Good stuff, Kate! I would LOVE to be able to stop giving the CBC my money, but I am forced at gunpoint to do so.

Is that Rick Mercer in drag?

a quick cut of 1 billion from the 21 billion Alberta sends for transfer payments could be requested by Special Ed to kill CBCpravda .

The American tea partyers are talking about a tactic called defund and disobey. I we do the same CBC would fall under defund.

That polar looks like its having fun going for a swim.

Letter sent to Carlin Ombudsman
Those pictures were all nonsense in the Nancy Heppner interview and somebody at the CBC has an agenda and is acting irresponsibly. However how is the damage that is done ever corrected? Is a record kept by yourself for a history that an individual may have in performing such acts? What about discipline?

is carol macneil working road construction in her off-hours?

Unemployed potash workers. Skyrocketing fertilizer prices.

Juxtapose?

Someone should tell Potash Corp. about supply and demand curves. A message from Sask. government that reallocation of mining rights or "royalty" fees for disuse will be reviewed for failure to mine at high potash prices would do wonders for motivating Potash Corp. to stop acting monopolistically.

What a coincidence! I emailed Vince just this Sunday (or Monday) about whether the CBC "documentary" footage of an anviro-nut group illegally occupying Jim Flaherty's constituency office following them through their planning, training on how to resist the police, committing the crime, their arrest and removal, and the aftermath (all done in a sympathetic tone) was supplied by the charged criminals themselves, or if the CBC was embedded with the criminally-charged "activists" and failed to inform the police about the planned crime.

I guess Vince doesn't have to worry about his job future.

I'm more insulted by all our politicians treating AGW as a "fact". All they are doing is giving the journalists shilling for the IPCC cred. After the mountains of evidence come out in recent weeks about how iffy the science is, you'd think they'd be jumping at the chance to pull back from global agreements. But no, the vid finds our Sask Party minister talking the talk of an AGW believer, giving the pics of melting ice credibility and confirming the AGW stance of the CBC ... it's the polician in this case whom we should be rageing at for they just gave the CBC the green light for being green.

If it weren't for US, Australian, and some UK politicians, who are far more courageous than our own phonies here in Canada, the IPCC would rule the day. Our conservatives have been bullied, cowed, and shamed by the IPCC and greens. While the pics of Tar Sands and Polor Bears are inappropriate, I find conservatives simply mouthing the international line even more offensive. What weak, pathetic, rudderless dupes with a cast of snivelling supporters (us) letting them get away with it.

Unless of course, the notion of global governance gives them all a thrill up their legs ... after all, PM Harper is a staunch advocate of global financial systems regs and transnational authority to oversee those regs. Do we really know whom we've elected?

Man, I really hate the CBC. A little more every day, I'm becoming a Western Separatist.

The angry look on that cbc twits face said it all, trying to trap Sasks environment minister into a Katie Couric/Sarah Palin gotcha soundbite and using the visuals that she had no knowledge of. Hey cbc, your garbage works in that giant cesspool called Toronto, that 's spewing trillions of gallons of what CBCers do best, into the once beautiful lake, but they don't work on the west. We are to smart, and if our premiers were as smart as readers of this blog, your effing funding would stop and you would be making beds in a homeless shelter where your kind belongs!

No surprise regarding the CBC..I agree with earlier posts, however, that it would be nice for a Canadian Politician to say we don't need to battle Global Warming, mainly for the reason that the whole concept is a bunch of crap..instead, even our Conservatives tow the line....

"Lower the jib, we are heading into a shit typhoon" - Jim Lahey

Cut and paste for Suzuki's latest speech. http://fascistsoup.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/cowfarts.jpg

Can even one of the CBC morons explain how this treaty will reduce pollution?

If the new taxes and regulations are only imposed on the developed world which already has relatively clean industry, then won't even more production move to the already dirtier industry in China?
Which will mean more pollution, not less.

I agree with Paul. When my elected representative is asked, what do you plan to do , to fight climate change? I expect this response; Climate change? What climate change? I don't want the conversation to continue, without a challenge to this hoax.

Dp,

Why dont you answer, throwing a Virgin in a volcano to appease Mother Earth....it will do just as much good.

I didn't know about the melting ice bergs in Saskatchewan, nor the poor polar bears. One of the most unsubtle examples of visual propaganda ever.

When (hopefully) PMSH gets a majority government, I hope one of the first priorities will be to axe funding to the Canuvian Broadcorping Castration.
The socialist bastards running the show at CBC need to earn a living the same way other broadcasters do and not at the public teat!

Pictures of Copenhagen Marchers the CBC isn't showing Canadians. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNQqUACJ_Kw

Carol MacNeil. See her, change the channel. Same applies to Evan Solomon.

From Suhanna Mercherand on cbc while speaking with Shawn Atleo:'What good can Canada do,other than hang our heads in shame'..blathers about PMSH not getting the invite to attend Obie's luncheon,and our clean sweep of the 'fossil' awards.What a maroon she is.

Anyone other then me thinking 3-way while viewing the clip?

By the way, taxpayers spent $25,000 to send Heppner and the Saskatchewan delegation to Copenhagen. Similar expenses for Manitoba: http://www.taxpayer.com/manitoba/burning-carbon-and-taxpayer-dollars-copenhagen.

"One of the most unsubtle examples of visual propaganda ever."

Global National did the same earlier this week. As the reporter in China talked about the horrors of CO2 pollution, there were scenes of water vapour coming out of stacks and brown air in Beijing. All that was missing was a drowning poley bear eating a cub.

Perhaps the government could hire a former GM/Saab executive familiar with the processes involved in winding down useless money pits. Advice on how to sell the CBC's hardware to China and sell the buildings for top dollar should be worth plenty.

No, don't shut down the CBC. Simply "retask" it to a new conservative viewpoint. Change everybody behind and in front of any camera or microphone. I'd gladly work on writing the news stories, editorials, etc. as I'm regarded as too ugly for TV work.

The Commie Broadcasting Crop should be paying Kate,because this is the only place I watch their spew!
BTW....didn't know the Saskatchewan Polar Bear was going the way of the Prairie Water Buffalo!

How many people have been to, say, maps.google.ca and tried to find the oilsands? I'd like to see a Rick Mercer style "Talking to Canadians" that has a laptop and gets people to do so, then gives a took at, say, Toronto or Montreal at the same scale. These people have no clue just how much actual real estate we're talking about.

Justthinkin,

The only time I get any CBC (Calgary Bubblegum Company) spew is here, as well. I removed all CBC connections, to my TV, years ago. I confess I use it for watching my Maple Laughs (actually they're more the Leafs lately) but that is all.

If nothing else, it does continue to show what we're up against and to keep the "fires of reality" burning. But at what cost? Not worth the $'s I'd say.

Cheers.

The person on the left looks like Tony Curtis.

Oh...sorry, I meant right.

I would like to congratulate the make-up person who smeared the dog droppings under Heppner's nose to achieve just the right expression of contempt.

I shudder every time I think about how much carbon the CBC emits every minute.

Mr. Harper, low hanging emissions reduction fruit... please, please, please, for the sake of the planet, shut down the carbon-spewing, global-warming, polar-bear drowning CBC. It's what Dr. Suzuki would want, I am sure.

If the CBC thinks we can run our society without energy then perhaps their own studios could be used as a pilot project. Will someone please power-down that place?

I am still waiting for the day I read, unsafe for CBC mobile production Van to drive the streets.

This is the NEP all over again, different name same leaches looking for a free meal off the backs of hard work, sacrifice and those willing to take a chance.

The sooner Western Canada becomes Western Canada and kicks the asses of the socialists the hell out of here the better. A little political cleansing so to speak, truck the socialist bastards back east.

Has anyone confirmed is the one on the left is Rick Mercer in drag?

Must See

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnoYTotZRjE

It looks like Sask has a pretty good representative in your Environment Minister, Kate. Calm, well spoken, answered questions effectively. The split screen shots while Ms. Heppner was listening to the interviewer were not flattering (compare the camera angles for each person).

Aside from the irrelevance of the icebergs and polar bears to the discussion, the worst thing about it was that the pictures began to show just as Ms. Heppner was talking about things that Saskatchewan is actually doing to reduce emissions. Most viewers sitting in big city living rooms probably watched the photos and didn't listen at all. Was this a live interview?

If I were to offer any criticism of Ms. Heppner it would be simply to ask why she agreed to talk to the media about speculation. A complete waste of 4 minutes of her time. Hopefully she at least asked beforehand what the interview would be about.

I think that Mr. Prentice and Ms. Heppner and others are doing pretty much all they can to minimize damage to Canada's economy that may result from this circus. I would bet that whatever public statements they make, they are making effective points about reality to the right people in the back rooms. PM Harper has been very low profile in public but he is probably doing the same thing. And don't forget, Mr. Prentice has been handing out some 'hot air' awards of his own.

When I hear this question ... "What is Saskatchewan doing to reduce global warming".

Why can't that conservative politician just say something like this ...

"all current evidence points to the fact there is no such thing as AGW and therefore we will concentrate on reducing pollution and promoting jobs in our own province."

Why?

Just look at what speaking the truth has done for Sarah Palin's popularity.

"a quick cut of 1 billion from the 21 billion Alberta sends for transfer payments could be requested by Special Ed to kill CBCpravda"

If a billion $ was cut, I'm afraid some other area, such as the military, would bear the brunt and the CBC would remain unscathed.

Our elected representatives seem to have a love affair with this grotesque entity which serves no purpose other than to be a Liberal cheerleader and, in the process, urinate away a billion plus annually.

Well, either a love affair or they simply don't possess the cajones to do what needs to be done to remove this giant leech from the hide of the Canadian taxpayer.

China's electrical generating capacity has tripled in the last 10 years, from 1,070.09 billion kilowatt hrs in 1997 to 3,042.31 in 2007, that's been fuelled by an increase in coal usage from 1,450.4 million short tons in 1997 to 2,892.7 million short tons in 2007. Canada's total electrical gen capacity, for comparison, in 1997 was 557 billion kilowatt hrs and that went up to 613 in 2007, coal usage is same pattern, 57 million short tons to 62 million short tons. Note that China's increase alone from 06 to 07 was over 300 million short tons of coal, over 4 times the size of Canada's annual usage. You can download the data as .xls files from here, http://www.eia.doe.gov/ along with more, if you are into that.

Forecast out to 2030, http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/excel/ieoreftab_7.xls shows that China is going to double it's coal consumption again in the next 20 years, with most of the developing world following suit, global emissions will double, or more, and it's not us doing it. That's brand new capacity too, new power plants are not going to shut down, not unless something comes along that is cheaper than the kilowatt hour coal costs now. So solar, hydro, wind, tidal, biomass, etc are all not going to do it.

The world is going to be dealing with emissions from the developing world over the next 50 years that are going to far outstrip anything that we have seen for emissions before. Last time I checked, over 1.8 billion still don't have access to electricity, and they are not going to care about the environment or emissions until they have time for that luxury, and are not just struggling to survive.

And that's going to happen regardless of how much money our government agrees to throw at it in Copenhagen.

Reality can be such a drag.

I too, am disgusted by the ministers acquiesce when confronted by such tactics.

Conservatives every where need to learn how to take control of an interview when they consent to one. If they don't have the guts ...then don't go there!!!

There is no doubt that a big majority of Nancy's constituents reject, (and are aware of "ClimateGate") and in no way, would approve of the ministers apparent acceptance of the "settled science" and or the lack in courage to confront the assumptions peddled by the CBC.

If she is not comfortable representing her constituents...she should get out of the way!!

I am one of Nancy's constituents and do not approve of her apparent acceptance of the big fraud.

The Conservatives and Sask Party are between a rock and a hard place. The Liberals and Marxist NDPs as well as CBC et al would excoriate them if they publicly said it is all bunk.

But just once, I wish one of them would tell the left where to shove their big fraud.

I once got Carol McNeil angry at me when I was asked to appear on the Newsworld show she did w/Evan Solomon to talk about - of all things - the death of Anna Nicole Smith. I thought the whole thing was pretty silly, and at the end I mused that Smith filled a "whore-shaped hole" in our culture. McNeil exploded - she made me repeat my remark, and spluttered that she didn't know WHAT I was talking about, clearly offended that I had even used the word that, frankly, everyone was thinking.

I have met smarter animal companions.

With the exception of the occasional Canucks game on Saturday nights, I do not watch the CBC except for what I see on SDA. That said, I appreciate these egregious abuses perpetuated by Mother Corp being highlighted here. Thank you, Kate.

My letter, below, to Mr. Carlin. Others may feel free to use, alter and amend for the purpose of forwarding a similar letter:

~~~~~~~~~~

Dear Mr. Carlin,

I write to you, yet again, about bias and propaganda put forth by the CBC under the guise of "news".

I direct your attention to the following interview with Saskatchewan's environment minister, Nancy Heppner:



Specifically, I would ask you pay particular attention to the segment starting at the 1:38 mark. At that point in the interview, the screen is split with the minister relegated to about one-third of the screen on the left. The two-thirds of the screen remaining on the right are then used to display alternating images of Alberta oil sands activity, and melting arctic ice shots. Of course, no melting arctic ice shot would be complete without a shot or two of a polar bear.

My specific complaints are thus:

1. Last I checked, Saskatchewan had no oil sands development or activity. The use of file footage of oil sands production while interviewing a Saskatchewan government official was inappropriate.

2. Last I checked, Saskatchewan is a land-locked province. Footage of arctic ice and polar bears was not only inappropriate, but also completely illogical.

3. With respect to the ice and polar bear footage, this footage can only reasonably be described as propaganda, a fear-factor, if you will, to scare and titillate the uninformed CBC viewer. No self-respecting news organization would debase itself by inserting such footage during a live interview. I also wonder, was the minister advised such footage would be aired while she was answering a question? It is doubtful the minister would have approved.

4. Once again, CBC shows its Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) bias in accepting the theory as fact. No mention is made of the unfolding Climategate scandal and the significant doubt that has been brought to bear on AGW theory as a result of the scientific skulduggery that has taken place among prominent climate "scientists".

Thank you for your time.

Kindly,

The real sludge is the tax-payer funded network which uses smoke and mirrors instead of truthful reporting.

Soccermom @10:47 - I'm a Western Seperatist, and I don't even want you guys to seperate (this makes sense to me).

or Separatist/serparate, whatever.

I think it's pathetic the way the CBC keeps spouting the liberal-marxist propaganda. First there is no evidence that proves the climate change theory. Second, even if it warms us a bit before the Lord's return I have no complaint with that. If some natives on some tiny island in the Pacific want to whine about sea levels, let them. Far better that they whine than we slow this economic recovery. Thankfully we have the Conservative Party in Canada which maintains some balance and perspective.

Maybe the Minister has never seen this Blog...but had she even done a little research...even reading page 11 of the November 19th "Western Seducer" would have given her enough info to control that interview.

Of course we all know that in such a scenario the footage would not have made it to air. So what to do...don't even bother, it only makes them think they matter!

The pictures offended me the most. The clip shows the tarsands and talking about potash. You have to remember the minister did not see what was being shown, see just faced a camara and gave the interview. When she sees this the CBC may have access problems in the future. Isn't that a CBC complaint about the PM? He 'controls' the media. No he controls damage best he can.

Maybe it's just because they live in Eastern Canada that the CBC people are so annoying. It seems clear that sanity disappears the closer you get to Toronto or, even worse, Quebec. We shouldn't even be going through the farce of the Copenhagen talks. We need to stand behind our Prime Minister in saying Enough. Jobs are far more important than the environment. You can't live on clean air alone!

I'm gonna go out and burn some tires!

Mr. Harper; "Tear down that CBC building" with the occupants still in it please. Cesspool of miscreants communist sychophants, sociatal misfits are so close to the devil himself, burning it won't hurt them.

"Anyone other then me thinking 3-way while viewing the clip?"

Posted by: Mr Lahey at December 18, 2009 11:43 AM

No. Absolutely not.

That look on MacNeils face says it all. She must have eaten a very sour sex toy Bennett is worried about.

If Central Canada does not like the West all they need to do separate. We will be happy to let them go.

When you call yourself a conservative government and allow a distinct Ministry of the Environment and send that Minister to the largest enviro-hysteria, klepto-statist flustercluck the world has seen, you are playing a loser's game. The Minister was apparently cheerleader for Copenhagen, albeit without the large red pom poms that Carol McNeil would have preferred.

Sheeeeeit! Hasn't that GD asteroid arrived yet to flame out this Dino bellowing?

sent:

Dear Mr. Carlin,

I object to the fact that our national news service has taken to editorializing during news segments, while using inaccurate and misleading footage. In this segment (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyYGYotImEI&feature=player_embedded#), a newscaster interviews Saskatchewan environment minister Nancy Heppner, who has been seeking emission breaks for Potash development. The story seems straightforward at first, except the video shows footage of the Tar Sands development in Alberta, juxtaposed with video footage of melting arctic ice. This is editorializing, plain and simple. The fact that the footage is deliberately misleading is disturbing.

I live in Ontario, so I guess I can't get too upset if the CBC wants to attack politicians in Saskatchewan, but this is political activism and it's being done on my dime. This is unacceptable. I think that CBC newsworld should issue an apology to Ms. Heppner, and a clarification to their audience.

________________________________________

Not that it makes any difference. I notice that all of the email letters I sent to public representatives never make it past the autoresponder.

Here's the letter I sent:

Dear Mr. Carlin,

I am writing to regarding the broadcast of an interview with the Saskatchewan environment minister aired today on News Now with Nancy Heppner

I believe there have been several infractions of the CBC own code of conduct and journalistic standards which will be outlined below.

From the Journalistic Standards:

1. "Accuracy
The information conforms with reality and is not in any way misleading or false. This demands not only careful and thorough research but a disciplined use of language and production techniques, including visuals."

The story is labeled and announced being about tax breaks for trade sensitive industries, please let me bring your attention to the tag line captured below which shows "Sask. would benefit from as second biggest oil producer" however the story continues on to speak about the potash industry, then environmental responsibility.

This is inaccurate and misleading about the content of the story.

2. Integrity

The information is truthful, not distorted to justify a conclusion. Broadcasters do not take advantage of their power to present a personal bias.

Around the 1:38 point of the clip the split screen is moved so Nancy Hepner takes of one third and in the rest of the screen shots of melting ice, polar bears, oil sands mining are displayed while the minister is speaking about what exactly her province is doing to combat climate change. This breaks not only the above point about accuracy because Saskatchewan does not extend into the Arctic it portrays a well established bias by the CBC that anthropegenic global warming is fact, rather than the theory it is.
The above portion of the interview is not in line with the CBC's own editorial standards because it is displaying a message, global warming, opposite to what the Minister was speaking about, being environmentally sound.

Please inquire into these obvious breaches in this interview.

Sincerely,

Two days before the fall legislative session ended, Heppner introduced Bill 126, "An Act respecting the Management and Reduction of Greenhouse Gases and Adaptation to Climate Change," and went on the news to say she was serious about getting it passed before the end of session.

What a joke.

According to the news at the time:

"The centerpiece of the [Sask Party] plan has been a deal with the federal government that would allow that [carbon-tax] money to stay in the province even under a national cap-and-trade emissions system."

"At this point, however, there are no federal regulations -- and no deal."

What a surprise.

The Sask Party makes its centerpiece proposal something that doesn't exist

Sort of like how non-existent potash revenues were to be the "centerpiece" of last March's spend-happy budget, taking the province to a billion-dollar deficit.

Meanwhile, earlier this week, Wall backed away from the nuclear reactors they've been championing for two years, while opening the door to taking the nuclear waste they've said for years they'd never accept.

Wall's government couldn't manage its way out of a wet paper bag.

"Meanwhile, earlier this week, Wall backed away from the nuclear reactors they've been championing for two years"

I'm a little confused here. Shouldn't a leftist twit such as yourself be pleased by this development?

Leftist twits are never happy...but what of his larger point?

It's not just CBC, we have on Global, Kevin Newman (which is bad enough) asking the stone-faced (is it Tara) Nelson about what was the outcome of the talks thus far. If this woman smiled she would crack her face from ear to ear!

anybody else think carol macneil looks like annette bening?

Curious? - I'm unsure what this MacNeil looks like, and if she's from CBC I wouldn't because I don't patronize them. In fact I see it more here on SDA than anywhere, and it's been years since I saw Annette Benning, though I think she's married to someone I should know, but forget who. Is that the blond talking to the minister? Is this a good thing, or bad, or just a thing you have fro Annette Benning?

Yeah and believe or not The Wall government is better than the predecessor.

Sad isn't it?

@ biffjr

I'm a little confused here. Shouldn't a leftist twit such as yourself be pleased by this development?

By what development?

The government has basically announced that its long-term energy plan for the province is a mess, and that it has no idea what it's doing over the next decade regarding climate, energy or the rest, including budgeting and finances.

Why would anyone--left- or right-wing--be happy with confirmation that the government is working without any sort of plan?

UG. Nancy must have been hit in the face a few times since being elected. That outfit is as drab as Ms Hathway's from the Beverly Hillbilly's, and about as colorful as black and white TV. I just gotta ask, does the nose come with the glasses? Stop by Paris on the way home and pick up some good taste, fashion sense, and perhaps maybe a hoot or two in Amsterdam to loosen that flag pole up yer @$$.

Wow, I didn't know that Mr. Spock's mother came from Saskatchewan!

Poor lady, driveby journalism. Speaking and no idea the stuff they are putting on there. The precious polar bear. And a cute baby one! Gotta have the baby polar bear. They should have shown somebody shooting it and implied that SHE did it just for good measure.

Typical leftist backstabbing. That was so stereotypical of the liberal crap they pull.