"There's one in the spotlight, he don't look right to me.
Get him up against the wall."
Kate, this guy looks like he could use a good meal of fried Seal meat.
Followed by a run around town in a 4 x 4 with the windows open and the air-con on.
What a pack of lying arses greenpeace is.
Posted by: robins111 at August 19, 2009 5:50 PMIt won't as easy to get Gore, Suzuki and others to admit they are full of crap because psychopathic types feel no guilt when they lie and scheme.
This man, even though he is committed, appears to have a conscience and just couldn't keep up the lying in the face of heavy scrutiny.
It's a start.
Posted by: Momar at August 19, 2009 5:50 PMSounds "fishy" to me.
Quick, call the Whitehouse!
They admit to 'emotionalizing' their data. In simple terms they are big,fat,juicy liars. I know a rabid leftioid who has admitted that he uses good lies,which are lies that advance their agenda. My facts are an example of bad lies. He says this without any guilt,to him amd many others,the end justifies the means.BTW,the original greenpeace founder routinely criticizes the current greenpeace efforts because they have become too politicized and have lost the original focus.
Posted by: wallyj at August 19, 2009 6:11 PMTHANK YOU for this link. I have already added the trailer script to my blog and a new post, including this:
"...Even if there proves to be a long-term, constant warming trend, there is no proof - none whatsoever - that it is the result of human activity. I don't despise my fellow human beings enough to want to deprive them of things I take for granted. Mr. Gore and his ilk go far beyond that though. They are and always have been richer than the dreams of Midas, yet they want not only to deprive the underprivileged: they would dispossess people of modest means of what they already have. We are to become the expiators of THEIR GUILT, paying for their grotesque excesses with our own labor and our suffering, and the suffering of our children and grandchildren."
Next step: share the site with everyone I know. Now is the time to kick ass and make sure it STAYS kicked.
Posted by: Michael H Anderson at August 19, 2009 6:41 PM
The logic seems to be that AGW is so important an issue that we are justified in lying. It is only slightly removed from "we are justified in DOING anything".
I have read a few reports lately about a push to limit or decrease the number of humans for all sorts of reasons.
(Here is a link that might be interesting in that regard- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1207018/Attenborough-joins-campaign-curb-worlds-population.html )
If that philosophy joins fully with AGW, the implications could be frightening.
It reminds me of Tom Clancy's book 'Rainbow Six'.
Watt's Up With That has full coverage of the Greenpeace video with comments.
(As a side note, there are at least 2 ships trapped in the arctic awaiting assistance)
The most important thing about thus interview is not that they econut admitted he was lying but rather that an interviewer under the employ of the BBC would nail his ass to the wall like that. And that interviewer had been to the icesheet in question - the more one knows the more one realizes it's a scam
Posted by: Gord Tulk at August 19, 2009 7:16 PMThe more I watch the "Hard Talk" program ... the better that guy Sackur seems to get.
I've seen him skewer quite a few leftards over the last coupe lof years.
Although he often lets them wriggle off his barb he at least makes the squirm.
The unfortunate thing is how he rode the BDR bandwagon without any compunction for so many years.
As for Greenpeace .... They LIE? No SH!T Sherlock..
Posted by: OMMAG at August 19, 2009 8:15 PMThere is a lot of discussion about this elsewhere...like WUWT....
The interviewer had to be extremely tenacious to get that concession but contrition was totally absent....he attempted despite the line of attack to persist in spewing BS (Bad Science).....
Make no mistake this Greeny did not experience an epiphany........he is still a slimy, lying POS.
Q: How do you know a lefty is lying?
A: His/her rent-seeking lips are moving.
lefties don't LIE
they live a lie!!!!
they luv to emotionalize any topic, thus avoid using logic, as they don't deal in logic or truth
Why live in the real world when you can create your own reality and sucker people into going along with it?
Posted by: set you free at August 19, 2009 9:58 PMNever trust a man with a combover.
Posted by: Bestman at August 19, 2009 11:33 PMGord Tulk you nailed it. When I saw "BBC" at the bottom of the screen I could hardly believe what I was hearing.
For the BBC to seek the truth on a subject such as global warming, and to hold someone to account for not telling the truth, is a very rare thing indeed.
Posted by: TJ at August 20, 2009 12:03 AMTo a leftie truth is anything that advances his agenda.
Posted by: Ken at August 20, 2009 12:26 AMNo. No.!!!!!!!!!
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!!
Posted by: KevinB at August 20, 2009 4:14 AMcurious_george: only 895 views.
all from the sda link. LOL !!!
Well, it may have neem 895, now its over 10000. If that is all due to SDA in less than 24 hours than I would say Kate is having quite an impact. However, previous experience shows that the YOUTUBE counter is notoriously unreliable and often undercounts.
For instance, it was 10046 before I viewed it, and 10046, after. I also viewed it through a proxy with clean browser. It is still 10046. So my viewing did not count apparently.
In the end, if even BBC, THE BBC, questions this "axiom" then it speaks volumes that the AGW crock has peaked in its influence and we are now clearly seeing sunlight.
Posted by: Frenchie77 at August 20, 2009 5:03 AMyoutube view counts are not updated in real time, btw. If you have some belief that every skeptic and their friends won't have seen this within a week, you are fooling yourself.
Posted by: tim in vermont at August 20, 2009 5:33 AMtim in vermont - ...skeptics and their friends...
Most likely, but also add in the agw zealots as well. After all, if they are going to qualify his statement, they will need to know what he said.
Or let me re-phrase, if agw zealots are going to accurately qualify his statement and not just pull something out of their butt.
Thanks for tip on the counter, I just did a quick check with a proxy to see if it changed, I didn't bother to investigate why it hadn't! Too many gopher hunting videos to watch...
Posted by: Frenchie77 at August 20, 2009 8:06 AMCommies are unbelievable.
Yup, it's all the rich people's fault. Over-breeding has nothing to do with cause that's what the poor nations do.
Compare Canada to China. Canada has a greater land mass than China and has a population density of 3.5 people per square KM vs 110 for China.
Canada has 33mm people, China 1332mm people.
Canada has a GDP of 1.3 trillion, China 7.8 trillion (and that means that china produces 6 times as much as Canada.)
China's pollution per unit of production is hugely worse than Canada's as they have little to no emissions control and generate a much higher percentage of their electricity from coal.
India (whose density is higher than China's) has a GDP of 3.3 Trillion - more than double Canada's output. Again with more pollution due to lesser environmental standards.
Brazil's GDP is 2 trillion.
Mexico's is 1.6 trillion.
South Korea's is just over ours at 1.35 trillion.
Turkey is just under ours at 1 trillion.
Even if we took the greentard's kyoto lies as truth, does the planet care if 1 person produces X amount of co2 instead of 100 people? No. Their theory is that it's the CO2, not the people.
But it's all our fault cause we aren't poor. Greentards are worthless, intellectually absent dimwits.
Posted by: Jason at August 20, 2009 9:29 AMDid anyone catch the link in the "more here..." link? (Bottom of article)
It looks like a showing of a documentary is coming on October 18th and they are asking everyone to spread the info.
KATE MIGHT WANT TO USE THE POWER OF SDA TO HELP THE CAUSE BY GIVING IT A THREAD.
Check the movie trailer and info here:
http://www.noteviljustwrong.com/
There is light at the end of the tunnel folks!
Before submitting, review the post to ensure your comment is on topic and does not contain words that might get caught in the spam filter (eg: insurance, viagra, online, poker). This is not a forum or a repository for off-topic link dumps. Profanity is discouraged. Take your extended debates and/or flamewars to private email. Thankyou.