19 Replies to “The Children Are Our Future”

  1. And I thought keeping a kid back a year used to be protocol. 0% for not handing in your assignments used to be protocol. Giving a kid corporal punishment for really out of line behavior used to be protocol. I would suggest that absurdity in the education system is the new protocol since the “protocol bar” keeps moving in that direction.

  2. He should have said that he was just practicing for the pride parade.
    Problem solved.

  3. Or he was waving to the Christians with “it”, but I guess that is sort of the same thing.

  4. Exactly, little Eric should have self-identified as Erica when he was forced to sign his sexual misconduct form.

  6. Off Topic but; listen to the preachy, condescending, overpaid bureaucrat cop’s disastorous press conference after one of his officers shot a dog, below the article.

  7. I think there is something to Kate’s idea that space aliens have taken over.

  8. This is yet more evidence that anti-bullying programmes are yet another way for bully’s to bully.

  9. Oh man oh man….
    “Befehl ist Befehl” (translation: Orders are Orders).
    The Excuse given at the Nuremburg Trials for Concentration Camp, SS, Gestapo and other NAZI’s.
    Is this insanity any different..??

  10. I just love it when I get to deal with “Policy”.
    I learned how after a clash with AT&T. What I asked for was “forbidden by the FCC”. So I asked them to give me the FCC rule forbidding it, and wouldn’t take no for an answer. After being referred several levels up the “supervisor chain” I finally reached someone who admitted that it was actually not an FCC regulation but AT&T policy. So then I asked who signed the policy. There was silence. I pointed out that policies don’t just spring up out of nowhere, and that if it came from some group, I wanted the name of the head of that group since (s)he was ultimately responsible.
    I never got the name, but I did get what I wanted.
    The last time was when my mother was seriously ill in hospital in the UK. I called to see how she was, and they refused to tell me. They said that if I called in in person, after seeing me they would then answer questions over the phone.
    So I asked if they checked and validated ID if I walked in … no.
    So what’s the difference? “Its policy”.
    So again, who wrote the policy, who signed it into effect?
    Eventually, they told me the name of the committee that issued it, but wouldn’t tell me the name of the person in charge.
    I took a different tack. I found the cellphone number of the minister of health in the UK (just needed a bit of patience)
    .
    A quick call explaining my problem resulted in the head of that committee calling me, and saying he wished that I had not involved the minister, that we could have sorted this out amicably …
    Next time I called, I got all the information I wanted.
    When they invoke “policy”, question it. Question the person responsible for signing it, and if you have to, don’t be too hesitant about invoking the nuclear option.

  12. Yeah good on ya mate.
    Most of these “gun control” regulations are made up on the spot….unsupported by legistlation…IOW not lawful.
    The door-kickers (formerly barn burners) arbitrary designations of restricted/prohibeted firearms are questionable…especially when certain items are prohibited based upon appearance.

  14. “A quick call explaining my problem resulted in the head of that committee calling me, and saying he wished that I had not involved the minister, that we could have sorted this out amicably …”
    Yeah, they hate it when you don’t follow their hierarchy.
    They forget, of course, that you are not their employee and not in their “chain of command”.
    As a private citizen, you retain the right to skip the bureaucracy and go straight to your elected MP.
    Since I’m now retired from the military, I think it’s probably safe to reveal that on one or two occasions when private citizens came to me with a legitimate complaint about DND, I answered:
    “I’ll deny I ever said this to you but you don’t have to do what I have to do – work your way laboriously up the chain of command. Go straight to your MP if you’re that dissatisfied. Nothing gets results quite like a ‘MINQUIRE’ (Ministerial Inquiry).”

  15. Deferring to “policy” means never having to make a decision on your own – which means never having to worry about anybody questioning a decision you made – which increases your chance of getting into Head Office someday – which is what many of these school administrators really want.

  16. At the core of these protocols and policies, is the widely held belief and teaching in academia that children are sexual beings from birth. This myth, created by Kinsey, has inflicted incalculable damage on children. Kinsey used the diaries of p a e d o p h i l e s as scientific proof that children, including infants, were sexual. Kinsey documented the pedophiles diaries under the guise of research in chapter 5 of his book turned textbook $exual Behavior in the Human Male published in 1948.
    The Kinsey Institute remains a member institute of the UN to this day-despite the discovery of the fact that he indeed used $exual psycopaths and an assorment of deviants as the basis of his research and conclusions for his “authoritative” work on human $exuality.
    In 1999 child abuse advocate, journalist and film maker, Timothy Tate, exposed Kinsey’s research in a BBC documentary for which persons attempted to get him fired. Timothy Tate interview here: tinyurl.com/pp9r5e9. Timothy Tate Kinsey P a e d o p h i l e s documentary here: tinyurl.com/pm9g5u7
    In response to Tate’s documentary, films, musicals, and plays were produced to redeem Kinsey. “In 2000 a play produced by Steve Morgan Haskell, called Fu_king Wasps followed Kinsey’s life from his childhood to his death” and in 2003, the musical Dr. $ex focuses on the relationship between Kinsey, his wife, and their shared lover Wally Matthews. Hollywood’s response to Tate’s documentary was the movie Kinsey (2004), which portrayed Kinsey as a male who was $exually repressed and frustrated stemming from a religious upbringing-he is depicted as victim and hero.
    For further information on Kinsey “research” and his impact on the criminal justice system and the public school systems $ex ed curriculum; search for a video by the name of Kinsey Syndrome.

  17. All I gotta say is this: if volunteers are needed to help build the gallows for public school ‘educators’….I’m around. I am also available for work on firing squads too!

  18. Perhaps the Lopez boy had listened to one of his relatives tell the old shaggy dog story of a man who confronted Pancho Villa and was forced by the old bandit to “pull down your pants” because Pancho had “two beeg pistols pointed right at my head”, before turning the tables and forcing Pancho to do the same. If you don’t know the story, it would take to long to tell; if you do know, you probably wouldn’t want to admit it in public.

  19. “The other child who had instructed Lopez to pull his pants down had given the boy no choice, by the way: He had told him that he would pull Lopez’s pants down for him if he did not obey.”
    Thought #1: Was any action taken against the other child who “instructed” Eric? If any child here is ‘sexualized’ it would more likely be the other kid, although much more likely it’s just semi-normal child’s play. However, there is a problem when the coercive person does not suffer for his action and the coerced person does. In the case of children, a telling-off would be enough for a first offence.
    Thought #2: I would think that a sure way to “sexualize” children is to assume their child behaviour is actually motivated by an adult mentality.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation