It has been said that certain persons are grooming children for certain purposes. I believe this bolsters that case.
It seems very bizarre to me that every male who has anything to do with children is presumed to be a pedofile unless he’s cleared through a criminal records check at his expense, yet here’s a whole group of “educators” who are essentially saying that sex with children is OK. This is a clear example of one law for the little people and another law for the special people aka those who have government connections.
Rather than a chastity diaper, I’d suggest the following option: http://www.antirape.co.za/
A few of these “educators” having experience with the Rape aXe device described at the above web site might still harbor deviant thoughts but be unable to act on them.
As is usually the case on such topics, my comment got caught in the spam filter.
When famed bank robber Willie Sutton was asked why he robbed banks, he responded “Because that’s where the money is.”
To pedophiles, schools are where the children are.
everyday I see things that are beyond words. the captcha code is getting closer to what I think about this, fu3rcp. no kidding.
U of T has a Centre for Sexual Diversity Studies? Has anyone ever counted the number of students and the budgets in the “Studies” versus, say, STEM subjects?
What normalizing ‘gay’ wasn’t enough?
U of T is really out of control.
There is no doubt in my mind that both Toronto centric CBC and CTV have made the scary decision to ignore this information.
Scary!!
As I said over on the authors comments, I see nothing wrong here that couldn’t be fixed with a few drums of tar and half a ton of feathers.
This does appear to be where the modern Lefty is going. Child molestation and bestiality. Those used to be the punch lines of a million “Little Johnny” jokes, but now its just a description of their policy platform at OISE.
It seems us knuckle draggers on the Right, us Nazis, us violent rednecks, us Intolerant Reactionary Victorians have been so accommodating to the Progressives that they have used up the shock factor of anything regarding normal sex or even gay sex, and now all that’s left for them to exploit is the far reaches of the abnormal.
Maybe we should reconsider this while not showing up to riot thing.
Our society is becoming very sick.
Maybe it is time for a reset.
Just curious..
In the last two Ontario elections, two groups, the EFTO (which we know is the elementary teachers’ union) and “Working Families” (which is, IMHO, an NDP front) saturated the airwaves with anti-Tory ads.
Just wondering, if next go round, any Ontario readers here will contribute to a 3rd party organization dedicated to airing ads that publicize events such as these, or the close connection between Levin and Wynne. Remember, that unlike federal politics, in Ontario elections, there are no 3rd party advertising restrictions, nor restrictions on contributions by individuals, corporations, or unions.
perverts…
The prison population has more morals…that’s why they have to guard the perverts so carefully….the general population takes them out promptly.
I briefly lived in the GTO.
Most people I met there were/are conservative, but they just don’t know it.
They have yet to figure out that the ‘tolerant’ theme is a one way street.
I made a point of forwarding the Trudeau/Wynne/Levin pic from the parade. Most of the responses were horror at just how intolerant I am.
When I respond that, well, hey, it’s your children in the system, you get the Homer Simpson blink/stare. It would be funny, except it’s not.
ah joey my bible thumping friend, you forgot to throw in “abortions” and ‘atheists’, or did the RC child molesting priests tell you to go easy this time around
So being the atheist you are, nme666, where along this sad trajectory do you arbitrarily draw the line regarding sexual perversions? If not homosexuality or pedophilia is it bestiality or necrophilia or do you have any standards at all?
Personally from all the evidence I’ve seen humanity seems to be happiest; one man one woman in a committed relationship. And doyawanna know something I don’t need a Bible to see it either.
Yes, ignore the countless cases of public school teachers, many of them married, that are having sexual relationships with young students and playing tongue touching games with kindergarteners, and then there’s Penn State, yet you choose to focus strictly on priests which is narrow minded and, if you have children, could put them at risk of being abused by other groups that have much higher incidences of abuse towards children.
Recently, a male teacher was only given 30 days in prison after it was discovered he had been having sexual relations with a male student for three years. Worse still, the other teachers wrote letters of support for the male teacher, who was suspended with pay. Your comment suggests that “religious circles” are the number one abusers, when in fact, this is not true. Abusing power and trust is despicable behavior
“Most child abusers have one thing in common, and it’s not piety—it’s preexisting relationships with their victims. That includes priests and ministers and rabbis, of course, but also family members, friends, neighbors, teachers, coaches, scout leaders, youth-group volunteers, and doctors. According to federal studies, three quarters of abuse occurs at the hands of family members or others in the victim’s “circle of trust.” “The fundamental premise here is that those who abuse children overwhelmingly seek out situations where they have easy and legitimate access to children,” he said. “These kinds of positions offer a kind of cover for these offenders.”
Very well said.
It does appear that someone has some sensitive issues of some sort that cut deep.
He finds this all amusing. Forget him.
Crap! I feel the need to go wash after just scanning the article.
It has been said that certain persons are grooming children for certain purposes. I believe this bolsters that case.
It seems very bizarre to me that every male who has anything to do with children is presumed to be a pedofile unless he’s cleared through a criminal records check at his expense, yet here’s a whole group of “educators” who are essentially saying that sex with children is OK. This is a clear example of one law for the little people and another law for the special people aka those who have government connections.
Rather than a chastity diaper, I’d suggest the following option:
http://www.antirape.co.za/
A few of these “educators” having experience with the Rape aXe device described at the above web site might still harbor deviant thoughts but be unable to act on them.
As is usually the case on such topics, my comment got caught in the spam filter.
When famed bank robber Willie Sutton was asked why he robbed banks, he responded “Because that’s where the money is.”
To pedophiles, schools are where the children are.
everyday I see things that are beyond words. the captcha code is getting closer to what I think about this, fu3rcp. no kidding.
U of T has a Centre for Sexual Diversity Studies? Has anyone ever counted the number of students and the budgets in the “Studies” versus, say, STEM subjects?
What normalizing ‘gay’ wasn’t enough?
U of T is really out of control.
There is no doubt in my mind that both Toronto centric CBC and CTV have made the scary decision to ignore this information.
Scary!!
As I said over on the authors comments, I see nothing wrong here that couldn’t be fixed with a few drums of tar and half a ton of feathers.
This does appear to be where the modern Lefty is going. Child molestation and bestiality. Those used to be the punch lines of a million “Little Johnny” jokes, but now its just a description of their policy platform at OISE.
It seems us knuckle draggers on the Right, us Nazis, us violent rednecks, us Intolerant Reactionary Victorians have been so accommodating to the Progressives that they have used up the shock factor of anything regarding normal sex or even gay sex, and now all that’s left for them to exploit is the far reaches of the abnormal.
Maybe we should reconsider this while not showing up to riot thing.
Debauching childhood and exposing children to special interest perversion seems to be a universal theme of “progressive” social regressives entrenched in public education planning.
Fourth graders taught about ‘pimps’ and ‘mobstaz’ in Louisiana “ebonics sensitivity” conditioning
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/09/19/fourth-graders-taught-about-pimps-and-mobstaz-in-louisiana/#ixzz2fRS6BBEU
Our society is becoming very sick.
Maybe it is time for a reset.
Just curious..
In the last two Ontario elections, two groups, the EFTO (which we know is the elementary teachers’ union) and “Working Families” (which is, IMHO, an NDP front) saturated the airwaves with anti-Tory ads.
Just wondering, if next go round, any Ontario readers here will contribute to a 3rd party organization dedicated to airing ads that publicize events such as these, or the close connection between Levin and Wynne. Remember, that unlike federal politics, in Ontario elections, there are no 3rd party advertising restrictions, nor restrictions on contributions by individuals, corporations, or unions.
perverts…
The prison population has more morals…that’s why they have to guard the perverts so carefully….the general population takes them out promptly.
I briefly lived in the GTO.
Most people I met there were/are conservative, but they just don’t know it.
They have yet to figure out that the ‘tolerant’ theme is a one way street.
I made a point of forwarding the Trudeau/Wynne/Levin pic from the parade. Most of the responses were horror at just how intolerant I am.
When I respond that, well, hey, it’s your children in the system, you get the Homer Simpson blink/stare. It would be funny, except it’s not.
ah joey my bible thumping friend, you forgot to throw in “abortions” and ‘atheists’, or did the RC child molesting priests tell you to go easy this time around
So being the atheist you are, nme666, where along this sad trajectory do you arbitrarily draw the line regarding sexual perversions? If not homosexuality or pedophilia is it bestiality or necrophilia or do you have any standards at all?
Personally from all the evidence I’ve seen humanity seems to be happiest; one man one woman in a committed relationship. And doyawanna know something I don’t need a Bible to see it either.
Yes, ignore the countless cases of public school teachers, many of them married, that are having sexual relationships with young students and playing tongue touching games with kindergarteners, and then there’s Penn State, yet you choose to focus strictly on priests which is narrow minded and, if you have children, could put them at risk of being abused by other groups that have much higher incidences of abuse towards children.
Recently, a male teacher was only given 30 days in prison after it was discovered he had been having sexual relations with a male student for three years. Worse still, the other teachers wrote letters of support for the male teacher, who was suspended with pay. Your comment suggests that “religious circles” are the number one abusers, when in fact, this is not true. Abusing power and trust is despicable behavior
“Most child abusers have one thing in common, and it’s not piety—it’s preexisting relationships with their victims. That includes priests and ministers and rabbis, of course, but also family members, friends, neighbors, teachers, coaches, scout leaders, youth-group volunteers, and doctors. According to federal studies, three quarters of abuse occurs at the hands of family members or others in the victim’s “circle of trust.” “The fundamental premise here is that those who abuse children overwhelmingly seek out situations where they have easy and legitimate access to children,” he said. “These kinds of positions offer a kind of cover for these offenders.”
Very well said.
It does appear that someone has some sensitive issues of some sort that cut deep.
He finds this all amusing. Forget him.
Crap! I feel the need to go wash after just scanning the article.