38 Replies to “SCOTUS – Open Thread”

    1. Can’t stand Maggie Atwood. This Kanuckistanian commie has been given too much by the far-left. Too bad she is too chicken sh*t to disparage Islam.

      1. Atwood’s snooty condescending voice has put me off of reading anything she’s ever written.

        I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that the TV remote control was invented to reduce the time it takes to change channels when she starts talking.

        1. I tried reading one of her books once, it was so boring I could not get into it, so boring I can’t remember which one it was.

    2. When she appears before the Senate, I hope she wears a vivid red dress with white trim and a white hat and shoes to match. Boy, that would send em into a tizzy.

  1. So far as we wait for the president to come out, the American and Canadian media are busy trashing Trump’s nominee.

  2. As widely expected Amy Coney Barrett in the Scalia mold.

    The catholic bashing has already started…I’m sure they’ll ratchet that up to exponential hysteria.

    When does BLM/Antifa light up their burning pyres with wild eyed “Shrek-lich” trolling?

    Prosit!!

    Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
    1st Saint Nicolaas Army
    Army Group “True North

    1. The church hierarchy adore Catholic politicians who champion the worst parts of the Church of Rome’s agenda—its anti-Semitism, its anti-capitalism, its support of uncontrolled Latin immigration to North America, and its contempt for the purer faith of Anglo-American Christians (“Protestants”)

      Expect plenty of limp-wristed priests and lesbian nuns to condemn the nomination with the tacit support of the Holy See. Fortunately President Trump knows better than to listen to them.

      He knows better than to take the word of an Argentinian ponce as that of God incarnate. So too, all possible protest aside, does Barrett.

      1. We’re going to take over the world, Watto Santanya’s Ghost.

        And when we do, you’ll be working in our underground sugar caves.

        I’ll just leave this right here:

        “Zubik said while that list is but a “partial litany” of life issues, there is a “hierarchy of these issues that needs to be recognized.”

        “At the forefront of ‘life issues’ is the right to be born as the right upon which all other ‘life issues’ rest,” he said.

        Zubik said that the primacy of the right to life has been a “consistent Catholic teaching,” and pointed to the words of St. John Paul II, Pope Francis, and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops as examples of this.

        “Precisely because this involves the internal consistency of our message about the value of the human person, the Church cannot be expected to change her position on this question,” Pope Francis wrote of abortion in his apostolic exhortation Evangelii gaudium.”

        https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/bishops-in-us-emphasize-importance-of-life-church-teaching-in-voting-guidances-49492

        “In the new poll, 54 percent of Catholic voters said they are open to voting for President Donald Trump in November, which includes 34 percent who declare that they will definitely back the incumbent. Trump’s biggest support among Catholics comes from the devout: 67 percent say they are sure to vote for him or are open to it. That also describes the position of 52 percent of devout Hispanic Catholics.”

        https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/wither-the-catholic-vote-a-new-poll/

  3. Well this was a surprise…NOT. I hope she’s wearing very thick Armor, along with her tin foil hat. After what they deliberately did to Kavanaugh, she will need nerves of steel. I’m sure she gave it a good deal of thought once PDJT asked her to accept the nomination. Even if she was a descendant of Joan of Arc, and was the daughter of mother Teresa, she will be vilified by the left. I hope they understand the bar level they are setting, and are reminded when they are in power, and nominating an extreme lefty to the SCOTUS. At least if she is successful, the second amendment is safe for the next 20-30 years.
    Even then, the right, and the NRA must be ever vigilant!

    1. What happened to Kavanaugh was that an incompetent Chairman lost Control.. Control that he never HAD, Feinstein lied & he ate it up…. Linsey is the guy that called them ass-hats

      IMHO she is not a treat to ROE (Equal Justice) The RATS will still scream & lie
      The Pro-life group won’t be HAPPY unless they avoid the equal justice clause, NO ABORTION… NO CONDITIONS

      Biden is sitting in the Corner scratching his Balls, wondering how his “MAIL A VOTE FOR JOE” Con will find a SCOTUS Majority… John Roberts has become an also ran….It’s her Court to organize

  4. Rumour has it that tomorrow CNN, Washington Post, and the New Times will publish from an undisclosed source that she held drunken orgies in college and drugged women to have sex with them.

    1. Oh I think you must be mistaken that was 26 time Lolita flight fiend Epstein along with his numerous high and mighty friends/accomplices.

      I believe he was in the docket and not sitting on the bench 🙂

      Apparently, he decided to “move on” with some unreported “assistance” into the hereafter.

      Prosit!!

      Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief
      1st Saint Nicolaas Army
      Army Group “True North

  5. And now for something completely different: https://www.westernstandardonline.com/2020/09/trump-approves-22-billion-railway-between-alaska-and-alberta/
    There’s even a map. Makes shipping solid bitumen feasible and end runs the blockage in Hongcouver for just about any commodity produced in western Kan-eh-duh. I posted about this in detail not too long ago. Everything Asia coming in and going out through this route is shorter, time wise by about 5-6 days, by my calculations. On a bulk carrier rate, that’s considerable savings per load for just about anything that’s produced in western Canada. Freight to Teranna isn’t backlogged/on strike either in Port of Vancouver and it’s too far for bused in “protestors”, unless they want to swim. I’ve swam in the Pacific and PM SFB can attest to the fact his dangly parts end up under his chin after a weekend of surfing in the west coast waters, wet suit or not.

    1. I’m hoping that story shows up SOMEWHERE in Canadian media. It’s the first I’ve heard of it. Great news!!

      1. Some rumblings of this showed up in the US Alaskan news a couple of years ago and I picked up on it. I even measured out the mileage of track needed (from McMurray) and calculated the water distances to Shanghai just for fun. Very little of it was in BC…on purpose. You can chop considerable distance from any western North American ports to Asia, but the real savings are on Canadian commodities, time and distance, plus the employment boost in economically challenged areas of northern western Canada. Should have done this right after the Alaska Highway was put in, but Kan-eh-jian “politics”, eh. Remember “Think Big”? Our “news” is Teranna centric. Period. Even out here.

    2. I truly hope this is the first step in the independence with loose association with the United States by both Alberta and Saskatchewan.

  6. The presstitude is simply despicable.
    I read an article from one of them talking about Barrett’s two adoptive children from Haiti, and the fact that her youngest has a physical disability.
    You would think the writer would be happy that she is proven not to be a racist, and has demonstrated that she treats “People with Disability” equally. That’s checking off two of the liberals’ victim class boxes.
    But no. The writer didn’t say anything about those things. Instead, the writer says many children are illegally taken from Haiti and adopted, and wonders if Barrett’s two are illegal. With zero evidence presented to support her speculation. And, also with zero evidence, she wonders if Barrett’s youngest is mistreated because of the physical disability.
    Another article introduces Barrett by listing her accomplishments and physical measurements, including bust, waist, and hips. How totally irrelevant and demeaning. Sure liberals are the ones respecting all women.

    1. Rest assured that those seven children are the best behaved in Washington.

      Barrett understands a Christian wife’s duty, to honour and obey her husband.

      That would have made it much harder for the children to play Mommy off Daddy. Amy would be not be the one begging for mercy if the children had defied Jesse. She would be the one holding them down while Jesse belted their backsides until they cried, and telling them that they earned every belt and to take it like grown-ups, and matched them to bed without one apologetic word.

      That meant, of course, that Jesse only had to belt them twice at most. The message would have got through.

      “Honour your father and your mother” means when Father tells you to do something, you do it without argument, because Mother will not shield you from the consequences if you do not.

      Children who learn that early in life will never be anything but their fathers’ pride and joy.

      1. You are literally out of your mind.
        Children of truly loving parents listen to them because the children realize the parents really care and know what is best. We raised well behaved children, in the Catholic faith, as Amy and Jesse are doing, and never laid even a hand on them, let alone a belt. And I bet the Barretts never did either.
        Don’t graft the snakes twisting in your mind onto them.

          1. Thanks for replying to his other post here. I can’t reply to them all, and I picked this one because he was trying to hijack my post.
            I doubt very much he ever had a kid, or even had the opportunity to produce one, hence his bitterness against the entire fair sex.

  7. Rumor has it that the Dems already have their henchpeople in Haiti investigating the orphanage. And recruiting a Haitian actress to cry on cue and claim her children were kidnapped.

    OK. You got me. That last part is a prediction.

  8. What are the odds? I guess they had their meetings, and they have 95% certainty she will get through. Must have been about the same number for Lagoa, so what was the deciding factor? Was there a single critical vote that would not have accepted a Lagoa nomination? Was there a Democrat who said “if you don’t pick Lagoa, you can count on me”?

    I wonder what it was.

    This is the October surprise. My feeling right now, is either Barrett is just another Roberts, and she is the one Democrats actually want; or there are going to be a critical last minute about faces from a Senator or two who have promised to vote to confirm.

    1. Defeatist.
      So why are you for Lagoa and against Barrett?
      Barrett could be another Roberts? Consider Barrett clerked for Scalia. Now that President Trump has nominated Barrett, everything else is water under the bridge. The focus ought to be to get her affirmed. Period.

    1. Barrett is too old but she has some daughters that Biden would love to grope. There’s video of Jeff Sessions whacking Biden’s hand when he tried to feel up Session’s grand-daughter.

Navigation