sda2.jpg

February 25, 2009

Conservative Bashing Corporation Faces $65M Shortfall;

Globe and Mail;

The CBC is heading toward a new fiscal year with little clarity about its funding from Ottawa, even as it suffers a projected 2008-2009 shortfall in ad revenue of up to $65-million.

This financial uncertainty increases the possibility of job cuts and changes to its services and programming, which CBC senior management says it is having to consider in order to ride out the current crisis hitting the entire media industry. "We are still working away at finalizing plans. Nothing has yet been determined," CBC President Hubert Lacroix said in a memo to staff yesterday.

More - that stingy little Flaherty guy says they already get lots of money. Mutters something under his breath about biting the hand.

In related developments, a Winnipeg Free Press poll with the potential to go horribly wrong (scroll down main page and look to left) .

Posted by Kate at February 25, 2009 7:48 PM
Comments

Poll currently going horribly wrong. 71% no.

People frickin' hate the CBC. I mean, what is there to like if you're not a granola crunching geezer who likes classical music? What's on there, anyway? Corner Gas? Ew. Little Mosque on the Prairie? Double ew.

Half of Ontario's manufacturing sector is out of work. I think the CBC can take a frickin' pay cut.

Posted by: The Phantom at February 25, 2009 7:55 PM

Maybe have to cut back on the corporate travel & executive perks ?

Posted by: Fred at February 25, 2009 7:55 PM

The poll is over 70% "NO".

Posted by: dp at February 25, 2009 8:04 PM

I suppose they could sell some advertising space on one of their cherished programs, what's that you say? you need to state how many people watch or listen to these programs in order to sell ad time?

never mind... we'll just beg for more.

Posted by: marc in calgary at February 25, 2009 8:06 PM

Are they still getting free doughnuts etc. at the Mother*******Corps like they were years ago?

Posted by: andycanuck at February 25, 2009 8:08 PM

People frickin' hate the CBC. I mean, what is there to like if you're not a granola crunching geezer who likes classical music? What's on there, anyway? Corner Gas? Ew. Little Mosque on the Prairie? Double ew.

Silly Phantom -- Corner Gas is on CTV, and is actually worth watching. Plus, the only good thing that CBC Radio 2 had *was* the classical music. Now, they've gone and changed formats, alienating 75% of their listenership. I'd rather listen to Shostakovich than some folk ensemble from Botswana or a new-age fusion quartet from Chicoutimi.

Posted by: Yukon Gold at February 25, 2009 8:12 PM

Slightlly O/T but check out this media-related link:

http://www.pugetsoundradio.com/forum/m-1235434864/

Scroll down to the letter from the CFO and CEO of Canwest...

Posted by: Bravia at February 25, 2009 8:13 PM

Harper's opportunity

Posted by: GYM at February 25, 2009 8:15 PM

Yukon Gold - amen to Corner Gas and CBC 2. I haven't listened to CBC 2 since its "remake" - used to list often

Posted by: Erik Larsen at February 25, 2009 8:16 PM

If you can not figure how to keep the HNIC theme,and still pay Bob {I have no clue}Cole on the payroll you do not deserve any tax dollars.
Just wondering if the very pleasant interveiw of PMSH with Mansbridge ,post Obama was just a setup for the money plea. NO,No,NO and NO!

Posted by: janet at February 25, 2009 8:23 PM

Corner Gas is not produced by CBC and it is funny. It has made money and stands on its own in a free market.

Posted by: janet at February 25, 2009 8:27 PM

I'd say NOW would be a good time to contact your MP's and let them know funding should be cut off to the CBC totally. Kick them when they are down sorta scenario.

Posted by: The Glengarrian at February 25, 2009 8:27 PM

I've been pissed off at the CBC since they canceled The Food Show. It was on at 0-dark-30 on Sunday morning, and I set my alarm so I could listen to it.

Sell the TV arm. Then smack Radio 1 and 2 with a friggin' clue-by-four.

Posted by: djb at February 25, 2009 8:28 PM

Gee, I wonder why the CBC isn't resonating with the good people of Western Canada. Oh, wait a minute, could it be that we have nothing in common and we just fundamentally see the world differently.

Posted by: Steve at February 25, 2009 8:29 PM

I told my commie NDP MP i wanted cuts to the CBC and he told me I was way wrong and not to think that way. He tried to make me believe these scum plays an important role in the cultural life of our nation and these commie ndp'ers want the $$ to never stop.

Posted by: FREE at February 25, 2009 8:38 PM

linky no worky for winterpig free press

Posted by: FREE at February 25, 2009 8:39 PM

The CBC used to be populated with real thinkers, and hardworking investigators. Now it's full of bloomin's J-school grads and leftwing neo-libs, babbling away at Commie Party talking points all day.

I mean, Anna-Maria Tremonti? Geeezzzz... No wonder the Aussie Foreign minister told her she was doofus on live radio...

Too bad, but just let 'em drown. Actually better yet, why is it that CTV has to compete with massive state subsidies for the CBC. There shouldn't be a SINGLE ad on CBC. They already get hundreds of millions!

Posted by: bcf at February 25, 2009 8:41 PM

Yukon you must admit you're not really the middle of the CBC consuming demographic. How many seconds does it normally take before you yell at Peter Mansbridge?

Anyway, CTV, CBC, hard to tell the difference anymore. I don't watch either of them. At all. Ever.

In fact, this very month I told Bell Expressvue to shove their $100/month satellite dish. Twelve HUNDRED dollars a year for 500 channels of nothing on? Pffft.

I may eventually get around to hooking up the antenna, maybe even add an HD antenna. Maybe. We'll see when the weather gets nicer. In the meanwhile I'm hard pressed to see a down side to having no idiot box to burn time in front of.

I burn enough time at SDA as it is. ~:D

Posted by: The Phantom at February 25, 2009 8:41 PM

I agree with the "kill them while they're too weak to fight back" idea. It's an upward spiral, kill off the CBC. They and their lib-lefty fan base will scream bloody murder for a while (they always do) but the screaming will end quickly and then they'll have one less outlet to continue spreading or reinforcing their poisons groupthink.

Posted by: DrD at February 25, 2009 8:46 PM

Yukon you must admit you're not really the middle of the CBC consuming demographic. How many seconds does it normally take before you yell at Peter Mansbridge?

No arguments there. I estimate it at 0.2 seconds, and that's only because Pete looks like my dad would if he shaved his beard and lost his sense of humour.

But the Radio 2 thing was different! I loved waking up to Tom Allen and a little classical. Heck, if got me, a 33-year-old informed Prairie Conservative, to listen to that station they had to be doing something right.

Posted by: Yukon Gold at February 25, 2009 8:46 PM

http://www.cbc.radio-canada.ca/facilities/stations/index.shtml

Surely something could be down-sized in the total collection of stations and affiliates squealing for more funding.

Look at each province and see how many stations there are...OMG!!!!!

Posted by: BB at February 25, 2009 8:49 PM

I wake up to a CD. Darude, "Before The Storm". The pump needs a serious kickstart before it begins to move blood first thing in the morning. :)

Posted by: The Phantom at February 25, 2009 8:54 PM

I went to the poll, and it was 86% no, so I would say that it is actually going wonderfully right.

Posted by: GreyOne40 at February 25, 2009 8:55 PM

I just went to the site and voted. It just reset back to the main page. I clicked on "view results" but showed me nothing but the main page again. Maybe its over. Sounds like an ass-whoopin to me.

Posted by: a different bob at February 25, 2009 8:59 PM

Thank God the people understand what a waste of money, CBC is!
Glad that the government did not cave into the begging of the elite mother corp!

Posted by: MaryM at February 25, 2009 9:01 PM

Just caught the tail end of this, government will not cover their 65m shortfall, was that right?

Posted by: Western Canadian at February 25, 2009 9:09 PM

I haven't had a tv in a coupla decades. I am a radio nut though. I have internet radio (12,000 stations) xm and of course terrestial radio (Adler etc). I just can't think of a reason why taxpayers should provide me with a form of entertainment that I want to listen to. I like Limbaugh Savage and Liddy. I pay to listen to them. These are extraorinary times. Most of us have not experienced this type of financial unrest. To suggest that a tax funded public broadcaster should escape unscathed is unconscionable. What sets them apart?

Posted by: dodger at February 25, 2009 9:18 PM

Who needs the CBC when we have SDA Late Nite
Radio? Here, Yukon Gold, is our last Shostakovich:

www.smalldeadanimals.com/archives/009429.html

Posted by: Vitruvius at February 25, 2009 9:22 PM

Toronto Star Poll from today

Should Ottawa give the CBC $65 million to cover an unexpected shortfall?

Should Ottawa give the CBC $65 million to cover an unexpected shortfall?

Yes 1426 31%
No 3008 66%
Don't know 108 2%

Posted by: Phil at February 25, 2009 9:25 PM

Not only the CBC, but every government employee in this country(federal, provincial, municipal)should take a 10% pay and benefits cut.

We cannot afford all of this fluff trough wallowing any more!

Time. For. Some. Cuts.

Posted by: kingstonlad at February 25, 2009 9:30 PM

Worth noting that although Corner Gas is on CTV, it too is paid for with tax dollars from the Canadian Television Fund.

In fact, CBC's own productions, with the exception of News and Children's programming, are paid for with money from the Canadian Television Fund.

Posted by: Gerry at February 25, 2009 9:37 PM

Let us see now.

If they cut the pay of the CBC, let’s say 15 % that would solve the perceived problem with some cash to spare and return back to the taxpayer.
What is strange in most cases, like municipalities, cities and towns they threaten layoffs in hope the more senior government will throw some monies their way. They never, ever consider cut in pay, at least not for public consumption.
It is clear that the taxpayer financed corporation should consider reducing interference in the life of the population to base minimum with projection of going out of businesses.

Though the channel 933 on Bell could continue. There is no money in classical music.
There is no CBC 2 in Okanagan, the lotus eaters don’t listen to classics.

Posted by: Lev at February 25, 2009 9:46 PM

Boo hoo: The CBC is going to have to make some "difficult choices," just like the rest of us. Well, duh. It's been a long time coming.

I've never been able to understand how come the CBC is allowed to collect advertising revenue when it already receives $1 billion plus from the Canadian taxpayers and then dares to ask for more. And what assets are they planning to sell? What assets does the CBC have that don't belong to the taxpayers of Canada?

It's time the CBC brass took a good, hard look at why their revenues are down. Might it be that what they're offering is of absolutely no interest to a majority of Canadians? Might it be that a great many requests for balanced reporting instead of a constant lib-left bias have fallen on deaf ears? Might it be because CBC CEOs receive BONUSES at the end of the year, even when hardly anyone watches their programs and even when they're a publicly funded corporation?

Tough times at the CBC are the logical consequence of years of arrogance and entitlement. Canadian taxpayers who are having to cut back should not have to bail out a bloated, unresponsive broadcast bureaucracy. Like the rest of us, they're going to have to cut back and live within their means ... and I'm hoping that means scrapping Little Mosque on the Prairie, to name just one extravagance that needs to go.

Posted by: batb at February 25, 2009 9:47 PM

And check this out:

http://www.torontosun.com/comment/2009/02/25/8521411-sun.html

The CBC is lobbying using our money!!

Posted by: Gord Tulk at February 25, 2009 9:49 PM

The poll question that has to be asked - Should the Government sell the CBC at a time when the deficit is $30 billion and the CBC gets over $1 billion.

Posted by: Fritz at February 25, 2009 9:50 PM

Should Ottawa give the CBC a funding boost?
Yes 15%
No 84%
Total Votes: 542
as of minutes past......I think they are getting the message.
This CBC funding is just another political subsidy---just for the LIBRANO$........
Poor LIBRANO$....broke and maybe disconnected from their taxpayer funded media propaganda network.
HEE HEE HOO HOO HAW HAW HEE HEE HOO HOO HAW HAW HAW
I'll be alright...give me a mo....

Posted by: sasquatch at February 25, 2009 9:51 PM

I am all for introducing cyanide into the CBC's veins. People(socialists)will be upset at first, but after a week or so they won't remember. Honestly what's to remember? I personally like Mercer, but he sells his show to CBC so he can go anywhere. Other than him, CBC sucks arse. I honestly haven't seen much evidence that government funding provides quality. Don't even try and use health care as an example, because I have never been able to experience a family doctor.

Posted by: Joel Schroeder at February 25, 2009 9:52 PM

84% no.

Consider that a kick to the nards, Mansbridge.

Posted by: Hannibal Lectern at February 25, 2009 10:12 PM

Little poll on the prairie.

Heh.

Posted by: Hannibal Lectern at February 25, 2009 10:13 PM

Somethings up - the poll is now 62% No. So it drops by 20% in 10 minutes??!!

Posted by: Agent Smith at February 25, 2009 10:29 PM

Somthings fishy - shades of Olivia Chow...?

Posted by: Agent Smith at February 25, 2009 10:30 PM

The more I think about it the more I am convinced the government should give the CBC its $65 million on the following conditions.

1. Meaningful Affirmative Action of Employees. 40% of all employees working at the CBC must be true Conservatives by the end of 2009.

2. Meaningful Affirmative Action of Programming. 40% of all programming must be Conservative oriented. For example Kathy Shaidle should be given a talk show entitled "Why MultiCulturalism Sucks". Ezra Levant should be given a show entitled "Why HRC's and Political Correctness Suck" and Mark Steyn should be given a show where he sings old show tunes and reads his columns.

3. Ron McLean is fired from Hockey Night in Canada and the Toronto Maple Leafs are only shown once per year.

Posted by: Fritz at February 25, 2009 10:37 PM

This post made my week.
Thanks Kate.

Posted by: Paul at February 25, 2009 10:38 PM

I don't think there is a real big difference in the budget of the CBC and the RCMP. The CBC gets 1.1 billion plus what they can dig out of the government from other sources. The RCMP gets about 1.5 billion and is taking a pay cut. The way I see at it is they give some of the money to the guys and gals with guns. Let the CBC have a telethon to raise the shortfall. I hear Andean nose flute music is a cash cow.

Posted by: Speedy at February 25, 2009 10:41 PM

Personally, outside of HNIC (and since I live in Toronto, that "H" is used pretty loosely), I haven't watched the CBC for years. I used to love Barbara Frum on the Journal, but sadly, she's gone on to her reward, and while Wendy Mesley is easy on the eyes, she's no Babs.

However, they bought Jeopardy! rights this year, so I've been forced to watch the Corpse. What galls me are their ads touting Mansonsbridge's "The National" as the most watched newscast in the country. Say what? It's easy enough to check the BBM measurements, which show that CTV news is the ONLY Canadian news program to break into the top 20 week after week. Global National occasionally sneaks into the list. The CBC? NEVER. So, isn't there someone I can complain to about truth in advertising? The CRTC? The Broadcast Standards Council? Any advice?

Posted by: KevinB at February 25, 2009 10:42 PM

I would certinly tune in, Fritz, to listen
to Mark Steyn singing old show tunes.

Posted by: Vitruvius at February 25, 2009 10:44 PM

One word solution to the cbc's woes:

LAYOFFS.

It's happening everywhere else in the private sector, and those are jobs that are actually adding to the economic base, not draining it.

Oh, and maybe the revenues generated by Little Mosque may not be sufficient to let that propaganda turkey strut and gobble under its own weight; perhaps it's time to harvest that bird, too.

mhb23re
at gmail d0t calm

Posted by: mhb at February 25, 2009 11:07 PM

They are a caricature within a farce within a lie. Making up a microcosm of fleas with delusions of power. In an opium dream of simulated fame beyond reality.

Posted by: Revnant Dream at February 25, 2009 11:14 PM

Thanks, Vit, once again, you deliver the goods.

Posted by: Yukon Gold at February 25, 2009 11:21 PM

Ahem: "granola-crunching geezers'' who did, indeed, enjoy Bob Kerr and Gilmour's Albums on CBC Radio have been told to go to Hell by present CBC management. So in between bites of granola the said geezers are ... muttering seriously impolite comments about the CBC being a money-pit and so forth.
It has not escaped our notice that the new geezer-unfriendly programming doesn't seem to appeal to anyone else either.

Gee - $65 million - it is a lot of money in personal terms, but it is so tiny compared to the amounts that our American cousins are throwing around these days.

Posted by: John Lewis at February 25, 2009 11:26 PM

I assume the CBC is willing to wait until CTV and Canwest get their Billion each before asking for more?

Posted by: duffman at February 25, 2009 11:27 PM

I used to listen to CBC2 a lot as well for the classical music. Last time I turned it on it was a french rap artist. The host subsequently read the lyrics allowed in english, spoken not rapped of course. It had won some kind of award...

And that was it for me and CBC2

Posted by: Steven Burton at February 25, 2009 11:28 PM

Not to mention the "Songs listeners would like played at their funeral" special I listened to one night... Did anyone else hear that one?

What drugs are these people on?

Posted by: Steven Burton at February 25, 2009 11:30 PM

Lise Lareau, president of the CBC's main union, said "In any huge corporation of this size, ask any CEO how they could function under these (conditions)."

I'm guessing that if you asked a CEO from a comparably huge corporation how he could function with a free billion a year, every year, scraped off the taxpayers and given to his corporation, he'd say "quite well, thank-you."

Posted by: EBD at February 25, 2009 11:44 PM

Well, as the folks within the Obama administration would say, never let a good crisis go to waste. Harper should use this economic downturn to gut/sell/dismantle/whatever CBCPravda.

Long overdue.

Posted by: Colin from Mission B.C. at February 25, 2009 11:45 PM

Heck, I'm just a hick from the outskirts of nowhere in Alberta ... years gone back.

The CPC just announced, as part of the infrastructure spending, hi-speed internet (whatever that is) to hicks, just like me.

Can any of you eggjamakated folks tell me why? Will I be able to watch porn when they get it out here?

anonymous

Posted by: ural at February 25, 2009 11:56 PM

Phantom; Corner Gas is CTV

Posted by: Norm Matthew at February 26, 2009 12:19 AM

Ahem, CBC, you also told me to go to he**

I was a faithful listener/watcher of; As It Happens, The Journal, The National, Radio Noon, Quirks&Quarks, Venture, Nature Of (phsssst)Things, Ideas, and more.

Although I believe the quality was not too bad back then, I had nothing to compare it too.

The Internet plus g*d awful programing (especially news) now has changed my viewing habits. If it is on, I turn it off. CLIck...

Posted by: ron in kelowna at February 26, 2009 12:31 AM

Why not just have our friends in Ottawa sell a licence for a cable channel (like fox news did in the US). We could get our own fair and balanced Canadian news out and have fun trashing the CBC/CTV while doing it.

Posted by: caroil at February 26, 2009 12:38 AM

Mama don't allow no CBC type music in our den of iniquity. But really - would ya really listen to crap by anyone called Rotchacockoff!!

Posted by: Whorehouse piano player at February 26, 2009 12:43 AM

I'll take that yodeling lady over CBC radio any day.

Posted by: Free Thinker at February 26, 2009 12:56 AM

I voted No on more CBC funding. But if it had been School Day 4 or Garbage Day 2, I might have voted Yes.

Posted by: nv53 at February 26, 2009 1:00 AM

Poll

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/

@12:55 eastern
1800 and some votes TOTAL
69% NO!

P.S.
I love watching CBC tiptoeing around ADSCAM characters resurected, and joining the recent events.
"How should we spin this"

Posted by: eastern paul at February 26, 2009 1:03 AM

Re: "Not to mention the 'Songs listeners would like played at their funeral' special I listened to one night... Did anyone else hear that one?"

No, but that strikes me as an interesting topic; I have a few selections myself. "Soon" by Yes, for example.

Posted by: nv53 at February 26, 2009 1:09 AM

CBC has ~10,000 employees and receives ~ $1.1 Billion in direct subsidy from the Canadian taxpayer, and nearly another Billion$$$ in indirect subsidy.

That's and annual subsidy courtesy of the Canadian taxpayer of ~$200,000 per CBC employee...!!!

Seems a tad high to me ... particularly since the CBC does not provide value for money spent ...!!!

Posted by: Observant at February 26, 2009 1:25 AM


At 11:15PM (Pacific) the Winnipeg Free Press poll showed 84% NO for me. Something is funny with those earlier numbers, for sure...maybe the LibLoggers are linking to it as well?

Posted by: FredfromBC at February 26, 2009 2:23 AM

The CBC it's a lot worse than you think.
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/publications/reports/BrAnalysis/tv2008/tv2008.pdf

(Page 21, 2008 Financial Summary)

Total Salaries & Benefits: 771,074
Average number of employees: 10,200
Remuneration/employee: 75,595

Posted by: Largs at February 26, 2009 3:35 AM

All you monarchists are shooting yourselves in the foot..er...feet? Where will your next Governor-General come from? What about Tremonti's or Slaphead's career paths......On a serious note[because I know The Corpse will continue to suck the taxpayers dry],I read this morning [in the Ottawa Sun] that paroled ex-con Richard Condo has seen the light and has produced a 90 minute film on his life of violence.....sounds like a real good buy and probably the CBC could pick it up at rock bottom price in view of their financial wows

Posted by: Squiigy at February 26, 2009 6:58 AM

Attention: Globe Poll poised to go horribly wrong too.

Posted by: Darryl at February 26, 2009 7:37 AM

No soup for you. Fire them all.

Posted by: A storm is coming at February 26, 2009 8:16 AM

NV53
"Soon" is an interesting selection that I have heard others refer to in the same context. I have also heard people suggest "To Be Over" from the same RELAYER album. YES is an aquired taste that I acquired many years ago - and still enjoy, despite the somewhat garbled lyrical elements.

Posted by: sub-urban.ca at February 26, 2009 8:46 AM

CBCpravda may have to backfill thier timeslots with reruns of Razzle Dazzle and junior forest rangers.

maybe the last time I truly liked any of their shows.

Posted by: cal2 at February 26, 2009 9:24 AM

If CBC can outbid private networks for US shows like Jeopardy and Martha Stewart, they have some gall begging us for more.

Posted by: Liz J at February 26, 2009 9:33 AM

Interesting/obvious connection between CBC and Globe readers and lib bias.

43% of Globe readers say 'yes' to increased funding to CBC.
Other polls have a much lower 'yes'.

Quelle supris!!

Posted by: bluetech at February 26, 2009 9:35 AM

Perhaps the CBC budget for this new year should be divided per capita and given to the provinces. CBC hard assets should also be ceded to the provinces that house these assets. Starting next year(year 2) the said provinces are on the hook for half the budget needed and fully responsible for the year after and beyond. No strings to be attached as far as programing is concerned or for keeping this broadcaster at all if not wanted by the said province as the funding will have to come from provincial monies by year 2. Transfer payments and /or equalization payments from the federal government cannot be used after year 2. Just a thought to enliven the upcoming rants from CBC acolytes about "CULTURE" provided, please keep in mind Bloc Quebecois say English Canada has no culture and Central Canada says westerners are to backwards to even know what "acceptable" culture is.

Posted by: uuess at February 26, 2009 9:36 AM

Should Ottawa give the CBC a funding boost?
Yes 53%
No 46%
Total Votes: 4027

Posted by: puddin n pie at February 26, 2009 9:56 AM

Should Ottawa give the CBC a funding boost?
Yes 52%
No 47%
Total Votes: 4075

Keep voting, people.

Posted by: Bert at February 26, 2009 10:07 AM

G&M poll is odd (quite a surprise).

As of a few seconds ago, it stood at 44% Yes and 56% No. But the total of the votes is 3,534. Earlier posters show the total of the votes over 4,000.

Posted by: John Luft at February 26, 2009 10:19 AM

For all you "old geezers" like me who used to listen to CBC2, I have started listening to KING-FM out of Seattle, WA on the internet. All classical, commercial radio.

Commercial and classical? No government handout? Who'd a thunk it?

Posted by: leeky sweek at February 26, 2009 10:26 AM

For all you "old geezers" like me who used to listen to CBC2, I have started listening to KING-FM out of Seattle, WA on the internet. All classical, commercial radio.

Commercial and classical? No government handout? Who'd a thunk it?

Posted by: leeky sweek at February 26, 2009 10:27 AM

Oh dear, looks like the Yes side is pulling ahead. (One vote per day allowed.)It looks like the CBC have got their employees on the case. Quite frankly, I am astonished that anyone would argee to more money for CBC in such dire economic times -- what happened to other important "priorities" favoured on the left . . . extending unemployment, more safe injection sites, money for researchers, status of women, auto bail out . . . oh well, I guess the already generously funded CBC is more important.

Posted by: LindaL at February 26, 2009 11:08 AM

What about Al Jazeera,they'll take over where the corpse leaves off.It will be a seamless transition one would think.

Posted by: h.ryan at February 26, 2009 11:35 AM

Polls: there are two, the one at Winnipeg Free Press is neck and neck-50% yes , 49% no,,,The G&M is still - 44% yes , 56% no. Both have over 4000 total votes.

Posted by: uuess at February 26, 2009 11:39 AM

"I may eventually get around to hooking up the antenna, maybe even add an HD antenna. Maybe. We'll see when the weather gets nicer. In the meanwhile I'm hard pressed to see a down side to having no idiot box to burn time in front of."

Two words: March Madness

Posted by: Indiana Homez at February 26, 2009 11:44 AM

No bailout funding for the CBC is a slice of red meat for conservatives, who sorely need a good bite around now.

None of the usual leftie suspects (Atwood, separatists, etc) who will soon scream "Censorship!" will NEVER EVER vote Conservative anyway. We don't have to cave on EVERY issue, for pete's sake.

Posted by: Soccermom at February 26, 2009 11:52 AM

More Not Waiting for the Asteroid news:

http://www.timescolonist.com/business/Crofton+Mill+Catalyst+announces+more+layoffs/1201158/story.html

The 35 day shut-down of Catalyst's pulp and paper plants is now looking to be semi-permanent. It's all over the local news this morning.

Posted by: crjc at February 26, 2009 11:52 AM

Now isn't that a classic case of the kettle calling the frying pan black? Or was it the melting pot?

Posted by: Jack Frosst at February 26, 2009 12:33 PM

You can be sure that the CBC's secret bloggers are voting like crazy
in the on-line polls and posting comments to create the impression that
Canadians want their CBC. Fire them all.

Posted by: Gerry at February 26, 2009 1:26 PM

Indiana, two more words, who cares?

;) JK!!

Seriously though, CTV and Global get zero viewing from me and the CBC gets 90 minutes a year on the 11 November for the national Rememberance Day service.

History, Space and CBS get the rest of my viewing hours.
Radio? That is what CD players are for.

Posted by: AtlanticJim at February 26, 2009 1:45 PM

Looks like the CBC has hitched their wagon to the wrong horse.I guess they must have thought we wouldn't notice the thieving Liberals and boot them out of office.Should have thought of that when they constantly lied to the public.And if one extra cent goes to the CBC not another of my hard earned dollars will be donated to the CPC.

Posted by: STaylor at February 26, 2009 1:54 PM

"posting comments to create the impression that
Canadians want their CBC. Fire them all." -- this is not credible, really. Two reasons. CBC does not have a very significant audience share of the Canadian market and their most loyal fans (50+ and probably majority female I would guess) are not big bloggers. I'm in that category myself and hardly anyone I know in my demographic blogs. So, I do really suspect CBC employees of skewing the results on the poll. Do these people realize that average salaries at CBC are in the $75,000 range -- rather different from private broadcasters. Time to join the real world.

Posted by: LindaL at February 26, 2009 2:07 PM

"sounds like a real good buy and probably the CBC could pick it up at rock bottom price" Actually, the CBC could pick up a lot of cheap footage, and they should not be going after expensive American fare. What's the point of a taxpayer funded entity going after U.S. programming? They should consider re-broadcasting some of the Provincial tv programming nationally. I hear there are good things in Vancouver that we never see in Ontario and vice-versa. Also, there are enough independant films still around that should be cheap -- why even Mr. LaFond (LaFrond) -- whatever -- the GG's husband -- has quite a few films that should be cheap. I am not saying viewers would watch all this stuff, but at least it's Canadian.

Posted by: LindaL at February 26, 2009 2:14 PM

"Are they still getting free doughnut" -- and luggage too. Used to be if you worked for CBC and travelled, your own luggage was not good enough. I am sure that has stopped, but if they looked hard they could probably find dozens of existing perks that could be cut back.

Posted by: LindaL at February 26, 2009 2:17 PM

Another conservative bashing entity hurting.
BNN reporting Torstar has $211 million loss in Q4, dividend slashed 50%.

Posted by: Grobe at February 26, 2009 3:34 PM

The poll at the G&M is laughable. While it was fairly close all day, it is now at 70% yes (increase CBC funding) versus 30% no. Total votes just over 16,000.

This reminds me of the poll that the G&M had a year or so ago (something about gay rights of some sort) where the pro gay-rights side was at about 20%.....when the poll was over, the G&M poll magically said it was 50/50.

What a joke. The CBC staff and clingers and hangers on must be jamming in the votes pretty hard. But the the G&M is nothing more than a paper version of the CBC so that shouldn't be a surprise.

Posted by: John Luft at February 26, 2009 4:50 PM

Charles Adler discussed this issue today. You can listen to it here at 7:00. Absolutely delicious ear candy!!!

Posted by: Robert W. at February 26, 2009 5:57 PM

From CNEWS;

Are you concerned about the CBC's financial crisis?
Yes

20%
No

22%
I don't care about the CBC

24%
I hope the CBC ceases to exist

33%

Total Votes for this Question: 2276

Posted by: Bruce at February 26, 2009 6:55 PM

The cable channels are bringing on ALL the quality new programming.

MSMers are buying or copying.

Parasites.

Posted by: OMMAG at February 26, 2009 7:45 PM

They should consider re-broadcasting some of the Provincial tv programming nationally.

Perhaps Coren's show, for one. It's currently on a "religious network" (and I'm not particularly religious, myself) but it's a pretty good program with good discussion.

Posted by: PiperPaul at February 27, 2009 12:50 AM
Site
Meter