67 Replies to “Articulatings Of Impeachment”

  1. Botox rots what little brain that old hag had, one more facelift and she will sport a Chuck Todd beard. From such a nice Baltimore family brother was a real peach.

    1. One observer noted hilariously that Nancy’s body is rejecting impeachment, hence her gesticulations and afflictions.

    2. I’ll bet years ago she was able to capture the vote with the use of a extreme push-up bra in her district.
      Now a days, not so much.
      Shameless opportunist is now in a corner having to actually come up with a strategy to keep the bag of doggie dodo from catching fire before she figured out there was no way to leave it on the front porch of the Senate.
      Wile E Coyote got nothing on this woman.

  2. The msm will soon pronounce her untouchable because “she’s already done so much and needs rest” – so nobody can ask her questions.

    1. She was communing with “Turtlehead” today, so maybe she already has one foot in the afterlife.

  3. Not your call Nancy, the Senate exercise discretion in impeachment trial. There you go shredding the Constitution again.
    More nonsense added to no crime required (oh yes there is), denying due process and right to confront accusers.
    Now she accuses the Senate of not playing fair ball. No, besides projecting, she’s just trying to take her ball home.
    Are the Dems so lost in the wilderness of echo chambers of group think that she doesn’t see this is one big bluff?
    Go ahead demonstrate your hoax by leaving it in the House. Meanwhile Senate can investigate Dems six ways from Sunday.
    One more way to show voters Dems have no intention of playing fairly on behalf of the people. They must win at all costs.
    And the costs are mounting, but the bill will be going to them not the GOP, now united as never before. Ain’t irony great?

    1. She’s a psycho Knut. We’ve all met a few.

      What? What? Now I can’t call someone an insane Scandinavian?

    1. Ditto, silly old Git.

      Notice how her media muppets also heeled immediately for her. Not-A-Sound, no more questions. Obedient SOBs

  4. In a word, no. Nanzi does not speak English. Her language is some sort of mix of kalifornication gibberish and senility. Her congressional district is located somewhere beyond the rings around Uranus. When she dies, she shall pass from the US house directly to somewhere without a stop at a memory care facility. As my hero Bugs Bunny says: Bon Voyagee!

    1. She sounds like she’s being taking public speaking lessons from Prinz Dummkopf.

  5. Cannot believe the complicit media.
    I could not keep from laughing…how did they manage to accept that excuse for a press conference?

    1. America like Canada needs a complete reset. Freedom and morality need to make a comeback. Government needs to be cut to the bone and all laws need to be thrown out. The supreme court needs to be abolished and the Ten commandments recognized as the basis for all law.

      1. The only way thathappens is with real live ammunition. Sorry, but history’s a bitch. If you got a brain in your head, you are getting your money and your family out of the West. The West is going down. Hard. It’s over.

  6. Those that remember the Federal Criminal Civil Rights trial in the Rodney King case should also realize that the Conspiracy (Nancy was one of Six) to deny Carter Page his civil rights should all rightly be in jail… The House & Senate leadership have a reckoning SOON,,, Not to mention the Billion’s Trump will demand in 2024…… Nancy owes the Country for the Russian & Ukrainian Hoax millions spent on Lawyers who all knew the flawed facts

    JMHO

  7. Donezepil Nancy, Donezepil. Also known as Aricept.
    How many people in the Democrat Leadership are on Donezepil? Half? All?

    They look like the Supreme Soviet Politburo during the long and fading Brezhnev, Chernenko, Andropov Gerontocracy. All desperately clinging to power until they are hauled out in a coffin.

  8. Sure sign of nothing when the arm waving and hand gestures get to be a distraction. It does not synch with anything she says. Does not emphasize anything she says. Beto also thought this was a good idea but Nancy is more choreographed. It looks she has the same movement loop no matter what she is talking about.

  9. In ten years she’s gone from: “we have to pass the bill to see what’s in it” to complete gibberish. Only in a universe where someone would take the CBC or CNN seriously would this geriatric mannequin or the Spawn be seen as leaders.

  10. Pelosi is tongue tied because she doesn’t want to reveal her scattered thoughts.

    Like:  “we lost big time, my clothes, shoes and teeth are too tight, I need to go to the ladies room badly, I’m hungry, I’m thirsty, I need a double shooter of sambuca, is my private plane ready for the trip home, did they fill it up with tons of booze, when are these people going to stop with the questions, how do I look, how’s my hair, see this Speaker’s pin I’m wearing, yes I’ll forever be known as Madam Speaker, yes I’m praying for the President and finally…
    DON’T MESS WITH ME.”
     
    Figure her sign lingo, see the following tutorial.
    You’ll be ready for a trip to Italy.

    https://youtu.be/_8hAOxsTpVY

    PS — Likely she and HRH Justin of Canada went to the same Public Speaking Classes. They haven’t yet learned how to articulate properly just what it is that they actually want to convey.

    1. Oh Nanzi Pelosified speaks perfectly; that is why cogent folks are leaving the “Dem-pocalypse Party”.

      It’s Official: Rep. Van Drew Flips Republican and Pledges ‘Undying Support’ for Donald Trump
      https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/19/its-official-rep-van-drew-flips-republican-and-pledges-undying-support-for-donald-trump/

      Trump called his decision a “big deal” noting that it had been about ten years since a member of Congress switched parties to become a Republican.

      “It’s a very big deal,” McCarthy agreed. “Because he’s going from the majority to the minority. It normally doesn’t go that way.”

      “Yeah, but he’s very smart because he knows it’s not going to be the minority for long,” Trump replied. “I have a feeling we’re going to do very well in 2020.”

      Van Drew noted that one of his political heroes continued to be former President Ronald Reagan.
      “He said, ‘I didn’t leave my party, my party left me,” Van Drew said. “I’m saying the same thing.”

      The former Democrat pledged his support for Trump in the next election.


      You go girl Nanzi Pelosified…the biggest booster for the GOP in a very long, long time!

      Cheers

      Hans Rupprecht – Commander in Chief
      Army Group “True North”
      1st Saint Nicolaas Army

      1. Saw that Oval Office News conference today.
        Risky business… switching sides.
        Considerations:
        # 1 What will his NJ constituents think of this switch?
        # 2 Will they vote for him or his Democrat replacement?
        # 3 What will the Republican who was going to run in this New Jersey district in November think? Is he or she automatically prevented from running now? Wonder if he checked with them?

        1. Pelosi’s Proposal to Withhold Senate Trial Is Unconstitutional
          By Alan Dershowitz
          Thursday, 19 December 2019 02:40 PM
          https://www.newsmax.com/alandershowitz/hamilton-pelosi-tribe-senate/2019/12/19/id/946659/?ns_mail_uid=b959e8f9-1d39-4b9a-83d2-48b46da27020&ns_mail_job=DM76392_12192019&s=acs&dkt_nbr=010504765vpi

          Now that the House has impeached President Trump, the question is what happens next. Speaker Pelosi has suggested that she may withhold the articles of impeachment from the Senate as part of a negotiating tactic. This ploy drives from an idea put forward by my friend and colleague Laurence Tribe, who has proposed that the Senate not conduct a trial — at least not now.

          He would withhold the trial until the Senate agreed to change its rules, or presumably until a new election put many more Democrats in the Senate. Under his proposal, there might never be a Senate trial, but the impeachment would stand as a final and permanent condemnation of President Trump.

          It is difficult to imagine anything more unconstitutional, more violative of the intention of the Framers, more of a denial of basic due process and civil liberties, more unfair to the president and more likely to increase the current divisiveness among the American people. Put bluntly, it is hard to imagine a worse idea put forward by good people

          Denying President Trump and the American people a trial in the Senate would constitute a variation on the title of my new book, “Guilt by Accusation.”

          President Trump would stand accused of two articles of impeachment without having an opportunity to be acquitted by the institution selected by the Framers to try all cases of impeachment. It would be as if a prosecutor deliberately decided to indict a criminal defendant but not to put him on trial.

          This would deny him the right to confront his accusers and to disprove the charges against him. Tribe himself uses a variant of this analogy.

          He hypothesizes a situation in which a prosecutor indicts a criminal defendant and then discovers that the proposed trial would be been tainted by jury tampering. Would the prosecutor then not have the right to withhold the trial until such time as an untainted jury could be seated?

          As a law professor who has employed hypotheticals for more than half a century, this one fails on its face. A true analogy would be not to a prosecutor who discovered after indictment that the jury was tainted, but to a prosecutor who believed before the indictment that there was no possibility of a fair jury trial.

          A prosecutor who indicted under such circumstances — not intending to bring the defendant to trial — would be violating his duty and denying the defendant his fundamental rights.

          An even better analogy would be a prosecutor who knew that both the grand jury and the petit jury were tainted by preexisting prejudices: the grand jury was biased against the defendant and the petit jury in his favor.

          Nonetheless, he went forward with an indictment by the grand jury that was biased against the defendant and withheld a trial by a petit jury that was biased in the defendant’s favor.

          Tribe’s analogy fails for another reason as well.

          Tribe is the first to admit in his excellent book and prior writings that the process of impeaching and removing a president contains political elements as well as judicial ones.

          So he should not be surprised that the Democratic dominated House pre-judged Trump’s guilt, while the Republican house may have pre-judged his innocence. That is the nature of the system and should be addressed as a whole not by accepting the partisan nature of an impeachment, while rejecting the partisan nature of a trial.

          This is yet another example of partisans failing the “shoe on the other foot” test. I cannot imagine Pelosi or Tribe proposing this jerry-rigged unconstitutional gambit had Hillary Clinton been elected president, and had a Republican House impeached her.

          They would then be demanding that the Democratic controlled Senate conduct a trial and acquit their improperly impeached candidate.

          Alexander Hamilton worried that the greatest danger of misusing the impeachment process would be to make it turn on the comparative votes each party could muster in the House and the Senate. This danger has come to fruition with the current impeachment — the first one in American history — that is based purely on partisan votes.

          The proper response is not to distort, ignore and violate the explicit terms of the Constitution that view impeachment by the House as a first step toward a trial by the Senate. An impeached president has a right to be tried and acquitted by the Senate.

          Denying him and the American people that fundamental right might serve the temporary interests of the Democratic Party, and academics who support it, but would do violence to the rule of constitutional law that is supposed to serve all Americans, regardless of party or ideology.

          Alan M. Dershowitz is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law Emeritus at Harvard Law School and author of “Guilt by Accusation” and “The Case Against the Democratic House Impeaching Trump.”

          So there you have it folks an “unconstitutional President” impeached by an unconstitutional process in a NON-TRIAL.

          The “Shame-Peachment” farce continues with no high crimes or misdemeanors; but rather a lot of mudslinging because they have nothing else!

          Cheers

          Hans Rupprecht – Commander in Chief
          Army Group “True North”
          1st Saint Nicolaas Army

          1. …. “withhold the trial until the Senate agreed to change its rules, or presumably until a new election put many more Democrats in the Senate. Under his proposal, there might never be a Senate trial, but the impeachment would stand as a final and permanent condemnation of President Trump.”

            Dream on Democrats– about “getting many more Dems in the Senate!” Not going to happen.

            All this proves is how confused the Democrats really are. They make up the rules as they go along. Ultimately the Dems are afraid to be indicted for the crimes perpetrated during the Obama administration.

            Trump is demanding his day in court because he and they know that Trump would clear his name. They’ve got nothing.

            If this doesn’t work for the Dems they said that they will continue to impeach the President until something sticks to him. Nice bunch eh?

            I believe that the Members of House of Representatives wanted to be perpetually in Committee to ‘merit the additional compensation’ that being in a committee brings. Sitting in the House, trying to pass laws for a President that they hate or fear or both, doesn’t cut it for them.

            Everyone knows that there is a good chance that Trump will get a second term. The Dems want to give pay back to the GOP for the Bill Clinton impeachment trial. That’s all.

            If Trump hadn’t have campaigned on “draining the swamp” we, rather the American people, might’ve been spared these shenanigans.

            Cheers,
            N.R.

    1. Good find James. This should be sent to every media outlet in Canada but they’d ignore it. They love the sound of oRAngE mAn imPeAcHed…

      **If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.
      That’s because “impeachment” under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.
      As for the headlines we saw after the House vote saying, “TRUMP IMPEACHED,” those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement. So far, the House has voted to impeach (future tense) Trump. He isn’t impeached (past tense) until the articles go to the Senate and the House members deliver the message.**

      1. The Canadian media HONEST?

        ACCURATE????

        Include ALL THE FACTS???

        C’mon, $600 Million buys ya a lot of omissions and lies. Not worth the time to tune it in

        1. You’re right Dan. They’re not worth tuning in to and I don’t except when I’m flipping around during commercials. Then I often regret it. It’s like they’re unaware there’s this thing called the INTERNET out there that provides facts they won’t report. You know how it works, it’s not what they report it’s what they WON’T report.

      2. Boots – don’t think for one minute that what you posted will be accepted by the Dems or their followers. Their belief is and will remain for all time is “TRUMP WAS IMPEACHED ON DECEMBER 17th OF 2019!”
        There is no point in trying to reason with any of the loudmouth Dems in congress or those on the street. You see TRUMP WAS IMPEACHED.
        Full stop! No backing up regardless what facts may emerge or how the Senate rules!
        TRUMP WAS IMPEACHED!
        There! Bear with me and save yourself a lot of breath!

        1. That will be the Demarxists only election slogan. Their echo chamber doesn’t resonate with independents, and it’s a failing policy, to attract non-Demarxists to vote for you.
          These people are stupid.

  11. So they create the impeachment and don’t send it to the Senate because they know how rediculous it is?

    BTW Is she drunk, got a swollen tongue or what?

    1. The sheer audacity, the Demarxists have at this time is something to behold. After their one way street, Russian style show trial in their House, where there was strictly a tilted table, now they want, of all things:

      A FAIR Senate trial, where the Demarxists dictate the terms…….they are brazen.

      Cocaine Mitch is holding firm, basically telling them to pound sand.

      Where does it go from here? Time…………..although there is also a far-out rumour, that there may be an action to the SC, by Trump, the WH or similar counsel, to have it sent automatically to the Senate. There are no terms of negotiation, whatsoever.

      The day after the Demarxists discovered and embraced the Constitution, they once again trample all over it.

  12. Come-on…. Hillary only discovered Vodka after she woke up in Russia with Putin’s dick in her Mouth… That dam Russian got her hooked on Vodka… The Hillary Cigars where a trick that the black Midget taught her …You know that Guy who was told to stay away from Hillary, or the Louisiana swap critters they would de-nut him….I don’t think little Al Sharpton has ever been closer than 10 feet from Clinton since…..

    Who really cares!

  13. Don’t be cruel. She looks like Marilyn Monroe, articulates like Oprah Winfrey , belongs to a party that was recently lead by a Nobel Prize winner and another that sold US uranium to the person pulling the strings on the current “not my president”.

    Yep Nancy is mentally stable, as gorgeous as one of Harvey’s casting couch hotties, and by the way Jeffrey Epstein didn’t KILL HIMSELF !

    FYI I’m leaving thIs blog in 6 hours if this post isn’t deleted by the time I go Kate isn’t getting her Billion Dollars.

  14. OK, seriously; what language WAS she speaking there? I have met stroke victims more on point than that.

  15. And Sanfransh*tsco will re-elect her. When the electorate is brain dead it votes for stupid.

    Same with the propaganda and entertainment media. These two groups will leap over the cliff together. They will never admit the skank was a bad candidate choice.

  16. I think Nancy Pelosi should be the Democrat candidate for President in 2020.

    Because, how could anyone criticize incoherence?

    If you used this Nancy Pelosi clip on your voice mail… telemarketers would take your number off of their calling list.
    Mind you, so would your employer.

  17. The “impeachment” gong show was for two reasons only. The first was that it was a weeks long infomercial for the Democrats to try to push another of their false narratives. And second, it was to cover for the IG report and the FBI corruption in the FISA court, etc. And of course, the media did the bidding of the Democrats as it always does.

  18. I’ve devoted much time to personally testing the effects of alcohol. In my learned opinion, this is drunkenness. Plain and simple.

  19. Pelosi is a vile and evil woman. She clearly suffers from a severe personality disorder and is likely possessed by demons. She will not win.

    Trump 2020

  20. I have heard grumblings that the House Democratic leadership may not foward the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate. That is unconstitutional and it is said by the law prof the Dems called at the very start, Noah Feldman, that if that occurs, then it is NOT IN FACT and impeachment. Impeachment ONLY occurs according to him if the Articles are turned over to the Senate by the House Impeachment Managers. Until that happens, Trump has NOT been impeached.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-12-19/trump-impeachment-delay-could-be-serious-problem-for-democrats

    “If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.

    That’s because “impeachment” under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.”
    Just my 2 cents.

    1. Your 2 cents sounds correct and Trump knows it.

      If Pelosi were on a gong show she’d be hauled off, she’s a frightening spectacle.

Navigation