He Admires Their Basic Dictatorship

Blue screen.

More: Liberals filibuster opposition motion to get details of Trudeau family’s speaking fees

40 Replies to “He Admires Their Basic Dictatorship”

  1. Curating the official record; so that you have the MOST UNETHICAL GOVERNMENT EVAH!

    For good measure bribe the “official propagandists” aka “journalists” with $600 million;
    and the WE story detailing their SELF DEALING will never get out!

    Count de Monet was just ahead of his time… 🙂

    Prosit!!

    Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group “True North

  2. How does parliament justify censoring themselves?
    Other than Canadian voters are stupid enough to put up with it?

    1. Yes they will. Because “he’s a dreamy dreamboat!”
      Canadian voters – especially in the GTA and Montreal – are that shallow.

  3. In the British parliamentary system a prime minister can do whatever he wants if he has a majority. There are few things to stop an out of control leader.

    That is what we have here…. An out of control ‘minority ‘ librano government. The corruption is rampant aided and abetted by the equally corrupt ndp.

    Sickening

  4. Progressives (i.e. libs, ndp, greens) have only one agenda: normalizing depravity. They serve evil because it’s easier than living a righteous, moral life.

  5. From 11 hours ago…

    The Liberals are sinking if one were to believe the latest polls. Nick Nanos looks like he is disappointed, very disappointed:

    TREND LINE: Trudeau’s support craters after WE scandal, polling trajectory now favours Conservatives (06:38)
    https://youtu.be/MwB8-h7wSkU

    1. L- “He admires their basic dictatorship” leads to the corollory.

      How much do they(the C.C.P.) admire Trudeau’s basic dictatorship ?

      Trudeau’s Long March through Canadian institutions, is it simply a version of Maoist theory and practice? The Panic-demic, the shutdown of Parliament, the threat to censor the internet, the growing political control of the private sector, the governing by decree. Is the C.C.P. virus, a gift of opportunity from one fellow totalitarian to another?

      Who will answer ? Who will even ask ?

  6. So, Pierre draws the adept Orwellian analogy, and 200 or so people who got the deeper Orwellian point tweeted about it.
    A groundswell of support. Hoorah. Cough.
    Meanwhile, Blackie and Jughead party at the lake.
    Anyone feel disenfranchised yet? Hello? Hello?

    1. You’re Conservative?

      Assume the position.

      Bend over and keep your mouth shut.

      Anonymous internet diatribes are allowed on limited sites.

  7. Well you just gotta know, the orange touqued Marge Simpson will fellate the moron once more, Hard to believe we have come to this point in a once, noble country. This moron is so sick. I cannot even stomache my Toronto sister in law showing up to Thanksgiving dinner knowing she voted for this traitor and it’s enablers. Gosh I wish Polievre had run for leader.

    1. Bartinsky…you
      “wish Polievre had run for leader”

      So do I.
      I think the Laurentian elite would not approve because even though Pierre has an Ontario seat and is perfectly bilingual he was born in Calgary Alberta and went to the U of C.

      Il n’est pas Laurentian!!!!
      Shocking, most shocking!
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Poilievre

    2. I would suggest that Poilievre, while it appears on the first sight that of course he would be a good leader, he has more freedom to hammer on the idiot in charge and his corrupt party of useless socialist/fascists without reservation.

      Me thinks that the rest of those that call themselves in the parliament are just as happy so they don’t need to expose themselves to such arguments, a completely, utterly useless bunch of nothingness.

      If you think about this too long it can get you really, really mad.
      It also makes you feel impotent other than writing about it, there is not much else to do,

  8. Boy, if Harper tried this he would have been run out of town on a rail. Media tolerance for Liberal missteps seems infinite.

  9. Coulda had Max, but too many people were too scared to try something different. You balked when you had a chance for change, and you ended up with more of the same.

    1. “Coulda had Max, but too many people were too scared to try something different.”

      No you Couldn’a. Other people weren’t scared, they were just a better judge of Character than you and the other Maxbots were.

      1. And how did “being a better judge of character” work out for you?

        Did Scheer win?
        Did you get rid of Trudeau?
        Did you get a smaller government?
        Did any of the predictions you super genius judges of character make come to pass?

        Methinks you are doing Dunning Krueger perfectly. Keep up your good work.

        1. a)Did Scheer win?
          b)Did you get rid of Trudeau?
          c)Did you get a smaller government?
          d)Did any of the predictions you super genius judges of character make come to pass?

          a)No, he lost. That’s on you and the sycophants who voted Bernier.
          But The CPC had a plurality of the vote and increased it’s seat count.
          Still Andy Scheer resigned because he was a man of good character. Bernier didn’t resign. He has no sense of responsibility.
          b)No, Trudeau is the Prime Minister. That’s on you and the sycophants who voted Bernier. We told you a vote for Bernier was a vote for Trudeau. We were right.
          c)No we didn’t. We got Trudeau, thanks to you.

          d)
          We predicted that a vote for Bernier was a vote for Trudeau. We were right.
          We predicted that Bernier was going to lose his own seat and get no new ones. We were right.
          We predicted that Bernier could promise anything he wanted because he knew that he’d never have to deliver. We were right.
          We predicted that the CPC was the only party that had a chance to beat Trudeau. We were right.

      2. you still working for the CCP, Ooz, and do they feed you at that wet market?

        Try again Ooz, Max is a conservative, a real conservative, and you are an idiot ,plus cuckservative. Have you even read the PPC platform?

    1. ditto. the terminally stupid who are unwilling to stop voting the socialist line have brought us to the brink of the complete destruction of Canada and a total loss of freedom.

      1. You A-holes split the right vote and prevented the only people who could have defeated the Liberals from winning.
        You are the terminally stupid. You are the ones who bought a pig-in-a-poke, the pie in the sky.
        Trudeau and everything he does is on you.

        1. Ooz take some math classes, that “split” cost andy cuck 5-6 seat, and even if andy cuck had same number of seats as the turd, the incumbent still gits first crack at the job. Your last post is a demonstration of just how STUPID you are.

          Kenin’s post says it all Dunning Kreuger!!!

        2. Ford defeated the Liberals in Ontario, and….. We still get the same shit government.

          1. For the most part, I agree. Still no beer or wine or liquor corner stores, there is no cannabis store in our city of 15,000 and there seems to be endless handouts – millions to Ford to build EVs. At least there has been a stop to covering up the countryside with solar panels and bird choppers.

        3. OZ, there is no right vote to split, have you not been paying attention, one of these is just like the other.

          1. Vowg, in the last general the CPC got the plurality of the vote.
            noun, plural plu·ral·i·ties.
            the excess of votes received by the leading candidate, in an election in which there are three or more candidates, over those received by the next candidate (distinguished from majority).

  10. Hey moderator. People like NME666, Oz and others who would denigrate and insult should be banned from this site forever. Keep the discussions civilized.

    1. Here you go, Shitbird.
      kate@katewerk.com;
      Now you can e-mail Kate personally to tell her what to do with her own blog.
      Me? I’ve been here as a regular, same nic, since the early oughties.

  11. Weeeelll, I have mixed feelings about this Max V CCP. I spent time trying to convince people that yes Max is a real conservative, but it’s more important to vote the Turd out first, then support Max, cuz I gotta admit I’m no Scheer fan. I would have preferred Max, but was willing to support Scheer and co to get rid of the libs. Well that didn’t work out did it. I really don’t give a fig if Max is from kebek, if he is truly con and he is. Yes I know the Laurentian elite have infiltrated and taken over Government, and we have zero chance of getting it back or getting a fair shake either. I agree about the fake con Ford as well, it’s always a box of chocolates, no matter the winners and losers. Its also unlikely we’ll get the libs out next time either, so what are we to do? No real answers, but we continue to vent on SDA. From my perspective, at least I can commiserate with like minded, who knows, we may do better next time, and I refuse to succumb to the current reality. slapping each other with rhetoric and cussing ain’t productive, but fill yer boots if ya wish. Next time I’ll vote to get the libs out, AGAIN!

  12. His reference to Orwells “1984” is right on. When the left wing book burning pogroms begin, and I quarantee they will, this powerful little volume from 1949 will be near the top of the list. “The truth is only what we tell you it is.” A ministry of Truth to rewrite history would be a great thing for trudope to create to provide work for the thousands who have lost jobs because of his non existent economic skills.

  13. The “circular” reference is also accurate. The Bureaucratic Dictators – the unaccountable senior civil servants – took all the Federal governmental department and agency websites and stuck them all under http://www.gc.ca. Some of the original addresses still exist but only as a means to direct you to the main one. There are a limited number of pages that can be easily found and bookmarked.
    If you’re searching for specific topics for one department or agency, the search engine will bring up results from every other department and agency making it next to impossible to do research. When you do find what looks like the page you need, it then puts you into an endless loop. Each link you click on eventually leads you back to where you started.
    Unless you had the originals bookmarked from 10 years ago (which I had done with most of them) a person trying to start out on his own would be lost and have to pay a (Liberal Party donating) firm for an electronic library and/or on-line reference software.

Navigation