15 Replies to “Social Disease”

  1. The vitriol of the true believers must not be polling well with anybody else.

    Push them to start banning accounts – not just clean up after them.

  2. They have just realized that it is a bad look for them. And, for their ardent supporters too.

    I don’t think anyone is going to change their minds over the President catching covid, but I guess if enough of the left are allowed to profess their heartfelt desire to see him die, it could perhaps sway some of the more “normal” undecided voters? Can’t take that chance right now, with hid’n Biden no where to be seen or heard.

  3. I hope the voters in the US know if they vote democrat they are voting in Heels Up Harris as their president. Joe Biden will not even be lucid in three months.

  4. So what did NPR’s expert tweet?

    “Meanwhile, responses to
    @TwitterComms’ announcement is a laundry list of people who routinely experience actual DEATH THREATS, doxxing, racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, fat phobic, ableist, etc. abuse, etc., on the platform. Every day. Who have reported it. To no change.”

    In other words, leftist and globalist scum of every stripe—anti-Semites, black supremacists, perverts, man-hating lesbians—think that good people’s condemning them (and reporting their real names and addresses, leaving it to a candid world to judge them appropriately) is the same thing as calling for the death of the President of the United States.

    I have my own way of dealing with people I can’t stand on Twitter. I don’t have an account.

  5. What changed?

    I’m guessing they realise public sentiment is more powerful than hate-filled social media blether and want to make the left appear less deranged.

  6. What changed, precisely?
    What changed may be less precise but nonetheless fundamental. Maybe even thinly hopeful.
    Perhaps a still, small vestige of a drowned voice was vaguely heard by those with barely ears to hear anymore…
    Keep the faith.

  7. Trump deserves as much respect as he gave Clinton when she was sick during campaign:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gT-LfVlTE94&feature=emb_logo

    So given Trump’s own words it it seems that the most appropriate response would be to mock and attack Trump for getting COVID. Fortunately most people do not stoop to Trump’s level.

    SO it is quite ironic to hear Trump supporters complaining about others being rude and intensive towards Trump. Does the phrase “what goes around comes around” mean anything?

    1. Ha bullshit, she was saying how great she felt right after. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6Uz3u2ZuRk
      She “overheated” and was out cold and had to be carried into that SUV. No mention of pneumonia to news networks at the time of the event at all. At worst he was insensitive about her not being able to make it through an event without having to be dragged into her waiting vehicle while everyone surrounding her trying to hide her from cameras haha. Meanwhile people are wishing he dies. No comparison what-so-ever.

      I would say nice try but actually it’s a horrible try, total fail on your part.

      1. Whatever the reason it was most definitely related to her health yet Trump mocked and belittled her. Using Trump rules we should mock and belittle Trump for getting COVID because, after all. it is his own damn fault for constantly refusing to follow he the most basic prevention measures. Do you agree with that at least? i.e. no wishing for death but mocking Trump for getting sick is perfectly acceptable according to Trump rules?

        1. Hillary didn’t have the ovaries to admit she was sick until after questions. Joe says there’s no decline in him. Trump is open about having caught the Wu Flu (aka Chinese Cornonavirus) and taking preventative steps to keep it from becoming more serious. One owns up to problems while they’re still new. Can you see a difference there?

          Trump isn’t being the Black Knight from the Quest for the Holy Grail.

          1. You are kidding right? A close associate of Trump tested positive and instead of going into quarantine like any responsible adult he kept the test secret and continued on as if nothing changed. When you look at the timelines that we now know it is quite likely that Trump deliberately arrived late to the debate so he could avoid the onsite testing because he knew he could be positive at that time.

            Once the cat was out of the bag the seriousness of the problem was downplayed the point where his doctors refused to answer simple questions about his treatments even after being repeatedly asked.

            But none of this changes the fact that Clinton clearly had some medical issues going on and Trump’s response was to mock and belittle her. This response alone means is perfectly appropriate to mock and belittle Trump for getting sick. If Trump can dish it out he should suck it up. Or is that asking too much from your narcissistic snowflake?

  8. Ginsberg is gone, and they now know they cannot stop SCOTUS from labelling them content producers, and then the civil suits can start. They are simply trying to get ahead of the hurricane, after sowing the breeze for so many years.

    1. SCOTUS cannot label them “content producers” without blatantly ignoring the plain text of S.230(c) of the CDA. I mean, they ignore the plain text of the Second and Fifth Amendments, sure, but I thought we were supposed to be against justices legislating from the bench.

      Or is this one of those “it’s not illegal when we do it” things.

Navigation