“The Vatican had no comment.”

Richard Fernandez – [Archbishop Viganò] says a gay and left wing mafia has been trying to take over the church; that Benedict acted vs McCarrick but it was subsequently overruled by the left and gay mafia. I was reading the PDF yesterday now the WaPo has it.

Viganò, 77, was the Holy See’s apostolic nuncio, or ambassador, in Washington from 2011 until 2016. He has been a lightning rod within the Vatican who lost a power struggle in Rome under Benedict, emerged as a Francis critic and reportedly ordered the halt of an investigation into alleged sexual relations between an archbishop in Minnesota and seminarians.
 

Jason Berry, who has written several investigative books about the Vatican, said he believes this is the first time a pope has been accused from within.
 
“From within the Vatican hierarchy, from within the Roman Curia, I don’t think anyone has ever publicly accused a pope of covering up for a sex abuser,” Berry said. “That’s why this is such a big deal.”
 
[…]
 
Viganò’s letter says that in 2013, he met Francis and told the new pope face to face that there was “a dossier this thick” about McCarrick. He says he then told Francis about Benedict’s order that McCarrick remove himself from public life.
 
“He corrupted generations of seminarians and priests and Pope Benedict ordered him to withdraw to a life of prayer and penance,” Viganò says he told Francis. “The Pope did not make the slightest comment about those very grave words of mine and did not show any expression of surprise on his face, as if he had already known the matter for some time, and he immediately changed the subject.”
 
Barry Coburn, McCarrick’s lawyer, said in a statement: “These are serious allegations. Archbishop McCarrick, like any other person, has a right to due process. He looks forward to invoking that right at the appropriate time.”
 
The letter also includes an allegation against Wuerl, D.C.’s current archbishop and McCarrick’s successor. He is a close ally of Francis and is already under scrutiny following a grand jury report in Pennsylvania about clerical child sex abuse and an alleged coverup. Wuerl for years led the diocese of Pittsburgh.
 
Viganò is vague in the allegation against Wuerl. The letter says “obviously” Wuerl knew about Benedict’s restrictions on McCar­rick because the then-ambassador, Pietro Sambi, was “responsible, loyal and direct” and must have told him. Viganò says he brought up the subject himself with Wuerl, and he writes that Wuerl “was fully aware of it.”
 
Wuerl’s spokesman, Ed McFadden, denied the report.

It’s behind a paywall, but the story is available if you haven’t run out of “free” visits.

36 Replies to ““The Vatican had no comment.””

  1. As a sinner and conservative Catholic I pray the Church hierarchy can sift through this and get their act together. If this Pope is removed I pray he is replaced by a much more orthodox Pope. They should all get due process in the investigation of their illegal activities but the guilty ones should have the moral decency to remove themselves while being investigated. Being a sinner, though, I know how hard it is to admit and make amends for my sins.

    These allegations contain no surprise and change nothing in terms of my beliefs. Jesus knew Peter was flawed when he decided to build his Church upon him. Trump is a flawed person, perhaps even more flawed than our Pope, and he is achieving good things — even for the Catholics of the US and to some degree people all over the World.

    1. That is the interpretation of the Roman Catholic hierarchy and not that of millions of other biblical scholars. There is no evidence that Peter was even in Rome and much against. And the church history from the beginning would lead anyone to disbelieve that Peter, or Christ, had anything to do with the Church of Rome.
      The “Rock” on whom the church is built is plainly set out in the Scriptures:
      For other foundation NO ONE can lay, but that which has been laid, which is Christ Jesus. (I Corinthians 3:11)
      And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and THAT ROCK WAS CHRIST). (I Corinthians 10:4).
      Jesus said to them, “Did ye never read in the Scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?” (Matthew 21:42) (Compare with Psalm 117:21, 23)
      For they stumbled or the stumbling-stone, as it is written, “Behold I lay in Sion, a stumbling-stone and a ROCK of offence: and whosoever believeth on him (Christ) shall not be ashamed.” (Romans 9:33)

      And I could go on and on and on….

      1. You can go on and on with error after error after error. There are NO millions of scholars which support your claim. The Church fathers also disagree with you. Tell me Gellen, which church is the one true Christian church? How many books are in the one true Bible? Who has final authority to interpret scripture? You? Me? The guy in stall number 666?

        BTW, bearing FALSE WITNESS is a sin. Be careful.

        1. Hey Cloud, take it easy now

          There are hundreds of “Christian” denominations, and many factions within each one. But, if you are into behavioral psychology, it stand to reason that from a human POV, if there are 1.5 billion Christians, then there are 1.5 billion gods!!!!

          1. Has anyone ever told you that you bring NOTHING to any of the discussions on this website? You bring nothing.

        2. The word “church” does not appear in the scriptures. The Roman Catholic church inserted that pagan word as it served their purposes. The purposely mis-translated word comes from the Greek “ekklesia”, which means a gathering.

      2. Hey Gellen;

        Are you my long lost cousin: Robert Loblaw? Otherwise known as Bob Loblaw? Say it quickly, over and over again!

        Just funnin ya Gellen.

        Shoot, now I have to confess and do penance.

    2. The Babylonian cult, now known as the Roman Catholic Church, has covered itself with Christian trappings, but is the literal Whore of Babylon. Its practices are anti-Biblical in every way.

      Its priests and cardinals are rife with pedophiles, it has its anti-Christ (look up the meaning of “vicar”), it teaches heresies like purgatory and praying for the dead, and it is the greatest persecutor of actual Christians. It pretends to be able to forgive sins and make Christ come alive during the Eucharist. It is a satanic forgery and the greatest evil in the history of the world.

      The Bible warns those fooled by Catholicism to “come out of her, my people, that you be not partakers of her sins, and receive not of her plagues.”

  2. Something I do not understand….I’ve heard these same allegations about the church all of my life
    …there must be a million jokes about it

    Every so often, there’s another one of these big scandals…and nothing is ever done about it

  3. The Church is defenceless against the homosexual cabal that threatens to tear her apart from within. The homosexual assault on Western Civilization has advanced to the point where 95% of Canadians have now been won over. The rest of the Western world isn’t far behind.

    Worst of all are those Christians who approve of sodomy. How is it fostering the well-being of a person afflicted with “same sex attraction” if — instead of helping them to overcome these unnatural and dangerous urges — Christians abet them in their damnation? If Christians truly loved their homosexual neighbours, they’d do anything possible to help them overcome their affliction, just as we’d do whatever we can to help a teenaged girl suffering from anorexia nervosa (it would be horrific to abet her affliction as we do with gays).

    1. No Christians approve of sodomy. Those who do prove themselves not to be Christian.

      They just think they’re Christian. They’re more likely Liberals coated in a veneer of spiritualism.

      1. So true. Much like the ‘Liberation” segment of the Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union and many of the mainstream Protestant churches of today that have been infected by Marxism and the full gamut of the sodomy menu. A veneer of false spiritualism.

      2. Wattso, god reserves the right to be the only judge, so you can’t be a Christian either, as you are trying to usurp god’s authority here!!!

        1. God spells out his views on homosexuality quite clearly, and unambiguously. He also mentions why they are homosexual.

          Pretty sure I’m good with my theology NME.

      3. Well, one can start with Anglicans and the Uniteds, and surely the list continues with other denominations that APPROVE, if only with a wink, nudge, or overtly. These fit your description. They clearly have moved the gay culture into their orthodoxy.
        The only ones that stand out clearly as NOT approving would be the Baptists, Four Square, Pentecostals and Evangelicals, to start.

        1. There are many Jesuit-infiltrated corporations that call themselves “churches” that approve of homosexuality, but that has nothing whatsoever to do with Christianity.

  4. I doubt that an archbishop has a legal “right to due process” when it comes to papal decisions concerning his career.

  5. The Roman Catholic Church has no problem with homosexuality. If they did, they wouldn’t partake of it so liberally themselves. Or with pedophilia.

    The great confusion among the masses is caused by Roman Catholicism pretending to be Christian.

  6. I saw a discussion of this back in the late 80’s on TV, and the guy they all wanted to make fun of was stating that the problem is the church was screening candidates for the clergy to eliminate those unsuited to a life that forgoes marriage, children, and romantic relationships with women. They were very good at eliminating people with those inclinations, however they ended up with a process that highly favoured the selection of what he called deviant homosexuals. Discuss whether all homosexuals are deviant at another time, what he meant by deviant homosexuals was child molesting homosexuals.

    This is not to claim that all priests are child molesters or gay, but the screening process greatly increased their representation amongst the priesthood in comparison to the general population.

    1. A couple of points here…

      1. The vast bulk of the charges of inappropriate sexual advances are NOT for what we would call pedophilia. That crime is typically an assault against preadolescent children. The real story is about pederasty, in which the predator grooms or coerces a younger post-adolescent male to be receptive to sexual advances from an older male. While both behaviors are vile, repulsive, and an affront to the teachings of the Catholic Church, the distinction is important for understanding the scandal currently being unveiled. In essence, it begins from the seduction/coercion of young men by predators within the Church, and continues through the coverup by Church officials that allowed those predators to continue their practices, even to the point of putting them into a sort of exile, to a community where homosexual practices were both common and not punished.

      2. National Catholic Reporter has an editorial that puts a different spin on this entire scandal. ( https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/distinctly-catholic/vigano-letter-exposes-putsch-against-pope-francis ). It basically accuses Vigano of badly twisting a lot of facts in his effort to damage Pope Francis. I don’t know which to believe at this point, and the truth may cut across both sides of this apparent battle for power within the hierarchy of the Church.

  7. Betrayal began with Judas Iscariot and is continued under the Father Iscariots of the world. There are many Judas Iscariots in the world with different titles.

    Here is the recent homily from Fr. John Lankeit, rector of Ss. Simon and Jude Cathedral in Phoenix, Arizona that completely speaks TRUTH. It hasn’t been banned, yet, by YouTube.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOXPRpfjbtM

    The gates of hell will never PREVAIL against the Church.

  8. The cross was for Jesus. Not for a progressive pope. Chances are Francis will remain a lifer come hell or high water. There are many backers and a willing media to make history disappear.

    1. He fits the profile picture of the “black pope”, a Jesuit…….he won’t leave, there’s an agenda he has to fulfill…….

  9. It just seems so simple.

    Priest is an occupation that gives you unsupervised access to children.

    Pedo people want unsupervised access to children.

    Two, plus two, equals…

    Any job that gives gives people unsupervised access to children will be sought by pedo people.

    Just like serial killers ala Kermit Gossnell are attracted to a certain profession…

    1. You’re sick. 99.7 per cent of ALL Priests are innocent of any allegations. This story is like every other media driven story; ALL Americans are guilty of slavery; white males built western society on stolen land; Capitalism exploits the poor, and on and on. HOMOSEXUALITY is the problem. The “state has no business in the bedrooms of the nation” was supplanted by the rainbow is the symbol of perfect love and must be promoted. Canada’s government is obsessed with HOMOSEXUALITY. You people changed marriage to a union of TWO perverts, and claim it as a VIRTUE!

      Pedophiles have infested the public education system across NA, and wrote the sex education curriculum in Ontario. Have you done anything about any of that? Did you cheer on Doug Ford firing Tanya Allen? Do you cheer on “conservative” politicians marching in gay propaganda parades?

      You are like most folks today; beholden to media driven frenzies. Seek help. I know a good HOLY Priest.

      1. Cloud, you are a prime example of the real problem. I know of a priest (in SoCal) who used insider info to become rich, different time, different crime. Your 99.7% number would crumble like a poorly baked cake under close scrutiny. The church has a lot more problems than just butt bangin, child molesting priests. Butt cloud, if this problem was so insignificant in numbers as you profess, then there would never have been a need for cover ups. Read a little, the problem is wade spread, very wide!!!

        1. Once again you bring NOTHING to any commentary on this website. I gave FACTS, you give bullshit nothingness.

      2. The facts show otherwise. A large percentage of Catholic clergy are homosexual, and a huuuuuge percentage are pedophiles. They account for a far greater percentage of pedophiles than any other profession.

        They simply have a hierarchy that is far better and far more powerful at keeping their institutionalized pedophilia covered up.

    2. Quite. I like guns, I like shooting. I don’t necessarily want to kill people but my first career was soldiering, and I particularly chose the infantry. I didn’t want to be a driver in uniform, a cook in uniform, a clerk in uniform, I wanted to play with guns. And I like motorcycles. I’m not talented enough to race, never mind professionally. I spent five years as a d.r. in London. The money isn’t remarkable, but I made a living and rode a quarter of a million miles.

      As I said in another thread, when homosexuality was illegal and unacceptable, the celibate and male-only priesthood was a hiding place for homosexual males, whether they truly believed in Christ or not, whether they wanted to act on their homosexual desires or not.

      1. Where did you obtain the talent to read the mind and hearts of men from another era? You must be a liberal.

        Grow up.

  10. All the RC priests I have had the honour to work with were decent, hard-working men who took their vows seriously and who sought to feed the flock, not prey upon it. Did hear of one priest in the diocese who was accused of targeting young males; friend who had worked in a parish where he was priest was shocked; teacher I knew was not – her brother had been at the RC boys’ school when this particular priest was a teacher there and the boys all knew that this particular teacher was not a man a wise student would approach solo, so to speak.

    That being said, I do remember there were comments going around about one particular male teacher in our thoroughly secular high school. We may well have done the man a disservice; we may have been passing along warnings that we didn’t totally understand. But he wasn’t RC.

    1. Would you know a pedophile priest if you came across one? Most Catholics are shocked when one of their priests is found to have been a pedophile. Many have raped hundreds and even thousands of children over their lifetimes. When eventually allowed by the authorities to be charged with a minor offense (thereby keeping the enormity of his crimes hidden), most Catholics will support the priest and refuse to believe the charges. They will instead attack the actual victim.

      Roman Catholic priests have overwhelming numbers of pedophiles within their numbers. This is not new. This is how they’ve always been since Babylon. All that’s new is them pretending to be Christian so that fools invite them into their communities and have them raise their children.

Navigation