32 Replies to ““The Most Valuable Commodity in the World””

  1. When I was a young pup, I never spent any time drooling over women who weren’t attractive. I wasn’t the social worker type.

  2. The world of advertising figured that one out a long,long time ago. Hot babes ARE “the most valuable commodity in the world”, and that is just as it should be.

    Apparently Gal Godot make more money as a shill for Huawei than the average person makes in 20 lifetimes, but I will resist and not buy one even though the sultry bitch entices me during every NHL playoff game.

  3. I’m not a captain but I can do some arithmetic:
    A) “your average webcam girl can make anywhere between $50-$100 an hour”
    B) “The Most Valuable Commodity in the World”
    The consumer price will be (A) plus overhead , but still does not seem to support your claim (B).
    The price, while not cheap, does not seem excessive. If you want to fly a P-51 Mustang around it will cost you $3000/hr.

    I do agree that men are highly motivated by sex with cute young girls. But this is likely to lead to shape-shifting sex-bots which will likely depress the value of “The Most Valuable Commodity in the World”.

    When the left destroys Western Civilization we will all be terrorized by Neo-Viking raiding parties. In this scenario your claim will make much more sense. In those times the most valuable commodities will be: food, ammo and “entertainment” which will include your pretty young girls.

    1. It costs nothing to look at the P-51. Flying the webcam girl will cost much more than $100/hr.

  4. “When the left destroys Western Civilization we will all be terrorized by Neo-Viking raiding parties.”

    The wheel goes around. The destruction is exactly what is happening and the result will be the same.

  5. And to think. All this hatred oozing from these non-decorative types is just envy that springs from a simple childhood jealousy: even though they all look like slobby boys, they can’t write their name in the snow.

  6. It is simple:

    Two people get together, one a man, one a woman, and have sex. One gets pregnant, which one?

    The woman, of course, and she stays that way for nine months, and then must give birth, and then nurse. So, the woman’s body is far more important to the act of procreation than the mans. Thus, the very shape of her body, including many things harder to see than just shape, is necessary to procreation.

    Result, the man looks for what is necessary in a woman, her physicality, and the woman looks for what is necessary in a man, his character, will he stick around and support her and the child when she is pregnant and later must tend a small, vulnerable child?

    Now look above, which woman looks more healthy? For that matter, which woman looks like she wants to attract a man?

  7. Yves Lavigne is a Canadian who wrote some true crime books about twenty years ago, about outlaw biker gangs, he listed pussy higher than drugs on his list of underworld commodities, I can’t remember the others… pussy, drugs, muscle, weapons, respect… the money makers, more money in pussy than in drugs, hard to believe…

  8. yop

    I read Lavigne’s books on the Angels. He did better investigations than the rcmp. Surprised he’s still around….

    “more money in pussy than in drugs, hard to believe…”, not really. All males are addicted to pussy. Some are addicted to drugs as well.

  9. I am a woman and I absolutely loved this article. And I say this as a woman who owned her business for 30 years and climbed the property ladder. Mind you, I wish I had monetized my youth and beauty in my 20’s and not believed the guff about brains and independence. I am glad that I received a good education in Design and Construction.
    I also agree with his comment that hopefully these young women can “keep” their money. At one point in my career, I designed a couple of strip clubs. The strippers tried to encourage me to become a stripper. However, by the time they were 25, their “careers” were over. And as they had spent a lot of money on booze, drugs and supporting their never do well boyfriends (which was a perverse source of pride for them), they had to continue stripping after their “best by” dates. I only met one who was smart, was sober, no drugs and saved a pot full of money to buy 3 houses, 2 of which she rented out.

  10. The Captain’s right. Money has no value if it can’t be exchanged for something someone else wants more than the money. All values are opinions. Opinions shape the culture and cultures shape opinions. Human nature can’t change itself. That’s why, a good 100 years ago, it was known that socialism can’t work.

    Oh, the notion of female beauty also changes. In the past, being “too thin” was bad; because it either meant disease in some form or deprivation you couldn’t fix. A woman who’s too thin either can’t conceive or is at a higher relative risk carrying a child than one who was, not that long ago, pleasantly plump. Besides, if or when the stuff hits the fan, the ‘plump’ person can go without food longer than the ‘thin’ one. Don’t forget that when starving and you’ve run out of glycogen, muscle goes first, then fat, then back to muscle, then death. I see a lot of these “hot, fit” girls that look like they are ill. On the other hand, there are some real ‘land whales’ out there, too.

  11. An ugly woman probably begrudges a pretty woman her looks

    And captain, o’ my captain … let me add that SOME pretty women begrudge their OWN attractiveness ! Case in point …

    Rachel Maddow … BEFORE and AFTER:

    Before:
    http://img.wennermedia.com/480-width/maddow-931b8331-8207-4c03-bac9-9f9456b2f61b.jpg

    After:
    https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-zucsWTfbMkw/V8MYXHNMl7I/AAAAAAAAMp0/T6c0jjPlwJIR0w-XXi6spp4V6p1K3ovDQCLcB/s1600/rachel%2Bmaddow%2Bplayboy%2Bamy%2Btrost_.jpg

    THAT! Is an attractive woman who HATED being attractive. Mission accomplished

    1. Let me fix that for you: THAT! Is an attractive woman who HATED being “female”. Mission accomplished.

      I think one can conclude that Rachel is the pseudo male in her relationship.

  12. Women, I understand, make the decision on a good 80 percent of household consumption. To put it another way, men ought to be able to live as well as they do now while working only one day a week. Were it not for women helping themselves to the fruits of their labour, they would.

    The wonders and marvels men might have worked without women holding them back or squandering the fruits of their labour on their own indulgence simply stagger the imagination.

    Female youth and beauty is the reason the world exists? Not quite.

    I’ve read that farming got started because people wanted not a dependable supply of food (hunting and gathering sufficed for that) but a dependable supply of grains for making beer—so they could get stumbling drunk.

    Booze and “female youth and beauty” are not the reason the world exists. They’re among the many rackets that ensure that an idle class of parasites can keep able-bodied men in debt-peonage. There won’t be women, or booze, to found anywhere in the kingdom of heaven—same way you won’t find banks or newspapers.

    The reason the world exists? That would be the God of Israel, Who created the heavens and the earth.

    God’s love has no end. Female youth and beauty fade fast. It’s a woman’s self-absorption and heartlessness that last forever. Her love only lasts till the money runs out.

    Choose the object of your adoration accordingly, gentlemen.

    1. No women or booze in heaven? Who would willing go there? Sounds more like Hell to me.

    2. I kid you not … true story (re: the photo above):

      I am driving across country with my 22yo daughter, and we pull into a Hooters in Amarillo TX for some quick greasy food … and the adorable (and ample) Hooters waitress plants herself right on my knee … as though this were a strip club. She asks if I want anything to drink prior to taking our food order. I ask if they have any micro-brews … and she motions really small with her fingers and says … “you mean, like in a really tiny cup?”. It was obviously a line she had used before… but she was so cute, I just squeezed a little of her bottom, and said “craft” brews. Ohhhhh! She feigned, and read me a list.

      So much better than a sweatpant-clad, mean-face, clipped hair beast taking my order. If you want a man to spend freely … I suggest you appeal to his most primal senses.

      Did I think I was going back to the hotel with a Hooters waitress? Puhleeze! But was I entertained, and titilated for a moment … hells yes.

    3. My A Canadian friend …

      I share your deep devotion and belief in God, but I am also a keen observer of his creation in addition to a reader of His Word. From the Book of Romans:

      For ever since the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky. Through everything God made, they can clearly see his invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse for not knowing God.

      God, through Paul’s Words has suggested we LOOK around us to see (and implied; understand) his creation. I have been given the Gift of observation, and interpretation. I can say, without hesitation, that the design of a woman is the most amazingly beautiful, and beguiling, part of all creation. As a design professional, and keen observer of the arts; I can say without reserve that a young woman’s form is simply THE most beautiful thing in all creation – nothing else comes close. And to be honest, a woman does not need to be a 10 to be attractive. A woman who cares for her body, and has a cheerful spirit is an attractive force – that few men can resist.

      Why did God (nature, if you’re not a Believer) design woman this way? Procreation and reproduction. Yep. Sorry gals… but you’ve been created to be laid, and squeeze out puppies. That’s all there is to it. And you can buck that “outmoded”, “patriarchal” , “oppressive” design FACT all you want … and do nothing but make yourself miserable. You’ve been designed to be HOT when you’re YOUNG, healthy, and vibrant … not so much when you age. You can try to cheat nature (God) all you want, but all the Botox in the world won’t help … it will just make you look ghastly (the human eye is finely-tuned to recognize “health” and well-being).

      In the Proverbs 11:22 the author writes:
      A beautiful woman lacking discretion and modesty is like a fine gold ring in a pig’s snout.
      I will add to the meaning of that proverb to say, a beautiful woman acting like she’s God’s gift, is trampled under pigs feet. And a woman who REJECTS her God-given beauty, by dressing-down and doing everything possible to push men away … is suited for the pig sty.

      What am I saying? Women are designed to be beautiful, and desirable beyond measure to men. For the purpose of mating and establishing pair-bonding which gives a woman security and care in her old-er age. Does this mean a woman should subject herself to an abusive relationship for the sake of God’s plan? Of course not. You are given Free Will. But every action of Free Will has a consequence. If the feminazis want to reject their design and shun men as testosterone laden beasts, then they shall get their just rewards in the pig sty.

      We are MUCH healthier and happier people when we accept the roles built into our DNA. There are plenty of personal choice “options” available to us humans … and now even MORE options as outlined by the captain. But some of our characteristics are immutable. We desire closeness, touch, and relationship. NONE of those things can be satisfied through a video projection of beauty and sex. They can ONLY be achieved by intimacy. Women who REJECT their design will PAY a price … as will all the lazy jerk-off men.

      Enjoy the decline … or wake the fkcu-UP!

      1. Kenji, or could it be that women weren’t/aren’t designed to appeal to men, but men’s brains self programed to accept the female design:-)))

  13. There is something unattractive about a woman who shows up with a sign wearing sweat pants and sandals. I take off 3 points right there.

  14. The Captain presents another metric based critique to the university courses most female students major in, in this the now female dominated universities. His predictions will be measurable for their degree of validity. The trend is underway.

    I argue it has a soon to be reached limit, because with fewer successful relationships and thus a lower birth rate. It produces a self-limiting economic market, within a generation or so.

    What others have noticed is that marriage is still the norm for the middle and upper classes in Western society, but much less so for the under class. Formerly, the working class were still independent, just poorer. Now the government provides working class women a more secure, just above survival income than husband/fathers can. This as working women and men’s standard of living has been lowered for the unskilled/semi-skilled by mass, 3rd world immigration. Over supply drives down the price of labour.

    So for the formerly labelled ‘working class, marriage and being raised by both parents, to be of good character, has been replaced by gov’t. subsidized housing projects. Where the Good Father role model is also replaced by a peer to peer gang infested inner-city criminal sub-culture. One that is for the first time in history, financially viable. This being due to government subsidy.

    Social safety nets have changed from keeping people from falling/failing, and morphed into a net placed so low over their heads, it keeps them from rising high enough to succeed in life.

    Prof. Jordan Peterson argues post-modernist humanities and “studies” courses in Western universities, are intellectually and economically bankrupt models of education. That digital communications can provide access to higher quality humanities and social science education at a fraction of the price that universities do. They are more obsolete than the fossils of extinct species. No one will want to excavate them.

    In the post-WW2 decades when an increasing number of women began attending universities, yes, they were looking for husbands with better than average earning potential. In addition, they were adding to their sexual attractiveness quotient, as 2 or more years of university, would make them better mothers, able to educate their higher IQ, higher status husband’s children.

    Anti-male, family destroying feminist-Marxist identity politics has destroyed that argument and made them a liability to a potential husband/father of their children.

    Let me suggest a corollary, if university courses were subject to a value for money audit, Canadian provincial governments would save so much money, and so many youth would have to contribute to growing the economy to survive. They’d be able to balance their budgets.

    If women cease signing up for those courses. The government no longer has to fund them !!! Nor does it have to legislate and fund affirmative action hiring for such graduates. Lowering competency standards, by definition, will lower economic productivity.

    P.M. Justin Trudeau’s “The budget will balance itself.” is unadulterated, bovine fecal matter, but market forces can do so.

    1. Very smart post, Larry. It is indeed (mostly) the lower, and lower middle classes who are not marrying. And this springs from a society (government and culture) that pushes an “independent woman” narrative … a “non-traditional Family” narrative (such as grandparents raising children, two mommies, etc. etc.) … and government funding of every “non-traditional” Family. Indeed, father’s are being ditched as unreliable and unnecessary. Unreliable, in part because the government has taken-over their duties.

      I have always found it amazing how in certain “communities” … women put themselves on parade and display around military bases to attract a man … with a job. In a culture that mostly considers the typical military career “below” them … many, many, women see a man in the military as a responsible entity with a consistent paycheck. A government paycheck. More reliable than the average lower, lower-middle-class wage earner. And I’m speaking of enlisted men, not officers. Officer candidates are in a whole other “class” – economically.

  15. The marriage thing about a mother and father is bunkum.

    The “f__k’em and Leave’em” “father” (sperm donor) can not help the children grow into responsible adults. The sperm-donor has no idea of what a “responsible adult” is. I’d guess, neither does the “egg donor”.

    I have no idea of what the solution might be, except for generous visiting hours and bus passes to the state or federal quarantine facility. Maybe they just grow up slower than “normies”.

    1. The sperm donor is actually contributing to his child’s support. What?!

      Once the sperm donor disappears … leaving no forwarding address … the government steps in to give aid to his dependent child. Welfare. SSI. Medicaid. More programs and support than you can even count. And his baby-mamma is the receptacle for this government largesse as surely as she was for his man goo. The government (we, the taxpayer) gives cover to every sperm donor in America. We be the REAL baby-daddy. No wonder Abortion is so popular. When the culture has slouched toward Gomorrah… infanticide seems an expedient “solution”.

  16. Without young beautiful women, the human race would have died off years ago.
    Ugly modern day feminist woman? Fishing? GET THE BOAT!

  17. “Asshole Consulting” has spent too much time on the sub genres of porn and overlooked the underlying reason “women possess the most valuable commodity”…..procreation. Dumb asshole.

    1. … ha ha ha … sub genres of porn … ha ha ha

      I am ashamed to admit that I have actually encountered “tentacle porn” (what the hell is WRONG with Japanese women? ). But all this live-streaming jerk-off shit? I had NO IDEA. What a lonely, isolated, life. How pathetic. How self-destructive.

      I DID encounter the live-streaming nonsense when seeing a film called, I think, “Bad Moms”. A somewhat funny comedy about moms who subvert the “supermoms” of the neighborhood. The adorably HOT lead actress (Mila Kunis) catches her husband wanking it to some live streamed HO … and she boots him out of the house. Good! (who would be wanking it with Mila Kunis in the bedroom?! … oh well, I had to suspend my disbelief) Then, of course, Mila falls in lust with a HOT “brown” man who happens to be a widower in her daughters class. I had a few laughs.

Navigation