All is forgiven: “Prince Andrew’s attempt to explain away his friendship with pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein in a high-profile TV interview degenerated into a farce that threatens to be the British royal family’s biggest public relations disaster since its handling of the death of Princess Diana in 1997.”
Wow, there was a lot of blinking in the response to that question. Probably nothing. 🤔 pic.twitter.com/HDet6xcfSY
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 16, 2019
Breaking: House minority leader Kevin McCarthy demands answers from ABC News on Epstein story
Reminds me of a certain disbarred lawyer
“It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”
I did not have sexual relations with her…
Déjà Vu?
Dirty Bill
=
Dirty Andrew
My humble peasant’s point of view on this ( though I am not worthy to judge a Royal!!): Andrew likes to have sex with young girls,just like his close friend Jeffrey Epstein,and like Jeff,”the younger the better”.
No one with a functioning brain believes otherwise. Smooth move to bring up the Falklands War, Ange, didn’t work, though, you’re no war hero,you’re just another rich perv that likes little girls,and quite possibly little boys too.
This is the latest attempt by the globalists to discredit the British monarchy. Nobody cares that Andrew is a rapist. This is revenge for the Queen’s support of Brexit behind the scenes.
You’ll notice nobody is dragging Bill Clinton in front of TV cameras and demanding to know what, in the name of whatever he swears by, he was thinking when he boarded the Lolita Express.
Nobody dragged him before the cameras. He chose to do this.
..and what in this world was he thinking?
Indeed Kate. I suspect The Royal Family advised him to put an end to this story. Instead it was surely a “catastrophic own-goal”. Ha ha ha … too funny, that metaphor describes it perfectly. The Prince took a wild defensive swing at the incoming charges … and shanked the ball into his own net. The Prince fluffed his lines.
“I have no recollection … no memory” … of this meeting? Really? That answer is prepackaged for plausible deniability when the PHOTOS, WITNESSES, or CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS, show up proving he was with her. That was NOT a denial.
Was Buckingham Palace so stupid as NOT to have thoroughly prepared the Prince for this interview and CONTROL the questioning?! Without a doubt … the Clintons MANAGE their affairs MUCH tighter and CONTROLLED than that disastrous interview.
And his body language! Oh my, what a mess. Again … wholly unprepared and unrehearsed. Where’s that body language woman who did such a bang up job on Dr. Christine Hazy Ford. I can’t WAIT to hear what she says …
I wonder if the Queen is wishing that the Tower of London was operable as the prison that it was in the olden days, so she could lock Andrew there. It was not uncommon for European nobles to have their children imprisoned if their antics and scandals ended up tarnishing the good name of their house.
As an example, one common way to get incarcerated in the Bastille if you were the son of a noble house was to embarrass your family enough to cause someone within your House to petition the king for a lettre de cachet (The equivalent of an Executive Order) ordering your arrest and imprisonment.
Or an iron chastity belt for the pedophile-Prince … Let HRM hold the key
That 17 year old who got raped? She looked kind of happy. Confusing…
– Attention from older (important, legitimate) men who tell you, you’re pretty
– Rubbing shoulders with stars, and Royalty
– Gifts, baubles, and goodies
– Promises of future compensation, connections, and perks
– Jet set life.
– Enjoys sex – a lot … and being sexually desired
Off the top of my head. However, she was STILL underage, and was PROCURED as sex partner in a really creepy set-up. Doesn’t matter whether she was a “willing” partner or not. If we cannot draw a line (age) where kids remain kids and are offered EXTREME protection from predators … then we are a sick, decaying, decadent, dying culture. And despite some 13yo girls “looking” like ready, willing, and able, sex partners … they’re NOT. They’re OFF LIMITS to adult predators … BOTH men and women.
Well she was 17 when Randy Andy nailed her. I wonder how old she was when she originally got snared by Epstein?
Probably groomed, I reckon.
That was between the money and the sex.
Yep 17 and the legal age is 16. I hope he got her twice. I think pedophiles should die but when citizens of a liberal democracy decide on a legal age fine by me. As to her being forced to do so against her will – the smile speaks volumes and she had to clear customs.
Isn’t this the young prince who was involved with a young B-film star, Koo something-or-other? Didn’t the tabloids use to call him Randy Andy, back in the bad old Lolita Express days? Why not just resurrect the old stories, and save time re-writing? Since we’re just re-formatting everything for modern outrage.
Not a fan of the royals or of Epstein or pedophilia. My only question is a definition of pedophilia that makes sense to rational minds. Is a 17 year old woman a child that any man who has sex with her somehow a pedophile? Curious. My 40 year old great uncle married my 16 year old great aunt. Was that pedophilia or was that just the ways things were a century or so ago?
That’s how it was back then. The age of consent when the new world was first occupied was 10.
Ya I know sounds a little young.
“My only question is a definition of pedophilia that makes sense to rational minds.”
As it has always been, a sexual attraction to the prepubescent. Pedophilia and Under Age are two distinct things, but hysterics will hysteria.
In Epstein’s NYC apartment she was legal then and would be now. 16 for marriage with parents permission. Note that NYS has the highest age of consent in the northeast, including Canada, where, until recently, the age of consent was 14.
Of course whether you should may be considered a distinct matter from whether it’s legal, but if they were carrying on in NY reports that she was “under age” are fake news.
Florida is another story though.
I’m wondering why me again KELLY is getting a full resurrection?
I am profoundly uninterested in any story she … “breaks”. She was forever DEAD to me for what she did to MY President.
She is the EXACT type of woman that Trump was talking about in his offhand comments to that guy … a woman who is SO eager to be in the company of POWERFUL or REALLY RICH men … that they’ll drop the panties and let such men grope their box. That’s who Megyn Kelley strikes me as … one of THOSE kind of women
the man is a liar,a mooch and a diddler . If an argument is to be made against inherited privilege ,this fat elitist retard is it .The French had it right ,off with their heads !
Am I wrong in thinking that Commonwealth countries have veto power over who or what becomes k k k queen?
I know this much about Commonwealth Country’s
Is that Commonwealth Country’s wants to make my wealth common to everyone else but I…
I read that once so I printed it and firmly attached it to the top of my desktop screen at work
Just as this story reaches its
epiphany in what can only be seen as
fictional yet
frank diatribe
Eventually the truth will
present itself
starkly and ever so
tenuously that
even the most biased
individual will have no choice but to accept with
no doubt the truth.
Doing so will clear the air without
insisting that guilt is already
determined and
no amount of
tawdry discourse will change that.
Knowing the truth about
intimate details seems
limited to a who’s who of the top
layer of society.
Having the truth be known
is the crux of the
matter in what appear to be a
sinister conspiracy that will only be solved if
enough folks are brought in for
legal action
first.
I don’t know what the major US New networks would want to deep six the Epstein story. It’s not like they themselves are full of sex-crazed perverts. And even if they were, there’s no way any of them would know Epstein, or visit his island, or any of his other brothels. So therefore, there’s no reason to bury the story.
Democrat connections?
It is a Republican, not a Democrat, who is asking for more to come to light.
From the majority leader, not a peep.
“there’s no reason to bury the story.”
They have their noses up Democrat butt and Democrats have a high proportion of kiddy diddlers. You notice how Biden simply can’t help himself in public.
Koo Stark’s 1975 movie title – Las Adolescent
Haha two fools apologizing – the prinz and ron maclean.
Neither was convincing. Both apologizes fell flat on their faces.
CTV reported on the maclean debacle tonite. Said the reaction was ‘mixed’ and then proceeded to quote Ian Hanomansingh and charles adler…..are you kidding…… I’m not making this up.
My guess us maclean got scorched on twit and farce book.
maclean needs to be booed everytime he appears in public. Yell DON CHEERY at the top of your lungs.
Just another filthy lying aristocrat.
Penn Jilette’s 2005 movie “the aristocrats”.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0436078/
Why exactly do we need the monarchy? They are the punchline to the dirtiest joke ever told.
QE2 was a fine enough monarch and figurehead of a foreign country. Her kids, not so much.
I don’t believe a word Andrew is saying. Perhaps there is video of him boinking kids that is now in the possession of the police, from the search of Epstein’s house after his death.
When the western provinces of Canada separate, it would be a good moment to make the break from them and become a republic.
”I have no recollection of ever meeting that lady. ”
And that’s where all of those bogus accusations should end.
This from a man whose nickname was Randy Andy? Yeah…sure.
Years ago I saw an interview with Sarah Ferguson and she hinted that the breakup with Andrew was his fault, not hers. She wouldn’t elaborate. She seemed rather heartbroken.
A Johnny Carson outtake is circulating about Prince Andrew being “back on the market” for young girls…
I wonder why all the photos of the young women show them with big smiles on their pretty faces. 16 is the age of consent in Canada, it used to be 14.
I think we are talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Not to mention that their brains are not fully developed yet, which is the whole reason for the restrictions. It’s good Canada recognized that and changed her laws.
tim, human trafficking is a very serious problem. Young women are kidnapped, taken from their families, raped and sold. This sir does not fall into that category. There are young teens who get involved with men who pimp them out and control them on pain of death. I don’t think that applies either. The ice berg is huge and if under law any of it can be prosecuted then it should be, if not then what is your solution?
“Not to mention that their brains are not fully developed yet, which is the whole reason for the restrictions.”
No, it isn’t. That’s the progressive narrative that hijacked the original reason, which was to give East Ender girls a couple of extra years before being pimped out by their parents. Before the Victorian English progressive moralists got involved the age of consent has always been, in every time and everywhere, tied to the general age of puberty. The traditional age of marriageability in Christendom was 12.
To put it in the crude street idiom, “If it bleeds it breeds.”
Please note that I’m not advocating that, just noting that that’s the way it was until the late 1800s, and it only began to change because of issues in the poorer sections of London relating to prostitution and gradually spread from there. Had they simply criminalized prostitution at that time raising the age of consent from 14 might have been considered a moot issue.
Current age of consent in England remains 16. Age of prostitution has been raised to 18. Coercion to prostitution is criminal.
You missed the best part. Where he said he couldn’t have done it because he was at a children’s party at a PIZZA parlor.
Epstein was murdered so the Prince and his compatriots don’t need to worry about what he would have said. I could care less about the monarchy.
The idea that a person could be murdered in prison without any real serious concern by the public is astounding. It truly shows how thin the veneer is between supposed ‘law & order’ and anarchy. Many Americans might question why the opposition to the ‘Red Flag’ law? To me it speaks of the huge distrust many have in government. All of this is a ticking time bomb.
My opinion for whatever little amount it is worth. I think Epstein got rich by setting men up for what they thought of as consensual sex and then blackmailing them. He used these girls as bait. Most men simply paid him off to get rid of him whether or not he had something on them. Some men refused to be blackmailed and then they were punished with legal battles. Epstein’s lawyer buddies in on the scam filed a suit against three people, Trump, Dershowitz and Prince Andrew on behalf of an anonymous girl which was later thrown out as unsubstantiated. I do not believe Trump was sleeping with young women provided by Epstein. I also do not think Dershowitz was. I believe the law suit was a set up, a punishment for refusing to be blackmailed and refusing to cooperate with Epstein. Now why did they include Prince Andrew in the threesome? Maybe he was added because he had sex with the woman but refused to be blackmailed. The young woman did not say Prince Andrew raped her. She said Epstein forced her to have sex with the prince. Did she tell Andrew she was an unwilling participant who wanted nothing to do with him? Would Andrew have gone ahead if she had told him that? I don’t think so. He was nicknamed Randy Andy because he had an endless supply of willing young women happy to sleep with a prince. It is possible that he thought she was just one more of them. It might even be possible the woman had sex with someone she was told was Prince Andrew. Now “Randy Andy” has not ever been known for being smart. Epstein, like most predatory blackmailing sociopaths was remarkably charming and very convincing. It may well be that Andrew was in New York for the express purpose to trying to talk his “friend” out of involving the royal family and the entire thing was another set up by Epstein right down to having reporters tipped off and being there to take pictures in order to further the blackmail attempt. I am prepared to give Prince Andrew the benefit of the doubt in regards to him having knowingly raped an unwilling young woman. Is he a hound dog willing to use his position to dazzle willing young women into bed? Yes. Is he a rapist? I just don’t think so.
I very much WANT to “believe” Epstein (reportedly) became a $Billionaire by blackmailing men who had sex with underage girls on Epstein’s offshore pedophile island. A $Billion is a LOT of money. And how many profoundly RICH men could be successfully blackmailed … before word got out to STEER CLEAR of Epstein? It doesn’t make logical sense that he could blackmail thousands, or even hundreds or as little as dozens of FILTHY RICH men with appetites for child sex … and become a Billionaire off his scam.
It is far more likely he was simply charging a Prince’s Ransom for underage intercourse. He was running the world’s most exclusive brothel. Most expensive brothel. An Ultra high roller illegal whorehouse. $1M per penetration? Now THAT is a much more viable business model.
BTW … how come nobody in the disingenuous FAKE media DEMANDING the government release Epstein’s Tax Returns?
Well Justin that was Some contorted verbiage you employed there.
The obscenely wealthy do not clean up their their own messes : they hire ‘fixers’ to deal with those unpleasant sorrid details.
Royalty does not act solo for any cause as it is an institution that has a rather extensive PR team including the best lawyers money can buy.
No I imagine Randy used some foolish judgement and as such the Queen is not amused.
Then again being so filthy rich is not all it is cracked up to be…at least for the unimaginative.
Too much idle time looking for distractions and we know how the devil loves idle time.
anybody remember the scandal regarding modelling jobs for young girls in S Fwance area? back around early 90s or so.
one of those news story hour long shows about how the wealthy sponsors would hand pick some of the kids for
a special treat on the 250 million dollar yacht.
the treat being raped.
all the denials and non-disclosure stuff . . . . .
money talks !!!!
!7 eh? Well, if it happened, then he’s just a filthy old pr*ck. And legal or not, he would deserve all the disgust that could be heaped upon him.
I have a funny feeling that he’d be in for a lot rougher ride than Dirty Old Pierre got from our press and public when he was sniffin’ around the 18-year old Shaggy Maggie.
“!7 eh? Well, if it happened, then he’s just a filthy old pr*ck.”
Well lock me up along with most of the male population. The law says 16. When Harper changed it from 14 in Canada the Liberals were whining against the change.
“lock me up along with most of the male population.”
Well thankfully, in these parts the majority of middle-aged would find the thought, of having sex with a teenage girl repugnant.
The royal watchers report Charles want to cut back all royal duties and monies for Andrew and his girls and Andrew had been against it, wanting his daughter to remain involved princesses. I suspect after this fiasco Andrew will vanish from public life and go into retirement and Charles will get his way now.
He can’t remember meeting “that lady,” because she was a child at the time, his version of using semantics to lie.