23 Replies to “Theresa May’s Britain”

  1. So what is the evidence they are actually mooselimb or immigrant?

    There, UnMe does not need to ask.

  2. Where are the Viking raiders of Yorkshire when you need them? They need some 8th Century folks to deal with this lot.

    1. Yeah, but I bet they came from different Muslim countries, and that is real diversity.

  3. CBC will be all over this – reporting 24/7.
    A story that has to be told…
    Just wait for it.
    Still waiting…

  4. Merry Olde England is royally effed up. Look no further for a prime example of blooming diversity.

    1. Good one LindaL.

      This equity stuff has gone too far. I’m feeling a bit under-represented.

    2. Good one,Linda! No wonder Ralph Goofdale wants to take all the guns away from us white hunters and farmers.

  5. Far too little and far far too late.
    IF they had addressed this back in the early 80’s when it was getting started then perhaps there would still be traditional names in Yorkshire.
    White flight started way back in the 70’s in W. Yorkshire.

  6. The CBC would describe them as, “a broad cross section of British society”. The main thing is while these suspects were possibly active (innocent until proven guilty), at least no one got called, “Islamophobic”, because that would have been a real tragedy. /sarc.

  7. Not a Tom Jones or Richard Davies in the bunch.
    A clear case of wilful omission.

  8. But let’s get Tommy Robinson in jail for video streaming outside a courtroom where some of these monsters were on trial. What info did Robinson reveal while streaming? Nothing, other than that there was a trial.

  9. The UK has exactly the government, hospitals, police, new casters, newspapers, immigrant, criminals, … that they deserve. As a person against the idea of shielding people from the effects of their own folly, I say just let ingsoc run its course.

    And yes, I do think the ‘1984’ reference is appropriate.

  10. Here’s the rub (sorry) … what are the names of the victims? Are they Aishas … or Charlottes ? Because IF “their” culture permits the arranged marriage (and statutory rape) of 8-yos … and the wanton rape of 13-15yos (seemingly their favorite category) … then WHO are the Brits to say anything about it? Under the “new rules” of immigrant non-integration into Western Law and Culture … we should have little to say about these immigrants raping “their” little girls. We “need” to suspend our Laws … and let them adopt their own … right? After all, who are WE to say our culture is “better” than theirs? Aren’t all cultures – equivalent? Who are we to impose our Western values on these noble Islamic practitioners?

    But IF … “our” little girls are being RAPED by immigrant men … then shouldn’t “our” Laws still apply? Or will we be accused of … “lynching” … people ovvvvvvv cullller … just because they “touched” our “white” girls? See what happens when you pray at the altar of “moral equivalency”?

  11. the defense position will be related to ‘cultural’ differences and ‘that’s illegal in UK?’
    think Im kidding? keep watching.

    sharia is going to make this alllllllllll go away.

Navigation