The cure:Republican mega-donor buys stake in Twitter and seeks to oust Jack Dorsey – report
8 Replies to “Social Disease”
“Breaking them up” won’t work if the Baby Social Medias just get snapped up by China, Inc., and other globalists. Putting Big Social Media in the hands of good Americans—and making sure it stays there—is the only realistic fix.
Actually, this is one form of regulation with which I agree. For example…Orient Hontai and Canyon Bridge (both Chinese companies) were blocked from making major investments in US companies by the current administration. The same could be done even easier on Twitter since it is a communication infrastructure. You could, actually, solidify such limitations under National Defense.
That being said, I strongly support the application of the RICO Act against a large swath of Silicon Valley. They are actively conspiring with each other to limit capitalistic competition. Say someone comes up with a viable and innovative competitor to Twitter. Pay pal, and various other payment distribution entities will refuse to do business with that start-up challenger out of an “unwritten” agreement with Twitter. Apple is knee deep in this sort of behavior (Just ask GAB). This is textbook blatant violation of the RICO Act.
But, I wouldn’t stop there. Criminal charges would certainly get their attention. But, I think a Class Action civil suit filed by all these abused start-ups would be even more interesting. Potential earnings compounded by a whole boatload of abused start ups would add up to a pretty penny. That would tank revenue from all these conspiring entities and open up the field.
You could also do it under US antitrust regulation. Or, as Federal civil rights violations – the Bill of Rights, remember them? Time to get cracking!
Literally nothing you just posted is correct, factually or legally.
But will his stake be large enough to counter the radical Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal.
For a very long time, the Twitter business plan was about selling control of public discourse through issuing stock.
“All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.” – Edmund Burke
This may be a case of the slogan: “See something. Do something.” In this instance, acting in defence of the Right to Free Speech, the process by which, tested in conflict(battle), bad ideas die, rather than people dying in combat, which is inevitable without free speech.
Additionally, when you have a better idea, Western Civilization, Judeo-Christian morality, liberal democracy, self-government by individual sovereign citizens, accepting both their moral and political responsibility of self-government. Play your trump card, so to speak.
Some have remarked that after the Saudi Prince (Alwaleed bin Talal) purchased a large minority share in Twitter, There emerged a noticable increase in censoring anything critical of Islam, including political Islam. Probably, just a co-incidence… ?
You be the judge
The Twitter mob (mob of twits), whose cancel culture influence outweighs their actual numbers(Cult Marxists/post-modernists, use Stalinist/Maoist tactics). They try to stifle free speech on social media, as they’ve largely succeeded in doing with the (moribund) legacy media.
Since it is mostly men who are drawn to free speech content. Hence why YouTube’s audience is majority male, and I’m guessing Twitter, too. It is how, an alpha male, like Donald Trump is such a force de jour on Twitter.
Thus, it falls to a champion of “the Knights of the Realm” to rally forth, and to slay the Dragon of Chaos, yet again.
Alwaleed bin Talal- give the bum the bum’s rush out of the US!
Jack Dorsey supports the so-called Black Lives Matter racket. He is either mentally ill, or just another techie who is down with “ progressive” fascism, or, most likely, both.
“Breaking them up” won’t work if the Baby Social Medias just get snapped up by China, Inc., and other globalists. Putting Big Social Media in the hands of good Americans—and making sure it stays there—is the only realistic fix.
Actually, this is one form of regulation with which I agree. For example…Orient Hontai and Canyon Bridge (both Chinese companies) were blocked from making major investments in US companies by the current administration. The same could be done even easier on Twitter since it is a communication infrastructure. You could, actually, solidify such limitations under National Defense.
That being said, I strongly support the application of the RICO Act against a large swath of Silicon Valley. They are actively conspiring with each other to limit capitalistic competition. Say someone comes up with a viable and innovative competitor to Twitter. Pay pal, and various other payment distribution entities will refuse to do business with that start-up challenger out of an “unwritten” agreement with Twitter. Apple is knee deep in this sort of behavior (Just ask GAB). This is textbook blatant violation of the RICO Act.
But, I wouldn’t stop there. Criminal charges would certainly get their attention. But, I think a Class Action civil suit filed by all these abused start-ups would be even more interesting. Potential earnings compounded by a whole boatload of abused start ups would add up to a pretty penny. That would tank revenue from all these conspiring entities and open up the field.
You could also do it under US antitrust regulation. Or, as Federal civil rights violations – the Bill of Rights, remember them? Time to get cracking!
Literally nothing you just posted is correct, factually or legally.
But will his stake be large enough to counter the radical Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal.
For a very long time, the Twitter business plan was about selling control of public discourse through issuing stock.
“All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.” – Edmund Burke
This may be a case of the slogan: “See something. Do something.” In this instance, acting in defence of the Right to Free Speech, the process by which, tested in conflict(battle), bad ideas die, rather than people dying in combat, which is inevitable without free speech.
Additionally, when you have a better idea, Western Civilization, Judeo-Christian morality, liberal democracy, self-government by individual sovereign citizens, accepting both their moral and political responsibility of self-government. Play your trump card, so to speak.
Some have remarked that after the Saudi Prince (Alwaleed bin Talal) purchased a large minority share in Twitter, There emerged a noticable increase in censoring anything critical of Islam, including political Islam. Probably, just a co-incidence… ?
You be the judge
The Twitter mob (mob of twits), whose cancel culture influence outweighs their actual numbers(Cult Marxists/post-modernists, use Stalinist/Maoist tactics). They try to stifle free speech on social media, as they’ve largely succeeded in doing with the (moribund) legacy media.
Since it is mostly men who are drawn to free speech content. Hence why YouTube’s audience is majority male, and I’m guessing Twitter, too. It is how, an alpha male, like Donald Trump is such a force de jour on Twitter.
Thus, it falls to a champion of “the Knights of the Realm” to rally forth, and to slay the Dragon of Chaos, yet again.
Alwaleed bin Talal- give the bum the bum’s rush out of the US!
Jack Dorsey supports the so-called Black Lives Matter racket. He is either mentally ill, or just another techie who is down with “ progressive” fascism, or, most likely, both.