14 Replies to “Your Moral And Intellectual Superiors”

  1. Despite the MSM’s best effort, the news is out there. All they are doing is destroying what little credibility they have left.

    320-218.

    1. Once again, the election predictors have calculated, to a 90 percent confidence level or above, that Trump cannot possibly win.

      People with money at stake in the affair have different ideas. They give Joe a two-thirds chance of managing to succeed in usurping the presidency—at most. The know-it-alls are spotting Joe around 350 electoral votes. He’ll get around 300, if he’s lucky—and that includes the margin of fraud.

      President Trump’s one-in-three chance of keeping his job is the chance that good Americans will show up to riot—figuratively on Tuesday, literally if still necessary after that.

      1. It will be necessary after Tuesday. All these polls and predictions are priming people to believe there’s no chance Trump will win. Then, when he does, it’ll be because he cheated. Therefore, they gotta burn down the whole damn thing.

        1. If they do it will be a repeat of 2016 where Hillary had a temper tantrum, claimed it was impossible for her not to be 50 points ahead, with polls showing she had a 99.999% chance of winning, so it must be nefarious, and anyway she won the popular vote, so here sedition, I mean resistance, was warranted, though not literally without faked evidence.

          IOW they will have once again learned nothing of their rejection at the hands of voters.

        2. No matter who wins, there will be rioting in the streets. I fear, without hyperbole, that the US might actually descend into a shooting civil war where the military fires upon civilians.

  2. Liberals won’t look at the Bobulinski interview but they know that it is Russian propaganda.
    Imagine how much Russian propaganda they could spot in it if they screwed up enough courage to watch the video!

    Liberals won’t watch the Bobulinski video because they are intellectual cowards and are afraid of what they might see.

    1. not to worry foobert, we are still 100 times more intelligent than those we have to deal with.

  3. It would be a great time to be in journalism if someone had brain and was even slightly honest.

    1. That is the problem isn’t it. No one with a brain goes into journalism. They are the lowest of the low.

  4. Wanna have some fun? Try this exercise on CNN’s website:

    1. Click on the magnifying glass
    2. Type in Bobulinski in the search terms
    3. Profit!

  5. The media has adopted the Sergeant Schultz method of communication:
    “I see nothing! I hear nothing! I know nothing!”

Navigation