Why this blog?
Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me "what Canadians think". In all that time they never once asked.
This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio -
"You don't speak for me."
email Kate
Goes to a private
mailserver in Europe.
I can't answer or use every tip, but all are appreciated!
Katewerk Art
Support SDA
Paypal:
Etransfers:
katewerk(at)sasktel.net
Not a registered charity.
I cannot issue tax receipts
Favourites/Resources
Instapundit
The Federalist
Powerline Blog
Babylon Bee
American Thinker
Legal Insurrection
Mark Steyn
American Greatness
Google Newspaper Archive
Pipeline Online
David Thompson
Podcasts
Steve Bannon's War Room
Scott Adams
Dark Horse
Michael Malice
Timcast
@Social
@Andy Ngo
@Cernovich
@Jack Posobeic
@IanMilesCheong
@AlinaChan
@YuriDeigin
@GlenGreenwald
@MattTaibbi
Support Our Advertisers
Sweetwater
Polar Bear Evolution
Email the Author
Pilgrim's Progress
How Not To Become A Millenial
Trump The Establishment
Wind Rain Temp
Seismic Map
What They Say About SDA
"Smalldeadanimals doesn't speak for the people of Saskatchewan" - Former Sask Premier Lorne Calvert
"I got so much traffic after your post my web host asked me to buy a larger traffic allowance." - Dr.Ross McKitrick
Holy hell, woman. When you send someone traffic, you send someone TRAFFIC.My hosting provider thought I was being DDoSed. - Sean McCormick
"The New York Times link to me yesterday [...] generated one-fifth of the traffic I normally get from a link from Small Dead Animals." - Kathy Shaidle
"You may be a nasty right winger, but you're not nasty all the time!" - Warren Kinsella
"Go back to collecting your welfare livelihood. - "Michael E. Zilkowsky
1070 am radio..sarnia Ontario,had a talk show back in the day…i would call in and warn peeps that a vote for libs is not good….i hate it when i am right….cheers
WE depreciated two horses.
https://mobile.twitter.com/CharityCanada/status/1287914913617321984
Any accountants out there? Is this on the up and up?
Vivian Krause@FairQuestions
Re: @WEMovement
Important questions here from @CharityCanada
All 10 questions are important. Especially #6 about the “co-founder loophole.”
(Personally… I’m curious about the $4,800 in horses that WE owns.
Which country? Are they work horses or what?
————————————————————————————————————————————-
L- They are getaway horses ! Likely headed for the Badlands of the Big Muddy in S.W. Sask.
to hide out in the cave used in the 19th Century by the Hole-in-the-Wall gang.
The RCMP Musical Ride were sent to investigate but have not been seen or heard from since.
L-This little piggy went to the market,
This little piggy stayed home,
This little piggy had roast beef,
This little piggy had none,
And these little piggies cried We We We all the way to the trough.
Question: Since she totally supports Trudeau and Morneau, what did Chrystia Freeland know about WE, and when did she know it?
Oh, it gets better:
https://twitter.com/JJ_McCullough/status/1287904165822255105
Consider that one will only be able to listen to Justin stutter for one hour and not three.
Jesse Brown of CanadaLand has some really good questions for the Kielburger boys. He’s done some excellent investigative reporting on the WE scandal
https://twitter.com/JesseBrown/status/1287846510852550659?s=20
Apologies for duplicate posting under Readers Tips
The questions won’t matter.
What matters is if one or more witnesses provide testimony that conflicts with another witness.
That leaves a reasonable doubt that someone is hiding and therefore attempting to cover up something that could be detrimental to them or their goals.
In that regard, the witness that has a history of not providing fulsome and unambiguous answers is the one that will generate doubt that this process was above board and this was just honest mistakes being made.
Now who do we know among those giving testimony that tend to offer up a plethora of word salad, or obfuscates when asked a yes or no question?
Addendum
Unless it’s not obvious, the Butts/Telford strategy being employed is to create a plausible defence that the opposition is politicizing this and is on a fishing expedition.
The strategy plays out that the minute sock monkey enters the committee room the PMO will issue a press release about how sock monkey is being open and accountable by providing answers demonstrating how open and accountable his government has been.
Before he even utters one word.
They will explain in said press release how he has responded to all the questions and concerns of Canadians (code for the talking points provided to the CBC to excuse his government’s behaviour) and that the opposition is still trying to inflame Canadians to distract the oh so wonderful job the sock monkey is doing on the COVID pandemic, emphasizing the number of cases in the US (code for anti Trump rhetoric aka TDS).
By Friday the talking point, they hope, is that this is all just an honest mistake, the sock monkey is wonderful, and the opposition are all racist, homophobic, misogynistic, bastards, whereupon a poll will be provided (by Graves) showing a positive approval rating on how sock monkey handled this WE kurfuffle.
Neither an accountant nor a horse person, but I think it’s pretty common for them to end up having a market value significantly less than the purchase price.