10 Replies to “Frank Luntz: America’s Great Divide”

  1. Luntz gives Obama the benefit of the doubt with Obamacare. Once again he proves he’s a paid shill who tours whatever line the powers that be have decided should be promoted on that given day. Watch his work from 2016 if you don’t know him.

    Obama took an issue that people were concerned about, the price of health care, and used it to ram Obamacare down our throats. This after Massachusetts elected a Republican for the first time in years just to stop Obamacare.

    They did this because it was supposed to be a stepping stone to what the Dems actually wanted, which is socialized medicine. See the talking points of the latest election. Trump got in the way of their trajectory, but they haven’t given up in the goal.

    This is why they lied to the American people about what was in the bill. Gruber knew they had to lie, because they knew that the American people did not want the changes made through Obamacare.

    Luntz says he thinks that Obama simply didn’t poll they people and thought he was doing what th ru wanted. Total BS, and you can tell by his face that he knows it.

    1. Exactly. Obamacare wasn’t trying to fix anything, it was meant to collapse the system to allow single payer to be implemented.

      The people didn’t turn against the establishment because they are ignorant, its because the establishment is now filled with incompetent morons and partisan hacks; they’re not only mind-numbingly stupid, they’re also evil…and we know it.

      Luntz is not too stupid to know this, he’s a hack.

      1. DEB & SDH, a thousand thumbs up.
        Obama and his administration knew, you wouldn’t be able to keep your health plan,,, they knew you wouldn’t be able to keep your doctor,,, and they knew your health plan wouldn’t go down in cost by $2500, but rather, they knew your premiums would go up $2500. Despite publicly telling Americans over and over their lies.

  2. Thanks Robert.
    Luntz knows what and how much he can say and still keep the cheques rolling in. He said more than I would have expected on a PBS interview.
    He’s critical of Palin, yet manages to give her credit for opening the path for Trump. My reply to anyone from the left that criticizes her is that there would have been no Benghazi on her watch. Whatever her knowledge gaps, she was the best candidate on either side.

    The community organizer, with help from the MSM, Hollywood and the academics, stirred up division. Some did so deliberately, others because it’s in their nature.

    It was nice of Luntz to remind people how the Tea Party people were of such exemplary character in contrast to Occupy Wall Street.

  3. THANK YOU!!!
    This is the best layout of the American Crisis that I have heard, and I’ve heard a lot.
    In the 1970’s I heard of a Russian spy that changed sides comment that he could not understand
    why the USA was not under Russian control. They had been working on the Dems since 1946 to
    take over the country. Do not think that they have stopped trying.
    I read you every day (and many nights), and every time say “THANKS FOR BEING HERE”.

  4. Roughly at the 45-50 min mark when discussing white cops killing blacks, Luntz completely fails to criticize the media or Obama in their lies about Trayvon and Michael Brown. He fails to mention Obama’s mishandling of the beer summit and his negative comments about the police, leading to cop assassinations. Obama’s roll in blm, and the political and the negative societal roll that organization had. And while discussing black deaths at the hands of white cops, really so few as he states,,, never mentions black on black crime and gun deaths,,, and the absolute disregard Obama had for that black youth dying weekend after weekend in large Democrat run cities, particularly Chicago. Or how Obama needed to be the one to defuse those communities, but instead Obama and the media tried there best to hide that story away. Obama reveled in the race tension he helped to create. It was meant to be a means to keep Democrats in power, and in power, bring forth more and more socialism. Obama cared about the deaths of the black youth, but it was more about using them to pursue Democrat dreams, than the youths welfare.

  5. “Oprah”

    Frank Luntz on Twitter, November 8, 2016: “Hillary Clinton will be the next President of the United States.”

  6. This guy, and the interviewer, still don’t get it. You can’t disagree and walk away, when one side (the left) won’t let that happen. They insist on having the State involved in everything. From the food you can eat, to the education your kids get, to the health care you can receive, to the words you’re allowed to say, to the amount of water your toilet flushes. When everything that they think is good, must also be a law, then their position is ‘agree with us, or we’ll kill you’, because every law is predicated by coercion and force.

    You need look no further than the theater being played out in the US Capital today to understand which side is responsible for the divide.

  7. You have to give Luntz a lot of credit. He’s willing to openly address the media’s role in fomenting the divide. That he’s going that far means a great deal.

  8. Interesting comments. I am more positive than Luntz. If I were a Democrat, I’d take a good, hard look at the way that Pelosi, Nadler, Schiff, Vindman, the Dem presidential gaggle, the Squad, and others have comported themselves post-Mueller, and ask whether this was in the traditions of our country. The Mueller investigation should have been the end. They couldn’t find anything, so they threw a bunch of irrelevant baloney in Part II and kept the ball rolling. The Ukraine team picked up the ball and ran with it.

    It is hard to conclude that the Dems will ever move on. No matter what I think of Trump, I am not going to let the Dems undo the 2016 election. I have a number of friends who didn’t get there on Trump in 2016. They are on the way to vote for him in 2020.

Navigation