sda2.jpg

October 22, 2009

How's That Working For You?

Now is the time at SDA when we juxatpose!

The Hill - After weeks of public feuding between the cable news channel and the president's top aides, Obama seemed to agree with statements by his advisers that Fox is not a real "news station."

Rasmussen Reports - For the first time during Obama’s time in office, the Approval Index has been in negative double digits for seven straight days.

Posted by Kate at October 22, 2009 12:05 PM
Comments

Yeah, right - Fox is not a real news station. So I'm watching Glenn Beck yesterday. He's playing a clip about the latest marxist comment one of O's advisors made and wondering why O has so many of these freaks in his gov't.....I switch over to Wolf Blitzer on CNN and he's gushing about Michelle Obama hula hooping.

So tell me, who's doing the real news here?

Posted by: Soccermom at October 22, 2009 12:22 PM

Wolf proved how smart he was on Jeopardy.

Posted by: gobi desert at October 22, 2009 12:35 PM

I guess CNN figures they can't get into trouble with POTUS if they spend their time reporting on HOTUS (HULA of the US).
After all if Blitzer is not in trouble with Obamagazam then they must be doing a great job.
If you don't believe me just look up the ratings.

Posted by: capt_bob at October 22, 2009 12:43 PM

with Michelle's booty , she wouldnt even have to spin it to keep it up.

Posted by: cal2 at October 22, 2009 12:51 PM

I switch over to Wolf Blitzer on CNN and he's gushing about Michelle Obama hula hooping.
So tell me, who's doing the real news here?
~Soccermom

Maybe Wolf thought that nobody ever saw Michelle's butt doing an impression of the gas giant Saturn?

I think ObaMao's Approval Index has been in negative double digits for seven straight days because people are getting tired of seeing his face on so many magazine covers and on the TV.

ObaMao's solution to the low approval?
More TV exposure, more photo ops, more magazine covers.

Typical Leftist solution, more of the same and Hope it all Changes.

Posted by: Oz at October 22, 2009 12:51 PM

Secret Media Meeting on Monday at Whitehouse.. Election war room and freeze out Fox strategy session? When the news media is in on the secret, will we ever hear the truth?

At My Blog http://www.illiquidassets.com

Sorry Shameless self promotion!

Posted by: Illiquid Assets at October 22, 2009 12:53 PM

Obama is so thin-skinned that the idea of one media organization (the only one with growing ratings) critically covering his administration might just allow us all to see (the metaphysical equivalent of) an actual spontaneous human combustion event. The meltdown has begun. Things aren't going well for him. Its going to get ugly. His defenders (Church Police, Palace Guard, Lewinsky wannabes) of the MSM can't help him.

Posted by: John G Chittick at October 22, 2009 12:54 PM

oops too fast on the submit,
http://www.illiquidassets.net

not .com, slip up because I am trying to buy the .com domain and just wrote a long letter.

Posted by: Illiquid Assets at October 22, 2009 12:55 PM

The rest of the media will eventually turn on Barry.

You'll know when he is hurting when he fills the Whit House with mirrors so he can bask in his own glory.

If the MSM won't adore hime, he'll adore himself.

Posted by: Fred at October 22, 2009 1:07 PM

Now this could be real news:
40,000 Troops deployed
http://tinyurl.com/yl6ry2u

Posted by: Oz at October 22, 2009 1:09 PM

A local radio station gave me a big laugh a few weeks ago.

No mention of Obama's year-long slide in the polls. Then, the one day he goes up, it's the lead story on the the top of the hour news.

And now with this latest double-digit plunge? It'll never get mentioned.

Posted by: Mississauga Matt at October 22, 2009 1:10 PM

Cal2 12:51... Good observation, or you read my mind.

Posted by: Rob C at October 22, 2009 1:11 PM

It's disturbing to watch an administration attack a news outlet repeatedly, but the stupidity is also mind blowing. Aren't they smart enough to know what it looks like to most people? Or perhaps they're just too angry or petty to notice.
Either way, it's a boost for Fox as it becomes the only trustworthy voice around, even for those who consider themselves Democrats. Most people know the president and administration are sufficiently powerful without having a media cheering section.

Posted by: hudson duster at October 22, 2009 1:15 PM

Obama is not a "real President".

Posted by: grok at October 22, 2009 1:26 PM

"Obama's not a real President".

Well, that does appear to be true, because he never proved to anyone, as far as I can tell from months of digging for info, that he meets the "natural-born" requirement for being President.

Why, furthermore, should we prove it when we say Obama's not a legitimate resident of the W.H., when he won't make any case for his accusations and smears against FOX News?

Posted by: Canadian Sentinel at October 22, 2009 1:33 PM

The moral of the story:
Some things you simply cannot blame on the dog.

Posted by: mojo at October 22, 2009 1:46 PM

The guy's a hypocrite. He is willing to be interviewed on Obama friendly networks and give his OPINION and make his COMMENTARY and that makes those networks, 'news channels'?

That makes it an 'opinion' piece and so in order to justify his position, I expect that he will no longer accept gossip rag interviews for himself or Michele?
Opinion guru Oprah, may never wander the hallowed halls of the White House ever again. What will become of her?

Posted by: Bec at October 22, 2009 1:46 PM

"Hope it all Changes"

Oz, that too funny.

How stunning it must be for Obama to realise not everyone is swayed by his charm. One needs smarts and guts to lead a country, not smugness and adoring fans.
I hope this comes back to bite CNN. Their failure (READ: unwillingness) to be impartial and critical of the current administration will show them as an unworthy news source. If that translates ito super-low ratings, good.

Posted by: Osumashi Kinyobe at October 22, 2009 1:54 PM

Further to the White House Monday secret media meeting.

Guests (not neccessarily of honour) include Keith Olberman and Rachel Maddow.

No wonder Rush has been referring to the MSM as state-run media.

And they say he's nuts. It's all coming true before our lyin' eyes.

Posted by: set you free at October 22, 2009 2:17 PM

All I know is that 6 year olds are asking tougher questions than the MSM except Fox. I guess they listen to their parents and not the late night news. Wonder how it feels for the professional journalists to be outperformed by children. Millions per year and a 'good boy'.

Posted by: Speedy at October 22, 2009 2:58 PM

Looks like July 4th was the turning point. Hmm...

Posted by: Aaron at October 22, 2009 4:05 PM

Poor poor "Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers"!

Meet the 21st Century metro sexual progressive male folks...All spoiled manchild.

Only 10 months and he is unravelling faster than I ever thought...I predicted about 1 month after the election that he could possibly not even finish his four years. Increasingly, he might not even be there by next year's mid-term. He's showing enough weakness and narcissism that he may well quit (Or find a convenient way to be removed) if he knows that the Dems are going to be creamed Nov 2010. Becoming lame duck Prez midterm is bad enough but if most Americans turn on him too, with no one left to adulate him, he might not stay. No more town halls, Late night TV spots with cheering groupies will seriously wound his monstrously inflated ego.
Kinda like disgraced OJ Simpson or Michael Jackson, he will have nowhere left to go for his ego "fixes".

I really can't see his MSM cheerleaders staying on side much longer either...Unless they are all owned 100% by George Soros or whoever is "behind the curtain" they can't be possibly that stupid as they are all 'dying' along with their Fresh Prince.
If they turn on him, it's all over. They seem to be his last hope in holding on.


Did anyone catch Jay Leno's sketch last night? PRICELESS!!!
Jay needs better ratings. Kissing O's behind is not cutting it anymore.

Kate, you may want to find that clip on youtube.

Posted by: Right Honorable Terry Tory at October 22, 2009 4:39 PM

As Beck pointed out last night, Obama's probably using the furor over Fox as cover to sneak in the health care bill without anybody looking...

Posted by: Scary Fundamentalist at October 22, 2009 4:56 PM

Right Honorable Terry Tory

From your mouth (pen whatever) to G-d's ears.

Posted by: Bob from Virginia at October 22, 2009 6:27 PM

Yesterday in Saskatoon I had the rare honor of seeing and hearing a "real" President. This is a man who has a strong sense of what it means to be POTUS and the responsibilities that go with that.

Obummer is a bust. A one-term wonder. Can't wait for his term to be up and he gone!

Posted by: a different bob at October 22, 2009 6:55 PM

Terry Tory - your outline of Obama's need for adulation is very accurate, but I think that rather than quitting, yet, what he'll do is to become more authoritarian and repressive.

That is, I think that there are two 'voices' in the White House. There is that of Obama, whose agenda is simple: pure adulation from one and all. Period. To achieve this, he's in constant campaign mode, for it's on the campaign trail in front of screened and emotionally hyped up masses, where he gets his 'emotional fix'. He can't get it from individuals or meetings in his board room. He needs the crowds.

Again, his triad of tactics is: misinform the people with 'fictional facts' that are geared to them, and can be different to a different audience the next day. And emotional manipulation, using fear, hope.. And finally, accusations of bias if you disagree with him.

He has no interest in policy as a benefit to the American people. He will Sell Policies presented to him by his BackRoom Gang, who are all radical socialists. But he himself is not intellectually invested in anything other than Himself.

Then, there is that BackRoom Gang, who are most interested in policies and programs. Socialist ones. That set up the central government as the effective Ruler of the people; that set up an elite Washington governance to rule over the masses...who are all reduced to an 'egalitarian' mass who have no money and no power to do anything.

The White House has refused to openly recognize the existence of dissent and that includes the Town Hall meetings, the Tea Parties, it either ignored or smeared these events ..and is instead, trying to silence what it considers as the communication of dissent, by going after news media such as FOX who critique Obama and the government.

As a pathological narcissist, Obama feels no empathy for anyone, and in particular, if someone is not part of his adoring followers, this means that to him..they are not under his control. To Obama, such people literally cease to exist. And, he'll do anything he can to ensure their demise and silence. I suggest that he'll become more vicious and authoritarian, both directly and by his many proxies.

Posted by: ET at October 22, 2009 7:24 PM

ET
Where have you been?I've missed your Obama perspective.Having said that,I fear you are correct,Obama's only just begun to alienate,read Fox's latest if you have not already.

Posted by: h.ryan at October 22, 2009 8:14 PM

h.ryan.....ET is very astute on the Zero....but she still misses the fact that he is a dyed-in-the-wool commie/racist/facist. He has transcended socialist. So what about those 90% paycuts, ET?
I'll answer....90% of $1.00 is $0.50....BUT...he still get's his $10,000,000 bonus...again...ummmm.
Any way you slice it....give the elite their bucks,and put the rest on welfare.(gotta keep them dependent!!)

Posted by: Justthinkin at October 22, 2009 8:27 PM

just thinkin - again, I maintain that Obama has no intellectual commitment to anything. Not a single brain cell is interested in any theory. His focus is purely and only psychological: Himself in Control of You..who must adulate him. Period.

BUT, to achieve this control over people, Obama must operate within a system where he CAN control you. So, what could he have 'grown up to be'?

Could he have become a doctor, in control of your health? Well, that would have required a LOT of learning and training and Obama is too lazy and also too emotionally needy to spend the years and time as a student and medical trainee.

A teacher? Again, the years required to learn and work..the papers required to be published..all of that takes work, and Obama requires 'emotional feeding' constantly. He can't spend the time writing and researching anything.

Politics? Ah, now that requires no training. No years of research. And, Obama played on 'the race card' to move himself in and up. All it required, in these stages, was techniques he had already perfected as a boy: Misinform; Manipulate and Accusations of Bias if you disagree. Simple. All it requires is to read from a teleprompter, wink, smile, tell people whatever will make them love him..and that's it.

He moved into the left side of the political arena, quite naturally, because it ideologically rejects individualism. Rejects individual rights, rejects individual free thinking and speaking, and sets up an elite governing class over the disempowered masses who are assumed too ignorant to govern themselves. That suits Obama perfectly.

Think of how the Democrats denigrated the people who criticized Obama in the Town Halls, in the Tea parties..calling them 'unamerican', nazis, astroturf..whatever.
Think of how Obama ignored these mass protests and when he spoke of them, sneered at them.

So, I continue to assert that Obama has no intellectual knowledge of or interest in, the political theories of the left. In socialism or communism. But he has a deep psychological need for these very same theories because they alone set up him as a member of the Elite, and reduce everyone else to a non-individualist and disempowered mass.

However, the BackRoom Gang are intellectually deeply committed to a socialist infrastructure in the US. They, as utopians, and social evolutionists, have the ignorant and arrogant notion of a 'future society' ruled totally by government. This would remove all aberrations..and therefore, all evil. Sigh. In order to achieve this utopian future, these same thugs feel quite righteous in destroying, literally not figuratively, any and all who impede their way.

Obama is quite faithful to this radical left; they enable him to psychologically exist. And, as he becomes more and more demented, needing more and more campaign events to fulfil his need for adulation..he becomes more dependent on them, and unable to confront and stop their agenda..of socialism in the US.

Posted by: ET at October 22, 2009 8:52 PM

Perhaps I'm being superfluous and redundent, but it does seem odd that Glenn Beck merely questions the big Owe and gains so much attention from the W.H. Anyone remember Keith Olberman going apoplectic while talking about Bush? NOt a word from the Bush admin. Just a thought.

Posted by: Olde Spice at October 22, 2009 9:52 PM

I must agree with ET (as I usually do) that O will become more frustrated and negative as his popularity continues to decline. Between the Back Room Gang ideals and the likely-hood that O will just become downright mean, I'm predicting very little good news for the U.S. over the next few years. No, I don't think he will quit. I think he will show the people of the U.S. what happens when you mess with 'perfection'.

Posted by: Brian M. at October 22, 2009 10:09 PM

ET- Thought you must have 'gone home' ;)
Although I don't really subscribe to the conspiratoy flim-flam, I get a kick out of some of the discussion/conjecture that seems to occasionally arise. Makes for good amusement.
However, on the subject of Obama, in your opinion, can you see any validity at all to references such as- Manchurian Candidate, Boys from Brazil, the Anti-Christ, New World Order, Illuminati, Bildenberg Group, etc?
Or does it all just boil down to his total narcassism, as you've so often stated, and nothing more?

Posted by: Snagglepuss at October 22, 2009 10:37 PM

Big Owe is next going after the internet.

http://www.reuters.com/article/regulatoryNewsConsumerGoodsAndRetail/idUSN2237873320091022

Shock. Surprise.

And you lefties wonder why US gun and ammo sales remain at record levels.

Next killer ap on the web, P2P encrypted cloud to subvert and obviate ISPs.

Posted by: The Phantom at October 22, 2009 10:41 PM

snagglepuss - it's just his narcissism.

I think it would be fun to get involved in the broader perspectives, of his being a Manchurian candidate or heck, even, the old anti-christ. But, I'll abide by Ockham's Razor and pick the simplest explanation. His narcissism.

But there are TWO agendas - and people might very well disagree with me on that. I see one agenda as belonging strictly to Obama, and that's his psychological addictive need for adulation. This need, which he probably moved into as a young boy, abandoned by his father and mother, was a tactic to enable him..not them or fate..to ensure some stability to his emotional needs. Unfortunately, he 'chose' to obtain his emotional needs by controlling and manipulating others to ensure that they 'loved' him.

Obama continued this pattern, used affirmative action and other means to advance in school, and then, moved into a career that ensured that others would 'look up' to and depend on him..as, first, community organizer. And then, politics.

At the same time, the Democrats - and I think a Set of Democrats, the radical left who have effectively taken over the Democratic Party, saw Obama's manipulative skills as a key to not merely getting them in power..for they weren't worried about that vote because of the unpopularity of Bush. But they saw Obama as The Key to getting their socialist, statist infrastructure into the US.

Obama is a master manipulator. He can lie his way out of anything - and get away with it. He'll tell an audience one thing one day, and a different audience will get the contrary the next day..and manage to get away with it, by a smile, a wink, a joke.

And, don't think that he doesn't play, constantly, the race card to stifle any emergence of dissent. Dissent? Why you are only dissenting because you are a racist. Not because of any problems with the policy. No way. Neat tactic.

Obama's approval ratings are going down, but people are still trying to give him 'the benefit of the doubt'. And all Obama does is campaign. He needs, more and more, the addictive fix of the crowd.

And, the BRG and Obama will try to stifle dissent and criticism..something that Americans are not used to having done to them. US politics is open,frank, and unlike Canadian. Stifling this openness is unheard of...But it will increase..

The question then becomes - can Obama do as he's supposed to do, which is to enable this HardCore radical socialist Set of thugs, get their agenda through Congress. Keeping Obama 'fed' with public adulation and satisfied takes a lot of work, money and energy. If he's successful then the Backroom Gang of Thugs will continue to use him. But what if he fails? Will they ditch him? Or...will he ditch them? Now, that would be quite the scenario - if the WH were to split, with each side..Obama and the BRG..battling each other.

Posted by: ET at October 22, 2009 10:58 PM

OK ET, well and good, and I can see where your opinion on BO can fly, but then: How about that BRG so often referred to- would they fit into any of that scenario that I mentioned?
Or is Obama just a sorry, unwilling dupe in this movie?

Posted by: Snagglepuss at October 22, 2009 11:17 PM

The BRG, otherwise known as the BackRoom Gang who supply Obama with the policies and programs, are hardcore radical socialists.

I don't see them as part of any global conspiracy. They are, all by themselves, utopian socialist statists...filled with the inanities of the totally fictional world of a global socialist system. Not that much different, frankly, from the Islamic agenda of total world domination, with everyone obeying the repressive sharia law. Islamism is as utopian and statist and repressive..as the Democrat socialist statism.

After all, this radical socialism is pretty big on many US (and other) campuses. That's because it's a completely virtual, fictional world, operative only in words. Trying to put it into actual practice and taking it off campus and out of the seminar room is difficult.

It requires essentially, destroying the individual..and you do this either by physical means..as did Mao, Stalin etc..or, intellectually, where you brainwash them into passive submission. See Kafka and Orwell.

Notice that this means the destruction of the middle class, for this class is the 'home' of the free, of the individual, of actual reality..a reality that is lived within practice rather than within words and rhetoric. The socialist agenda requires the destruction of this free class. the destruction of any means by which people can think, as individuals...See what Obama and the BRG are trying to do with FOX news.

And how he's trying to enlist the MSNBC as part of his personal propaganda strategy. That is, Obama and the BRG are moving the manipulation into the MSM, and using one or two key stations as part of their propaganda machinery.

You know, other large populations tried to exist without a middle class. You can only have a two class system (elite governance and the peasantry) in a medium size population, non-industrial and non-adaptive. eg..the old Islamic mentality.
BUT - once you get large populations..such a system will always, implode and collapse. Happened in ancient Egypt, Aztecs, Inca, Mayan...and in modern times, in the USSR.

Posted by: ET at October 22, 2009 11:40 PM

The mainstream media will carry Obama over the finish line in the next election. After the democrats lose plenty in the mid-terms and the republicans pick their nominee, the target will move squarely to the GOP, and Hatchet Job, Part 2 will commence. Anytime the president mis-steps, the media will ignore it, because it doesn't fit their narrative, so it doesn't get aired.

Posted by: Dean at October 23, 2009 5:15 PM
Site
Meter