sda2.jpg

December 9, 2008

Good Advice!

"If you're going to call someone on the phone to make threats, don't do it on voice mail because you leave them with a recorded copy that they can post on the internet ..."

(Put it in an op-ed.)

polly2a.jpg

Posted by Kate at December 9, 2008 8:57 PM
Comments

Whoah! Lots of swearing there, o enlightened one.

I have known a lot of lefties in my life. Their vocabulary is somewhat thin beyond the use of the F-bomb.

Posted by: Eagle at December 9, 2008 9:08 PM

I know I'm not supposed to point this out, but I just can't help it.

Is she talking about ovaries such as "Vagina Monologues" type ovaries; or has Stephen Harper somehow caused astrological agony over Aries?

Posted by: the bear at December 9, 2008 9:22 PM

tag open methinks .

Posted by: Bill D. Cat at December 9, 2008 9:42 PM

Woo, excitable! Living in a state of perpetual freakout seems to be SOP for these lib/left girlies. Always spinning out of control, no practicality to them at all. Phone up to rage at a blogger and -leave a message-, yeah that's thinking ahead,

Here's another example of the type, Paladiea.

thestormydaysofmarch.com/?p=337#comments

She was simply INCENSED that those damn neoCons dared to hold their eeevile rally on her holy day last week, Mark Lepine/Gamil Gharby Day. That's the day Canadian Feminazis celebrate their government imposed helplessness and victimitude.

Now, were I a loathsome Lefty I'd make some really class comment of the type Kathy Shaidle reprints from her inbox occasionally. Lefty women deserve Lefty men. They really are pigs.

Instead, not having been raised in a barn like a frickin' farm animal, I'll just say that a life like these women are living is clearly its own best punishment. Furthermore its a cautionary tale on the woe which awaits those who embrace the mental malfunction that is the Left.

Sucks to be you, girls. Maybe a steady diet of bile isn't good for you.

Posted by: The Phantom at December 9, 2008 9:55 PM

Lefty jerkwads (like Madame Ovary) sure love the Golden Rule.

They think it means that they DESERVE all the gold you've worked hard for all your life so that they can throw it down a black hole in Africa.

Posted by: Doug at December 9, 2008 9:56 PM

Fem Nazi with PMS. No wonder she gave her ex boyfriend sour blood diarrhea.

Posted by: BL@KBIRD at December 9, 2008 10:06 PM

Well, it's clear, in light of a recent court case involving an Alberta-based blogger, that threatening to kill the PM on a blog is a criminal offence.

It also speaks volumes about the Evil Forces that have been pushing this Unholy Alliance coalition -- and it demonstrates just cause for Harper's intention to eliminate public subsidies for political parties. Those morons are free to act like morons, if that's what they want to do, but not on the taxpayer's dime.

Posted by: Werner Patels at December 9, 2008 10:07 PM

Kate ,
Someone broke in and italicized your blog .

Posted by: Bill D. Cat at December 9, 2008 10:15 PM

what is the name of her blog

Posted by: DJ at December 9, 2008 10:23 PM

She's not only delusional and dangerous, she can't spell "ovaries".

Posted by: Soccermom at December 9, 2008 10:26 PM

She's supposedly at the U. of C.  Comments on her blog lead one to believe that she might even be a grad student.

A grad student!

I knew times were tough, but can't the U. of C. find grad students who can actually spell?


Garth

Posted by: Garth Wood at December 9, 2008 10:30 PM

This little piece of embarrassment to women, should be reported immediately. Make an example of the irresponsible behaviour. I am disgusted!

Posted by: Bec at December 9, 2008 10:30 PM

Actually Soccermom, I was just about to ask if that was the original sign or one of the photo shopped ones for that very reason.

I am sure I saw the original once and it was equally as moronic as that one. It may have been that one.

Posted by: AtlanticJim at December 9, 2008 10:33 PM

Y'all might want to verify the attribution of the text on the placard.

Posted by: Tenebris at December 9, 2008 10:42 PM

The pics (shown below) stay. The original has been altered enough in a manner (satire) that copyright is no longer an issue.

attribution verified...

Posted by: Richard Evans at December 9, 2008 10:45 PM

Doug: I love your "golden rule" line. It is now my banner ... thank you sir:

www.cjunk.blogspot.com

Posted by: Paul at December 9, 2008 10:47 PM

What exactly ARE overaries anyways? Is it a fancy place to keep birds? Why does this Harper person hurt them? Is Harper ornithophobic?

This is all so confusing.....

Posted by: Shere Khan at December 9, 2008 10:47 PM

I have only one question about the poster.

WTF is OVERARIES?

Posted by: set you free at December 9, 2008 10:47 PM

I find it disappointing that the Conservative, and by Conservative, I mean one man, Richard Evans, response to this is to call for Joanne, the nutty criminal blogger in question, to kill herself.

Emotionally I understand why Richard Evans would feel that way, but legally it's daft, as I have tried to explain and he has ignored.

She is obviously unstable — at least 2 other people on Richard's blog have pointed that out — and there's a reason encouraging people to commit suicide is a crime. Sometimes they take the advice.

It's a crime because it is immoral. It's an indictable offence subject to up to 14 years of imprisonment and it doesn't matter whether the person ultimately commits suicide or not

While I'm not Christian, many Conservatives are, and his response was decidedly unChristian. And it was criminal too, however you or I feel about it.

Richard makes the final point that the RCMP will be investigating Joanne because of this SDA link and the traffic and attention it causes. Several people — conservatives — have pointed out the problem with Richard's comment.

I wish Richard Evans would reconsider: For the sake of his wife and kids, he shouldn't open himself up to criminal liability.

I don't for one second mean to say I agree with Joanne. I have said Richard should report the threats to his police force and have it investigated. The RCMP protective detail should be aware of the online threat, however vain and stupid it was. Richard's local police force should be aware of the threat on his life.

And I believe Joanne should be charged. My point is committing a crime on top of a crime isn't helpful. There's a reason you call the police!

We're the law and order party, remember?

Posted by: Christoph at December 9, 2008 10:57 PM

WTF is OVERARIES?

They are ovaries whose productive life is over (before they start in this case, evidently).

Posted by: Me No Dhimmi at December 9, 2008 10:58 PM

I wonder if anyone has called the cops on Scott Reid yet for his freak out a few days ago.

Posted by: Soccermom at December 9, 2008 11:00 PM
"I wonder if anyone has called the cops on Scott Reid yet for his freak out a few days ago."

Probably not.

One distinction is Scott Reid didn't mention a weapon. Kill is an expression used in in many contexts. Get a gun and shoot someone (or shoot oneself) is quite a bit more specific. Harder to argue reasonable doubt.

Posted by: Christoph at December 9, 2008 11:02 PM

Uh, Christoph? Richard didn't actually counsel her to commit suicide aka kill herself, you read that into it. He simply suggested she shoot herself.

Posted by: Shere Khan at December 9, 2008 11:08 PM

Overaries + Grad Student = Bird Brain

Posted by: OMMAG at December 9, 2008 11:10 PM

This is the new retroactive "think of the children"!

Just looking at her weapons grade stupid makes me glad I'm already married.*
(safe and sound) :)

*she's probably a greenie who is fixed like the neighbour's cat and doesn't even have huevos.


Posted by: Oz at December 9, 2008 11:13 PM

Christoph; If you can't tell the difference between a statement that tells an individual to take a specific action and one that suggests that an individual "maybe" "consider" a specific action, then I can't help you beyond stating the obvious; One of them does not include the potential for thought or make allowances for the practice of free will. The other does. To counsel is to direct. Joanne directed someone to shoot. I directed Joanne to think.

Posted by: Richard Evans at December 9, 2008 11:21 PM

Christoph, since when is one guy's response to something "the Conservative response"?

Profile much? Dare I say, stereotype much? I thought stereotyping was -bad-, and only done by meanie Conservatives.

Posted by: The Phantom at December 9, 2008 11:24 PM

Richard also said it would put an end to her misery, and went on to tell her how awful she is.

Yes, that's exactly the type of behaviour the criminal code is designed to prevent, Shere Khan. Free speech isn't a license for violent speech. Ezra Levant would agree with that, and has made the case many times.

The whole point of this is Joanne committed crimes when she threatened Stephen Harper online, and when she threatened Richard Evans on his answering machine. Actual, for real, you can go to prison type crimes.

And... Richard Evans may have as well. Possibly a prosecutor wouldn't want to do anything with it, but it is clear that under the letter of the law he is in the wrong:

Criminal Code PART VIII: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION Suicide

Counselling or aiding suicide


241. Every one who

(a) counsels a person to commit suicide, or

(b) aids or abets a person to commit suicide,

whether suicide ensues or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 241; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 7.

Further, even if he didn't "mean" it, that doesn't much matter. He said it to someone who is unstable -- someone who one of his own commenters on his blog (RightGirl) told him is possibly mentally ill and suicidal.

There are other reasons to enforce laws in cases like this. To set an example for society at large to follow and have respect for (this important) law. This is among the factors a prosecutor considers when deciding whether or not to charge.

Richard Evans took a clear example of someone being totally unhinged to the point of mental illness or criminality and decided to match it. Pointing it out -- to the public and/or the police -- would have been the thing to do.

Posted by: Christoph at December 9, 2008 11:28 PM
"Christoph, since when is one guy's response to something "the Conservative response"?

Did you miss what I wrote in that very sentence?

"I find it disappointing that the Conservative, and by Conservative, I mean one man, Richard Evans, response to this is...

What I'm saying is Richard Evans was the wrong response from a conservative point of view: i.e., a moral as well as and law and order perspective.

Posted by: Christoph at December 9, 2008 11:32 PM

All of a sudden, Christoph seems to be protesting too much...

Oh look! A concern troll!

Posted by: Richard Evans at December 9, 2008 11:33 PM

Hey, Christoph, are you the total killjoy that posts sporadically on Ace of Spades HQ?

Man, if it's you you make my SPLEEN hurt!!!

Even when I think of you and how you make Canadians seem like a bunch of retarded children who don't take responsibility for themselves and their own actions like a bunch of "blankety blank" Liberal wet-ends.(hold me back boys)

enough....OW my SPLEEN.

Posted by: Oz at December 9, 2008 11:38 PM

It's not a matter of protesting, Richard. People on your blog other than yourself expressed the same basic concern:

written by RightGirl, December 09, 2008

I guarantee that she will be dead by her own hand if you don't call the cops to have her investigated/sectioned. Do it Richard - it's for her own good. She's clearly depressed and possibly manic. She's no danger to you, but she will kill herself if she doesn't get help.

RG ~ one who knows the signs

She wrote that before I commented. steve wrote after I started commenting:

written by steve, December 09, 2008

What the hell is this doing on a blog? If something needs to be forwarded to the RCMP, then by all means, but making a spectacle out of it for people to laugh at is completely tasteless. Would Jesus encourage people to kill themselves?

If you were the bigger person, you would have kept it to yourself and notified the appropriate people if need be. By posting this, you have no right to claim any higher ground.

Grow up and pray that you don't play a part in pushing someone over the edge.

I object to what you did primarily because it is immoral as well as illegal. This woman should be dealt with by the criminal justice system and/or the mental health system or even, as a last resort, in self defence is she acts on any of her crazy statements.

On your blog, I've been looking at this from your point of view and my concern — yes, concern — was how this could negatively effect your family, who you had expressed great concern. Committing crimes in public is stupid, and is wrong in any case.

Is that the example you're setting for your children? If someone says something offensive about a political figure, don't call the police or anything, instead go to their blog and call for them to shoot themself and end their miserable lives?

I assume you don't have teenagers — you may not be as cavalier about that mode of thinking when you are.

Posted by: Christoph at December 9, 2008 11:44 PM

What the hell is wrong with this woman? It can't just be mental illness. She must really be stupid.

Posted by: Osumashi Kinyobe at December 10, 2008 12:03 AM

Christoph, I read what you wrote. How is what Richard did in any way connected to anything Conservative? Or Christian, for that matter? Is Richard a Conservative MP? Is he a professional Christian of some description? Nope. So WTF?

For your part, you appear to be neither a conservative nor a Christian of any sort anyway, so I fail to see the reason for your "concern".

In other words, you're trolling. You have "concerns", send Richard an e-mail eh?

Me, I don't share your concern. I see stuff like this on Lefty blogs pretty much daily. Its who they are. Friggin' camp guards in training. I'd just as soon they weren't running the damn country.

Posted by: The Phantom at December 10, 2008 12:08 AM

"Would Jesus encourage people to kill themselves?"
!Christoph

To start, Christoph you are a twit.*


Jesus-(the JESUS=God) already knew who is a waste of skin.

Let's face it Christoph, jesus is just a lame bit of pseudo intellectual leverage for you.

The real question is: Would Jesus like it if Miss "I wouldn't bone her with your bone" was using her future spawn as poker chips to influence impressionable but politically naive women to vote for the Communist parties that favour ABORTION?-well you get the drift.

Is that what you're about Christoph?
Murdering children and making non-specific apologies for "women with sore Ovaries"?
wink wink nudge nudge-i'll swallow your soul

*may God forgive me :)

Posted by: Oz at December 10, 2008 12:18 AM

If Richard agrees, I would be happy to leave a message once a month or so...

Hmmm...I think the Pope should be killed too...

But, really if you're all so bored, I'd be happy to spice things up.

Aaah...I just figured out what all of you are complaining about with regards to the spelling of ovaries as "overaries;" Evans Photoshopped that in.

Posted by: Polly Jones at December 10, 2008 12:20 AM

"Polly Jones" (not "Joanna" as I thought?), the message you left on Richard's answering machine was disturbing and serious. I don't know whether the Crown will find out about it or not in order to decide whether to press charges (that's their decision, not Richard's, in theory)... but if you'd left that message on my machine, you would have a criminal record, guaranteed.

Posted by: Christoph at December 10, 2008 12:24 AM

Christoph,BTW,what a pretentious name.I would never,ever counsel one to commit suicide.Life is sacred,even yours.But if you ever do,don't put a gun to your head,aim for a vital organ.

Posted by: wallyj at December 10, 2008 12:25 AM

Hey Chrisoph, perhaps you and I could have a conversation?

gnmiller@shaw.ca

Posted by: Oz at December 10, 2008 12:26 AM
"For your part, you appear to be neither a conservative nor a Christian of any sort anyway, so I fail to see the reason for your 'concern'."

I'm conservative yes, Christian no.

It is a conservative value to support respect for the law, especially in public. It's important to civilization.

It is also Christian value -- although I'm not a Christian -- to value life and to oppose calls for both murder and suicide. So perhaps you need to work on your definition of conservatism.

As for lefties of "Polly Jones' " ilk being vicious, camp guards in training, etc., I agree.

Posted by: Christoph at December 10, 2008 12:27 AM

While I do not disagree with your thesis OMMAG, perhaps this is closer to the truth.

Overaries + Grad Student = womyns studies.

Posted by: Cascadian at December 10, 2008 12:29 AM

I sent you an email, Oz.

Posted by: Christoph at December 10, 2008 12:38 AM


As for lefties of "Polly Jones' " ilk being vicious, camp guards in training, etc., I agree.

Posted by: Christoph at December 10, 2008 12:27 AM

"EVERYBODY shut up about the coalition. Somebody take a gun and shoot Harper. Maybe then I'll believe that your cause is more than a hunk of butter."

Well Christoph, are you more than a mouthpiece when it comes to oreserving human life?

More than a hunk of butter?
Guns or butter chilluns it's time to choose?

Posted by: Oz at December 10, 2008 12:50 AM

Oz, what you said doesn't make any sense. Grammatically. Put it in English and I may reply.

Posted by: Christoph at December 10, 2008 1:08 AM

It looks like NAMBLA Dick got tired of making fun of holocaust victims.

Posted by: ulianov at December 10, 2008 1:10 AM

Cascadian

Make that -wymyn's- studies

Posted by: DanBC at December 10, 2008 1:11 AM

Readers.....

DFTT!

Posted by: DanBC at December 10, 2008 1:13 AM

The pics (shown below) stay. The original has been altered enough in a manner (satire) that copyright is no longer an issue.

I don't know wth you get that idea, the original works maintain copyright no matter how much you alter them. It's intellectual property, but there is the issue of ownership and that generally takes court action to resolve. After that, there is also fair use. BUT there is NO SUCH THING as altering an original work so much that it nullifies the original copyright.

Posted by: the bear at December 10, 2008 1:25 AM

when it comes to observing human life?
(sorry I've been typing poorly)

Looks to me like you're on the side of the "my ovaries Hurt" girl who probably believes in the right to choose ABORTION after failing to choose abstention or commitment.

I'm replying to you on e-mail but haven't composed what I want to say. (I've been reading your stuff on Ace for a few months now.)

P.S. her ovaries hurt because they have a mind of their own and don't want her to be a mother.
(insha allah)or the Sons of Adam and Daughters of Eve think she's being politically trite and using the future to leverage the past.

Posted by: Oz at December 10, 2008 1:47 AM

I don't know wth you get that idea, the original works maintain copyright no matter how much you alter them.

Bear, are you telling me that if I alter every pixel in a digital image, save for one, that the original copyright still applies? If you say "yes", you're a liar...

Someone look outside. Is there a full moon tonight?

Posted by: Richard Evans at December 10, 2008 1:47 AM

I'm on the side of the law, Oz. By strange coincidence, I'm also on the side of the Catholic church: we oppose abortion, calls for murder, and calls for suicide.

Posted by: Christoph at December 10, 2008 1:59 AM

Someone perhaps another woman please slap the bitch.

Posted by: Rick at December 10, 2008 2:15 AM

Real manly of you, Rick.

Posted by: Christoph at December 10, 2008 2:24 AM

"we oppose abortion, calls for murder, and calls for suicide."
~Christoph

Well Christoph, I'm for life too.
But I think that draconian calls for restriction on free speech and calls for killing that will bring about the preservation of greater life are something to be considered.

If I stood by and did nothing while violence was being committed before my eyes or premeditatedly and I knew it was going to happen or happening, I would feel culpable.
(even if someone slapped that self-absorbed lady with the lame sign)

I support Canadian Troops who are stationed abroad to bring the quality of life that I enjoy to other cultures who are handicapped by their cultural/religious retardation.
(Geese/Louise this sounds too stupid for me to submit)but life is a complex thang and you make your stand because the things that are worth saving are saved by sacrifice.

Make a commitment and you, my child, are a stakeholder.

Posted by: Oz at December 10, 2008 2:44 AM

Oh, and I need to say that the girl with the hurting ovaries???...if they really really hurt
she should see an oncologist.
(pretending that the Harper referrence is legit, which it possibly isn't) (8^D.

Posted by: Oz at December 10, 2008 2:59 AM

It isn't a draconian restriction on free speech to outlaw calling for murder or suicide.

Posted by: Christoph at December 10, 2008 3:00 AM

Hey Oz, hope you have gotten some sleep because an oncologist is a cancer doctor. It's better to go to a gynocologist before making a diagnosis via blog.

Silly me, I forgot that here in Canada you have to have a referal to see a specialist and from a "family" GP, not a walk in clinic. Oops, start of a Tommy rant. Must stop now.

Posted by: Texas Canuck at December 10, 2008 5:56 AM

Ah, Christoph... suggesting that someone blow their own brains out rather than someone else's is not "counseling suicide". There's no arguable s241 violation there. The comment may be offensive, but its not criminal.

Posted by: Skip at December 10, 2008 7:17 AM

Richard Evans, that's correct. You should really go to the Industry Canada website. It explains the copyright act. Rather than blathering liberal, yes LIBERAL 1/2 truths.

Know the law and quit being an idiot. Calling me a moonbat because you don't have a clue how the copyright act works make you look stupid.

Posted by: the bear at December 10, 2008 7:37 AM

I bet she thinks the words Taliban Jack are offensive.

Posted by: dinosaur at December 10, 2008 8:04 AM

Yikes!! Is there nothing Harper can't do. I mean if he can make someone's ovaries hurt, he is obviously a mythical magician able to put a curse on lefties and we should be crowing him king of the land.

Posted by: Alberta Girl at December 10, 2008 8:07 AM

"WTF is OVERARIES?"

the opposite of Underaries ?

Posted by: Fred at December 10, 2008 8:37 AM

WHAT IS THE NAME OF HER BLOG, CAN'T SOMEONE ANSWER A SIMPLE QUESTION?

Posted by: DJ at December 10, 2008 8:38 AM

I think it's called Vaginal Notes or something like that. She's quite special, uttering threats, eats still beating hearts. Quite the package, she'll make some guy or gal a real catch someday; maybe.

Posted by: the bear at December 10, 2008 8:42 AM

Christoph said: "...but if you'd left that message on my machine, you would have a criminal record, guaranteed."
Translation: "I'm TELLING!!!"

You'd call the cops because a -girl- told you off? By phone no less? You he-man you. I bet your collar size is under 10 inches, right? You're a pencil neck, aren't you?

If she'd left that message on -my- machine I'd have done what Richard did, post it on my blog and had a good laugh.

Hell, I've been yelled at in person harder than that and laughed in her face. That's what men are supposed to do when strange women freak out at them. Laugh. Because its funny. I mean, what's she going to do, hit me? Will it hurt? Oooo, I'm scared of the mean lady!

Stuck up, punctilious rules lawyers like you are what make this country suck as much as it does, Christoph. Try maning up instead of running to the teacher. Jeeze.

Posted by: The Phantom at December 10, 2008 9:37 AM

Hey DJ, go to the link Kate's provided to nolib and then click on the words that are in blue ( "I will kill the campus pro-lifers and eat their hearts... "). That will send you to her blog. It is probably NSFW as far as language goes.

Posted by: Texas Canuck at December 10, 2008 10:04 AM

Everybody sing:
It's a long way to Over-arie....
It's a long way to go
It's a long way to Over-arie
to a moonbat we all know...

Posted by: Ghost of Ed at December 10, 2008 10:38 AM

Phantom

U R on fire! Especially your first comment.

Posted by: Indiana Homez at December 10, 2008 10:56 AM

Oh come on guys, nobody reads her blog. She deserved to get called out for the Harper thing and the voicemail, but she isn't a High Value Target.

When she leaves school she will embrace the system, instead of revolting against it!

Posted by: Tuco at December 10, 2008 11:23 AM

Well, you got your 15 minutes Evans.

Posted by: dp at December 10, 2008 11:28 AM

I'm not after "15 minutes", dp. I post what I post because the general public needs to know the character of the social activists and community organizers who claim to be speaking on their behalf. I believe that the voice of the people needs to be taken away from the nutbars like Joanne and given back to the actual people. If you have a problem with that, you're a MoonBat...

Posted by: Richard Evans at December 10, 2008 12:01 PM

Try http://marginalnotes.typepad.com/pj/2008/11/i-will-kill-the-campus-prolifers-and-eat-their-hearts.html

Posted by: eastern paul at December 10, 2008 12:07 PM

Well, she DOES have the perfect qualities to become a top-notch NDP candidate. That alone should make life worth living for a Harper/pro-life hater.

Posted by: Soccermom at December 10, 2008 12:33 PM

The bully in this story is Joanne.

She wants to kill Stephen Harepr and wants to beat up Richard Evans.

But if leftists/feminists can manage to convince us she is the victim ( Joanne is suicidal, unstable, depressed, as helth problems, blahblahblah...) then Joanne the leftist-feminist bully is not only absolved of her crimes but now in this new twist the bully is the right wing male.

This way leftists/feminists kill two birds with one stone ( pardon the pun )

Posted by: Friend of USA at December 10, 2008 12:57 PM

Kill the Pope; the Pope smokes dope.

Posted by: Polly Jones at December 10, 2008 1:17 PM

Kill the Pope; the Pope smokes dope.

Posted by: Polly Jones at December 10, 2008 1:18 PM

Wow...is this what is refered to as a make work project?
Joanne...who is desperate for attention of any flavour succeeds by getting on SDA (high exposure)
Hypothetical Brou Ha ensues.
Richard Evans receives responses of many genres...some supporting...some not so.

Higher authorities MAY BE NOTIFIED...perhaps not.
Richard,(by some) eluded to as perhaps insensitive...by others as WTF?
If he had told her to JUMP OFF A CLIFF then none of this would be coming back on him by the self proclaimed righteous.
MY OPINION FWIW...Joanne should do with herself exactly what she sees as fit...Everyone else should leave her to her misery and move on as Joanne got exactly what she was craving...ATTENTION.

Posted by: norhtside 777 at December 10, 2008 2:09 PM

You know, its because of Crazy Bitches like P.J. here that women still arent being taken seriously. When you bitch in a blog that your ovaries hurt (try getting some exercise PJ, it helps with PMS cramps, maybe go out for a walk at a children's pallative care hospital, take a jog down the rougher neighborhoods with a couple homeless people, or just go GET LAID) then trust me, not only will men refuse to take you seriously, sane women wont either.
When you declare your intent to murder and eat the hearts of people who are pro-not-killing-BABIES and actually put out a call for someone to shoot the prime minister you lose ALL moral ground and all claims to mental stability.

You make me ashamed to be a woman.

Posted by: Irene Swain at December 10, 2008 2:10 PM

I don't see a winner here.
Yes poor Joanne is sick and clearly off her meds.
But Richard? Pushing the buttons of a clearly irrational, unstable woman like that? Wow! It must take a real man!
This is a tough round to score...best I can say about Richard is he sucks slightly less than Joanne...not much of an achievement.

Posted by: Edward Teach at December 10, 2008 3:17 PM

Thanks, Mr. Homez. Our Polly is just having her youthful university hijinks like all the other good little Leftist girls. Getting in minor heck for hating conservatives, Christians and pro-lifers is a real plus on the resume, and she's all over that.

I predict she has a bright future in the Civil Service, if she works hard on polishing her sucking-up skills.

Posted by: The Phantom at December 10, 2008 3:29 PM

Edward; Would you rather we say nothing when we see leftards acting like leftards?

Posted by: Richard Evans at December 10, 2008 4:07 PM

I hate lefties as much as the next feller but this clucky skank is obviously suffering from a mental condition. Picking on this chick would be like beating up a retard and there is little sport in that.

I do note with some dismay that these emotional nut cases and marginal people always line up on the political left for some reason. That should tell ya something.

Posted by: Jim at December 10, 2008 8:54 PM

what a loon, kind of reminds one of the Maggy syndrome. Maggie Trudeau and Margot Kidder.

if your going to go nuts , do it in private.

Posted by: cal2 at December 10, 2008 9:52 PM

Richard, there are many choices between "nothing" and "pushing buttons".

Besides, in her case what really needs to be said? If it isn't immediately clear to an observer that she is obviously mentally unbalanced, it never will be. Prodding her accomplishes almost nothing.

Posted by: Edward Teach at December 10, 2008 10:36 PM

Sorry Edward but this country got as screwed up as it is because folks like you refuse to call a spade a spade.

Posted by: Richard Evans at December 11, 2008 12:17 AM

I'm sorry too Richard that apparently you suffer from a lack of reading comprehension skills.

Posted by: Edward Teach at December 11, 2008 12:47 AM

Richard is right on that score. We see these nutbars and we try to be polite with them. We try to ignore their obvious mental problems. We try to give them a fair shake and make them feel better.

It never works. In fact, their demands get more unreasonable, they get more shrill and demand more special treatment with every concession we make. Now these arseholes are running (ruining) our country. Their last attempt to do an end run around democracy tells you just how large a problem these people have become.

I know exactly how Richard feels. When some obscenity spewing liberal bitch like this opens up, maybe we have to do the same - in no uncertain terms.

As conservatives we tend to be self contained, polite and reasonable. That just doesn't work with these lefties. Sometimes they need a crack across the face with the back of the hand in order to make them pay attention to that line in the sand.

I hope this chick came away from all this with much more than a beating to show for it...but I don't expect miracles from these people. By and large, they ain't that bright.

Posted by: Jim at December 11, 2008 7:43 AM
Site
Meter