27 Replies to “Marketing Campaigns Of The Apocalypse”

  1. “…a tasteless PR stunt”.
    How would they know? Possibly their trying to sell German ketchup stocks. Hypocrites all of them.
    PS: Does it say In the Koran that eating human flesh is forbidden like pig? Some “food for thought”.

  2. Knight 99: Wasted no time busting out the hate against Islam.
    The bible doesn’t mention anything about not eating people. That, of course, doesn’t mean anything at all.

  3. It’s just one of those acts one knows is “inately” wrong. Can you donate boils, corns and warts?

  4. “Yavo, Gunther never smiled much, that’s why ve call zis dish sauerkraut.”

  5. Humans are equal to animals.
    We eat animals.
    Why not humans?
    – Progressive’s playbook, trying to disgust gullible humans (curiously mostly female) into becoming vegetarians.
    Fallacy being is that if God wanted us to be vegetarians, he would have made us into cows, not humans.
    Don’t fall for it.

  6. Progressive’s playbook, trying to disgust gullible humans (curiously mostly female) into becoming vegetarians.
    The funny part is that the Young Ladies don’t have the right parts.. we don’t eat cows..we eat Steers…bet they don’t even Know what parts steers have..
    They must be gelding Asses

  7. First add generated by Google at the bottom of the article:
    Halifax Restaurant Coupon
    Save 50-90% On Top-Rated Halifax Restaurants. Tasty Deals Every Day!
    Dealfind.com/HalifaxRestaurants
    God the Krauts are weird.
    “Bernd Jurgen Brandes, a computer technician, volunteered to be eaten by Meiwes in 2001. The cannibal chopped off Brandes’ penis and ate it after cooking it in garlic, salt and pepper.
    I hate garlic.

  13. At least the ad has caused outrage; that’s something to be hopeful about.
    Dark Night, aka ?/ “The bible doesn’t mention anything about not eating people.”
    Um, well, it does say that our bodies are the temples of the Holy Spirit and makes it pretty clear that we are to honour them as such, which would assume our not mutilating them or cutting off body parts (‘only acceptable if your hand or eye will cause you to sin), especially to munch on.
    Our Creator has given us an abundance of edible plants and animals. ‘No need to begin raiding the human body parts pantry which is the domain of sickos like Jeffrey Dahmer. set you free’s got it right: This is an attempt to equate animals and humans in the food chain. We eat animals, why not humans? It’s sick.
    ‘Trust the decadent Germans to want to normalize such a grizzly practice. It boggles the mind: Bach and Beethoven on the one hand and a restaurant serving human body parts on the other.

  16. Just another publicity stunt by some starving performance artist trying to make a name. Germany is full of them.

  19. Dark Knight: The bible doesn’t mention anything about not eating people. That, of course, doesn’t mean anything at all.
    If you know the Bible that well, DK, then you know that where it is mentioned it is God’s punishment for the vilest of sin in His eye.
    Haven’t heard a prophet warning recently that God is cursing Berlin.
    My guess is that there is more injecting and inhaling going on than cooking and eating.

  20. What fun!
    The Romans didn’t call them barbarians for nothing.
    “PS: Does it say In the Koran that eating human flesh is forbidden like pig? Some “food for thought”.”
    And yet again, SDA proves that Godwin’s Law is increasingly outdated. Islam has replaced the Nazis AND you no longer need to factor in a lenghty discussion for its introduction. On this SDA thread, it was the first reply.
    So I decided to have a look and typed in cannibalism and koran into the google toolbar. Not very difficult to do. Turns out it does mention Cannibalism in 49:12. Apparently you shouldn’t eat the flesh of your dead brother or something. Given Islam’s focus on global brotherhood, I don’t think they were going for a literal meaning. But I may be wrong.
    All the same, I am surprised our self-proclaimed scholars of Islam (no shortage here) don’t even bother doing basic research (even just googling). Given the way our self-proclaimed scholars know about Islam, particularly its apparent secret agenda for global domination, I am surprised that they haven’t actually read the koran in detail. Living off second-hand information these days, eh?
    “”Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Abul Kasem, an ex-Muslim who is the author of hundreds of articles and several books on Islam including, Women in Islam””
    I would take him about as seriously as I would take an ex-Christian. No bias and all that.
    Read the article by the way. When he speaks of Islamic cannibalism, its pretty obvious he’s talking about sectarian violence.
    “During the last few decades we have witnessed Islamic cannibalism right, front and center. The most recent event was the Iran-Iraq war, in which millions of Muslims were killed, not by the infidels (kafirs) but by Muslims.”
    I don’t think he was talking about actual cannibalism. However, when you do post links to articles, you would be better off reading them first.
    “We saved that continent from themselves twice, why?”
    So that they wouldn’t get here?

  21. Well it looks like aka Darknight has taken of his by day street cloths and finally morfed into the Bat Suit.
    Thanks DA – You helped answer the Islamic Cannibal question, that’s how we help each other around here.
    I’m not sure that it is “obvious” about secretarian violence though, you know how these books are up for interpitation, no? Example some would say that Mohammed’s marriage to 9 year old AIsha was pedophiliac and then again others possibly even yourself would say not. I argue that it was, but there is always room for interpitation by the devotee.

  25. Anyone with a strong stomach can search out the original article(couple years back). It’s pretty morbid.

  26. “I’m not sure that it is “obvious” about secretarian violence though”
    Out of context. That line was directed at the guy who posted a link that, he claimed, was about muslim cannibalism; it was actually about muslim sect on sect violence.
    The following line is straight out of the article:
    “During the last few decades we have witnessed Islamic cannibalism right, front and center. The most recent event was the Iran-Iraq war, in which millions of Muslims were killed, not by the infidels (kafirs) but by Muslims.”
    Obvious enough, no?

  27. DA>
    There you are, I thought we lost you again, was getting worried.
    Agreed then – These holy books are up for interpretation via the differing views of allegories within their texts. Thanks for proving that point for me.
    What we don’t seem to agree on is my allegation that Mohammed was a pedophile by his marriage to a 9 year old girl. There is not allot of room for interpretation there I’m afraid, and you just won’t win that argument. I’m very sorry.

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation