Weblog Awards
Best Canadian Blog
2004 - 2007
Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
homepage
email Kate
(goes to a private
mailserver in Europe)
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
I am not a registered charity. I cannot issue tax receipts.
Want lies?
Hire a regular consultant.
Want truth?
Hire an asshole.
The Pence Principle
Poor Richard's Retirement
Pilgrim's Progress
Trump The Establishment
*
not a single “privileged white guy”
in the whole darn bunch…
*
hmph.
appeasement alive and well on the Web.
side by side with unending hypocrisy.
sign of the times folks !!!!
sol’n? easy !!! CONservatists with deep pockets need only start their OWN paypal, twitter, google, youtube, fakebook etc etc.
or mebbe the refusal to part with cash trumps all that?
more goddamn hypocrisy.
The original incident took place several years ago and, yet, it’s still treated as an open entry on the books, presumably to be filled in once “justice” has been served. What that “justice” is was made abundantly clear.
I’m reminded of an old Doonesbury strip, back when it was still worth reading. I recall that the setting was Bush War I, nearly 30 years ago. An American soldier is being driven around by his Muslim counterpart, who is either Shia or Sunni. He commented that someone from the other faction killed one of his relatives a “while back” and that he had to settle accounts.
The American asks when that took place, to which the Muslim’s answer was something like “more than 700 years ago”.
Nice people…..
Seriously, a tweet from 2015 is “in violation of Pakistan law”?
Do they track every tweet for four years for violation of a law in any of nearly two hundred countries in the world? Does Twitter honor repressive laws which in the U.S. would violate the First Amendment of the Constitution? How do you even know if anything you write isn’t in violation of some law in some country? China? Venezuela? Cuba? Iran? South Africa?
Don’t be complacent: Justin Trudeau Liberal’s M-103 is direct from Pakistan, via their Liberal M.P. s with really close ties, err I mean strings.
If it wasn’t for a majority of Canadians having a negative view of the current results of political Islam. Thus being a potential threat to re-election to a Liberal C-103. We’d have mass arrests for Islamophobia, already. Trudeau would have made M-103 into C-103, and the police would be directed to make mean tweets a higher priority than Sharia related crime. Just as is now happening in the U.K. .
Yes, the Liberals are badly wounded, by J.W.R. testimony, but until they bleed out politically speaking, and have their crypt salted with garlic, and wooden stakes. They and their M.B. allies are still a threat, sabotaging the Canadian economy and the Rule of Law, at every opportunity.
Merely the tribe in action. Why the surprise? And you say Pakis aren’t tribe? No, but Twatter is. “Reformed” tribe. And their goal is One World Government. BAMN.