14 Replies to “From the Land of No Diversity of Opinion”

  2. No Turds in the Bay… City of flat-liners… How come all the Trump ladies are attractive “Keepers” and the Communist thing (Nancy) looks like Stalin’s old house keeper

  3. The title and by line tells all we need to know about Sturat (sp.). Broke-ass dumb moron. Why give him time?

  4. I can’t remember where it was published, it was 15 years ago. It was photographs that compared the Left-wing/Liberal/Democrat women with the Right-wing/Conservative/Republican women.
    The former made you want to swear off women forever while the latter were all hot babes.

    Captcha was about fire hydrants. Must have outed me as an old dog.

  5. When the heads of leftists explode it is very dangerous…..all you see flying around is bone shards….nothing else….just bone. Kind of like shrapnel from a hand grenade.

  6. “who asserts that everyone who isn’t a Communist sympathizer must be a racist”

    Gee, sounds a lot like a Trump supporters who insist that anyone who does not support Trump is a leftwing loonie.
    What is it they say about glass houses?

    1. Evidence was provided of the argument but your retort gives none whatsoever.
      What is it they say about begging your own question. It’s a fallacy and the person advancing is forwarding illogic.
      So is diversion, as is projection, and ad hominem. Pee Wee Herman school of political argument in evidence.
      The germane issue is you do have an amazing ability to totally miss the point, that an article uses opinion as evidence.
      No matter their argument while only exposing their bias. What about whataboutism?
      Dems support green new raw deals to give government even more power, based on specious science and partisan pandering.
      They also support outlawing private healthcare, stacking SCOTUS with partisans in robes.
      Sounds left wing to me even if doesn’t to you; but then again unlike others you provide zero evidence, once again.
      What do they say about glass houses? I say let the voters decide with a full airing of party platforms; they deserve it you know.

      1. Evidence is plenty from posters on this forum who constantly accuse me of not being a conservative because I think Trump is a crooked, incompetent narcissist (as if my opinion of Trump has anything to do with my opinion on government policies).

        The entire point of of this op is to point to ridiculous extremists that reject people that do not think exactly like them. The parallel with posters on this forum was too obvious to ignore.

        1. Oh, look, the pidgie is back on the chessboard. Shoo, shoo, pidgie!

          I have never accused you of not being a conservative. I have accused you of not being able to think or conduct research. I’ve tried to engage, and you regularly ignore that with which you disagree.

          The point is that tolerance tends to be on our side. You disagree? Fine. I’ll try to use logic and arguments to change your mind. When you prove that that won’t work, I fall back on ridicule (that’s the current phase). The second link is to a site that is as intolerant as can be. You don’t agree with me? You’re a racist, and I don’t talk to racists. Total intolerance.

          2. Thanks Gerry,

            For those who are new and lurk but don’t want to join the discussion. If someone newly arrives, and sees what might appear as reasonable questions going unanswered, it makes the rest of us look bad. One or two comments that aren’t directly mean towards the questioner show that this is just the newest installation of an older debate, and that Tim/AllenA/UnMe are pigeons playing chess (strutting around knocking over pieces, crapping on the board, and knowing that they’ve won {though they’re actually not understanding the rules by which the rest of us are playing.} )

Proudly powered by WordPress & Skyrocket Themes

MENU

Navigation