Wuhan Flu: 99.5% Survive The Vaccine

Wuhan Flu 54 Comments

The person had tested positive for coronavirus in December and had been vaccinated just hours before their Jan. 21 death.

In a post on Facebook, she said she saw her grandfather’s aid, a 56-year-old man, get the vaccine at a senior living facility on Thursday.
 
“Twenty minutes later he realized his legs felt tingly and he was having shortness of breath. He was wheeled out in an ambulance…1 hour later he was in ICU on a ventilator and three hours later he passed away,” she wrote.

I’m by no means an anti-vaxxer, but why are they vaccinating people who’ve recently recovered?

More on this topic from Brett Weinstein and Heather Heying: “I have recovered from COVID. Should I get the vaccine?”
(h/t alecincgy)

54 Replies to “Wuhan Flu: 99.5% Survive The Vaccine”

  1. What if you had knowledge that wuhan diagnoses over the last year were maybe a little inflated? Then you might vaccinate someone who had previously been “diagnosed” with Wuhan. 😉

  2. Why are they vaccinating anybody? Over 99.9% survival….
    Oh right follow the money, billions are being stolen from the taxpayers around the world.
    Correction $Trillions.
    Disgusting.
    They treat the pubic like dairy cows, milking their property as they see fit.
    It isn’t going to stop.

    2. Bob….You hit the nail on the head.

      Why the F indeed..??
      I ask many folks this question: You are healthy right.? Yes. Ok so if I told you that an injectable HIV treatment was available, and even though you DO NOT have HIV, would you still take it.??? Eyes gloss over- no clue as to what I just asked them.

      Just the Fact they call this crud a vaccine is disingenuous. A REAL vaccine will IMMUNIZE oneself., This crud..?? Won’t immunize anyone, nor will it prevent you from getting infected nor will it prevent you from spreading it and you might not even survive..!!
      So would someone tell me please just what the hell this crud is good for.???

      Meanwhile No one talks about the incredible importance of Vitamin D – Not one so called Govt Health Expert. No one talks about HCQ…or Ivermectin (both of which Work Exceedingly well), as we continue to kill patients with ventilators.

      So tell me why I, when told to stay home and wear my mask, should believe this is a true PANDEMIC and ignore any talk of: Great Reset or Agenda 2030 etc…??

      And as to being an ANTI VAXXER..?? Bullshit. I’m a vet and I can gaurantee you, that in the course of my enlistment, I took more preventative shots than anyone of you here…10 times as much.

  3. L-Vaccinating the recently recovered is part of the experimental process for safety not done under the regulatory process suspended for speed. There is a reason vaccines normally take years of testing before being approved for widespread use.

    “Pathogenic Priming” was thought to be a risk for a vaccinated person’s immune system in contact with a wild virus, a very deadly risk of unknown scale. Perhaps, this is an unexpected variant of that or some other untested for side effect.

    Everyone vaccinated in the first year are part of an *experimental trial, except without informed and signed consent. Individual rights, that is becoming such an archaic concept in the 21st Century.

    *(America’s Frontline Doctors and others are suppressed on social media for pointing this out.)

    1. Dr. Simone Gold — one of the frontline doctors — was recently arrested. She had an excellent video (taken down) that assessed levels of risk in the vaccine vs. levels of risk for the virus. As I recall, she was advising most under 50 not to take it as the experimental vaccine risk was higher than risk from Covid. For older people she suggested making it a personal decision based on your overall health. Now what’s curious is that they stopped the vaccine (Belgium??) for the very old because a bunch had died after the vaccine. This “vaccine” is highly experimental and makes no sense for an illness with a very low death rate and for which effective treatments are available (HCQ and Ivermectin).

      1. Dr. Simone Gold, admitted her self that she was a stupid twatt for entering the Capitol building.
        Some people should stick to what they good at, in her case Medicine.
        She was arrested because they have photographs of her on the Rotunda floor with a megaphone.
        She was inciting and directing traffic, hence the megaphone.

  4. Anti vaccer? Must we label? That kind of branding is what polarizes us these days.
    Without any disclaimer let me say that these ‘ vaccines’ which do not bestow immunity and may reduce symptoms are largely untested in the traditional sense. They are a possible antidote to permanent lock downs, should the powers that be decide that’s what they want.

    1. If this were a vaccine in the traditional sense I would say ok, it has been tested and will indeed prevent a person from getting cov2, BUT, it is not and will not do as advertised. How many DEATHS AS COLLATERAL DAMAGE IS ACCEPTABLE?

  5. … why are they vaccinating people who’ve recently recovered?

    Bureaucracy and money.

  6. You can get COVID again, just like you can get another Common Cold again, or Influenza again. Governments are incompetent enough in purchasing, distributing, and innoculating this vaccine. Let’s not try to make it any harder for them.

    1. No. Natural immunity derived from CV19 is similar to that of SARS-COV-1, which is genetically close and shares very similar spike proteins. Immunity derived from SARS-COV-1 has been shown to be a few years at least.

      Of course, more study is needed and it’s true there have been numerous reports of reinfection of CV19, but false positives of PCR testing confound any conclusions around those claims. Considering that there have been over 100 million cases of CV19, reinfection rate would be less than 0.001% even if all the reports of reinfection were true.

  7. https://www.globalresearch.ca/what-not-said-pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine/5729461
     “All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been… in development for more than a few months.” Yeadon then went on to declare,
    “If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for…whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information.”(Mike Yeadon) former chief research scientist of respiratory medicine at Pfizer

  8. People are saying – in fact I may have read it in a comment here – that Hank Aaron had received the vaccine just a couple weeks before he died. In fact, they filmed him getting the vaccine as part of a promotional effort to encourage people to get the vaccine.

  9. Why, you ask?

    Because Globalist designed and manufactured nanobots running through your veins and into your brain are perfectly safe!

  10. From vaccine studies, what happens to the placebo group receiving NO vaccine:
    https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/why-number-3-may-make-you-rethink-covid-hysteria
    Study of vaccine placebo group
    Well, out of 20,000 people who did NOT receive the vaccine, 162 of them expressed symptoms of acute respiratory illness and tested positive for COVID-19 during the evaluation period.
    And out of those 162 in the placebo group who tested positive for Covid, THREE of them had ‘severe’ Covid. And only one of them was hospitalized.
    (The study also clearly defines ‘severe’ Covid by a quantitative measurement of oxygen saturation. So there was no subjectivity involved.)
    So from the roughly 20,000 participants who did NOT receive the vaccine, 162 (0.8%) tested positive for COVID-19 during the evaluation period. And THREE (1.9% of the positive tests) had ‘severe’ Covid. [see page 30 of the report]
    Remember– this was a BIG test. Tens of thousands of people, from all walks of life, under uniform research conditions. So this is pretty pristine data.
    Yet the numbers show that 98% of the people who tested positive for Covid during the evaluation period had a mild case

    2. There should have been a greater focus on the elderly. As I understand it, the average age of study participants was in the mid 50’s. There are strong arguments against using these “vaccines” for most people under the age of 70, and especially for subgroups in which the disease is mild and survival rates are essentially 99.99%.

    1. Irrational fear it would seem and no, the so called variant is no worse that the previous one and still no worse than the seasonal flu. Keep looking for the truth folks eventually it will hit us right between the eyes. What is being touted as a vaccine is not.

    2. I have a REAL issue with the use of the world VARIANT. All media stating this is a “mutated” version of the original Wuhan virus. I don’t buy that at all. As per 2 different Dr.s (Front line Docs), Simone Gold and Lee Merritt both stated that viruses that go through a population tend to become less severe.

      If there is a much more virulent form of this virus – I’m betting it was PURPOSELY let out of the bag. Just like it was foretold in LOCKSTEP. All to keep us in a continual state of FEAR.

      1. steakman, I want to see millions dying in the streets, all hospitals jammed to capacity and all politicians dead from it. Then I will believe. I will believe. Maybe.

        1. But they are, doncha know. The MSM keeps reporting it….. and there are enough people dumb enough to believe that codswallop.

  13. I’ll keep talking vitamins and ivermectin for now.
    Side effects are positive in maintaining better health.

    1. And don’t forget to include D3 and Zinc in your “preventative” regimen. Just don’t overdo it on the zinc.

  14. I’m by no means an anti-vaxxer, but why are they vaccinating people who’ve recently recovered?

    Indeed, why are they vaccinating anyone other than the vulnerable?

    Let’s assume for the sake of argument that Covid-19 and the vaccines are real and as described. We know that almost everyone under 60 is not vulnerable to a bad outcome. Why vaccinate them? Just vaccinate the vulnerable (no obligation) and as soon as that’s done open the whole country / world up to a massive party of free social interaction. No vaccine shortage, vulnerable plus health services protected, herd immunity soon after.

    If governments act so stupidly, to the point of being evil, then citizens can – should- reasonably conclude that governments have an alterior motive against their interests.

  15. “I’m by no means an anti-vaxxer, but …”

    What are the new rules again? Oh yeah, self censor, and start apologizing.

    So you signal what you don’t want to be called, my bet is that is what they call you regardless of anything you say or do.

    On the plus side! Experiments on the people who were gonna vote Trudeau anyway. Win, win.

      1. Neither AM I….and I have likely been VACCINATED for pretty much any Bacterial or Viral Agent out there….It’s what they do when you join the Canadian Armed Forces.

        But this inoculation is something all together different. It’s in my mind a Global Experiment with humans as the test subjects.

    2. Nor am I an anti-vaxxer … thank God my beautiful 1yo grandson will never face the scourge of polio, smallpox, and a host of other deadly bugs, viruses and pathogens.

      However

      The one thing I haven’t really heard asked or answered by the cows in our so called Press is WHY this particular strain of Coronavirus was able to be solved? When we first heard of COVID-19 … the news was replete with stories about how medical science had not been able to successfully manufacture vaccines for the vast majority of the Coronaviruses. Case in point, the common cold – a Coronavirus unsolved.

      So why is THIS variety able to be solved? Is there something in the biochemistry that makes it easier to vaccinate against? Did we get help from the ChiCom scientists who developed this strain in the Lab … before they “accidentally” spilled it?

      1. It wasn’t solved Kenji and the vaccine is really not what a vaccine has been in the past. It will not prevent the flu, it will not prevent the spread of the flu, it might kill you. The science behind this is questionable at the very least. One thing about today is that information is available on all the science behind this nonsense and a lot of it sure is nonsense. I am sure many here read with understanding and must see the lies behind the “science”.

  17. ” but why are they vaccinating people who’ve recently recovered?”

    Why is there a vaccine for a disease with an over 99.9% recovery?
    The old adage, follow the money, this is a huge rip off.
    It needs to be stopped or:
    COVID21
    COVID22
    COVID23
    COVID24
    COVID25
    ……..

      1. Where is it? The flu shot has a very low percentage of accurately coming close to any particular strain of flu virus in any given year and if you never took you will be no worse off than someone who did.

  18. “I’m by no means an anti-vaxxer, but why are they vaccinating people who’ve recently recovered?”

    To make sure you have a lasting and strong immune response. Vaccines often do a better job of this than ‘natural’ infection.

    2. Unme

      Listen up pin head – these shots are in no way shape or form a “VACCINE”. They Do NOT provide IMMUNITY, can give you the very infection you took it for, can also ensure you spread said infection and you have a chance of being killed.

      “Vaccine” my ass. These shots are nothing but GARBAGE.

      2. Yes, they are a vaccine and yes they do provide immunity according to science. No they cannot give you the infection.

        1. They do not provide “immunity” — they reduce symptoms . . . supposedly, according to company data. That is not the same as immunity. And they certainly do not prevent transmission. They did not even test for that.

  19. It’s a glorified flu shot hastily manufactured, barely tested and shoddily distributed.

    It is the topping of a dreadful, draconian sundae.

    What this will do is make everyone afraid of any vaccine, even ones we know to work.

    This entire farce has caused people to question their shabby, grubby institutions, something that they should have done earlier, but now they will distrust things and people that did work.

    1. it is not even that, it is a whole other animal, mRNA is not a regular flu shot.

  20. Merck pulls out of their vaccine trials. Says the vaccine does not work. Well, surprise, surprise. Dr. Simone Gold made the same point regarding the years spent trying to develops a Sars/covid vaccine. They were not able to do this but now — after just a few months — voila . . .the Covid vaccine. That certainly does beg the question about what Psizer, Moderna, etc. are providing. Plus, governments (for whatever bizarre reason) simply rely on data provided by the company about effectivness. That has to be a complete sham.
    https://twitter.com/roccogalatilaw/status/1354088643749687299?s=20
    Someone needs to start blowing the whistle on this crap.

    Sorry — just noticed someone already posted this, but I will leave my comments.

  21. Not 5 hours before reading this I heard a similar story. This one went Covid 19 vaccine, DVTs, now a candidate for double leg amputation to avoid pulminary embolisms. (Active mid to late 50s)
    Curious about both cases.
    I don’t think many who are labled anti-vaxxer actually are.
    It is reasonable to question the injection of four “attenuated” viruses into children between 1 and 2 years of age considering the wide array of developmental rates. While the viruses are attenuated, immune responses aren’t.
    It’s probably wise to delay the schedule and separate, as much as possible, the inoculations. (Perhaps not if the child attends Calcutta / daycare in an urban environment.)
    As to M-RNA injections, I think it is shocking that testing for an existing immune response is not a prerequisite. I’ve not read anything regarding the interactions between M-RNA injections and preexisting immune responses. That’s because the overlap was never intended. It is possible that many people have had COVID (of some sort) and are unaware. In my opinion, this application of M-RNA technology is reckless.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation