sda2.jpg

May 4, 2012

Take Me, Dear Leader

Somebody's planning on being President for a long, long time....

Let the parodies begin.

lifeofjulia3a1.jpg

More
- "Who is Julia and why am I paying for all her sh*t?"

Posted by Kate at May 4, 2012 12:08 AM
Comments

If Americans are really so dumb as to buy into this NDP-type claptrap where there's no limit to the amount of debt they and their country can incur then they TRULY DESERVE Obama for another 4 years of destruction.

Posted by: Robert W. (Vancouver) at May 4, 2012 12:45 AM

First!

Cradle to grave, baby ... cradle to grave.

Posted by: No Guff at May 4, 2012 12:45 AM

Alright. Second then.

Posted by: No Guff at May 4, 2012 12:46 AM

Headachy thinking sucks...Applied thinking...not so much.

Posted by: syncrodox at May 4, 2012 12:46 AM

Parodies linky is blanky...

I'm sure there is a parody in there about Julia's birthcontrol pills being provided by Bambi, and Romney makes her pay for them...at Walmart, obviously.

Posted by: bluetech at May 4, 2012 12:53 AM

Robert, exactly.

This reminds me. Did anyone else see the interview Sean Hannity had with Occupier this evening. This anarchist thought that everything should be free. Bin there and done that, and, by the way, that did not work out so well for the 99% who suffered for seven decades.

Posted by: Ken (Kulak) at May 4, 2012 1:32 AM

Well the scary thing about the US voters is that at least 50% are below average intelligence and education wise.....probably that's why 52% voted for him...counting the illegals and dead folk.

However it is estimated the in 2008 62% of catholics voted Demoncrap now polls put it at 46/46 for and against....

The food stamp crowd is disappointed he didn't give them more stuff.

OWS is not popular and the Demoncraps have endorsed them...not a way to win friends by having your pets crapping in public parks and on Police cars.

Electricity and gasoline prices rising is not a way to win friends either....

The survivor/american idol crowd may not get out and vote this time....

Still I dunno....the demoncraps are nervous because the republicans are raising more funds than the desperately canvassing campaigner in chief and the demoncraps....

The biggest factor could be the now aggressive Romney compared to the lack-luster/laidback McCain...

Posted by: sasquatch at May 4, 2012 2:25 AM

To answer the original question ("Who is Julia and why am I paying for all her sh*t?"): you are paying because a huge number of voters (many were women) voted for a man they knew little about based on endorsements from hack leftwing journalists and actors and brainless friends. Julia is a fictional character made up in order to tug at female emotions so they will refuse sexual favors to male friends unless they vote for the equally fictional character attributed to Obama. Welcome to the 21st Century and American decline.

Posted by: Sarattus at May 4, 2012 3:58 AM

To answer the original question ("Who is Julia and why am I paying for all her sh*t?"): you are paying because a huge number of voters (many were women) voted for a man they knew little about based on endorsements from hack leftwing journalists and actors and brainless friends. Julia is a fictional character made up in order to tug at female emotions so they will refuse sexual favors to male friends unless they vote for the equally fictional character attributed to Obama. Welcome to the 21st Century and American decline.

Posted by: Sarattus at May 4, 2012 3:58 AM

To answer the original question ("Who is Julia and why am I paying for all her sh*t?"): you are paying because a huge number of voters (many were women) voted for a man they knew little about based on endorsements from hack leftwing journalists and actors and brainless friends. Julia is a fictional character made up in order to tug at female emotions so they will refuse sexual favors to male friends unless they vote for the equally fictional character attributed to Obama. Welcome to the 21st Century and American decline.

Posted by: Sarattus at May 4, 2012 3:58 AM

Ron Paul on the other hand would have the balls to undo Obamas doings...

Posted by: Hasse@norway at May 4, 2012 4:04 AM

Ah, that sensible brake on the ambitions and egomania of US politicians: presidential term limits.

Posted by: JJM at May 4, 2012 8:21 AM

Going through that "Life of Julia" reveals something else that's interesting: a Federal government whose interference in areas of state and municipal concern borders on the unconstitutional.

I didn't know the UNITED STATES of AMerica had become a unitary state.

And of course (as Kate suggests), the other inherent flaw is the idea that putting Obama back in office will help "Julia" throughout her lifetime. Alas, no. Even a re-elected Obama would be gone by 2017. "Julia"'s life will then be subject to an entirely new set of whims from an entirely new US administration.

Posted by: JJM at May 4, 2012 8:37 AM

Yes, Ken, I saw that Occupy cretin on Hannity last night too: I was prepared for stupid, but that guy’s deranged!

He actually asserted that it was the NPD that had sent in the rapists to Zucotti Park, but he w/couldn’t provide any proof. He swatted aside all the facts about violence and crime.

What he was willing to admit is that he wants EVERYTHING “FREE”—as in provided for zilch pay-back: post-secondary education (paid for by the government and the school—but he didn’t even know who’s paying for the degree he’s apparently pursuing: I’m sure he’s no clue what he’s “studying”); a job provided; health care, including dental; a free house, etc., including, probably, food and transportation. In fact, this deluded idiot wanted, for nothing, everything that Hannity mentioned. Honestly, I began to think that this developmentally-challenged jerk must be under the influence of some drug: how about Oba-mind-bending pills? Hannity was finally so disgusted with this parasite, he dismissed him out of hand: he waved him off the set and looked away. That’s exactly what such an entitled ignoramus deserved.

“Adult toddlers” like this are now legion in the West: our “we-give-no-commensurate-consequences (because the state won’t allow us to)” parents, teachers, police, and even military mean that the little barbarians, which all toddlers are before they’re civilized, remain barbarians. Like the aliens, in Men in Black, a critical mass of adult-looking humans are, in reality, cry babies/bullies in adult bodies. When are the legitimate authorities going to do something about this? E.g., Why are marauding Black Bloc vandals, aboriginals, college students, sports fans, Muslims, English scum, etc. allowed to wear face masks, while taunting and bullying law abiding citizens and the police, and breaking the law every which way? When are law abiding citizens going to regain their rights? At the moment, the barbarians are given more respect and protection than the rest of us, their victims. (I recently talked to a police officer about the Occupy hoodlums. He said that the police had to be very careful because they didn’t want to “hurt” any of them. I said, “Be my guest, and the longer you allow these miscreants to threaten and actually hurt the rest of us, the less the law abiding public respects you.” He was sympathetic, but he's also under orders . . .)

Our “leaders” are spineless and despicable. As long as these highly paid apparatchiks are AWOL, on our time and dime, the prognosis is abysmal.

Posted by: lookout at May 4, 2012 8:42 AM

"Genevieve" needs to sit down with "Julia" and have a little talk with her about that Obama guy.

Posted by: Ellie in T.O. at May 4, 2012 9:30 AM

Posted by: JJM at May 4, 2012 8:37 AM

True, if Obama and his minions plan to voluntarily give up power in 2017.

I'm sure you know how these Great Leaps ‘Forward' tend to play out.

Posted by: set you free at May 4, 2012 9:58 AM

first he takes the communist slogan 'forward' then runs on karl marx's birthday ? priceless...

http://www.myfreedompost.com/2012/05/obama-to-officially-launch-campaign-on.html

Obama will officially launch his 2012 re-election campain, and no I’m not kidding, on Karl Marx’s birthday, May 5th! First, we learn that Earth Day was started on the birthday of Vladimir Lenin, the Communist butcher and founder of the USSR, now we learn that Barack Obama, America’s first Marxist president, is launching his campaign on the father of communism’s birthday? Come on, now. This is just too appropriate! How fitting!

Coincidence? Stupid oversight? Or, an intentional middle-finger in the face of the American people?

Posted by: Bemused at May 4, 2012 10:01 AM

Americans are paying for Julia's stuff because women have proven the most dependable accomplices of liberals, communists and progressives. As soon as men granted the vote to women, progressives promised them all the benefits of marriage without the responsibility---namely, the money to raise their bastards by any of a number of gallants, without having to be loyal or faithful (in bed or out of it) or accept the dominion of any particular man. Free love was a standard demand among 19th century communist cults and cranks, enough that Karl Marx had to deny he believed in free love as such in the Communist Manifesto, claiming that it was rather capitalism that had made all women into whores.

Women have been thrusting progressives into office ever since. It has been shown that after women got the vote in a particular US state, the government sector invariably mushroomed.

That the left bought the loyalty of the average woman so cheaply is no real surprise. The snake turned Eve against God with far emptier promises than this. The real question is how men could have let it happen.

It wasn't just a few philandering radicals for whom free love was an excuse to have it off with "liberated" women without having to pay for the brats they had sired. Thankfully, there weren't enough of them to matter at the ballot box even after male suffrage became universal. No man in his right mind wanted his wife to be able to disregard her marriage vows and get away with it, nor did he want to pay for someone else's children.

Here is the answer I've found most persuasive.

It has been shown that men with more daughters than sons can be tempted to vote for liberals more easily than men with more sons than daughters. No man in his right mind wants his own wife to lord it over him in marriage. Fathers do, however, want their daughters to be able to lord it over their sons-in-law, the better to be able to pressure the sons-in-law to support their wives' fathers in their old age, not their (the sons-in-law's) own parents.

Men with more daughters, it has been shown, are also more likely to support women's "reproductive rights" (at someone else's expense, naturally). That's no real surprise either. Such privileges are a boon to fathers unwilling or unable to protect their daughters' chastity. Easier access to birth control (especially abortion) makes it easier for an unscrupulous father to cover up a daughter's sins until she's been safely married off to some sucker who doesn't know her reputation. No man wants an unmarriageable daughter and illegitimate grandchild eating him out of house and home until the end of his days.

In short, every man wanted every other man's wife to have "rights," because it made his own life a little easier.

In the end, of course, giving the feminists and suffragettes what they wanted only made life easier for the enemies of Christian civilization---and for the faithless women who thrust them into office year after year.

If it's any consolation? Julia has assuredly had her reward.

Posted by: Dick Slater at May 4, 2012 10:33 AM

There is no way I could get through the whole thing, but does it ever mention that Julia's taxes will be triple her equivalent from a generation ago?

Posted by: Pierce at May 4, 2012 10:40 AM

Is it coincidence that "Julia" was the name of Winston Smith's girlfriend in 1984? Are the Obamatons using Orwel as a play book?

Posted by: Occam at May 4, 2012 10:46 AM

Julia is a skank.

Posted by: Eskimo at May 4, 2012 10:49 AM

Bemused, the answer is, wait for it..."Or, an intentional middle-finger in the face of the American people?"

Posted by: Ken (Kulak) at May 4, 2012 10:51 AM

I'm surprised the Obama fart catchers used an very obvious white girl's name like Julia, rather than a name like Shawneekwa (or however the hell it's supposed to be spelled).

I clicked on the Espanol version of Obama's website, but couldn't find a "Consuela" version of the cartoon story either.

Shame on the Obama camp for not "focus grouping" this enough!

Posted by: Eskimo at May 4, 2012 10:56 AM

Looks like Julia makes out OK, but what happens to Winston?

It's ironic that the Obama campaign would choose to highlight the life of one of the primary characters from 1984.

1984 was a warning, not a freaking guide book.

Posted by: Lickmuffin at May 4, 2012 11:01 AM

"Under President Obama: Julia decides to have a baby."

I wonder how many "Julias" decided to have a baby under Bill Clinton?

Posted by: Don B at May 4, 2012 11:47 AM

even msnbc is calling 'bama out on this one...never thought I'd see the day


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDxiA9N4TpE

Politico’s Mike Allen: “One of the things that those hundreds of young people in the Chicago headquarters do is create viral pieces of content for the web. Things that people will share. This is one that I think may be viral in the wrong way, that I think is a lot bigger on the Republican side, than it is on the Democratic side. The Life of Julia takes her from age 3 to age 67 and at every point along the way the government is giving her a hand.”

MSNBC’s Willie Geist: “They did lob this up as a softball for Republicans, one conservative saying, ‘Who the hell is Julia and why am i paying for her whole life?’”

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough: “Who brushes her teeth?”

Mika Brzezinski: “I don’t think it helps. … I think we are at a state, time in this country where people feel that there is no hope, that they need help so desperately, but at some point we do have to inspire innovation and hope and get people on their way. … They do need a leg up but then at some point… but their whole life, funded?”

Donnie Deutsch: “Our character is John Wayne, rugged individualism. … Yes the government is there, but we feel weak in that. You don’t feel proud in that. … In reality, nobody, even a progressive guy like myself, wants to see America portrayed that way.”

Posted by: Bemused at May 4, 2012 11:51 AM

The best one I heard was Julia died at age 76, and voted democrat till she was 92..

Posted by: robins111 at May 4, 2012 12:34 PM

The Obama site diagram shows all the women with clothes on except four in the younger ages who appear to be naked.

Posted by: HEP-T at May 4, 2012 1:21 PM

Cartoon says it all - 'forward', because he doesn't want the people to look back on his three years of rule.

http://news.investors.com/photopopup.aspx?id=610274

Posted by: ron in kelowna ∴ at May 4, 2012 1:32 PM

Julia puts Womens rights back 100 years. Since when do Girls need this much government so called "help"? Is she that deficient mentally, or as a human being? Same goes for Men but people on the left really don't care for them. These poor Ladies it seems are helpless.

Posted by: Revnant Dream at May 4, 2012 1:32 PM

"Who is Julia etc?"

If you are one of the folks who is in fact paying for all Julia's stuff you need to think about stopping. Nobody can make you work 60 or 70 hours a week, nobody can tell you that you HAVE to make mid 6 figures so the Julia's of the world can stay home and watch Dr Oz. Relax, spend time with the wife and kids. Take an extended vacation. Trust me, it'll change your life.

Posted by: f1guyus at May 4, 2012 1:49 PM

Wow, if even Mika's questioning the Julia scam, The Won's really up the creek!

Posted by: lookout at May 4, 2012 1:56 PM

What has happened is those in power have let the inmates run the asylum. When non property owners got the vote they voted for those who gave them the most. Those that give, thinking they are benevolent by helping those less fortunate. Enabling till they become dependent on those giving.
Doing for others what they can do for themselves does not help anyone. It stifles growth of the individual, community and society as a whole.

Posted by: Yestersdaysman at May 4, 2012 1:56 PM

This is the link to a interview that has been linked to on these pages before. It may be appropriate to view it again as a reminder of what is going on here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeMZGGQ0ERk&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PLAD8B80D85B6657AD
We of the conservative, freedom loving mindset seem too dumbfounded to realize that we had better get into the game and pronto.
Our society is immersed in a war but we're asleep.

Posted by: gunney99 at May 4, 2012 2:28 PM

When I went to Julias site, I thought it said "LICK to get started".

Seems to be as good an idea,as any from Biden and company....

Posted by: eastern paul at May 4, 2012 2:43 PM

Occam said: "Is it coincidence that "Julia" was the name of Winston Smith's girlfriend in 1984?

Likely not a coincidence IMHO. The Obamatons are a bunch of snotty English majors who assume 99% of Americans are unlettered beer swillers, so this is the kind of Post Modern "in" joke they would think ever so clever.

"Are the Obamatons using Orwell as a play book?"

Yes, absolutely. Orwell wrote the book about them after all, and they haven't changed at all since he wrote it.

Posted by: The Phantom at May 4, 2012 6:25 PM

Obama wants control over the imaginations of the extremely gullible. If promising outrageous things that cannot be delivered doesn't work, fear-mongering might.

Parody this all you want. This crappy ploy deserves it.

Posted by: Osumashi Kinyobe at May 4, 2012 6:43 PM

That these clowns are more lefty than Mika Brzezinski is awe-inspiring. That they blithely talk about Julia retiring on Social Security in the distant future shows they are going for the 'tard vote.

Posted by: Mkelley at May 4, 2012 7:18 PM

one of the better versions....

http://www.suitablyflip.com/suitably_flip/the-life.html

...Her degree in Protest Macrame Making may not have led to gainful employment, but it's helping her to contextualize and assign external blame to her plight...

just like the rest of the 'occupiers'...

Posted by: Bemused at May 4, 2012 7:28 PM

obama is incapable of rational debate without the use of bizarre straw men to demonize. He's getting more and more desperate, as this shows. Good.

Perhaps Cretin is assisting in the Zero campaign; we'll know for certain if "julia" becomes homeless and obama talks to her one night after work.

mhb23re

Posted by: mhb at May 5, 2012 3:12 AM

Team Obama forgot about a little thing called domain names:

www.thelifeofjulia.com

Reality ensues.

Posted by: Linda at May 5, 2012 8:19 PM
Site
Meter