Why California’s “Cal-3” Proposition Will Expose the Left’s True Colors

“Deep down inside the left knows it needs those “no good dirty, hickish, ignorant, suburbanite scum” because the left is completely financially dependent on them.  They don’t want to admit it.  They don’t even want to admit it to themselves, but the professional left knows an entire “theoretical leftist utopian state” of social workers, guidance counselors, politicians, teachers, environmentalists, non-profits directors, welfare recipients, students, and other varied sorts of parasites cannot survive without an economic host to tax and live upon.  The California coastal cities, and their socialist utopian dream, NEED the people they hate the most.”

22 Replies to “Why California’s “Cal-3” Proposition Will Expose the Left’s True Colors”

  1. Is it just me, or does that map look horribly gerrymandered to try and give the Dems control of two more states?
    I notice that They left large coastal libtard cities in each area to maintain voting control over the red state interior.

    1. That’s EXACTLY what it is! It’s a 2 for 1 swap for the leftists … and a soul crushing division and total silencing of conservative voters. Anyone who lives/has lived in CA can see the cynical leftist strategy with this INSANE division of the State.

      And the wealthy “suburbs” are all well within the boundaries of CAL and NORCAL … only SOCAL will remain predominantly conservative … for a while. Until the new TWO Socialist States of CAL vote to erase our border with Mexico and SOCAL gets annexed to Baja California Norte

    1. Count your blessings … although your dance teacher is quite good friends with our syphilitic governor. Careful … some of his global warming musings might rub off

  2. “Deep down inside the left knows it needs those “no good dirty, hickish, ignorant, suburbanite scum”

    But they do usually forget that they need those “no good dirty, hickish, ignorant, rural redneck scum.”
    Because they think food is made at night by pixies in some back room of Whole Foods.

  3. Since splitting the State Of California into 3 parts only impacts a single State…How will they split the 2 Senators of that State
    (Don’t give me any yapping about 6 Senators).
    How will they divide the Electoral College split… The total population + 2 , said split would degrade the impact of the Cities

    1. Afraid the rules are quite clear, each state gets two senators.
      Electoral college is based on districts +2 so this would actually give the California area an extra 4 electoral college votes, but split them into 3 blocks instead of a single block.
      Could be good overall if they drew the boundaries differently, but with Sandiego carrying Socal, and San Francisco carrying Norcal, the interior is still screwed and has no point in voting. The new California along the coastal middle will be a dem shithole anyway.

      Interestingly, if the Dems want to go this route, I read somewhere that when Texas joined the US in 1845 they negotiated the right to split into up to 5 states, and many argue that the resolution of 1845, as it was a bill which passed both the Congress and Senate, stands as Congressional “pre-approval” under the terms of the Constitution for formation of such states. Of course they also thought they had the right to secede.

      If this trend continues of splitting states to gain more influence, I look forward to shopping in Fargo SouthEastNorth Dakota.

  4. Not unlike how the ROC needs Alberta’s/Saskatchewan’s “dirty oil” money to live their lavsih socialist lives.

    1. Many in the ROC are also “no good dirty, hickish, ignorant, suburbanite scum”.
      We’re also fighting the progressive leviathan. Alberta and Saskatchewan have their socialists as well. Need I start a list?
      To always blame entire regions instead of those actually at fault is lazy and tedious.

      1. Alberta is the most socialist province in Canada. That is why it finds itself with an NDP government that both supports the elimination of fossil fuels and the building of pipelines at the same time. The entire oil industry in Alberta is controlled by the government, right from the oil leases outward. Go to good ol Texas where the land owner gets the oil royalties and not the government and you’ll have a better appreciation for this fact. A bunch of socialist cowboys pretending their Texans…

  5. How about a coastal strip from San Francisco to San Diego plus Northern and Southern California? Put all the assholes together and split the rest. We could have 2 Trump states plus an 80% Hillary state so she can whine about winning the popular vote.

  6. I believe the new Californias would have to apply for statehood, like West Virginia did after it split from Virginia. They got 2 senators, btw.

  7. Voter registration in the three states of California
    Data: (California) (Northern California) (Southern California)
    Voter Registration (May 2018) 81.68% 75.02% 71.31%
    Democrats (May 2018) 49.68% 46.78% 36.55%
    Independ./Others (May 2018) 30.64% 30.74% 30.29%
    Republicans (May 2018) 19.69% 22.48% 33.16%

    It’s more of a way to add 4 additional Democrat seats to the senate.
    They don’t really give an eff if they run out of other people’s money in California.
    With the 4 extra Senate seats they’ll just vote themselves more national funding like Quebeckers.

    Hillery took all 55 of the electoral college in ’16 so…. That point is moot.

    1. If that’s the case, Congress will have to reject it. Californians can vote all they want but it’s up to Congress.

  8. How about dealing with the problem and only the problem?

    Send the Marines into Sacramento, send the globalists packing and replace the state government with something more interested in securing the future of Americans resident in California, headed by a military governor answering to President Trump, not the Chinese or California’s ethnic gangs.

    1. A noble idea … but I have another. Send ALL the illegal “Sotherners” directly to the toney Suburbs of Palo Alto (not East Palo Alto), Woodside, Pacific Heights, Belmont, Tiburon, Mill Valley, Piedmont, Beverly Hills, Bel Air, Orinda, Malibu, etc. No … not just during the mid day hours to mow lawns … but permanently … to live … to attend school with the smug, pompous little white children of well heeled leftis elites who live in these safe, white, enclaves. Where the price of admission and zoning codes are used to exclude the riff raff that these residents vote to flood into the hinterlands and urban hellholes.

      Do that … and the leftist elites would shut the border down as tight as their own puckered sphincters. Open borders … sounds … like such a … compassionate … idea, until the poor immigrants go to their children’s schools. Then it becomes a horrible idea.

Navigation