Being Divisive is Worse Than Being a Terrorist to Trudeau

Justin Trudeau was asked about the Canadian man that told the New York Times that he had executed people and flogged others to enforce Sharia.
His answer was to complain about the Conservatives trying to divide Canadians. You can’t make this up.

See the video and more here.

37 Replies to “Being Divisive is Worse Than Being a Terrorist to Trudeau”

  1. The cognitive dissonance required to regurgitate the moronic barf turdothedumber spews forth, is proof positive he is a drug damaged vapid nullity.

    And therefore the natural examplar to that bottom 20% or so of the IQ bell curve heavily populated with unionistas, drug users, bureaucrats, petty criminals, presstitutes, and assorted whackademic detritus.

  2. I recall when the debate started about returning ISIS fighters, Trudeau, at one point referred to ISIS war crimes as “activities”, with a smirk on his face — purposely sanitizing the cruel war crimes. Trudueau really does have sympathy for Islamic war criminals. This is the crux of the matter.

  3. Brian – You need to strike a deal to get back on Rebel Media. You’ve got a great message, and I love your delivery. Sadly, you have no audience…..just sayin’.

    1. The average Canadian doesn’t care about the truth, facts or any other thing that might require that they think critically. There is no audience for the truth in Canada. SDA should be as big as Breitbart if Canadians wanted to read the truth.

      1. the bible thumping stupidity drives a lot of people away, BUTT me saying this will get a few panties in a wad!!!

        1. Every society has it own form of religion, whether Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, … secular humanism or the theology of the omnipotent state… I find the “SJW bible-thumping” of the International Leftist globalists to be just as stupid and divisive…

  4. Can anyone tell me the procedure in the House about questions. Does each side get a list of questions so they can prepare answers before hand? Trudeau is always reading his responses so to me it seems he knows the questions he will be asked.

    1. Yes David, the questions are prepared and presented in advance so the government can do the appropriate research. That gives them the opportunity to put a spin on the answer and not be caught (as) flat-footed. But then again, can you imagine how long it would take Turdeau to answer a question if he didn’t have a scripted response? Umm..ahh.err..

    2. The Liberal staff anticipates questions and prepares Jr’s answers. Not too hard to imagine what the question yesterday would be; he is instructed by all means to stick to the prepared answers, for when he leaves the script he might blurt out anything. Like the higher gasoline prices are what we want.

    3. Yes, they know in advance what questions will be asked.Generally the parliamentary secretaries do a lot of the heavy lifting for the various ministers.

    4. In Trudeau’s case, he does not need to know the questions in advance as he will elicit the same three answers time and again. Two of them involve blaming and slagging the Harper government.

    5. Well, the way I see it is that Trudeau has a number of prepared “answers” which he just uses them randomly regardless of the question posed.

  5. Who gives Trudeau the questions? Who gives Trudeau the answers to the questions?
    Donna Brazile? Obama? Hillary? Kim Jong Un?

  6. Any answer by Trudeau is going to be a stump speech – the non-answer answer. If one did this at work, one would be fired, or constructively dismissed. The elite don’t care what you think, only if you comply, and Trudeau’s answers are reflective of this attitude. So ask any questions you want, you will not get an answer that you can believe.

  7. Trudeau is a mental midget who was elected by mental midgets. I don’t think Canada will survive the onslaught of stupid socialists of all parties. The country is going down.

  8. at his Toronto workplace, Abu Huzaif recanted what he had told the Times.

    “I did not,” he said. “You can put me through a polygraph and it will prove that I didn’t kill anyone.”

    When asked why he told Times reporter Rukmini Callimachi that he participated in an execution, Huzaifa said, “I was being childish. I was describing what I saw and basically, I was close enough to think it was me.”

    Well, there you are. He didn’t kill anyone. He was just trying to make himself important. He’ll take a polygraph to prove his innocence. Sure, he was there, close at hand, and saw murder and savage beatings but he ‘din do nuffin himself.

    I guess that about wraps it up. End of discussion. Trudeau is right once again. You Canadians are so lucky……

    1. Who the heck is he working for? Did they ask for references when they hired him?

      1. This is what I have wondered..

        Name three strengths: um….a good work ethic..a willingness to help others..and uh..oh yes..an ability to wantonly murder women and children without batting an eye.

        Hobbies: drawing, community volunteer,

  9. And yet Trudeau cannot see that HE is the most divisive PM that Canada has had the misfortune of electing. He is a morally bankrupt, hypocritical, egotistical, platitude spewing, shallow, moron.

    1. Obviously he’s been bought, he has no scruples or twinges of conscience, no doubts, misgivings, uneasiness, reluctance or second thoughts!

  10. Typical liberal response, its stephen harpers fault, no different in ontario its mike harris fault.
    Well the last time I checked stephen harper is not in charge, its time you, yes you mr pm, its time for you to get your
    Stuck up nose out of your butt and own up to your responsibility.
    And if anyone is fearmongoring and dividing canadians it is you. Yes canadians are watching and listening to your moronic answers and watching there hard earned dollars go to your tax and over spend
    Government.

  11. I really wonder what his security people and those on the hill and all those members of CSIS, RCMP, CES, etc. think of this twat. This man is a coward and a disgrace.

  12. Many great comments above and not much to add to those. This is what we get for being bamboozled by the media wing of the Laurentian Elite and electing a juvenile with a juvenile mind.

    The Conservative election campaign for 2019 should concentrate greatly on appealing to the blue and white collar voters that worked in the oil patch and related industries and in the industrial basins of Canada who have lost their jobs and are vying for service positions at McDonalds, Starbucks, and A&W. Neither the Liberals nor the NDP support them any longer and in fact are doing their best to have even more in those fields become unemployed to satisfy the mythical Gia utopia.

    If Trudeau is elected for another term Canada will be destroyed as an industrial nation and we will all become a 2nd world people.

  13. The extemporaneous answers generally come from the supplementary, or follow-up questions. These follow-ups may be partly anticipated, but the answer generally has not been formulated. Thus the continual non-answers repeated ad nauseum. I am absolutely convinced that the Liberals regard parliament, especially question period as an exercise best avoided. “The country I most admire is China because their basic dictatorship gives them the ability to turn …. on a dime.” QED

  14. Blue lawn sign installed overnight … this vicious Ontario election is a dry run … Andrew Scheer needs to get some Doug Ford into his shtick …. kill the goofy grin.

  15. If this ISIS boob doesn’t lose his job immediately over this, then I don’t know…

  16. If you immediately believed and got angry about the cut hijab incident that turned out to be a hoax because that lie was definitive proof of systemic racism and lack of Canadian values, but your Canadian values are totally cool with a terrorist confessing to murder and barbaric torture because you unconditionally trust his conveniently times recanting of his crimes….then you might be a progressive.

    It is revealing as to who progressives give the benefit of the doubt to and who they immediately condemn without a shred of proof.

  17. the LIEberal’s ISIS file is a mystery.
    what we see in the noooz is akin to the iceberg.
    some process somewhere is advancing on Canadian values and I dont like it.
    TURDoo embodies all that is wrong wrong wrong with the edjukashun cystem that does NOT emphasize critical thinking, it has ALWAYS emphasized compliance and linear thinking.
    migawd what the HELL is wrong with this country keeps putting ‘pretty boys’ in orifice? (note the spelling)

    the bubblehead party.
    and a tip of the hat to harper the bully who set the stage for TURDoo’s ascension to the throne:
    https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2015/08/06/Stephen-Harper-Abuses-of-Power-2/

  18. I visited Edmonton a couple years ago and every Canadian I met seemed rational and friendly: some remarkably so. (I am leaving out the Customs official in Calgary who questioned my wife and I for several minutes after we said we were there to see the Northern Lights. Is that really a weird answer?) Turdeau makes me think I hit an unusual cross-section of Canadians.

  19. Justard is a dangerous fool, and like his Mother and his Father he is quite likely mentally disturbed, if not out right deranged. The other thing Justard shares with his creepy totalitarian Father is a sneering glibness a pathological obtuseness to the damage they wrought upon the “post national state”. Justard suffers from what Dr. Peterson accurately described as a “casual malevolence”. Justard is stupid, that is without doubt and self evident, but like his Father he harbours a malevolence and a deep hatred for the country they were born into, with the exception of french yakking Queerbek. One more election win for this clownish drama teacher and the nightmare of Trudopia ends.

  20. Being Christian, White, or Conservative is Worse Than Being a Terrorist to Trudeau

  21. I wonder given his recent comments re the trump iran cancellation, is his brother still working with iran?
    If so that also connects another dot with his infactuation with communism, and dictorial govts.

Navigation