They're getting Scareder.

These creatures are still a peril until they are no more.

I really doubt the CHRC is getting smarter, I'll bet they're just waiting until we move on to the next topic of the day. Then it will be back to business as usual.

Well some young kids came to my door today and asked if I'd be voting for the local Tory candidate - and boy did I give them an earful. I hope they know what I was going on about. Doesn't matter; the MP sent around a feedback mailing, and I'll let him have it that way too.

Cut. Their. Funding.

Amazing how fast the roaches scuttle for the baseboards when the light goes on, eh?

Getting smarter?

I would suggest scrabbling for survival to justify their incredulous behaviour and 'rulings'.

"This ain't Kansas anymore Toto!!!"

The tinman and the lion send the flying monkeys on a new mission.

Cheers

Hans-Christian Georg Rupprecht, Commander in Chief

Hans Corps
1st Saint Nicolaas Army
Army Group “True North”

This outcome's certainly better than the complaint being upheld and, hopefully, it might be able to be used as some sort of a precedent--though, of course, precedents mean some sort of due process.

The heat's not going to be off these scavengers for a long time. I think there's cause for some small rejoicing here.

Not that the Catholic Church--that's THE CATHOLIC CHURCH--was weighing in exactly. But...

...if the CHRCs didn't want to have to go up against Maclean's and its legal department, maybe they didn't fancy going up against the Roman Catholic Church's legal department, either...

The CHRC knows that the spotlight's on them.

Deers in the headlight? You bet: "Let's get outta here..."

Agree with Hans Rupprecht... nothing but a calculated attempt to save their own skin. Hopefully MPs won't fall for it and approve Keith Martin's motion.

they found out the big fish are hard to land, and watch for the test line to shrink. With all those lines out there a quick speedboat manouvre.

"They're getting Scareder."

Will Paul Wells respond to this?
...-

"P.S. I just noticed an additional layer of incompetence, like icing on a cake of corruption: in the CHRC's letter* to Fr. de Valk, they named his tormentor as "Paul Wells", not Rob Wells. I guess they just have Maclean's magazine on their mind down in the CHRC's bunker."

"Corrupt ex-cop Kozak was CHRC investigator in Catholic Insight case"
"By Ezra Levant on July 4, 2008"
http://ezralevant.com/
*http://ezralevant.com/Dismissal%20letter.pdf

Smarter no, meaner yes. They will still bring about charges. The charged party will sweat and stew giving them stress and on top of it a huge lawyers' bill. Then these HRC's will drop the charges, but the poor sap is left with ulcers and an emptier wallet.

Can them all and never go back.

I called hrc they said they are not take complain about newspaper very much seriously
at this stage politically

plus hrc in Canada are not strong able to fight with big lawyers

still not know the law well and still
confuse over
some group in hrc is working also put thier own idea who need to accept their case who is not
because they have their owen prejedice

Hrc are not too serious in Canda
becuase i HRC really want to follow law
they must arrest 90% of Canadaian
all are discriminating Muslim law

lookout: The heat's not going to be off these scavengers for a long time.

Did you mean 'scavengers' or 'parasites'?

Picture Harper's crew, with the CPC dancing with the CHRC's mad bureaucrats, looking lovingly at the each other while this tune plays in the back ground. Someone is starting to make smart decisions there now & I am wondering, who, why, & how. These are all politically motivated decisions, besides which the penitents have had to pay ALL the legal bills. Fire them all , than lay charges.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvzUdM29_uA&feature=related

All these scum bags wait for is a weak opponent, nothings changed.

"what, when they are on side suddenly they're 'alright mate'?

what hypocrisy you people show."
Save it drama queen, the CBC is a piece of liberal propoganda shite and will continue to be.
That work for you?

some people are not understand the law

the difference bettwen snitching some one to court or to police

with report the complain

again with report wrong information to the court

if any body report wrong information and wrong complain in some where after investigation if some thing drop before hit trail taht is fine but if it goes after trial and use legal fees they can come back and sue the counter law sue them for wast their time and money as well

espcial peopel who complain to police in most case police wathc the complainat to the other party or both from criminal view
then do not snith if you do not k now your right and law talk to lawyer before do complain

gossiping, slandering and wrong report and snitching can be used against you in court too

most people who say freedom of speech are not able to handler other side opinion as well and sansour that too

I stand corrected but I believe the magazine is on the hook for $30,000.

It is a war of attrition. As Swill has stated, the defendants sweat and worry. They incur legal fees.

Again, though unsaid it is the old authoritarian admonition.

"You are lucky this time, next time you may not be".

I repeat is is a war of attrition.

I stand corrected but I believe the magazine is on the hook for $30,000.

It is a war of attrition. As Swill has stated, the defendants sweat and worry. They incur legal fees.

Again, though unsaid, it is the old authoritarian admonition.

"You are lucky this time, next time you may not be".

I repeat is is a war of attrition.

I correct myself and should have read the text more carefully. It is said on various blogs as well that..... "$20,000 of legal bills and 18 months....." of on-off litigation.

Again a statement that the process is the punishment. With this I agree.

flygirl...you are a leftoid moonbat,there now,feel better?