test
Posted by: Kate at September 8, 2009 3:11 PMI've never seen anything like that type of reporting in the regular press. Outstanding stuff.
I really don't see why we don't bring our massive military advantage to bear and annihilate the scum our forces are up against.
Posted by: Mississauga Matt at September 8, 2009 3:13 PM> the more time I spend in the Green Zone the more
> I begin to think we are fighting the people in
> general, and not some small group of Taliban
Somebody is seeing the light.
Posted by: Aaron at September 8, 2009 3:24 PMThe BBC and lefty friends going nuts over the dead from the diesel tankers blown up by air attack after being hijacked by the Taliban is revolting. The fuel from these escapades is sold to raise money to hire bomb builders, planters, and other needs.
The idea that the poorest people in the world cannot be manipulated to settle down and quit being idiots by the richest countries in the world really is a puzzle.
But the crowning idiocy is that all this is happening while being dependent on supply lines running the length of Pakistan, one of the most unstable nuclear weapons states in the world and the Taliban's sanctuary.
Posted by: Sgt Lejaune at September 8, 2009 6:41 PMSgt Lejaune
and the lefties say it's about a pipeline?
the troops could use one right now!
Posted by: puddin n pie at September 8, 2009 7:06 PM> The BBC and lefty friends going nuts over the
> dead from the diesel tankers blown up by air attack
It's good to know that criticizing slaughter of dozens of innocent people will not be tolerated.
Posted by: Aaron at September 9, 2009 9:44 AMThese "innocent people" are not so innocent.
Only an idiot would style looters (at best) as innocents....in a war zone looters are shot on sight....legally according to the Geneva Protocols (International Law).
Only a Quisling would label/style these looters as innocent civilians....
Yes, but we don't execute people for stealing a drum of diesel fuel (or gas, whatever it was).
Your heavy handed approach already cost Canada its paratrooper regimen. Congratulations, armchair commando.
Just like we don't execute people for not speaking English and holding a stapler. It's cost RCMP its reputation, or actually what's left of it.
You are correct, but you are wrong. I am not sure if your rigid mind can grasp the concept.
Attention to detail check: Afghanistan signed Geneva convention in 1949, when it was still the Kingdom. Several governments changed since. There are no provisions as regards to looting or marauders in the Convention, as it's goal is to protect the victims of war. Convention deals with looting by the hostile army, which does not apply to the situation.
Posted by: Aaron at September 9, 2009 1:04 PMBefore submitting, review the post to ensure your comment is on topic and does not contain words that might get caught in the spam filter (eg: insurance, viagra, online, poker). This is not a forum or a repository for off-topic link dumps. Profanity is discouraged. Take your extended debates and/or flamewars to private email. Thankyou.