33 Replies to “Non-Responders”

  2. Here is my take:
    Primary vaccine failure to routine vaccines Why? Different people have different gene compliments, different variants of the genes that make up the immune system. This is inherent. Also other environmental or host factors which affect immune response. Specifically age can be considered environmental (immunosenescence). Also being obese can be considered environmental. Both age and being obese increase the chance the response of the immune system is altered. The obese are always in a permanent state of high inflammation. The immune response is also altered by (likely upregulated) in allergic individuals but the mechanism or the implications of this are not understood when it comes to vaccines. It may be we can get around this primary failure of vaccines by altering the schedules and the mechanisms we use to administer. However at this time vaccines are only tested on young healthy non obese and non allergic individuals by design. What to do? More research.

    I generally hate this kind of paper because it is usually a preamble to a grant application. There is nothing specific to mRNA vaccines. The authors only bring up the old fashioned kinds.

    1. You nailed that, Justin.
      Oh, and in another life, I read shiteloads of grant applications, and saw the game.
      I like how your head works.
      Have a nice day.

    2. How about there’s something seriously wrong with these gene therapy “vaccines” and they’re loaded with a lot of harmful scrap besides the artificial spike protein, which is a pathogen.

  3. My take on Suboptimal response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in hematologic malignancies patients;

    People with blood cancers have messed up immune systems and don’t respond well to COVID vaccine. Mostly they don’t get any benefit from it. They should have antibody tests to determine how much protection the vaccines give them. (That is ironic since apparently it doesn’t give anyone much protection.) Plus they should be told to assume the vaccines offer no protection for them and they should extra careful about avoiding COVID. (And of course the standard “more research money is needed.”)

  4. My take on the VAERS one. First this looked only at 2012 and so is not relevant to mRNA. In the reprots things were not very clear to a panel of experts. Only about 1/4 of the reports could be directly attributed to the vaccine and the cause of the adverse reaction could often not be determined if they could give direct attribution. So yeah, VAERS is messed up and hardly useful but its the best thing we have going.

  5. For those interested:
    Reported side effects following COVID-19 vaccination in Canada
    https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/
    Treat with a huge grain of salt. It is a government source in a country where doctors are routinely bullied to fall in line or lose careers. Hence, while you may receive treatment for your side effect it will most of the time not be reported as a side effect.
    They only admit to killing six people and possibly just under two hundred.

    1. Yes indeed, our version of VAERS is very carefully regulated to hide as many adverse reactions as possble. For example, if you get any remotely COVID like symptoms during the 14 day period between when you get the vaccine and when your immune system is supposedly primed to fight the virus off, then it is automatically assumed you caught the virus before the vaccine started working. It’s the virus that caused your symptoms not the vaccine. I know this for sure because my daughter got very ill 8 hours after her vax and that was what she was told.

      I can’t really blame the government too much for doing this. Pfizer reported just under 1000/~40,000 such cases in their application to the FDA for approval for the vax. They only tested a few people to see if they had COVID. The tests were negative so they explained it as not being a vaccine case but rather as a mysterious “false negative” COVID case. Pfizer never bothered testing the rest of them and just labeled them all as false negative COVID. The criminally negligent FDA panel accepted this explanation.

    1. Okay I went back and read the original paper they link too and I am not sure it says what the link says it says.

  7. This link gives you links to each of the four main vaccines in the European vaccine database. It is data rich and you can look at all of the adverse effects of each individual vaccine as well as drill down into the data to look at medical professional responses and non-medical professional responses….as well as male/female effects.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/20595-dead-1-9-million-injured-50-serious-reported-european-union-database-adverse-drug-reactions-covid-19-shots/5751904

    1. Oh none of that couldn’t possibly have happened in Canada because those reactions are not on the list of approved adverse reactions that are permitted to be reported.

      1. Indeed. Canada is a special place, where very very few bad events ever happen.
        Because, the government said so.
        Trust them.
        Obey! Or else!

      1. Ted won’t like that one, Scissor. She notes that We know there is a risk of myocarditis with each mRNA vaccination.

        Particularly when she adds Research shows that most individuals with myocarditis do not have any symptoms. Complications of myocarditis include dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death and carries a mortality rate of 20% at one year and 50% at 5 years.

        Fascinating! According to the VAERS data, which admittedly underreports by as much as 100 times the actual SAE’s, there are well more than 600,000 documented Serious Adverse Events (ones requiring medical attention) alone and more than 13,000 fatalities directly linked to this particular vaccine. I cannot understand how this vaccine remains on the list of available options to treat Covid, when there are so many other non-deadly or injurious options available.

        Great link, thanks!

      2. That item seems to have quickly disappeared. Very weird. I wonder if it can be retrieved anywhere else.

        1. And this — a quote from Dr. Long’s affidavit:
          “I personally observed the most physically fit female Soldier I have seen in over 20 years in the Army, go from Colligate level athlete training for Ranger School, to being physically debilitated with cardiac problems, newly diagnosed pituitary brain tumor, thyroid dysfunction within weeks of getting vaccinated. Several military physicians have shared with me their firsthand experience with a significant increase in the number of young Soldiers with migraines, menstrual irregularities, cancer, suspected myocarditis and reporting cardiac symptoms after vaccination. Numerous Soldiers and DOD civilians have told me of how they were sick, bed-ridden, debilitated, and unable to work for days to weeks after vaccination. I have also recently reviewed three flight crew members’ medical records, all of which presented with both significant and aggressive systemic health issues. Today I received word of one fatality and two ICU cases on Fort Hood; the deceased was an Army pilot who could have been flying at the time. All three pulmonary embolism events happened within 48 hours of their vaccination. I cannot attribute this result to anything other than the Covid 19 vaccines as the source of these events. Each person was in top physical condition before the inoculation and each suffered the event within 2 days post vaccination. Correlation by itself does not equal causation, however, significant causal patterns do exist that raise correlation into a probable cause; and the burden to prove otherwise falls on the authorities such as the CDC, FDA, and pharmaceutical manufacturers. I find the illnesses, injuries and fatalities observed to be the proximate and causal effect of the Covid 19 vaccinations.”

          1. Just some observations regarding Dr Long’s affadavit:

            1. I found several spelling mistakes in the affadivit. Now, while we all make spelling mistakes, if you’re going to go through the process & effort to make an affadavit, correct spelling, punctuation & grammar all lend a professional feel to the end product. She’s allegedly a medical doctor. I expect better.

            2. In Dr Long’s point 24 she notes “one of the primary ingredients of the Lipid Nanoparticle delivery system is “ALC 1035”” and is a toxin per her attached Data Sheet. Fine. However, later on in her point 27 she notes that she has determined ALC 0315 is a toxin. Is that simply a matter of transposition? There is no mention of ALC 0315 anywhere else in the document. Once again, credibility?

            3. In Dr Long’s point 25 she notes that there is polyethylene glycol (PEG) listed as an ingredient in the Pfizer injection. She then notes that PEG is an ingredient *in* antifreeze, then makes the leap that antifreeze is being used in the injections. Shortly after, she calls PEG an antifreeze ingredient again. I do know that antifreeze does contain propylene glycol and ethylene gylcol (both toxins) but I was unable to determine if PEG actually is. PEG is actually listed online as being used as a human laxative. Once more, credibility?

            These just jumped out at me as being patently obvious. I wonder what else would reveal itself with hard scrutiny.

            Don’t get me wrong, I’m one of the good guys. I want every possible piece of evidence we can amass against these bastards. However, if I can spot these inconsistencies, so will they.

          2. @ Dumb Biker —
            I think it Is easy to miss spelling errors. She may not have had proofreading help. These are petty issues that miss the thrust of her affidavit. So, ok, some may have issues to pick on, but I feel that her claim that the vaccines are not safe is legitimate and deserves a hearing. Hopefully she will get one from the military.

  9. there is a commercial running on Global TV which features Edith Piaff singing “No regrets”

    Well I have regrets that I have been double vaccinated with Pfizer.

    1. Yes the suppression of inexpensive treatments is becoming so bloody obvious, it’s almost as if there is a conspiracy to force people to take the vaccine.

      Well, it’s no conspiracy, governments around the world ARE forcing people to take the vaccine. Why, I don’t knoiw. Possibly fear of missing sales targets or getting a payment from Bill Gates’s foundation? So hard to tell.

  12. That article over vaccination failure only offers two of the htree possib;e reasonms; the third being the vaccine does not work.

    1. Well, Robert, in truth and from a ‘we, the people’ perspective, no, it doesn’t appear to be working . However, from a ‘they, the elite’ perspective, as a stealthy, new world order/great reset population reduction agent, it would work perfectly. But no organization intent on mass genocide via biological means would embark upon such a program without effective protection for themselves. So, there would have to exist an effective vaccine that does work. But other than the skeleton crew chosen to serve ‘they, the elite, none of ‘we the people’ would get it.
      Jeez, isn’t a vivid imagination and cynicism a devils brew?

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation