If you hear of someone assaulting Warren Kinsella with a rolled up T1 Canada Revenue Agency Tax Return, it wasn't me.
Kate has somewhere better to be on a Saturday night than here with us? The nerve! Oh wait, so do I (and I'm not going to Lizzie May's house to put a bag full of termites through her mailslot, either, probably).
Posted by: Black Mamba at March 14, 2009 8:35 PMYou're covered by the timeline. Unless he's in Saskatoon.
Posted by: EBD at March 14, 2009 8:40 PMEBD, you forget Kate has an RD-350. ~:D
Posted by: The Phantom at March 14, 2009 9:01 PMWho cares about Warren the Brownshirted Clown? He can go screw himself.
Click on the link.
It's a judge gone crazy again. Ever hear of a woman being punished for throwing a little tiny ciggie lighter at a man and causing no harm at all? Well, if it was the other way around, well, the man, he's in big trouble...
Double standard. What, do judges use the following decision making tool:
The defendant has:
A penis: Guilty.
No penis: Not guilty.
Posted by: The Canadian Sentinel at March 14, 2009 9:05 PMWell, what we don't know may be the most important part. His prior record, his history of violence and any court orders against him.
If there was none, then I do believe an appeal will succeed.
D
Posted by: Phronetix at March 14, 2009 9:34 PMYou can add snowballs to the list of assault weapons. A teenage kid in a nearby town was charged with assault with a weapon for throwing a snowball at another kid.
Some more looney leftist craziness.
Kate are you paying in Toonies again?
Posted by: Speedy at March 14, 2009 10:24 PMCan I join you Kate? I dread the usual April 30th manic race with the deadline.
Posted by: Gus at March 14, 2009 11:57 PMLOL he has been banned from possessing a lighter! I guess he will have to settle for guns matches and white gas.
Posted by: Gord Tulk at March 14, 2009 11:58 PMBe funny to get a truck load of empty lighters and dump them at the doorstep of this judge's court house. Using 'empty' so they couldn't find any reason to levy charges of leaving a 'bomb' etc., just littering.
Posted by: ldd at March 15, 2009 12:57 AMWith my legal experience I acquired a restraining order against my X.....didn't work....on night she busted the door in and took a swing at me....busted a bone in my hand....defensive wound....OPP showed up and arrested me....
When they calmed down and re read the ORDER to specify to the JP in what manner I breached the ORDER....they came along and asked all manner of questions as to why a guy would get a Restraining ORDER against a woman.....
Break....enter....theft...assault...vandalism...
Ya can't live with them and ya can't hit back....
Oh yeah....they contributed to my retirement fund..........
It seems the Police SOP for Ontario at that point was:
If called to a "domestic" and a Restraining ORDER is involved ALWAYS arrest the man....don't leave him in the house.......
Posted by: sasquatch at March 15, 2009 2:56 AMThis reminds me to ensure that a potential mate for me isn't a nutcase, as well as being not-a-Leftist. Of course, that'll require a lot of stoic willpower... think with brain, not with you-know-what...
I think folks are too quick to get hitched these days, without the benefit of slowly getting to know one another over a long period of time, as was more commonly (and properly) done in the olden days. Folks need to know that there's nothing wrong with not having a "main squeeze", that it doesn't matter how they look socially to be "alone". It's better to be "alone" than to be living with/married to a hellish banshee...
Besides, for us guys, if we move too quickly with the girl and she turns out to be pure evil, well, who's going to care about us? The leftist-dominated state apparatus hates us for having willies and balls, as if that was such a horrible, unforgivable thing to be born with! We're clearly at a great disadvantage wrt equality before the law (in practice under the current state apparatus) compared to women, who can easily get away with the worst things, given a leftist-ideologue judicial activist deciding the fate of the parties...
Posted by: The Canadian Sentinel at March 15, 2009 7:22 AMSasquatch, I've long wondered what they teach at police academies these days.
Are youthful recruits and rookies on the beat brainwashed? Are they indoctrinated with unconstitutional bigotry and double standards, instructed to disregard equality before the law regardless of whatever group membership?
I do worry that police academies have been taken over by Liberal Fascists and that police are brainwashed into being Liberal Fascists themselves. I hope I'm wrong, but I fear I'm right.
Might be time to impose sensitivity training on those who control the academies... and remedial reeducation for those officers who were falsely indoctrinated by same.
Posted by: The Canadian Sentinel at March 15, 2009 7:29 AMThe Canadian Sentinel at March 14, 2009 9:05 PM
"A penis: Guilty."
That would depend on the appropriate use.
The Canadian Sentinel at March 15, 2009 7:29 AM
".... stoic willpower ...."
is the precise phrase. You know whereof you write.
Posted by: Lev at March 15, 2009 9:58 AMHe should consider himself lucky he didn't hit her with his penis.
Posted by: Largs at March 15, 2009 10:07 AMThis reminded me of a fellow I used to work with. About once a month he would come into work just dead tired. His girlfriend would come home after closing the bars and start hitting him while he was asleep. Then she would phone the police. The police would come and remove him from his own house and drive him to the Salvation Army where he would get a couple hours sleep and then come to work. He would get the same cops a lot of the time and they felt bad for him, but, the rule is you always remove the man from the scene no matter what.
Eventually he got her moved out but that was tough. He had to live in the basement for a couple months.
Posted by: gord at March 15, 2009 10:20 AM