM

National Newswatch (yeah...I know) now carrying editorials from nespapers related to this mess.
One small step...

Posted by: Rich at November 25, 2009 5:51 PM

"We have discovered that the warming in New Zealand

over the past 156 years was indeed man-made, but it

had nothing to do with emissions of CO2—it was

created by man-made adjustments of the

temperature. It’s a disgrace."
...- ...-

"Uh, oh – raw data in New Zealand tells a different story than the “official” one.
25 11 2009

New Zealand’s NIWA accused of CRU-style temperature faking

The New Zealand Government’s chief climate advisory unit NIWA is under fire for allegedly massaging raw climate data to show a global warming trend that wasn’t there.

The scandal breaks as fears grow worldwide that corruption of climate science is not confined to just Britain’s CRU climate research centre."

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/25/uh-oh-raw-data-in-new-zealand-tells-a-different-story-than-the-official-one/

Posted by: maz2 at November 25, 2009 9:40 PM


Kate - I'm speechless - fantastic work.

Posted by: Beer and Popcorn at November 26, 2009 12:42 PM

"The New Zealand Government’s chief climate advisory unit NIWA is under fire for allegedly massaging raw climate data to show a global warming trend that wasn’t there."

http://www.climatescience.org.nz/images/PDFs/global_warming_nz2.pdf

Canada needs to rethink their position based on the facts coming out about the science. Given there are claims that the data has been altered changing the outcome we need to take a step back before going forward.

I have always stated “to ensure that proper science and not the court of public opinion governs good environmental stewardship and policy development”

We need to ensure that the environmental policies of tomorrow are not developed today through conjecture and hearsay.

On a lighter note

Climategate Official Theme Song

http://www.tatumba.com/blog/archives/1304

Posted by: BS is also Organic at November 26, 2009 2:21 PM

THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION
We have been given a powerful tool in the form of GlimateGate.
It now has a name and has the potential to get a life of its own.
So if the mains stream media is not going to report on this then let us use the social Facebook and emails to spread the news.
Send the following two YouTube videos to two people that you know and ask them to send it onto at least 2 others.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu_ok37HDuE
And
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk

If you have a Facebook page post the two links.

Will

Posted by: Will at November 29, 2009 3:13 AM
Site
Meter