Author: David

Now Is The Time At SDA When We Juxtapose!

Wikipedia:

There are many health care professionals, especially those concerned with bioethics, who are opposed to PAS due to the detrimental effects that the procedure can have with regard to vulnerable populations. This argument is known as the “slippery slope”.[10] This argument encompasses the apprehension that once PAS is initiated for the terminally ill it will progress to other vulnerable communities, namely the disabled, and may begin to be used by those who feel less worthy based on their demographic or socioeconomic status. In addition, vulnerable populations are more at risk of untimely deaths because, “patients might be subjected to PAD without their genuine consent”.[11] However, recent studies claim that the available evidence suggests that the legalization of physician-assisted suicide might actually decrease the prevalence of involuntary euthanasia.[12]

Belgium:

Thousands of elderly people have been killed by their own GPs without ever asking to die under Belgium’s euthanasia laws, an academic report said yesterday.
It said that around one in every 60 deaths of a patient under GP care involves someone who has not requested euthanasia.

From the other side.

Via Zerohedge.
Glenn Grenwald responds.

The Sunday Times article is even worse because it protects the officials they’re serving with anonymity. The beauty of this tactic is that the accusations can’t be challenged. The official accusers are being hidden by the journalists so nobody can confront them or hold them accountable when it turns out to be false. The evidence can’t be analyzed or dissected because there literally is none: they just make the accusation and, because they’re state officials, their media-servants will publish it with no evidence needed. And as is always true, there is no way to prove the negative. It’s like being smeared by a ghost with a substance that you can’t touch.

This one’s for you Oz. 🙂

Oh, crap.

It’s official. The silly season has started; this buffoon is going to announce.


Update: A link for everyone who has forgotten who Trump really is.

Cold Camembert and Broken Crackers

You broke it, you bought it. Some people are more equal than others.

People “should not be forced to live on property with brown lawns, golf on brown courses or apologize for wanting their gardens to be beautiful,” Yuhas fumed recently on social media. “We pay significant property taxes based on where we live,” he added in an interview. “And, no, we’re not all equal when it comes to water.”

The utopia of failed social states continues unabated.

Milo is genius

There’s really nothing more to say.

Whatever your parents’ skin tone or racial history, this in no way relates to your own. (This is a tired 1950s prejudice sometimes called “science.”) It’s no secret that I, too, am trans-black — as is a friend of mine, social media activist Godfrey Elfwick. Transracialism is a more common condition than you think.

Of course, the British have a long history of transracial. Think ‘Grey Owl’.

Best practices, phaw.

The Register reports on the ‘new’ marching orders from the WH to gov’t IT.

In response to this week’s data breach at the US Office of Personnel Management, the White House has ordered federal agencies to immediately deploy state-of-the-art anti-hacker defenses – things like installing security patches, and not giving everyone the admin password.

I shake my head.

  1. Install software patches for critical vulnerabilities “without delay.”
  2. Use antivirus and check log files for “indicators” of malware infection or intrusion.
  3. Start using two-factor authentication.
  4. Slash the number of people with administrator-level access and limit what they can do and for how long per-login-session, and “ensure that privileged user activities are logged and that such logs are reviewed regularly.”

Can anyone in IT tell me why 1,2 and 4 are not standard operating procedure?
I’ll give them a break on 3, because 2 factor id is a tough nut. User + machine, user + user, user + IP, user + BYOD, etc can be difficult to integrate into a system.
I have some sympathy, though. You know how this happens? Every title needs a local wireless printer, cause, status. Then the users complain cause they can’t send email from their iPhone. And, “why can’t I use my Samsung tablet instead of that dirty old desktop?” “What do you mean the systems are going down for a restart? We can’t do that!” And pretty soon IT is just saying, “Screw it, I’m not going to bother fighting with senior management over what they see as nothing.” And you have a zillion holes in your perimeter.
How’s your networks perimeter? Have you chosen convenience over security?

Flashback

No. Just like every other prediction the enviro-whacko’s have made.

Then-GMA co-anchor Chris Cuomo appeared frightened by this future world. He wondered, “I think we’re familiar with some of these issues, but, boy, 2015? That’s seven years from now. Could it really be that bad?”

But, then, what do you expect when you ask a bunch of partisans for their best disaster-porn wet dreams.
Via peterj

Navigation