Hate Speech Is Still Free Speech



Bill Jacobson, founder and publisher of Legal Insurrection as well as a clinical professor of law and director of the Securities Law Clinic at Cornell Law School, shares his insights on Gibson’s Bakery v. Oberlin College.

7 Replies to “Hate Speech Is Still Free Speech”

  1. Offer to support every restriction and every punishment for hate speech that the liberals want but under one little condition: That you are the only one that gets to determine what constitutes hate speech.
    And assure them that every word out of their mouth will be deemed hate speech.

    That’s the deal they are demanding we accept.
    They get to make all the rules on speech.

    Ask them if we could have brought in women’s voting rights and gay marriage or ended slavery or made any changes to society if those in power at the time could have just declared everything that they didn’t want to hear was hate speech.
    Use single syllable words and speak real slow even though it isn’t complicated.

  2. all speech should be free speech unless it is slander or libel which can be proved in court. insults and or a personal dislike do not fall under that category.

  3. The globalists want protection for hate speech, all right—real hate speech, calling for the expropriation and slaughter of everybody they consider a threat to their wealth and power.

    Calling telling the truth “hate speech” just plays into their hands. We are motivated by our desire to survive and our love for our children.

    The assorted groups of human filth who make common cause with the globalists are the ones who long to gorge on our entrails while their masters toast the revolution with our children’s blood.

  4. Whoever controls the speech controls the thinking…there is a direct co-relation between language and thought processes.
    This sort of mind-control CANNOT be allowed to stand.

    1. No, there isn’t. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is bullshit and has been disproved over and over.

Navigation