sda2.jpg

November 30, 2012

Hide The Decline

14 is the new 15.

Posted by Kate at November 30, 2012 11:26 AM
Comments

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/10/13/report-global-warming-stopped-16-years-ago/

"The figures, which have triggered debate among climate scientists, reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012, there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures.

This means that the ‘plateau’ or ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. Before that, temperatures had been stable or declining for about 40 years."

They don't have to "Hide the Decline"; they are standing in the town square buck naked. There is nothing left to hide...


Cheers

Hans Rupprecht, Commander in Chief


1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”

Posted by: Hans at November 30, 2012 12:01 PM

Follow the money.There is not one "scientist" who belives in GLOBAL warming caused by CO2. Jail them all.

Posted by: Justthinkin at November 30, 2012 12:23 PM

There are several standard atmospheres like International Standard Atmosphere (ISA), ICAO Standard Atmosphere, and U.S. Standard Atmosphere. All use either 288.15K (15C) or 59F as the temperature at sea level.

The U.S. Standard Atmosphere, International Standard Atmosphere and WMO (World Meteorological Organization) standard atmospheres are the same as the ISO International Standard Atmosphere for altitudes up to 32 km.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Standard_Atmosphere

Posted by: ES at November 30, 2012 12:49 PM

Yes, I remember 288K in all my texts in engineering school - Heat Transfer, Thermdynamics, Fluids etc. Since the 20th century rise is reported as 0.7C, I guess that means an actual drop of 0.3C

Posted by: Greg at November 30, 2012 12:57 PM

Extreme Weather, nee Climate Change, nee Global Warming will also die in its time.

Doha/COP18 is being referred as the Farce in the Gulf and only the Eco Greenie Grifter Cabal & Echo Chamber is paying any attention to what the eco-loonies are whining on about this week.


The money is drying up and international eco industry will need to find the next great Sky-is_Falling hysteria to fund raise on.

Posted by: Fred at November 30, 2012 1:03 PM

Heh. Too bad this won't make news anywhere. Same as when they changed the (US)SAT score grading system and questions to 'improve' the declining scores, same as when they changed ladies' clothing sizes so that your ex could wear something labeled a size 9 and not look like the Michelin animated spokesperson, etc.

Posted by: another john galt at November 30, 2012 1:07 PM

Typical. Warmists with an agenda have no shame when it comes to manipulating the numbers to prove the hypothesis. Not much can be done with people willing to lie and cheat.

Now, what I do find curious are those who sincerely believe in the science not the politics - or at least claim to. The serious and mature people, not partisans and youthful mobs. You think they would be appalled at some of Team C-AGWs tactics. If C-AGW science is solid then why the need for embellishment, exaggeration, data manipulation, etc.

AGW seemed quite plausible to me until I looked a bit deeper into the science (flawed computer models for the most part) and the behavior of its promoters. Only after the solutions to C-AGW were revealed did the odd, unscientific behavior of the scientists make sense.

Posted by: LC Bennett at November 30, 2012 1:53 PM

Geez! You can't make this stuff up! Oh wait - apparently you can!

Posted by: Philanthropist at November 30, 2012 2:57 PM

15C.....14C.....AND STILL WARMING!!!

Posted by: iggy slanter at November 30, 2012 3:06 PM

My feet are cold.

Posted by: Brian M. at November 30, 2012 3:25 PM

to: Brian M. at November 30, 2012 3:25 PM

try wool socks.

Posted by: puddin n pie at November 30, 2012 4:18 PM

Portable goal posts...how novel...

Posted by: syncrodox at November 30, 2012 4:49 PM

whom ever invented this chang, so be good for a No Bell Pee-s prize

Posted by: NME666 at November 30, 2012 5:32 PM

I think I found where they get the 14 degrees C from. It is the 1961-90 global average mean temperature, and that was what they base their anomalies on.

See Notes to editors: at bottom of this report:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2012/global-temperatures-2012

Posted by: ES at December 1, 2012 12:12 AM

An excellent critical review of the literature -- nicely referenced and triangulated, and consistent with the scientific method.

Which means it will be completely ignored by the other side...

Posted by: David Southam at December 1, 2012 7:15 AM

Spinning the knobs!

Wheeeeeeeeeeeee!

Posted by: iurockhead at December 1, 2012 11:51 AM
Post a comment

Before submitting, review the post to ensure your comment is on topic and does not contain words that might get caught in the spam filter (eg: insurance, viagra, online, poker). This is not a forum or a repository for off-topic link dumps. Profanity is discouraged. Take your extended debates and/or flamewars to private email. THESE RULES APPLY TO EVERYONE. Thank you.










Remember personal info?






Site
Meter