14 Replies to “The WE Charity Scandal Explained”

  1. but, but, the Canadian recusal method of putting a bag over your head & not seeing the Corruption….The whole Civil service are bag heads…..No need for a mask….

    1. Agree. Quick Dick for PM spot. Only problem being he would be the only one there with any sense. Maybe add Kate onto the team as well 🙂

      bverwey

      1. Nope, make Quick head of the CBC. Let him hire a cameraman and an editor (if he wants), fire the rest. Then he can breathe fire on whomever is the PM, whichever the party is in power.

        We need people like Kate and Quick to keep the politicians honest.

  2. The betters know that the MTV need only be given the choice between tolerance for a corrupt government that awards benefits or honest government that would put those benefits at risk.
    They play bad Santa and the MTV buys it every time.

  3. As far as I can tell, Canadians, or at least “liberal Canadians”, are all focused on ridding the world of the Bad Orange Man. WE? What’s that? Oh look! Kamala Shiny Thing!

  4. Quick does the Mercer Rant better than, well, Mercer.
    better editing
    better music
    better anal-o-gees
    and never drops his pants on-the-ground with B-Rae.

  5. The folks south of the border will give the western halves of Washington State, Oregon and California in trade for Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Quick Dick. This week only, I’ll kick in 40 quart jars of Oklahoma moonshine.

  6. I am sittin’ here much, MUCH wiser, now.
    I say give Quick Dick McDick 1.8 billion and the CBC infrastructure and ALL CANADIANS will be much MUCH wiser, not that those bastards out east could handle that!
    Piss be upon them!
    F’n WEXIT already!

  7. Brilliant, just brilliant. Infinitely better explanation than the talking heads on the CBC. have provided.

Navigation