40 Replies to “Well Done, Hong Kong”

  1. Shows how some guts and backbone can accomplish things. Paying attention Canadian Hosers. Riot and raise hell over a hockey game and chant a beer commercial “I AM CANADIAN” as if you really were something but when the bullet meets the bone you slink off and change your dirty shorts. Crawl on your bellies like snakes. Roll on your backs like little dogs for another kick in the nuts. You deserve whats coming in full measure.

  2. Well certainly HK has more testicles in standing up to Chicom enemies than past and present Librano PMs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQunXuSa1VI&t=173s But then again, a sizable portion of new Canadians have no allegiance to civilization and see no problems with collaboration with civilization’s enemies. Just another consequence of multiculturalism and mass importation of turd worlders.

    1. “Just another consequence of multiculturalism and mass importation of turd worlders.”

      A consequence you can never actually prove.

      1. *
        ah, unme… the troll most famous for mounting
        a defense of canada’s largest fentanyl dealer.

        this gentleman also had 30 illegal glock
        handguns, but “unhinged” was good
        with that too. of, course, the guy wasn’t a
        member of the caucasian patriarchy.

        *

      2. Right, because all those turd worlders are loyal to western values. I would suggest you give your head a shake but it might rapture your sphincter.

        1. They’re as loyal as westerners. Good thing institutions and intellectuals matter, not so much the peasantry.

          “rapture your sphincter.”

          Priceless

          1. Oh sure they’re loyal, unfortunately not to civilization.

            Functioning institutions and intelectuals are a product of culture. Turd world lacks either. Ever wondered why?

          2. “Functioning institutions and intelectuals are a product of culture. ”

            Sometimes, sometimes not. Actually that may have cause and effect backward. HK isn’t where it is due to ‘culture’. It’s awesome because of the single individual they put in charge of the place. He was vigilant in keeping socialists at bay. Chile’s institutions weren’t built by culture but by Friedman in the space made by Pinochet.

            In any event, if mass immigration was going to destroy North America it would have by now but it’s not.

          3. Both HK and Chile are exceptions and in both cases culture that allowed those institutions to flourish played a huge role.

            Mass importation of turd worlders ruins lives of people forced to live nearby. It is a gradual process but with every turd worlder we get poorer and less free. You of course know it, and that is precisely what you want.

          4. “Mass importation of turd worlders ruins lives of people forced to live nearby.”

            If that were true, those living next to them would be most likely to oppose letting them in but the opposite is true.

            “It is a gradual process but with every turd worlder we get poorer and less free.”

            Wrong again. Canada is freer and richer now than 50 years ago when it had fewer immigrants. You should try getting out of your basement bunker place whatever you live in.

          5. “If that were true, those living next to them would be most likely to oppose letting them in but the opposite is true.”

            That is exactly what is happening. Take Oakville Ontario for example where the new koranimal super center/mosque immediately leads to “for sale” signs in neighboring areas even years before it is built, a decision to built it was enough for people to start running. As if anyone ever wanted a Somali or Pakistani neighbor. As if white flight wasn’t a norm.

            “Wrong again. Canada is freer and richer now than 50 years ago when it had fewer immigrants. ”

            Richer, yes not freer. Historically immigration was very different than today in terms of demands on immigrants, selection process and compatibility with western culture. So comparisons against 50 years ago are spurious. And you don’t have a counterfactual, you can’t tell how rich we would have been have been more selective in immigration process than we have been over the last couple of decades.

            “You should try getting out of your basement bunker place whatever you live in.”

            Bitch please, a subhuman like you should not be trying to be condescending to its betters.

          6. “Take Oakville Ontario for example where the new koranimal super center/mosque immediately leads to “for sale” signs in neighboring areas”

            A reed so thing you can measure it in Angstroms.

            “Historically immigration was very different than today in terms of demands on immigrants, selection process and compatibility with western culture. So comparisons against 50 years ago are spurious.”

            Hand waving. There’s nothing remotely ‘spurious’ about that comparison either. 50 years ago sodomy and MJ were illegal. Drinking laws were somehow even worse than today. Trade was less free.

            As usual, you have nothing but desperate rationalization.

          7. “A reed so thing you can measure it in Angstroms.”

            In other words as usual you got nothing.

            “There’s nothing remotely ‘spurious’ about that comparison either.”

            It is completely spurious. You compare before to after and claim it is all because immigration. You fail to distinguish between several waves of immigration, you fail account for all other variables. We’re poorer than we would have been otherwise because of last waves and less free in both relative and absolute terms.

            Didn’t they even teach you how to run and interpret multivariate regression in the shitty masters-for-all-imports diversity-university they rubber stamped your degree at?

          8. A special jewel deserving an own post:

            “50 years ago sodomy and MJ were illegal. ”

            Yay you can get assfucked while stoned, that is truly a remarkable measurable gain in freedom for you.

            The rest of us are concerned about property rights, gun ownership, driving, freedom of speech, freedom of association etc. They all take a hit after hit. Perhaps if you stopped selling your stoned ass in the toilet of a truck stop you would have noticed?

            “Drinking laws were somehow even worse than today. Trade was less free.”

            Utter lie, drinking laws are much worse and so are smoking laws. You have no clue what you’re talking about.

  3. Hong Kong is beyond help. The measures required to prevent Chinese domination of the planet and enslavement or destruction of the West would almost certainly prove the undoing of Hong Kong as well. And Margaret Thatcher, wisely, wasn’t willing to fight China for Hong Kong.

    By the way—Hong Kong got rich the same way China has, by helping western corporations cut costs by outsourcing production to Asia and destroying the livelihoods of north American workers. So I shan’t say I’m shedding many tears on Hong Kong’s behalf.

    1. “Hong Kong got rich the same way China has, by helping western corporations cut costs by outsourcing production to Asia and destroying the livelihoods of north American workers.”

      IOW, by being awesome. HK has generated tons of wealth by being an exceedingly easy place to do business. The only ones whose livelihoods are destroyed are losers too dumb to gain a real skill set. GG

      1. What? You mean by learning to code? That can be outsourced too.

        Our masters, in 2019, have no use for Western men of modest background and basic education except as cannon fodder in wars devoted to maintaining Chinese access to Saudi oil. Explain to me like I’m a Mongolian idiot why this is “awesome.”

        1. Then stop being of modest background and basic education. Upgrade yourself. Compete or die.

          “Explain to me like I’m a Mongolian idiot why this is “awesome.””

          Because I can get things like ‘decent cars’ (thanks Japan) and an unimaginable selection of other goods for extremely reasonable prices. Globalization: every consumer’s friend.

          1. “Compete or die.”

            Oh really asshole? How can people compete against affirmative action? Against state’s preferential treatment of protected minorities through courts? Against Human Rights Commissions?

            Everyone can be racist/proud other than those who are civilized and whose lives are immediately destroyed if they let it slip.

          2. “How can people compete against affirmative action? Against state’s preferential treatment of protected minorities through courts? Against Human Rights Commissions?”

            The same way I and a ton of other people did: get an education. Go to university, learn good.

          3. Bitch please, is that the best you got? Conditional on level of education white people are systematically discriminated against. Human rights commissions do not care about your education btw, neither do courts.

          4. Note how the goalposts have shifted from ‘how can my cohort of poor white ignorant peons get ahead?’ to fixating on discrimination. Even with that discrimination, those whites with the drive and intellect are getting ahead. It’s you. You suck.

          5. Haven’t shifted at all. You’re just to much of a brain dead bitch to follow the argument. Fact is, middle class whites are being replaced to make room for turd worlders. Policies range, aim is the same. They would be better off without hordes of turd worlders.

    2. Canadian, Hong Kong will do exactly what China tells them to do any minor tinkering around the edges will be meaningless to their masters on the mainland.

  4. I’m actually kinda shocked. China has the upper hand unfortunately. If HK were to really truly rebel I imagine the whole place would become a large wealthy version of Tienanmen Square. HK’s best bet is for their elites to form a sort of Fifth Column that infiltrates China’s power structure.

    1. Sounds like UNme needs to pack his suitcase and head for HK. You like chickee ball, chickee flied rice, sweet sour. Someone with your superior intellect and awesomeness could become their leader in no time. Of course everyone around here would be heart broken and stricken with loss.

  5. China plays the long game. They can wait until 2047 to kill anyone who pisses them off. They want an association with Taiwan with local independence that expires. They are occupying Filipino and Vietnamese Islands hoping that in 100 years nobody remembers that they don’t own them. The Filipinos should have bombed the first base the Chinese built and they would have backed off.

    1. MY comment is similar in that … the HK guv backed off ….. for now ….. governments who show that kind of weakness will either be replaced or will come back with new vigor and a lot of guns. They get what they want unless you can over throw them and start over. But China … you are right … the long game … they can out-wait you.

      It ain’t over ….

      1. That is exactly what will happen. The Chicoms will just out wait those opposing this move and do it by stealth.

        1. I am not sure about that. China’s history is a history of monumental slaughter of Chinese by Chinese. If the current politburo fails to deliver because Trump, a nice slaughter in tens of millions may be around the corner.

  6. The Classicist: Understanding Chinese Strategy
    interview with Victor Davis Hanson -(15min.)
    https://www.hoover.org/research/classicist-understanding-chinese-strategy
    ————————————————————————————————————————————————————
    L- Interesting, China’s naval strategy to take control of the Western Pacific and stand off the U.S. navy is based on submarines. You thought “The Hunt for Red October” was yesterday’s concern.

    Note-those artificial islands China’s military has/is building in disputed waters… think of them as permanently anchored aircraft carriers, impervious to torpedos.

    What would the world economy look like if China blockaded South Korea and Japan(3rd largest economy in the world?) How soon before China simply seizes Taiwan.

    How many state of the art nuclear submarines does Canada have ? Could we even assist South Korea, Japan et a. or even Australia and New Zealand ? None, no, no and no and no, but whose counting? China is.

    1. Nice to see a comment from somebody with some understanding of the consequences of chronic under funding of our military.

    2. And that is exactly why Trump does a great service trying to derail chicom economy. The sooner they slaughter each other in millions (as is their national tradition for more than two millennia) the better.

      1. And if he pulls it off, he’ll be seen as Reagan 2.0. I know this son an 89yo combat wounded Korean War vet would love to see them get their just rewards.

      2. Trump does not have the power to really derail anyone’s economy besides his own. China is having problems because of its own government.

        Your comment is also hilarious because Trump is trying to force China to open up to investment, which will make them richer not poorer.

        1. Yes, again you’re showing all the knowledge of an Econ 105 student (not Econ 100, but Econ 105 the Economics for Dummies taught by a retired prof in the summer or by graduate student). Meanwhile back in the real world, China is getting hurt and the communist hardliners who were bribed with factory ownership positions and promised mountains of gold are getting restless and the livelihood of their workers is threatened. And when Chinese get restless and threatened the results tend to be spectacular. Do you know anything about Chinese history?

Navigation