The 1996 Law That Ruined the Internet;

In 1996, Congress passed the Communications Decency Act, a law meant to crack down on digital smut. From a decency perspective, the legal standard that had emerged from the CompuServe and Prodigy lawsuits seemed, well, perverse. Prodigy was liable because it had tried to do the right thing; CompuServe was immune because it had not. So Section 230 of the act stipulated that providers of internet forums would not be liable for user-posted speech, even if they selectively censored some material.
 
Much of the Communications Decency Act was quickly struck down by the Supreme Court, but Section 230 survived. It quietly reshaped our world. Courts interpreted the law as giving internet services a so-called safe harbor from liability for almost anything involving user-generated material. The Electronic Frontier Foundation describes Section 230 as “one of the most valuable tools for protecting freedom of expression and innovation on the Internet.” The internet predated the law. Yet the legal scholar Jeff Kosseff describes the core of Section 230 as “the twenty-six words that created the internet,” because without it, the firms that dominate the internet as we have come to know it could not exist. Maybe that would be a good thing.

@KimZetter Someone asked me to provide a simple description of what this SolarWinds hack is all about. So for anyone who is confused by the technical details, here’s a thread with a simplified explanation of what happened and what it means.

In a demonstration of corporate integrity, Solarwinds has pulled the page listing their customers.

Oh, and…

SolarWinds, whose software updates were hijacked to breach U.S. government agencies, was warned last year that its update server was accessible with the password "SolarWinds123" – Reuters

— BNO News (@BNONews) December 15, 2020