Category: Trump

Stick a fork in it, it’s done

NAFTA: The end is nigh:

…the issue of Canada and Mexico making trade agreements with other nations (especially China), while brokering their NAFTA position with the U.S. as a strategic part of those agreements, is a serious issue that cannot adequately be resolved while the U.S. remains connected to NAFTA.
So you see, if you just look at the pure economics of the options, and you remember that President Trump is constitutionally antithetical to anyone having influence over U.S. interests other than the American people inside the United States, you can clearly see there is only one-way this entire process ends.
President Trump will end NAFTA.

Let Me Rewrite That Narrative For You

Having listened to Dennis Prager for over a decade, I’d long ago learned that most Leftists are incapable of listening to, let alone understanding the views of conservatives. They’re so deeply entrenched in their own echo chamber that they seem impervious to any ideas that don’t meet the officially sanctioned Leftist narrative.

Traveling through SFO the other day, I saw the book, How Democracies Die, for sale. I had a strong suspicion of what it was about but held judgement until I did some research. Here is an extract:

America failed the first test in November 2016, when we elected a president with a dubious allegiance to democratic norms.

Donald Trump’s surprise victory was made possible not only by public disaffection but also by the Republican party’s failure to keep an extremist demagogue within its own ranks from gaining the nomination.

How serious is the threat now? Many observers take comfort in our constitution, which was designed precisely to thwart and contain demagogues like Trump. Our Madisonian system of checks and balances has endured for more than two centuries. It survived the civil war, the great depression, the Cold War and Watergate. Surely, then, it will be able to survive Trump.

Here’s another article along the same line.

So, without opening the book, how did I possibly know that it would be a highly biased screed against Donald Trump? Please refer to the first paragraph above.

Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt purport to be political scientists. The second half of that profession involves science, which is all about research and inquiry. Being a scientist does not mean having predetermined Leftist views and then forcing all data to adhere to those views.

If anyone ever gets the opportunity to interview either of these men, please ask them the following questions:

  1. Is directing police and spy agencies to secretly monitor private conversations of your political opponents good or bad for democracy?
  2. If senior members of the top police agency of a country decide that they will use their power to defeat a duly elected president, is that good or bad for democracy?
  3. If the mainstream media mostly takes the side of one political party and constantly attacks another political party good or bad for democracy?
  4. If most members of the mainstream media ignore facts coming out about the corruption and alleged illegal behavior of one political party, is that good or bad for democracy?
  5. If a political leader, and those around her, are found to have accepted large donations from foreign entities, is that good or bad for democracy?
  6. If people of one particular political stripe constantly call “racism” over everything they disagree with, is that good or bad for democracy?
  7. If students and others are permitted to silence any speech on college campuses that they disagree with, is that good or bad for democracy?
  8. If two Harvard professors, in the Political Science faculty of Harvard University, write a 320 page book about how democracies die and ignore all of the questions listed above, does that indicate they are more Leftist Political Hacks than scientists?

Now Is The Time At SDA When We Juxtapose!

Financial Post, Feb. 9thThe consequential upset from the proposed new legislation will continue to disrupt and erode the regulatory climate in Canada while reducing the pre-eminence of the regulatory powers of the NEB or the new, proposed CER. These regulatory changes will continue to pose fundamental uncertainties and will make even more problematic effective and efficient determinations of energy projects judged to be in the national interest.
New York Times, Feb. 10th The Trump administration has adopted new limits on the use of “guidance documents” that federal agencies have issued on almost every conceivable subject, an action that could have sweeping implications for the government’s ability to sue companies accused of violations.

Art Of The Deal


We’re doomed.
From the comments“As far as the cancelling of NAFTA is concerned it might be a good idea to wake Canadians up to the fact that Liberals are no friend of industry and freedom of anything never mind trade. The current “Progressive” Liberal government and even more progressive NDP governments are doing their best to stop resource trade from reaching our eastern and western shores. So why should Trump worry about our trade, especially if his crude oil refiners can get our oil at a discount. It is not Trumps fault that we can’t get pipeline to our coasts.”

Your Moral And Intellectual Superiors

The Fake News Awards are out: and the Losers are…

1) The New York Times’ Paul Krugman claiming markets would ‘never’ recover from Trump presidency
2) ABC News’ Brian Ross’ bungled report on former national security adviser Michael Flynn
3) CNN report that the Trump campaign had early access to hacked documents from WikiLeaks
4) TIME report that Trump removed a bust of Martin Luther King, Jr. from the Oval Office
5) The Washington Post’s Dave Weigel tweeting that Trump’s December rally in Pensacola, Florida, wasn’t packed with supporters
6) CNN’s video suggesting Trump overfed fish during visit with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe
7) CNN’s retracted report claiming Anthony Scaramucci-Russia ties
8) Newsweek report that Polish First Lady Agata Kornhauser-Duda did not shake Trump’s hand
9) CNN report that former FBI Director James Comey would dispute President Trump’s claim he was told he was not under investigation
10) The New York Times report that the Trump administration had hidden a climate-change report

Along with the GOP, whose website crashed immediately under the traffic.

Big Red Button

I’m old enough to remember when global nuclear war was just a tweet away…

South Korean President Moon Jae-in credited U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday for helping to spark the first inter-Korean talks in more than two years, and warned that Pyongyang would face stronger sanctions if provocations continued. South Korean President Moon Jae-in credited U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday for helping to spark the first inter-Korean talks in more than two years, and warned that Pyongyang would face stronger sanctions if provocations continued.

The Insularity & Insanity of the Anti-Trumpers

David Brooks has been no fan of Donald Trump. He still isn’t. But he has written a very interesting column that challenges the sincerity of his fellow Anti-Trumpers:

I mention these inconvenient observations because the anti-Trump movement, of which I’m a proud member, seems to be getting dumber. It seems to be settling into a smug, fairy tale version of reality that filters out discordant information. More anti-Trumpers seem to be telling themselves a “Madness of King George” narrative: Trump is a semiliterate madman surrounded by sycophants who are morally, intellectually and psychologically inferior to people like us.

Navigation