That’s not Rigging! That’s “Redistribution”.

Socialist Math: Sen. Bernie Sanders’s supporters angrily stormed out of a caucus here on Monday night, calling the process a “joke” and a “waste of time” after they started out with more than twice as much support as any other candidate, ending up in a five-way tie, with all viable candidates sharing one delegate apiece.

25 Replies to “That’s not Rigging! That’s “Redistribution”.”

  1. Remember last time?
    Seven Coins Flips
    Bernie lost every single one.
    And he came in second by like 0.2%.

  2. Listening to Mark Levin tonight and he stated the obvious. Bernie is not a democrat. IOW the democrat party could take all his delegates and give them to any other candidate and it wouldn’t matter. Bernie should be running as an independent.

    1. You’re right, if Sanders supporters think the nomination process will be democratic they’re obviously in the wrong party.
      Do you remember Herb Tarlek? (WKRP): “He did that to me twenty times. Then I got smart.”
      I’m reminded of Herb when I hear about Sanders supporters complaining.

    2. “Bernie should be running as an independent.”

      My guess is that would be a sure-fire path to electoral oblivion for Sanders. I get a real sense that Americans are more comfortable with their two-party system and I suspect Bernie and his strategists know that too. Ross Perot* and Ralph Nader come to mind.

      The Democrats have only themselves to blame for the rise of Bernie anyway: they have strayed further left and become “woke”, making it possible for a candidate like Sanders to sit easily inside their party rather than as a fringe crank.

      * Though in 1992, Perot was enough of a challenge to make Bush Sr sound like Hillary Clinton in defeat, with all his unbecoming that-man-cost-me-the-presidency whining.

    3. Don’t you mean “Communist Party of America” candidate? Not an independent; just the guy who wants to be the face at the top. But since he is not willing to kill people like his heroes Pol Pot, Stalin, Hitler, Castro, Chavez, Mao, … he will eventually be discarded like Lev Bronstein was. And likely in the same way.

    1. Obviously it was the Russians and Trump colluded . Muller must investigate and they can begin impeachment !

  3. The Democrats used to be able to count, and also used to know how to smoothly rig an election. For example LBJ in Texas. One precinct (or whatever) used to phone in, “how many votes do we need?” And presto, LBJ was in.

    But I admit this is far more entertaining.

    Let us run your health care!
    Let us provide you with reliable energy!
    Let us run the country!

    Pop corn anyone? Before it’s banned.

    1. The Democrats used to be able to count,
      Now they let the Russians do it for them 🙂

    2. Compared to the current crop of Democrat contenders, LBJ was a political titan at a time when the US actually faced real challenges (Vietnam, the Cold War, civil rights).

      About the only thing Joe Biden has in common with LBJ is that they were both once vice-presidents. Beyond that, Biden is a dwarf.

      1. johnson the johnson only had 10 people killed to expedite his path to the top, his own sister and JFK were only 2 of those

        1. Ah, NME666.

          I long ago realized that your raving is the price we all must pay for frequenting SDA.

  4. I will be very surprised if either of those duffus are even on a ballot come Nov. If that is the best the democrats have in America then America will be much better off without the democrat party.

  5. The Globalists have created a nightmare.
    The billionaire class, had no problem with socialism. They had trillions of $$ so tax me more, what do i care, i got lots, and live in a bubble. Call me racist, I need to feel guilty with all this $$ its not fair. They want an EU model world, were they call all the shots and democracy is dead. For the last century, they educated the youth on the virtue of socialism. Now the youth, wants not just socialism, but communism. We don’t want to tax your billions, we want you to stop making money, and take it away. So now the globalist is scared, buying out the Dem party, with the Billions. Trying to move people middle, but it’s too late.

  6. From the Examiner article: “But supporters of other candidates said that this was the process that was set up in advance.”

    I wonder what those supporters had to say about the Electoral College after the 2016 election.

  7. What’s disappointing is that an extreme socialist/communist candidate is in a leading position of the “Democratic” party for the president of the US.
    It’s a life altering situation in the formerly free, democratic republic of the US.

    Apparently, the Venezuelan or any other socialist model, take yer pick, is good for the socialists in the US.
    J. Peterson replied to a question about socialists, paraphrasing, yeah, you would be better then those other ones, good luck with that.
    Socialism is tyranny, totalitarian dictatorship, misery on national scale, because it can’t work it must be forced if it has to kill many.

    That is troubling.
    Well …. what the hell, people that don’t care deserve to get what they want.

  8. So let me get this straight. The campaign workers for the candidate that wants to take actual money away from those who EARN more and give it to those who have LESS are up in arms when the party wants to take candidates who earns more and give them to the candidates that have less? Is this correct?

    Doesn’t sound very self aware. I guess WOKE means something else.

Navigation