
"The global temperature has fallen .653°C (from +0.554 in March 2010 to -0.099 in March 2011) in just one year. "
Posted by Kate at April 7, 2011 7:13 PMSo Al Gore's efforts and Gordon Campbell's global warming tax on gas in BC is working.
The planet is being saved .... now let's get back to those whales.
Actually, “An anomaly is any occurrence or object that is strange, unusual, or unique. It can also mean a discrepancy or deviation from an established rule, trend, or pattern.” (Wikipedia)
Seems that the graph is showing as though things are getting back to normal as opposed to anomaly.
Howeveh there is that thing about newspeak diktat from the ministry of truth.
It does also illustrate that all the talk about how the temperature has been lower since '98 is misleading since the gradual rise continued after '98 was spiked because of the el nino. So we'll see if the trend continues within a few years after the '10 nino. I'm sure the trend of global warmenists being annoying and ignorant will continue upwards in any case.
Posted by: canucklehead at April 7, 2011 7:38 PMAn Inconvenient Graph...
Posted by: Grandad at April 7, 2011 7:45 PMBeen watching this every day .... but do not expect any zealots to change ....
Posted by: OMMAG at April 7, 2011 8:17 PMThis must be why I still have my parka hanging in the back door closet and the dog's heated water dish is still plugged in.
A wee wager MSM will ignore this.
Posted by: Ken (Kulak) at April 7, 2011 8:44 PMThe change in temperature is minuscule.
There may be a trend there but only a fool would make anything of it.
The politicisation of climate research is a disaster.
Real scientists may have to develop a new term for such phenomena like 'weather'.....
Posted by: Philanthropist at April 7, 2011 9:00 PMI dont believe for a minute that global temperatures can even be measured. The globe is a very big area, and how can a few staggered weather stations possibly measure temperature changes at all accurately!!!
Posted by: MJH at April 7, 2011 9:09 PMThe 1998 El Nino is such an anomaly as to suggest problems with the data itself.
Man-made problems, I suspect.
I dont believe for a minute that global temperatures can even be measured. The globe is a very big area, and how can a few staggered weather stations possibly measure temperature changes at all accurately!!!
Posted by: MJH at April 7, 2011 9:10 PMThe globe is a very big area, and how can a few staggered weather stations possibly measure temperature changes at all accurately!!!
~MJH
Staggered, I like it.
"We shot all the remote temperature stations that didn't register an increase because they were "staggering".
No doubt the Urban Heat Island temperature stations were especially hot during 1998 because of all the airconditioner heat exchangers they were located next to.
LOL
The tax monies are so desirous that even a fraud of such Climate hooey has to be defended like crack addicts their stash.
Even politicians aren't this stupid.
This was to get people to give up private transportation. By hook or crook Politicians can't get rid of their own tax addiction. Even if they lie.
JMO
I heard 'Pretty Boy Roy' Romanow state we were headed for doom if we don't act right away on green stuff.
NDP going for re-cycling on grain bags as their only platform in the Sask. election?
Remember the Ejakohforgetit volcano? Then we had a pitiful summer in Canada, wildfires in Russia, followed by a brutal winter, all at the same latitude. These couldn't possibly be related.
Posted by: Ed Minchau at April 7, 2011 11:13 PMNah, all this cooling proves Global Warming.
Posted by: Dave in Pa at April 8, 2011 12:37 AMDon't forget that Google is now on-board to help fight those nasty "deniers". Good luck finding accurate search results on politicized science in the near future.
It if doesn't list falsification criteria, it ain't science. If they appeal to a higher power (ie a consensus that can't actually be proven) it's a religion.
Posted by: C_Miner at April 8, 2011 12:52 AMThe Liberals still believe in Global warming, it's in their red book along with cap and trade for carbon.
Posted by: tranio at April 8, 2011 2:22 AMNew to the blog and enjoying the different perspective. I would suggest that this graph is cherry-picking data and this video explains why:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y15UGhhRd6M
Let me know when you get around to argue about the "scandal" that is Climate Gate and how Richard A. Muller is going to shed light on things so that I can burst yet another bubble. I know, I'm such a downer. Still, I do enjoy the perspective.
Posted by: Michel at April 8, 2011 3:23 AMYes Climategate cast nary an aspersion on the motivations and biases of human beings engaged in work that is very important unless it isn't important whatsoever if the data fail to uphold the heroic end-times narrative. If only that data still existed!
I enjoyed your perspective even more :)
Posted by: canucklehead at April 8, 2011 3:45 AMThe Liberals still believe in Global warming
Posted by: tranio at April 8, 2011 2:22 AM
So does Harper, tranio...so does Harper.
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/p...r?bn=1#article
I work with people who steadfastly cling to the warmist religion, although they've changed to the "climate change" mantra. And it's all our fault. I got into a Facebook discussion with one that included links to all sorts of resources, including a paper that proves CO2 can't do what's being claimed of it, and it gets ignored, so you now how useful that effort will be. Because, you know, the science is settled, and all.
Later springs and earlier freezes? Not relevant. That's just weather.
Posted by: Another Calgary Marc at April 8, 2011 10:15 AM