December 30, 2008
Thank you, George W. Bush, for having the moral clarity and leadership that made possible the liberation of the Iraqi people and the execution of the monster criminal Saddam Hussein.
Posted by: Dave in Pa. at December 30, 2008 10:11 AMI watched the BBC's "House of Saddam". I'm not sure if they were sympathetic to Saddam, but they certainly tried to portray him as something more than a tyrant.
Posted by: dp at December 30, 2008 10:12 AMbut they certainly tried to portray him as something more than a tyrant.
Something they'll never afford President Bush.
God bless GWB's quiet, unperturbed, steady leadership through the ugliest MSM Open Season ever. His liberation of millions from tyranny in the Mideast and disease in Africa will never be reported by them.
Posted by: Joan of Argghh! at December 30, 2008 10:53 AMHe got what he deserved.
Posted by: Merle Underwood at December 30, 2008 11:57 AMYeah, that sure was worth getting thousands of our citizens killed, and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis.
You Republican shit.
Posted by: Kenneth Anger at December 30, 2008 2:02 PMkenny anger , you should always back up your peturbations.
http://icasualties.org/oif/iraqideaths.aspx
Kenneth,
Saddam was part of the 9-11 plot. Look in the 9-11 report. He also was involved in the '93 bombing of the WTC, which he admitted when he tried to trade the mastermind of it for peace. He was behind an attempt to assinate a former US president. I know that you think the above are all lies. But you don't really have any evidence that they are lies, on account of they are true.
BTW,
I have asked many leftards like yourself for examples of Bush lies, in his own words, in context, and never get any.
I can think of a lot of reasons why GWB was a lousy president. For example, he wants to flood the US with cheap, unskilled labor, that only worsens the plight of inner city blacks. He spends like a drunken sailor, could never defend himself effectively in the public arena when faced with a hostile press, etc. But national security and the decision to remove Saddam from the world stage is not one of the reasons that he was a lousy president.
Posted by: Tim in Vermont at December 30, 2008 3:36 PM"He got what he deserved."
He should have got it in '92!
I'd be a lot more favourably disposed towards the Iraq war if there'd only been one and if they'd done a proper job of it the first time!
Saddam Hussien WAS the weapon of mass destruction.
Posted by: cal2 at December 30, 2008 9:23 PMBefore submitting, review the post to ensure your comment is on topic and does not contain words that might get caught in the spam filter (eg: insurance, viagra, online, poker). This is not a forum or a repository for off-topic link dumps. Profanity is discouraged. Take your extended debates and/or flamewars to private email. Thankyou.