sda2.jpg

April 26, 2011

Respect

It would be entirely understandable at this point if one or two impartial observers got the uncomfortable, nagging feeling that Winnipeg NDP MP Pat Martin has a bit of an anger management problem that rears its head most barefacedly when he's addressing women of the female persuasion. His embarrassing, almost raging behaviour against female Conservative MP Candace Hoeppner , for example -- "You just stay out of it!" -- during a CBC appearance on March 7th certainly had a unease-inducing edge to it, to the point where even host Evan Soloman was compelled to make pointed reference to his rather extravagant anger.

Right around the same time, a few months after Conservative MP Kelly Block introduced a bill that would require First Nations chiefs and councilors to "make public every year the salaries and reimbursements...they receive from the federal government", Martin chose to address her point by personally insulting her, calling her "a hapless dupe for a bunch of rednecks." Several weeks later at a Parliamentary Committee hearing Martin was manifestly condescending, almost enraged, and - arguably - borderline abusive towards International Affairs minister Bev Oda, whom he constantly interrupted and spoke down to in a tone that was, for many, a bit unease-inducing.

This pattern of being a bit...rage-y, and on-edge, apparently continues: When Martin appeared at an all-candidates meeting in his riding on April 12, one of his female constituents stepped forward to the microphone to ask him why he didn't return calls from his constituents, and to inquire how much time he spends in his riding (apparently, he spends a certain amount of his time in BC, where his recently-divorced wife took ownership of their hobby farm). Martin proceeded to take the lowest road imaginable by verbally attacking this woman he didn't know, and in the most gratuitous way imaginable:

"How many restraining orders do you have against you?"

When the nonplussed women informed him that she had no restraining orders whatsoever against her, Martin allegedly said:

"That's not what I heard"

Martin subsequently issued a formal apology in which he avers that it's all a case of mistaken identity. As a non-Conservative MP, his apology must, of course, be taken at face value.

Posted by EBD at April 26, 2011 8:02 AM
Comments

Look on the bright side, he's not a Kennedy so he's much less likely to give a female staffer a ride 1/2 ways across a bridge.

Posted by: C_Miner at April 26, 2011 7:46 AM

"“*Stealing page from Liberals, NDP targets women in homestretch”.

Of the Liberal/NDP’s “old bag of tricks”.

Taliban Jack LaytoNDP is going fishing. The bait? The fish?

NDP Pat Martin is the rod/reeling in the suckers.

“*Stealing page from Liberals, NDP targets women in homestretch”.

Look who is the MSM’s women-fishing “expert”! David Herle, ” a key Paul Martin strategist.”

That’s Liberal Ad$Cam MartinJr.

…-

“*Stealing page from Liberals, NDP targets women in homestretch”

“If the NDP is really going to displace the Liberals as the main opposition party, they’re going to have to dip into the Grits’ old bag of tricks. Jack Layton has started to do a little of that with a last-week appeal to female voters.”

““Women are significantly less likely to be conservative or Conservative. So the pool of potential Liberal voters is always predominantly female,” said David Herle, a polling and market-research expert at the Gandalf Group who was a key Paul Martin strategist. Now Mr. Layton is fishing in the same pool.”

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/stealing-page-from-liberals-ndp-targets-women-in-homestretch/article1998796/

Posted by: maz2 at April 26, 2011 7:49 AM

Oh, EBD, he's a neo-liberal socialist. It's not anger; it's leftist "righteous" indignation, doncha know?! /sarc

Posted by: Mark at April 26, 2011 7:52 AM

Every time I think this a$$ clown can't get any worse, he proves me wrong. He has always been a narcissist who loves to be in the spotlight, but it appears this is morphing into much more serious issues.

Posted by: Jethro at April 26, 2011 8:01 AM

Just imagining how this would be treated in the media has this been a CPC MP?

hmmmmmm

Posted by: Alberta Girl at April 26, 2011 8:08 AM

Apprently this man has wimmins' issues? His treatment of Bev Oda went unreported by Liberal media. His absolutely disrespectful abusive treatment of Oda should of made headline news but it was ignored. Frankly he should be booted out of office ASAP.

Posted by: Rose at April 26, 2011 8:19 AM

C_miner, let's not drive off that bridge till we get to it.

Posted by: Stan at April 26, 2011 8:22 AM

Pat Martin is a disgrace but I am not sure if he is any worse than that other NDP freak Thomas Mulcair.

bverwey

Posted by: bverwey at April 26, 2011 8:27 AM

The msm will never pick this up, look how long it took them to even acknowledge the Boooo and flyer garbage pictures. This is the last days and they are favouring the NDP now more than Biffy and LIEberals.

Only if you are a Con will they pounce on it. That is why msm thought that Bev Oda was guilty without given a chance to speak - it is ok with msm.

Can't wait until CBC gets budget cut in 1/2 - like Global Warming/Climate Change and HRC - the Cons are afraid to admidt wrong to support these expenses and continue funding.

Perhaps a majority might change their minds - doubt it though.

Posted by: Clown Party at April 26, 2011 8:28 AM

Tantrums? Nothing a good lickin' wouldn't cure.

tantrum interruptus gluteus maximus ruber est...

Posted by: Jamie MacMaster at April 26, 2011 8:32 AM

...insane!

Posted by: Mike M at April 26, 2011 8:40 AM

There is a point there. I was talking to a female friend when she said she had voted in an advanced poll. She voted for Layton but wants a Conservative majority. Go figure.

Posted by: Speedy at April 26, 2011 8:40 AM

I guess it would be too good to be true if, after the election, Martin were reduced to flipping burgers at a Winnipeg McDonald's.

Posted by: JJM at April 26, 2011 8:48 AM

I look forward to the day that martin is exposed as a neutered big mouth when someone of the fairer sex challenges him to a round of fisticuffs.

Posted by: greyburr at April 26, 2011 9:15 AM

If there should be an NDP-led coalition running this country after May 3rd, you can bet that Pat Martin will have a prominent cabinet post.

The reason for the NDP surge in the polls, I think, is twofold: firstly, the Liberals are bleeding votes to them as a result of running a catastrophically inept campaign, despite the best efforts of the MSM to run interference for them. Secondly, Jack Layton, until now not being that close to power, feels free to offer the moon to voters, which apparently has great appeal in Quebec. The promises of the Tories and the Liberals, on the other hand, are somewhat constrained by fiscal reality. Layton can be as "hopey-changey" as he likes because so far no one is concerned about holding him to account for it.

It remains to be seen whether or not this surge will hold until election day.

Posted by: Dennis at April 26, 2011 9:21 AM

Pat Martin is one scary guy getting a free pass from the MSM.
I live in Manitoba and not a word of this has hit the local news. It appears the politicians under the NDP banner can say and do anything they want to women with out a worry in the world of being held to account.The Winnipeg Free Press is the NDP BFF. How else do you explain year after year of NDP rule in Manitoba?

Posted by: Fay at April 26, 2011 9:25 AM

We must be gentle with him,EBD. He obviously grew up in an abusive environment.

Posted by: Louise at April 26, 2011 9:29 AM

He's my MP. I have never seen so many Conservative [Bev Pitura] lawn signs in an election, usually one has to look for them. He'll likely be re-elected.

Posted by: oldfart at April 26, 2011 9:33 AM

Waiting patiently for Milewski,or Fife to track down the 'ex' to get the lowdown on what an ass Pat really is..waiting..ah,forget it.

Posted by: Sammy at April 26, 2011 9:39 AM

This is who Pat Martin is. Anyone that has watched CPAC/HOC has seen this kind of behavior before. I believe that he has had to apologize a few times for comments he has made to female MP's. Martin is a @sshat, entitled to his entitlements.

Posted by: MaryM at April 26, 2011 9:40 AM

Oh yes Pat is one of the newley, chosen ones by our MSM. Since Iggula has been a total intelliduncia disaster, that Harvard tall forehead thing just didn't go down our throats to easy, so Jack Lenin Layton has become the latest Lindssay Lowhand for us dullards out here in the land of the great unwashed. Yes, no investigation into the subsidized housing thing for Jack and Chow, no publishing of the NDPEE constitution, which looks like Marx's diary, no publishing anything of the Supermen of anger NON, management, Martin and Mulcair, never mind the lust to shut down the VERY BUSINESS that pays the bills for this NUT Jack, The Alberta Oil Sands. No our CTV CBC Globe Star have all jumped onto the NDPEE Titanic heading over the Niagra Falls of Business Failures. Women that vote for this communist must, have none or hate the children they have.

Posted by: bartinsky at April 26, 2011 9:48 AM

bvervey writes: "Pat Martin is a disgrace but I am not sure if he is any worse than that other NDP freak Thomas Mulcair."

Well put, and true. Mulcair is much better at putting on smiling airs of concern and bonhomie, but he is one of the nastiest pieces of work on the Hill, as anyone who works there will confirm.

Posted by: Roseberry at April 26, 2011 9:54 AM

EBD

"women of the female persuasion"

I haven't seen a line like that since the last Bowery Boys movie back in the day. Leo Gorcy made a career of that sort malaprop .... thanks for a great morning chuckle.

Posted by: Abe Froman at April 26, 2011 9:56 AM

Thomas Mulcair and Pat Martin = the stuff of nightmares....they are the scariest thing about a PM Jack Layton...

Posted by: Soccermom at April 26, 2011 9:57 AM

Martin's insulting reference to Kelly Block was certainly not reported very well by the media. No surpise there. There was absolutely nothing racist about the bill and, according to most reports, it was welcomed by the rank and file natives and those chiefs that had nothing to hide.

Block is a personable and extremely hard-working MP and is very visible within her riding. Contrast this to Martin who is nothing more than a blustering windbag who gives a whole new meaning to the term a**hole.

Posted by: biffjr. at April 26, 2011 10:06 AM

He is a man with a limited horizon- a turd hurler, nothing more, nothing less.

Posted by: Grant at April 26, 2011 10:19 AM

Just a piece of scum trying to hang on long enough to ensure that he gets a big pension at the taxpayer's expense.

Posted by: TJ at April 26, 2011 10:22 AM

When that other Martin, Paul, was PM we used to laugh at Pat Martin's bons mots, eg. "there is nothing more useless on God's green earth than a Liberal backbencher". Sadly, for a number of years now we have been seeing the other side of this narcissistic, publicity-seeking, raging buffoon and it is not pretty at all.

Pat Martin is undoubtedly in need of professional help, but he thinks he is pure, so he won't seek it out. Unfortunately, that riding, Winnipeg Centre, is reflexively and stupidly NDP-voting. It was represented for decades by socialist St. Stanley Knowles whose boots, socialist as they were, Pat Martin is not worthy to lick. He is one very sick puppy.

Despite the apparent conspiracy by the Winnipeg Shackled Press and the rest of the MSM to hide Pat's true nature from his constituents, some of it is probably getting through. I expect this time his margin of victory will be reduced relative to the last election. But he will still be elected. And as wacked out as he may be, he still has something to aspire to - he is not as wacked out as Libby Davies. Yet.

Posted by: felis corpulentis at April 26, 2011 10:23 AM

All of the above say it well.

I know Kelly block personally and there is not a racist thought in her mind and biffjr. is right. Kelly is personable and has been hardworking long before she became an MP.

Martin reminds me of Trotsky and Mulcair reminds me of Felix Dzerzhinsky the Cheka founder.

No doubt you have all seen the latest Ekos poll that shows Smiling Jack the Marxist seems to be doing a great job of wooing some voters away from the Liberals.

Posted by: Ken (Kulak) at April 26, 2011 10:26 AM

For many liberals, a male conservative is an enemy, but a female conservative is something far worse - a traitor.

Posted by: rabbit at April 26, 2011 10:53 AM

Bat shit crazy.
Truly saddening knowing this is what passes for government in our country.

Posted by: richfisher at April 26, 2011 11:00 AM

I live in Winnipeg and have been ashamed of Pat Martin for years. However, this is the first I've heard of this incident; I'm sure it wasn't in any newspaper. Funny how the incident with Shelley Glover was national news when she was accused of "ageism" against Neville.

I remember Pat Martin being a guest on Charles Adler's show when it was live on CPAC I believe in 2004. Even then Pat Martin was seething with anger and Adler commented on it.

Posted by: Barbara at April 26, 2011 11:04 AM

This guy is ridiculous. And yet he thinks he's right in everything he says because he's standing up for the supposed righteousness of the left in this country. Those comments towards Kelly Block are completely uncalled for. What a jerk. But is it any surprise that the liberal-biased media didn't report it? Of course not. Can't discredit an NDP MP right?

Posted by: Kdog at April 26, 2011 11:06 AM

Sounds like a story that the Sun News Network should pick up on.

Posted by: Robert L at April 26, 2011 11:21 AM

Here is the classic example of "biting the hands that feed you", Quebec going wildly after NDPEE, the very dopes that will shut down the MONEY TAPS, the evil TARRRRsands as Jack calls them, the people that send 9 billion a year Straight to Quebec. Go figure, Lenins court jester shutting down the economic driver that feeds a Province Quebec, who is 160 billion in debt on top of it all. Our so called MSM are the dangerous ones, aiding and abbetting the downfall of Canada like they have presided over, all while gloating in the USof A, unreal.

Posted by: bartinsky at April 26, 2011 11:22 AM

I live in Winnipeg-Centre, Pat Martin's riding. The NDP could run a convicted pedophile here and still win.

Posted by: Brent at April 26, 2011 11:22 AM

This is a typical Leftist response. They do not counter the argument presented, instead they try to destroy the person presenting the argument.

Posted by: farmer joe at April 26, 2011 11:23 AM

Obviously, Martin's bitter hatred towards conservative women is indicative of the systemic hatred of ALL women within the NDP ideology. Right? When John Baird argues passionately on an issue, the Left always says he's "angry", and that it shows that ALL conservatives are "angry".

Posted by: grok at April 26, 2011 11:27 AM

farmer joe @ 11:23 - that's right out of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals: Pick the Target, Freeze It, Personalize It and Polarize It.

Also note that 'it' is used instead of 'him' or 'her'. Talk about dehumanizing.

Posted by: Kathryn at April 26, 2011 11:47 AM

think about this
A Coalition Coup led by Layton & Layton becomes the PM. Thats if a Conservative Minority happens.
Would this country be in bigtime touble?
So that said now will the Center Liberals seeing they may not be able to stop the Orange Crush swing their votes to Conservatives, Or would there be a Coup after the election within the Liberal Caucas & center liberals cross the floor to prevent this.
Dont forget all this prior coalition talk has been with Ignatieff leading the Coup with Layton just grabbing the coatails. Now this new scenario is predomiment on the horizon.
Which is even more troublesome for this country, A NDP Led Federal Govt with the support of Left Leaning Liberals, Dosanjj & Rae for example.

Posted by: bryanr at April 26, 2011 12:06 PM

Despite having run a very gaffe-free campaign, notwithstanding the best efforts of the MSM to invent scandals, Harper still seems to be having difficulty motivating his troops. The prospect of an NDP-led coalition could be just what is needed to push his poll numbers decisively into majority territory by giving his supporters an issue to focus on. Up until now, that issue has been pretty elusive.

Posted by: Dennis at April 26, 2011 12:10 PM

Off topic: Jack prepared to re-open constitution. I guess two days of success was too much for him to handle.

Posted by: A. Cooper at April 26, 2011 12:16 PM

"Reopening Constitution not an 'immediate issue,' Layton says Globe and Mail"

Tall Jack Cane disappoints again.

'Nother setback for Taliban Jack:

"Escaped Taliban prisoners
BBC News"

Posted by: maz2 at April 26, 2011 12:28 PM

The apocalyptic vision of an NDP-led coalition is Canada's worst nightmare come true. Layton's wild promises simply cannot become reality without taxing the crap out of everyone and everything, especially when he wants no part of an economic engine like the Alberta oilsands. The NDP claim that tax cuts for corporations mean more dollars in the pockets of CEO's is simplistic and unrealistic. Has Layton never heard of dividends and retained earnings? The man is a far more dangerous menace than Ignatieff will ever be.

The best thing for this country would be for the GG to state that if a minority government is defeated, another election will be held forthwith. This process will continue ad nauseam until a majority government is achieved or the opposition decides to compromise and co-operate with a minority government. No coalitions permitted! Perhaps then the House of Commons could function properly without the opposition devoting all their energies to defeating the government.

Posted by: biffjr. at April 26, 2011 12:29 PM

biffjr


there is nothing in the constitution that prevents a coalition


and as to "opening the constitution" for reform, the USA up dates theirs about every 7 years, and ours is long over due

Posted by: GYM at April 26, 2011 12:54 PM

Another radically progressive misogynist. Well frizzle mah grits.

Posted by: Black Mamba at April 26, 2011 12:57 PM

If Pat Martin were a Tory MP, remarks like this would be headline news for days at a time, until the guy resigned or was forced out of caucus. Even then, such remarks would be presented as proof positive of the woman-hating, scary philosophy of the Conservative Party in general. But because he's an avowed socialist, he gets a pass from the MSM. It now appears that the MSM can run interference for the NDP as well as they can for the Liberals.

Posted by: Dennis at April 26, 2011 1:06 PM

"there is nothing in the constitution that prevents a coalition"

There is also nothing in the constitution preventing the GG from denying a coalition.

Posted by: biffjr. at April 26, 2011 1:11 PM

I live in Winnipeg-Centre, Pat Martin's riding. The NDP could run a convicted pedophile here and still win.

Posted by: Brent at April 26, 2011 11:22 AM

Unfortunately Brent is very correct on that statement.

Another riding in Wpg, Elmwood Transcona, is a similar lost cause, having elected Bill Blakie NDP repeatedly, till his return to Manitoba to double dip as an MLA in the Manitoba Legislature. His riding was then taken in a by-election by fellow dipper Jim Malloway.

Another NDP strong hold was Winnipeg North, which was held by Judy Wasylycia-Leis , who also tried to double dip, by resigning her seat, and taking a run as Mayor of Winnipeg, fortunately she showed her lack of substance in the campaign and lost to the incumbent Mayor Sam Katz. In the by-election to fill Winnipeg North, it was won by LPC candidate Kevin Lamoureux. But now to win it back, the NDP brought in Rebecca Blaikie, Bill's daughter, who lost in the last Federal Election, when she ran in a Quebec riding while she was a student there. Even though she is a relative (pun intended) neophyte, expect Winnipeg North to go back to NDP just because of her family name.

Posted by: Al the fish in MB at April 26, 2011 1:14 PM

biffjr
"as to "opening the constitution" for reform, the USA up dates theirs about every 7 years"

Really?
Facts and Links Please.

Posted by: doowleb at April 26, 2011 1:15 PM

Is Red Tory Joe Clark Brison's father? Is Brison Joe Clark's son?

That was the topic of discussion on Andrew Coyne's blog when Coyne shut his blog down for months in 2004. Coyne left his Comments open for the weekend and went off to his cottage.

On his return, Coyne closed off his blog; it was later re-opened.

Coyne cited libel chill as the reason for the shutdown.

...-

"Praising 'high standard' of conduct, Joe Clark backs Scott Brison"
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/praising-high-standard-of-conduct-joe-clark-backs-scott-brison/article1999163/

Posted by: maz2 at April 26, 2011 1:22 PM

My guess is that Rage Martin is caught in a vicious cycle. My speculation is his first love likely dumped him for being an first class ah0le. So now Rage Martin is a little defensive when it comes to the Ladies. When he comes upon another lady that he may fancy, the ah0le in him always pops up and he gets dumped again. Each time he gets rejected the simmering rage increases a bit. Every now and then, when the opportunity presents itself.....being challenged by a women , etc..... the rage boils up and he blows.

It's either that or he is just an ah0le 24-7.

Posted by: Bob Ronluk at April 26, 2011 1:24 PM

From Kim Calder:

"All candidates debate being held and put on by Gordon Bell High School (also being used for educational purposes by the school in the electoral process) 7pm.

It is now confirmed Pat Martin (NDP incumbant) will NOT be attending the event due to a fundraiser, instead the NDP have slotted Winnipeg South candidate Dave Gaudreau into Martin's place."

Posted by: Marty Gold at April 26, 2011 1:25 PM

so what.

I had the occasion to actually send a follow up email to a local conservative inquiring the status of an earlier inquiry and got the very offensive and brusk response he wasn't interested in being my (quoting now) 'email buddy'.

I then proceeded to WALLPAPER his riding with hundreds of copies of said email with a suggestion that anyone voting for him deserved the same response.

he lost the last election by a couple hundred votes.

I then coyly suggested to his camp followers the loss was because of the printed email I put in all those mailboxes.

Posted by: ping at April 26, 2011 1:30 PM

"This is a typical Leftist response. They do not counter the argument presented, instead they try to destroy the person presenting the argument.
Posted by: farmer joe at April 26, 2011 11:23 AM "

I think you're on to something here joe; seems to me ALL parties do that.

Posted by: ping at April 26, 2011 1:33 PM

Just watched the CBC thing with Candace Hoeppner and the android Evan Solomon. Martin reminds me of a couple of men I've known at too-close quarters: Hysterical, abusive alcoholic bullies in both cases (obviously I know nothing about Martin's personal life; I'm just free-associating). Martin seems unable to control himself or behave in a rational or dignified manner. Maybe politics is just too stressful for him.

Posted by: Black Mamba at April 26, 2011 1:41 PM

Speaking of respect. Layton respects PQ questions. But does he still respect the SC and the Clarity Act?

recent Inkless Wells twitter:

Rosemary Barton: @InklessPW agreed. I meant we did NOT get to Clarity today. We did consti and bill 101 stuff.

Rosemary Barton: @InklessPW it was a question from a listener. Wud u accept results. I can get exact phrasing if you want. We did get to Clarity in scrum.

Paul Wells: @RosieBarton For a few of us '95 referendum dead-enders, there is simply no question remotely as important in any election.

Paul Wells: Hey @RosieBarton, when you get a minute (I know, not easy) would appreciate full context of Layton's comments on "accepting" referendum vote

Paul Wells: RT @aradwanski: Is it just me, or is it a little depressing that the 'firewall' guy is the closest we have to a Captain Canada among our federal leaders?

Paul Wells: A prime minister needs to govern the whole country.

Paul Wells: I'll tell you straight, I think Stephen Harper has made a hash of 40 important policy files. But on Quebec secession I trust his instincts.

Paul Wells: Does Jack Layton still believe Clarity Act "has been broadly accepted across the spectrum as a basis for proceeding"? http://is.gd/PxaGl

Paul Wells: I'm sorry, but I take this stuff kind of seriously.

Paul Wells: No mention of constitutional requirements for provincial consent for the massive constitutional amendments that would be required.

Paul Wells: Jack Layton will "accept" result of a PQ referendum on secession. No mention of Supreme Court mandates regarding clarity of question, result

Paul Wells: RT @smithjoanna: Call-in Q: if you're in gov't & PQ in gov't, will you accept result of referendum on sovereignty? "La reponse est oui," Layton says #elxn41

Posted by: mikey at April 26, 2011 2:25 PM

Good thing Martin doesn't totally suppress his public antipathy for non leftist females. That
would be bad for his mental health. If he was a conservative with the same attitude towards
gays no doubt "research would be ongoing" to drum him out of politics at the first opportunity.

Posted by: Sgt Lejaune at April 26, 2011 2:30 PM

biffjr
"as to "opening the constitution" for reform, the USA up dates theirs about every 7 years"

Really?
Facts and Links Please.


Actually that statement was made by GYM.

Posted by: biffjr. at April 26, 2011 2:50 PM

Memo to dummy Conservative ad team and messaging room.

The reason Jack Layton's ads have been so effective is that they went beyond pointing out his opponents' weaknesses.

He did that, sure, but followed up with another segment outlining what he would do.

That effectively painted a positive alternative.

You guys didn't and if you get smoked at the polls and the country becomes the People's Republic of Canada, it's all because you can't understand that people get p**sed off at not knowing what they're voting for.

Another freakin' minority when you had all the positive economic messages going for you. Pitiful.

Capice?

Posted by: set you free at April 26, 2011 3:14 PM

@ SYF:

I would expect that the advertising blitz would be taking place in the last 3 day run up to May 2 when the undecided vote is beginning to firm up their voting intentions.


John Ivison: Cats have nine lives, the Liberal party may not

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/04/26/john-ivison-cats-have-nine-lives-the-liberal-party-may-not/

“It seems incredible to even suggest that the most successful political party in the Western world – an electoral machine which held power for nearly 70 years in the 20th century – could be in terminal decline. Yet the same fate has befallen equally successful parties in other countries. The British Liberal Party was also the natural governing party in the second half of the 19th century and first two decades of the 20th. Yet after the First World War, radical voters shifted to Labour, leaving the Liberal Party as a rump that has never reclaimed its former glory – the decline and fall of which was chronicled in George Dangerfield’s famous book The Strange Death of Liberal England.”

More at the link….Meow Pfft Meow!

Naturally, Jack Layton will need a ground game on May 2 to turn sentiment into votes.

The Conservatives have demonstrated and effective ‘ground game’ from sea to sea, over the last 3 election cycles. I expect that moving down to the wire, all hands will be on deck.

Cheers

Hans-Christian Georg Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”

Posted by: Hans Rupprecht at April 26, 2011 3:23 PM

Hans:

I do like the one where the gal's doing her income tax and pondering about which party will spend the least amount of her money.

That one should be pretty effective right around this year's tax deadline.

Posted by: set you free at April 26, 2011 3:26 PM

Me thinks he's angry about his divorce.
Better a jewel thief than a Misogynist.
BC always has the biggest freak farm of candidates in Canada next to the Bloc.
That one Province has so many nuts running for office is no puzzle. Just look at California or Oregon.
I agree this is a Liberal tactic of shouting down people ,but with this guy it sounds personnel.
As usual the CBC & others hide the imperfection while exploiting much less Conservative People problems. Just another entitled privileged member of the howling left. Confident all he says will be filtered no matter how bad.
JMO

Posted by: Revnant Dream at April 26, 2011 3:27 PM

I wonder why he got divorced?

Posted by: Another Kate at April 26, 2011 3:27 PM

I cannot excuse the conservatives spending election money improperly if that in fact happened. BUT, what makes me crazy is seeing that arrogant bugger Ralph sit there as if he's never been involved in anything slightly shady. I remember well the roll he played in ADSCAM, as well as the lead roll he played in the INCOME TRUST affair. I will forever believe that Ralph was helping certain individuals with providing them on info ahead of the markets. What I don't get is how Regina voters keep electing that BOZO year after year.

Posted by: sailboat16522 at April 26, 2011 3:54 PM

OT

I say "bring it" if Jack wants to open the Constitution. My number one political wish is the EEE Senate. That, and only that will assuage my feelings of Western Alienation.

That said, JL is talking pure BS. It's one thing to say "re-open" the Constitution and it's another thing completely to "open" the Constitution. Unless of course, Jack has a plan to put the world and it's problems on 'Hold'.

Posted by: Wesstern Canada Homez at April 26, 2011 4:08 PM

Hopefully after the election he is just another insignificant piece of dog sh*t on the sidewalk.

Posted by: RFB at April 26, 2011 4:23 PM

Coalition government is a "disoriented government"

Now that Duceppe has enlisted the help of Jacques Parizeau, former head of the PQ in Quebec, and has become involved in this election campaign, obviously he smells blood, Canadians must be reminded of his enlightening previous comments, in regards to a coalition in Ottawa.

“A weaker govt in Ottawa is eminently satisfying. The image must be one of a weak, disoriented govt which will become weaker and more disoriented in the future. This is perfect”

Posted by: Peterb at April 26, 2011 4:34 PM

how Jack wins votes with Pat Martin

Posted by: a@c at April 26, 2011 5:07 PM

Can't see how the escape of Taliban prisoners is a setback for Jack, he may need to replace a few of his MPs if this story is any indication.

Posted by: Peter O'Donnell at April 26, 2011 5:24 PM

“Vandalism is no joke Toronto Star”

…-

“Elections official fired for removing Tory signs”

“MONCTON – An Elections Canada information officer has been dismissed from his position to avoid a “political war” after several Tory campaign signs were taken down in Moncton near two advance polling stations.

Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe returning officer Ghislaine Ringuette Crawford confirmed Monday the head official at one of the riding’s federal election advance polls has been removed from his position for breaking federal election laws.

The information officer removed Conservative signs near two polling stations Friday as the polls opened to the public.

Campaign organizers for Conservative candidate Robert Goguen said that roughly 15 Tory signs were later returned to Goguen’s headquarters in the back of an RCMP cruiser.”

http://dailygleaner.canadaeast.com/news/article/1400921

Posted by: maz2 at April 26, 2011 6:11 PM

The press has given Count Who? a pass.

After all, Who? was “Just Visiting”.

…-

“In The News
Equinox Minerals
Vancouver Canucks
Barrick Gold
Jack Layton
Mike Gillis
Game 7
Minmetals Resources
Chicago Blackhawks
Blue Jays
Stephen Harper”
http://news.google.ca/

Posted by: maz2 at April 26, 2011 6:31 PM

Has this made any of the msm news??

Posted by: Sammy at April 26, 2011 6:48 PM

I did not know Pat Martin recently divorced, I wonder what Province the papers were filed in

Any SDA readers know how to find them in BC or MB?

Posted by: Al the Fish at April 26, 2011 6:59 PM

Pat Martin has exposed himself time and time again as unfit for political office. Martin is a colossal A-Hole and a bully, and like all bullies he's a coward! I've noticed that Martin's bullying rage is always directed towards woman, which to me suggests some kind of pathological inferiority complex, or wife beater mentality. A truly pathetic, angry man that gets a free ride from the MSM. Martins over the top raging antics in the HOC and the committee rooms are a disgrace, and illustrate the stifling, polarizing effect one person can have within the political sphere. Stick to bullying woman Pat, you're good at it, but then I suspect you've had a lot of experience with that type of bullying cowardice. Having said that, the woman I've witnessed Martin bullying have handled it well, and show a great deal of restraint and intelligence.

Posted by: Sean M at April 26, 2011 7:11 PM

Pat Martin is representative of the angry vitriol venom spewing cobras that comprise left in this country. If you think he is unique then take a 15 minute gander at the CBC or Globe and Mail comment board.

Posted by: Paul at April 26, 2011 7:13 PM

"I live in Winnipeg-Centre, Pat Martin's riding. The NDP could run a convicted pedophile here and still win."

I thought they were.

Posted by: Paul at April 26, 2011 7:15 PM

The unanswered question is: 'does Patty boyz Martin have a restraining order on him (maybe from his ex-wife)? Pat threatened the lady who asked the question - 'I will put out a restraining order on you' Pat said to his questioner. Pat should be cooling his sorry hide in a jailhouse. Intimidation...Where are the feministas and the Human Right pipples?

Posted by: Jema 54 at April 26, 2011 7:26 PM

Bring on the Layton led coalition and soooo long suckers! You wanna see a firewall go up in a hurray? The ROC better remember we are having our very own election in the very near future, bring on the Wild Rose!

Posted by: mark from alberta at April 26, 2011 7:26 PM

Bring on the Layton led coalition and soooo long suckers! You wanna see a firewall go up in a hurray? The ROC better remember we are having our very own election in the very near future, bring on the Wild Rose!

Posted by: mark from alberta at April 26, 2011 7:36 PM

I, too, would be happy to see a "re-opening of the Constitution" if it meant being able to ditch the Charter. Sterling Lyon of Manitoba and J. Angus MacLean of PEI warned of what the Charter might bring to Canada, and both were ridiculed at the time. It seems to me that they were both quite prescient.

Posted by: Roseberry at April 26, 2011 8:25 PM

It's pretty clear that Martin's using female Conservative MPs as proxies for his ex-wife. 'Can't get at her, so he substitutes Kelly, Bev, and Candace.

What a scumbag.

Posted by: batb at April 26, 2011 9:12 PM

@ Al the Fish

FD09-01-91267 09-Jun-2009 MARTIN, PATRICK D. VS MARTIN, BARBARA C.

jus.gov.mb.ca

Never a mention of the divorce locally.

NO MSM coverage that I know of about this apology story today. Compare that with the Winnipeg Free Press' dogged pursuit of a certain Tory MP's marital discord a few years ago.

Posted by: Marty Gold at April 26, 2011 10:35 PM

GYM:

and as to "opening the constitution" for reform, the USA up dates theirs about every 7 years, and ours is long over due

Not at all true. The last revision to the US constitution was in 1992, almost 20 years ago (ironically, an amendment first proposed in 1789, that changes to elected officials' salaries don't take effect until after the next election); the previous one (lowering voting age to 18) was in 1971. That's two amendments in 40 years.

Thanks for playing.

Posted by: KevinB at April 26, 2011 10:38 PM

I'd like to see Martin try that on Shelly Glover....

Posted by: OMMAG at April 26, 2011 10:50 PM

I'd like to buy Pat a drink.

No, make that a few drinks.
This guy must be a blast at a bar. The kind of blast that requires handcuffs.

Cheers Pat!

Posted by: eastern paul at April 26, 2011 11:20 PM

Does Pat have access to firearms? I hope not.

Posted by: eastern paul at April 26, 2011 11:41 PM

Just checked out Pat Martin's background info and sure enough -- like many in the NDP -- he was a union activist. In my experience, many union leaders are angry, hostile individuals who use their involvement in the unions as a way to vent their hostility and express their anti-social instincts. There is really something borderline psychotic about many of them. I think it is a personality disorder. This is a stereotype, I know, but lots in the NDP fit this profile. Pat Martin for sure.

Posted by: LindaL at April 26, 2011 11:52 PM

Hoeppner seemed to be enjoying herself, though. It must feel good to see your opponent light himself on fire and destroy himself in front of so many people. Even Goodale looked embarrassed. On the other hand, Martin should be grateful so few Canadians watch CBC nowadays.

Posted by: Louise at April 27, 2011 2:45 AM

LindaL: "There is really something borderline psychotic about many of them. I think it is a personality disorder. This is a stereotype, I know, but lots in the NDP fit this profile. Pat Martin for sure."

So, can you imagine them in Stornoway or, worst case scenario, at 24 Sussex Drive if the Coalition coup takes place? I shudder. My husband said, "We'll have to leave Canada," and I said, "Yeah, but where to?" There're no hills left ...

Olivia and Jack in 24 Sussex = Michelle and Barak in the White House and then the world will be totally run by crazy people.

O.M.G.

Posted by: batb at April 27, 2011 6:14 AM

Pat's trying to narrow down exactly who it is that his office was being harassed by but misses again, and a second female constituent wants an apology:

http://tiny.cc/xde02

Posted by: Marty Gold at April 30, 2011 3:10 PM
Site
Meter