Fake pictures? Why not? The whole friggin' report is based on fake science, fake pictures fit right in.
And haye/ishaq/mo/whatever, your butt is probably bigger than that house. You need to haul your sorry , pimply, palid, sea mammal ass out of Mom's basement more often, drop a couple hundred pounds.
Posted by: The Phantom at August 5, 2008 10:37 AMDoes someone have a shot of the floodwaters closing in on the IPCC,
Why can't they find a pic from a real flood we have them in Manitoba all the time,
Part of our annual climate change event, called spring.
If floods are getting worse why are they flooding Manitoba less than in the 1800's?
Posted by: dinosaur at August 5, 2008 10:41 AMMy pilaster is bigger! So take that, Ishaq.
Posted by: Gus at August 5, 2008 10:42 AMSorry folks, that should have been pillar.
Posted by: Gus at August 5, 2008 10:45 AMLike many religions, facts don't matter - emotions do.
Posted by: ron in kelowna at August 5, 2008 10:57 AMPropaganda section over at Global Warming Inc. is getting sloppier and sloppier. Don't they know that water doesn't go at an angle, as it obviously does in that photo?
It isn't just a fake, its a gawd awful obvious fake. How is it that WE allow OUR public agenda to be hijacked and driven over a cliff by such dismal, tiny brained, no-talent hacks?
Posted by: The Phantom at August 5, 2008 11:03 AM" How is it that WE allow OUR public agenda to be hijacked and driven over a cliff by such dismal, tiny brained, no-talent hacks? "
Simple. Because of the huge influence of Media, Universities, The United Nations, Hollywood and the Public School System.
No one, but no one is more POed over all this than the reasonable, everyday environmentalist. Their brand name is being ruined for a generation.
Posted by: ron in kelowna at August 5, 2008 11:29 AMNo one, but no one is more POed over all this than the reasonable, everyday environmentalist. Their brand name is being ruined for a generation.
Well said, I think greens will turn 180 on AGW --eventually.
Posted by: bob at August 5, 2008 12:24 PMI recall when the climate change alarmists were predicting widespread drought and desertification of the south and central USA as well as the North Central Plains and Canada's prairies .... Magazines had lots of photos of dry and dusty fields or shrunken river channels.
It's pretty clear that the Message they use to promote their own funding is as variable as ..... the Climate.
Posted by: OMMAG at August 5, 2008 1:40 PM>>Don't they know that water doesn't go at an angle
Probably not, since they seem to think that ocean levels can rise in one or two select locations (SW Pacific and Bangladesh) and not everywhere else. When will we see the predicted flooding of Manhattan?
Posted by: itlog95 at August 5, 2008 2:18 PMspeaking of phonies, old Ishaq , the phony, has the first post.
Posted by: GYM at August 5, 2008 2:22 PMHow come the backdrop is a dull white and yet the trees have shadows?
In front of the windows there appears to be shrubbery which would have to be small trees given how high they come up the windows, makes you wonder why the bothered to have windows at all?
CTV(tass) mixes up hydrogen and nitrogen
http://www.ctv.ca/mar/photo.html?pname=http://images.ctv.ca/archives/CTVNews/img2/20080805/450_engine_hydrogen_080805.jpg&win_width=645.0&description=A look inside BMW's Hydrogen 7, which runs on liquid Nitrogen.
CTV(tass) update
they have fixed it now. do you think they read this blog.
Posted by: cal2 at August 5, 2008 6:10 PMLooks like my place (well, with typical MSM exaggeration) - My pump's running as I write, trying to draw off the excess near the foundation. We've had 45mm so far today and its not over yet. 120mm in the last three weeks, not counting today.
Posted by: Skip at August 5, 2008 8:38 PM"Piltdown Mansion"
ROFL
Beautiful! And the reference is perfect, too. That was my biggest laugh tonight.
mhb23re
at gmail d0t calm