sda2.jpg

October 22, 2009

What Would We Do Without Norman Spector?

Now is the time at SDA when we juxtapose!

Norm Spector, expertus emeritus - "Where’s Mr. Brown these days, you ask? Well, he isn’t anchoring the CBS Evening News, a job that is now held by Katie Couric. True, she got off to a rocky start, but she’s found her feet and is now thriving".

Associated Press - Once again, Katie Couric's evening newscast was watched by fewer people than any network newscast.

Posted by Kate at October 22, 2009 1:29 PM
Comments

Who is this Spector guy? I find nothing more contemptible than a self-described "bald, white, aging boomer" who tries to suck up to other pressure groups by disparaging himself. He epitomizes everything that's wrong with today's so-called elite.

Posted by: RSP at October 22, 2009 2:06 PM

I would change that to "stupidus non-emeritus". After all,dumb can be fixed,stupid is forever.Of course,in his world,the AP does not exist as a "news" organization.

Posted by: Justthinkin at October 22, 2009 2:09 PM

Makes you wonder how's she's keeping her job.

Posted by: Mark Peters at October 22, 2009 2:09 PM

Hey you mean the Norman Spector who is VERY lucky I didn't sue him after he falsely called me a liar, repeatedly, at the Western Standard blog?

The Norman Spector who nevertheless still has a respectable, well paying job in Big Media while I don't?

Just a reminder at this juncture that Rush Limbaugh has more daily listeners than the Big 3 network news shows combined have daily viewers. That is all...

Posted by: Kathy Shaidle at October 22, 2009 2:20 PM

Mr. Spector wants the CBC to replace Mansbridge with a female anchor, citing Susan Bonner or "Alison Smith, who should have had Peter Mansbridge’s job years ago."

Spector scolds: "I say: get with it CBC."

If the CBC really wants to "get with it", how about giving the news anchor job to George Stephanopoulos? If that's not "with it" enough, dress him up with lipstick and a wig.

Posted by: G. Withit at October 22, 2009 2:37 PM

Kathy,

Have you ever thought of the reason(s) why you don't have that well paying Big Media job? I can think of a few.

Rush Limbaugh has 3 times the viewers because he's an entertaining former drug addict baffoon not because of his insightful reporting. Remember America is home to the 'Balloon Boy' and other egotistical attention getters who have their noteriety enhanced with child-like bad behaviour.

Posted by: not stirred enough said at October 22, 2009 2:38 PM

nses


""" Remember America is home to the 'Balloon Boy' and other egotistical attention getters who have their noteriety enhanced with child-like bad behaviour."""


like More Moore, and cnn's tingling leg guy????

Posted by: GYM at October 22, 2009 2:46 PM

Meanwhile back at the ranch, Tom Clark saying PM Harper put out a press release stating the Globe & Mail is a mouthpiece for the Liberal Party. lol!

Posted by: Soccermom at October 22, 2009 2:47 PM

Have you ever thought of the reason(s) why you want a Big Media job? I can think of none.

Posted by: Kate at October 22, 2009 2:48 PM

and Harper doesn't watch CDN news on TV! Ha.

he does watch US news, but didn't specify.

not likely for katie

Posted by: puddin n pie at October 22, 2009 2:49 PM

Watching the CBC is like getting the news from the L party. I don't watch because of the sneers. Although Mansbridge does not do it as much as some to me the institution is tainted. Wafergate? Doorknobgate? If I wanted WK's BS I would read his blog. The local guy should be dewormed or pull his shorts out of his butt.

Posted by: Speedy at October 22, 2009 2:49 PM

not stirred enough: I thought you on the left were on the side of people with addiction issues. You're showing your (fake)tolerance again!

Posted by: Soccermom at October 22, 2009 2:50 PM

nses....you forgot to add that Kathy tells the truth and exposes hypocritical commie/socialists like you. OBTW...she is also a recovering alcholic,like me,so maybe we should both be at the Communist Broadcasting Corp???

Posted by: Justthinkin at October 22, 2009 2:50 PM

GYM:

“Tingle up my leg" was uttered by Chris Matthews on MSNBC.

Cheers

Posted by: set you free at October 22, 2009 3:04 PM

set you free


thanx, they can be so hard to distinguish from each other:-))))

Posted by: GYM at October 22, 2009 3:08 PM

I find it amusing that Fox News gets more viewers than all other American networks combined. Surely one of them will be facing bankruptcy soon. Not soon enough, in my books.

Posted by: Louise at October 22, 2009 3:09 PM

Justthinkin,

Recovering alcoholic is not child-like bad behaviour, its actually good behaviour so it doesn't qualify as American style noteriety.

The other qualities you've mentioned are noble but not entertaining. And that's the point I'm making...to make it the next level you have to be practiced at delivering entertainment value (a Limbaugh trait).

Soccermom,

I'm a centerist (like PMSH), not a true socialist commie leftie at all. Harper is my idea of what a Canadian politician should be and I've made that clear in several past posts.

Posted by: not stirred enough said at October 22, 2009 3:13 PM

"Facts if necessary but not necessarily facts*"

RSP asks: "Who is this Spector guy?"

You mean Abnormal and his other brother Red-Green?

Memories are made of this: search archives.

(*http://www.bluelikeyou.com/2009/10/22/facts-if-necessary-but-not-necessarily-facts/#comment-65864)

Posted by: maz2 at October 22, 2009 3:28 PM

The real makeover needed at CBCpravda , hidden agenda . anyone else pick up CBCs poll story this morning, started off as Liberals narrow lead, became Tories still lead in polls, then it got shifted to the back pages ,

check out these two stories.
CTVtass names him

http://calgary.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20091022/CGY_homeowner_stabbed_091022/20091022?hub=Calgary

CBCpravda will not even allege a minority.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2009/10/22/calgary-man-stabbed-home-thieves.html


CBCpravda , All Liberal All the Time

Posted by: cal2 at October 22, 2009 3:58 PM

Spector, ( red tory) if I am not mistaken was an Ambassador to Israel for the liyan Brian Mulroney administration.

If the CBC really was interested in airing s successful prime time program it would get a conservative voice on air, (which it has never had since its inception)
lets say a Catherine "Kate" McMillan, a Kathy Shaidle or a Wendy Sullivan and give George Strombopolous a London Ontario Health Sciences Centre half million dollar style payout and good riddance.

My guess is CBC would have a real winner for a change.

Posted by: Joe Molnar at October 22, 2009 4:10 PM

Katie Couric is still working in television? Guess I'm not watching enough. Last time I saw her she had someone shoving a camera up her hoobajoob on live TV. I mean, geez. If I wanted to watch crap like that I'd turn on CBC.

I just download the shows I want to watch onto my media server now.

Posted by: Sean at October 22, 2009 4:10 PM

another example of CBCpravda reporting. any idea of the name of the crooks in this story?

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2009/04/09/cgy-farmer-theif-alberta.html

Posted by: cal2 at October 22, 2009 4:16 PM

Norman's not so bad. He regularly kicks the snuff out of Warren Kinsella, not that takes much skill.

Posted by: Fred at October 22, 2009 4:18 PM

baffoon
noteriety
centerist

Okay, idiot boy, let's take it nice and slow: buffoon, notoriety and centrist. I'm not surprised Limbaugh is tough for you to understand.

Posted by: biff jupiter at October 22, 2009 4:21 PM

Fred - when Spector shows up to protest Kinsella, you're supposed to pray for a runaway bus, not pick a favourite.

Posted by: Kate at October 22, 2009 4:22 PM

maz2:
Your link didn't work for some reason.

I asked about Spector because, being an American, I'd never heard of him. We have plenty like him in America, though... white guys of my age, 65 or younger, who pretend to be tormented by the prominence of their own group in society. Because it is essentially timid, manipulative and insincere, I find the implied self-abasement repulsive. But worse is the abandonment of individual merit as the sole criterion of advancement. The notion of "group rights", as opposed to individual rights, is a recipe for social fragmentation.

Posted by: RSP at October 22, 2009 5:10 PM

Kate 4:22, lol, good point. Not much difference between a "Progressive" Conservative and a Liberal. Forget the Marxist NDP, to them anything that serves their purpose is "truth" no matter how blatant a an untruth it is.

These days you have to be a conservative to carry on the classical liberal heritage.

Posted by: Ken (Kulak) at October 22, 2009 5:42 PM

Jeez, Spector - I haven't given that twit a thought in years - not since he got the boot from the Western Standard blog. Does he actually still write for the Globe?

Posted by: Kevin Jaeger at October 22, 2009 5:48 PM

Self-deprecation is the name of the game these days. Silly, really.
I don't care who is the frontman/woman/monkey for CBC. My cynicism is brusque.
As for Katie Couric, karma did not care for her treatment of Sarah Palin. That's a thigh-high boot up your bum, Katie.

Posted by: Osumashi Kinyobe at October 22, 2009 5:49 PM

nses...good points. But how does that explain Letterman? Oh wait. I forgot my 1000's of affairs.
what's the employment # for the CeeB?

Posted by: Justthinkin at October 22, 2009 6:15 PM

Because I love $$$$$!!!!

I'm more insulted that Spector has his job than the fact that I don't.

Posted by: Kathy Shaidle at October 22, 2009 6:27 PM

Biffy,

It’s apropos that your alias is taken from Death of Salesman and the planet where boys are from. There, is that slow enough for you to understand?

Posted by: not stirred enough said at October 22, 2009 6:45 PM

Spector's in the same category as Mansbridge -- as in I'm-Peter-Mansbridge-and-you're-not.

The Canadian media gene pool is extremely and stupefyingly small.

What more can I say?

Posted by: batb at October 22, 2009 6:50 PM

Justthinkin,

I think Letterman jumped the shark. Besides affairs are more like borderline criteria. Coming unglued like Spears, Nolte or Hilton is far better.

Even Rod Blagojevich is starring in a reality show with some other of America's finest.

Posted by: not stirred enough said at October 22, 2009 6:54 PM

Well, Spector lives in the Cordova Bay area, so it's no surprise that all the champaigne socialists in that neck of the woods (Greater Victoria) have had some influence on him........as he decays into old farthood

Posted by: DanBC at October 22, 2009 7:02 PM

CBC still on the loose? I thought the gubmint sold it to Rot Stern for $1. Guess that means Judy R still has a chance to push Peter out the door and take over the Teleprompter once all his patrons die off.

Posted by: Sgt Lejaune at October 22, 2009 7:31 PM

I vote for Sheila Copps. That way she could get paid for interrupting. Mind you, Judy R would make an excellent co-host. Garth could be head political analyst.

Posted by: Ken (Kulak) at October 22, 2009 7:42 PM

Norman Spector once accused me of single handedly corrupting Canada's intellectual traditions. (Or something like that.)

Naturally, this is one of the proudest moments of my life.

He also accused me of being a Yankee spy.

Well naturally, this was outrageous. As a native Texan I would have been a Confederate spy, and associating a Southerner with a Yankee endeavor is offensive.

This was all back in the old days before America became a banana republic, and I was full of piss and vinegar and posted a lot.

Posted by: Greg in Dallas at October 22, 2009 7:59 PM

So he's relative??? Noticed his email is explorer6.WTF....and zero referrals for his blog/article...ummmmm

Posted by: Justthinkin at October 22, 2009 8:20 PM

You RCMP/CPC faggots raided my THC supply....
Media is focused upon lung receptors in addressing flu pandemics. But this Swine Flu should be causing cytokine storm according to this flawed reasoning. The reason it isn't is that 1918 activated our immune system into overdrive somehow. Most of our immune system is localized in intestine tract. Bird Flu attacks intestinal tract. Is mostly harmless for birds though, but once in a while wipes out birds. Now that my weed is delayed/lost, I might spend the next few weeks discovering just what specifically causes flu to target our lungs like an allergy. I think Bird Fancier's Lung might offer a cure.

Bioterror is the logical conclusion of your small town ethics; really expect the poor to take it forever??

Posted by: Phillip Huggan at October 22, 2009 8:37 PM

CBC News couldn't get more viewers even if they brought back Lorne Green.

Had an interesting call from a pollster the other evening. Lots of questions about what I thought about the CBC News service. Although the person asking the questions didn't understand English very well (I think she was calling from India) I made sure she got my answers correct about what I thought of the CBC. It was the only reason I didn't hang up on her.

As for George Stephanopoulos, he's way too much a tree hugger to be a reporter or newscaster.

Posted by: justsaying at October 22, 2009 8:38 PM

CBC News couldn't get more viewers even if they brought back Lorne Green.

Had an interesting call from a pollster the other evening. Lots of questions about what I thought about the CBC News service. Although the person asking the questions didn't understand English very well (I think she was calling from India) I made sure she got my answers correct about what I thought of the CBC. It was the only reason I didn't hang up on her.

As for George Stephanopoulos, he's way too much a tree hugger to be a reporter or newscaster.

Posted by: justsaying at October 22, 2009 8:38 PM

CBC News couldn't get more viewers even if they brought back Lorne Green.

Had an interesting call from a pollster the other evening. Lots of questions about what I thought about the CBC News service. Although the person asking the questions didn't understand English very well (I think she was calling from India) I made sure she got my answers correct about what I thought of the CBC. It was the only reason I didn't hang up on her.

As for George Stephanopoulos, he's way too much a tree hugger to be a reporter or newscaster.

Posted by: justsaying at October 22, 2009 8:39 PM

justsaying, not being critical, but those of us that are a little slower got it the second time.

Posted by: Ken (Kulak) at October 22, 2009 8:48 PM

LMAO - can we blame it on server connection problems.

Posted by: justsaying at October 22, 2009 9:54 PM

"Fred - when Spector shows up to protest Kinsella, you're supposed to pray for a runaway bus, not pick a favourite."

Kate I expect we will see a frothing post over at Warren's site within minutes and that he will file suit against you by 10am tomorrow morning for the above.

Posted by: Gord Tulk at October 22, 2009 9:56 PM

huffington post misinterprets Dennis Miller.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/08/dennis-miller-knocks-hann_n_313696.html

Posted by: cal2 at October 22, 2009 10:02 PM

Philip your post is fairly incoherent but I can assure you the immune response is not mainly in the gastric system. B and T cells in the blood have the memory of immune response. I won't go into IGM, IGG et al.

Posted by: Speedy at October 22, 2009 10:09 PM

Kate i read your blog quite a bit dear,i say dear cause im older than you most likley,but i have noticed your letting some real goodtopics pass by without comment.Dont let some libtards muzzell you kate.

Posted by: Rj green at October 22, 2009 10:18 PM

Whatever many say, Mr Spector has wit, knowledge (not quite in this case, I grant you), and a degree of intellectual honesty rare in our major media. Take a look for a few days at "Norman's Spectator" and compare with any other Canadian news aggregator.

Also, he's constantly taking on other members of those major media in a way no-one else among them dares.

Kate posted this today Mickey I.'s ignorance about Mahar Arar's rendition to Syria. Mr Spector chose the same Toronto Star story as his "Bouquet" today:

"Ignatieff gets his facts wrong in Arar case"

Disagree yes, but no need reflexively to disrespect.

Mark
Ottawa

Posted by: Mark Ottawa at October 22, 2009 10:28 PM

As for Mickey I. see this from Raphael Alexander (and my comment, second).

Mark
Ottawa

Posted by: Mark Ottawa at October 22, 2009 10:32 PM

Mark, I had enough of Spector's intellectual dishonesty directed at me at the WS a few years ago to waste any time following him. This link was the first I've read of him in years, literally. As usual, his content is barely coherent, but the Couric comment was too juicy to pass up. Otherwise, I'd have let it go by unmentioned.

Posted by: Kate at October 22, 2009 11:06 PM

Speedy immune system is 60% gastric. Obviously evolutionary, despite what our creationist Minister of Science thinks, response to all our diverse food sources. There is a lymphatic connection between intestinal tract and lungs but yeah, no one knows why cytokine storm happens. Anyway, I don't see why extinction via bioterror is bad if extinction via AGW isn't bad, so CPC supporters shouldn't care. I'll pay myself a token penny and call it market forces.

Posted by: Phillip Huggan at October 22, 2009 11:15 PM

Pj, unfortunately there are only so many hours in a day, and the world is full of bloggers. So I keep up on the topics that interest me. If I started trying to cover everything, I'd probably burn out in 6 months.

It's why I have a blogroll - so folks can keep track of the stuff I don't write about elsewhere.

Posted by: Kate at October 22, 2009 11:16 PM

Katie couric is just miserable to watch. I watched her interview ann coulter and she had daggers in her eye's you could see the jelousy she had of ann (ann has a big fat mouth and should use moderation ). Ann is blonde, blue eye's, sexy frame, tall and leggy.Katie just hates her for it, Anyway i feel sorry for katies husband if she has one .

she seems like a man hater! LOl

Paul in calgary.

Posted by: paul at October 22, 2009 11:35 PM

If blogs were threaded it would be much more entertaining. Like Usenet.

Posted by: LEDA at October 22, 2009 11:38 PM

since you're on the topic of juxtapositions, here is a suggestion for your next one, starring your beloved Stephen Harper

October 2008
“We will not be running a deficit. We will keep our spending within our means. It is that simple. The alternative is not a plan. It is just the consequence of complete panic, and this government will not panic at a time of uncertainty.”

I'll let you fill in the October 2009 statements.

Posted by: chumpdawg at October 22, 2009 11:40 PM

Speedy;

You are right to take issue with Phillip Huggan's suggestion that the immune system is largely in the gastric tract. As I'm sure you know, immune response can be found in literally every layer of tissue in the body starting with your skin and working its way inward. It appears that the RCMP got to Phil's weed supply many years to late.

Posted by: bob c at October 23, 2009 12:46 AM

chumpdawg

All G7 countries agreed to go into deficit spending to prop the economies after Harper made those statements.

It's nice to be an armchair economist with 20-20, isn't it?

Posted by: LEDA at October 23, 2009 12:50 AM

LEDA, nice comeback. Liberals never let facts get in the way of their agenda.

Posted by: Ken (Kulak) at October 23, 2009 1:52 AM

... funny, liberals say that about conservatives...

how unique we are!

Posted by: SpuriouslyYours at October 23, 2009 4:52 AM

That ain't nothing, Greg!

Spector accused me of being "personally responsible for every abortion in Canada."

Telling that to our MSM, Spector is a grand old man of journalism in spite of that and other equally bizarre public assertions but (say it with me) "Glenn Beck is the crazy one". :-)

Posted by: Kathy Shaidle at October 23, 2009 6:52 AM

Nice comeback? that's all you got LEDA?

Harper refused to acknowledge there was any economic gloom on the horizon that might require deficit spending. He even encouraged Canadians to jump in the stock market, along with his mama.

However, he did call an election (breaking another one of his election promises you all seem to ignore here) because he feared the economic malaise might sour his chances of a majority.

And Ken, I am a not a "Liberal". I have no party affiliation. Sorry that bursts your little bubble of classifying people who dare to question Harper as Liberals. It's convenient to have all our opinions formed for you by your party- saves you the energy of thinking for yourself, which I guess leaves you all more time and energy to be angry with the world.

Nice echo chamber you all have built here.

Posted by: chumpdawg at October 23, 2009 1:43 PM

chumpdawg

Again, you prove the cherry picking of your facts.

The situation involved the choice between sticking to his guns, and tempting either an election that -nobody- wanted, especially the leftards of the world, because it would have proved -nothing-, except that Candians are good at wasting millions of dollars at a time......for the moral principle of the high road, of course....

...or the choice of the Coalition of the Swilling, involving the troika of Taliban Jack, Citoyen Dion, and the separatistes.

Harper got past that, but realized, politically, that he had to move somewhat into deficit spending, so as to cut off criticism from the left for "not doing anything", as the laaeft would gain politically from that position. Yes, I don't like the deficit spending either, but can see the rationale of doing it, as again, politically, it has worked out VERY well for Harper...Count Igula is spinning in the breeze, Dion was cut disgracefully, Tally Jack is busted, and Qbecers are irrelevant.

And Canada is still the envy of the western world for its financial position, namely, the stability of the banks (and I don't like the banks any better than you, I'm sure).

Given that, we're not the financial basket case that Owebumble is leading the states into.

Posted by: DanBC at October 23, 2009 7:36 PM

it's true our banks are the envy of the world. any you know why? you left out one important fact. The banks are not on the hook for most of the mortgages they write. You are, via our state sponsored debt addiction program, called the CMHC. Which, by the way, Harper expanded by offering 0 down, 40 year mortgages. Anything to keep the party going on his watch, including selling out the taxpayers who actually save up for a downpayment. What a concept.

Posted by: chumpdawg at October 23, 2009 10:09 PM
Post a comment

Before submitting, review the post to ensure your comment is on topic and does not contain words that might get caught in the spam filter (eg: insurance, viagra, online, poker). This is not a forum or a repository for off-topic link dumps. Profanity is discouraged. Take your extended debates and/or flamewars to private email. Thankyou.










Remember personal info?






Site
Meter