It's not fair.

My what big numbers you have.

Okay, I'll do it before someone else does.

You must be thinking right.

Illiterate, yes: but also good for rude laughs.

SDA meets its match

Lets try that again (first time that I've tried to do html style links.

Your talking about the guy who claimed TO's mild winter in 06 was evidence of global warming. Did you really expect more?

Hey, Katie, you're the one who lives with ugly little dogs. What is your relationship with those animals?

Kate clobbers him ... again.

Is that him resorting to slander on the dogs ?

"What is your relationship with those animals?"

What was it you were saying about moral illiterates Kate?

Warnout Kinsella . . .

king of the biggest internet pussy club

A fight between Warren and something in his own species...

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=warren+kinsella&word2=a+slug

What is your relationship with those dogs...is Warren speaking from experience?

Now for a real contest

Doesn`t Kinsella work at Daisy?

Pollara is got to be some sort of Liberal scam or front for the Librano cash bag exchange program.

Look at their most recent press release, posted on their front page dated October 11:

"Halloween continues to be a strong tradition among Canadians"

Who the hell would pay a PR company thousands if not millions, to come up with this inane shit?

Does the guy really only have a right eye?

Why isn't it his left eye?

Why isn't it just his mouth?

Does he only have a quarter of a brain?

What moron designed his site, Pollara?

I've heard of Warren Kinsella. Who is Kate McMillan?

"You think its izzy being the lamest Liberal on Earth?!"

Another clash of the titans

Max...Kate is the one who turned the light on to expose the cockroach that Kinsella is,any more questions?

This pretty much explains WK's comment policy on his blog. If he did engage in debate with commentors he would soon reveal himself for the juvenile windbag that he is.....the myth of "Canada's leading blogger" exposed in a fit of petulant puppy piddle.

And will Warren ever give up the weeping over an inappropriate comment posted here or will he forevermore hide behind parental outrage to cover his factual deficiencies?

Jeezus Kinsella....learn some more tricks will ya.

Syncro

Max - you're not due out of your hole until Feb 2nd, 2008. Crawl back in there.

As for Warren K - well what can you say that has not already been said about the slimmy pr@@k.

I like this one
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Warren+Kinsella&word2=Kate+McMillan

But I TOTALLY LOVE this one:

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Warren+Kinsella&word2=The+Phantom

Bwaha!

*
pollara? that sounds real classy...

"Here's the entry for Daisy Consulting. Notice the scanty list of
clients is shared by three people working out of the same
high-rent Yorkville office owned by Michael Marzolini, owner
of the Pollara polling firm."

*

Those are two of three comments left here by that ip address. The third, also anonymous, points to a post of Steve Janke's - that refers to Warren Kinsella's Nigerian "death threat"... rotflmao

Max... Kate is the lady that owns this blog. She posts topics of interest and leaves them open to discussion Kinsella on the other hand is your run of the mill lieberal POS that has a blog "somewhere " who posts his lieberal propaganda BS and does not allow comments. He is also a burned out "punk rocker" of 50ish years who refuses to grow up. The word " KeyboardCoward" come to mind.

Kate, you have to post that.

Kate, I wondered what you were going to do with that post after I first read it.

I have to say that this beats just deleting it all to hell and gone.

BZ

Now now, you guys go easy on Warren. He is after all a Liberal. Do you tink it is izzy to spend your life on the short school bus.

Oh the poor little web-wanker-wuss, Warren. A girl made him cry.

GDW: Illiterate, yes: but also good for rude laughs.

Oh, for sure you first tried "CBC vs Small Dead Animals" before resorting to the more awkwardly worded "Canadian Broadcasting Corporation versus Small Dead Animals."

This could go on forever.

Just think, the self-esteemed author that wrote the dog comment was once upon a time a "liberal back room boy" that advised the leaders of the Liberal party, it amazes me that the juvenile rantings from the supposed elite of this country are now self published on the internet for all of us to see, and the best part is it's not even original. Can anybody say "Chow"!

Personally, I think SDA is a sh!t stain on the anal sphincter that is the far-right blogosphere, and even I have to admit that Kinsella got punked on this one. Nicely done!

Personally,I think the liberals are a sh!t stain on the anal sphincter that is the left wing.

Kate; very good post. Merle Underwood

Jeez,A person like kin sell A,shouldn't be allowed to have kids!

At 12:23PM I commented (It was just a hunch from an ordinary Canadian);

"Kate clobbers him ... again.

Is that him resorting to slander on the dogs ?" ron in kelowna.

Then 17 minutes later, 12:40, Kate nails Kinsella to his cross !!. (I would bet, not because of my hunch ---- she is always miles ahead of me !!)

It is just that a long time ago I had some email exchanges with WK ---- civil at first, but rapidly his agenda showed through. But, I have to admit, he is probably one of the better Libs. After all, he did help take down the worst flake of a PM we ever had --- PMPM :)

Funny thing is, I have a feeling ole Warren is just getting warmed up. You probably haven't seen nothing yet...just ask Mark Bourrie or Robert McClelland if you think sparring with Kinsella is a fun, painless process. On the other hand, SDA is no OttawaWatch or MyBlahg, so he may have his hands full on this one.

Kinsella vs. MacMillan...hot damn, I can't tell you how much I've been looking forward to this bout...

...I've been saying for a while that I'm not too worried about the decreases in privacy telecommunications advancements are causing... sure some people will lose out, but that's because they're losers.

...this is a no-brainer (albeit very funny/just) example though... but I really think it's broadly generalizable, and will serve to not only expose people like this, but also help us identify those people who are actually good, but have been labeled bad by arbitrary convention...
/end ramble
Thanks for the laugh!

Too late, Ringo. He's already shot his wad on this. He's libeled me on national radio and in the National Post. I don't think he was very happy when the Post showed him copies of his own emails to me, proving he was engaging in blatant blogospheric revisionism (per the second quote above).

The problem with Warren is that he's never had to deal with someone who has no political ambitions whatsoever and no higher-ups to whine to. So he can blast away all he likes. Those who read it just have to consider the source, and the company he's kept.

So he's reduced to writing Top 10 Jerk lists and leaving anonymous comments on my blog.

WK takes on small dead animals:

http://www.theshockzone.com/games/gopher.php

and to make it a final nail in Warnout's coffin . .

he still lives in the delusional world where he thinks Jean Cruton was the best Prime Minister we had.

I don't think there is any medication that will help him recover.

Warrens complaints about SDA are well known, nothing new.

Clearly business was slow and he had some time to kill.

Funny though, it shows he reads it. It also gets people to go to his site, smart man that Warrne is, he knows where the readers are.

Isn't Warren Kinsella a best-selling author and wellknown political pundit?

Isn't Kate McMillan a very small player in the silly little world of conservative misfits?

Hey Kate, you like stats. Why don't you post your dogshow earnings and then Kinsella's annual income from his consulting fees, book sales, newspaper columns etc?

It's cute that you think you're important though.

yes max, it is all very punk of Warren to be advisor to the rich and powerful.

Very punk.

Selling the revolution indeed.

Hey Kate, you like stats. Why don't you post your dogshow earnings and then Kinsella's annual income from his consulting fees, book sales, newspaper columns etc?
--- Max

By telling us high income equals high intelligence Max has just revealed his low IQ.

"Isn't Warren Kinsella a best-selling author and wellknown political pundit?"

Which makes one wonder why he spends so much time obsessing about a commercial artist in Saskatchewan, no?

Max - showing dogs is a hobby. There are no financial "earnings" to speak of as there are few cash prizes. Most compete for the love of the sport and to broaden their knowledge.

It teaches you a lot about the value of a thick skin, though. Perhaps Warren should get a dog and try his hand at it? Think of it as "personal development".

"So he's reduced to writing Top 10 Jerk lists and leaving anonymous comments on my blog."

Clearly a case of "Sudanese Shrinking *enis Syndrome" -- Mark Steyn's wonderful phrasing from a few years past.

Kate, you have the right to defend yourself, but don't do it for the wrong reasons...

ignore Warren...

...you'll be better off in the long run. This is beginning to bring out a little bit of an ugly side in your character that I know we all have buried deep within us... and I know its almost unfair to bring that up, considering all the ugliness that sometimes descends upon you for saying what you believe and sticking to truth, facts and your own stated opinions.

Do you really want to end up addicted to the same false hubris that Warren suffers from?

Keep up the good work, you are truly one of the good people.

Cheers!

Leto

Here we go again.

I actually made the post that Warren is complaining about (and has been dining out on for years now). As he knows perfectly well, I did NOT suggest that Warren's children should be raped. I suggested that Warren himself was allowing people to rape his children. Needless to say, I don't think he should do that. But the fact is, he posted on his own website a series of posts in which he boasted of allowing his homosexual friends to molest his kids. He shouldn't say such things if he doesn't want them believed. I'm sorry I took him at his word, but of course, so is everyone who does that.

And of course, Kate permits comments, which means she pretty much had to "permit" mine. But I didn't post that remark because Kate "permitted" it. I posted it because Warren himself invited me to. On that particular day he was inviting his readers to post offensive comments at Kate's site, and his readers, with his full approval and express satisfaction, were posting offensive filth all over Kate's comments page. I joined in only because that was apparently what Warren wanted me to do. Clearly I was just a bit too offensive for his tastes, but how can I judge his taste in turds at this distance? If he didn't want filth posted, he shouldn't have asked for it.

Sorry, Warren. You only got what you asked for. You shouldn't have asked for it. You're well aware than the moment you expressed any concern, I requested that the post be removed, and it was. Hey, I only posted it because you wanted me to.

So, you asked me to make that post, I made it, and Kate removed it.. and SHE'S to blame for something? Blow it out your ass.

"" GDW: Illiterate, yes: but also good for rude laughs.

Oh, for sure you first tried "CBC vs Small Dead Animals" before resorting to the more awkwardly worded "Canadian Broadcasting Corporation versus Small Dead Animals."

Posted by: GDW is lame at December 5, 2007 1:36 PM ""

Thanks for that GDW. CBC has spent billions of dollars to have google hits that are only 3 to 4 times that of Kate's SDA.

Only a Liberal would think that is money well spent...

"boasted of allowing his homosexual friends to molest his kids. He shouldn't say such things if he doesn't want them believed."

The same Warren that makes fun of his former firm, Navigator, as Brokeback PR because a couple of the pricipals are gay? Like there is something wrong with it?

Say it ain't so.

What's wrong with ugly dogs - I take offence to that remark. LOL

Kate, Kinsella is a joke. Don't waste your time. He's resorted to goading you in search of some attention. But, it doesn't hide the fact that plain and simple, he's done. He's completely irrelevant, he knows it, and is haunted by it.

Would the first (and probably only) one to go to WK's site, please post his mutterings here (for what they are worth ---- that way others will not have to soil their keyboards :)

The slippery K will likely claim teenagers like Max are at his keyboard and he *regrets* their inappropriate web behaviour. = TG

ebt

The handle is correct so I assume you are who you say you are.

Please explain how Kinsella asked for derogatory posts on SDA. Links would be helpful.

Syncro

Speakign of slippery...you're going down a slippery slope, Max. How would you like a slippery stockbroker to show both Warren and almost all of us up with the same metric? Including (unless you're a rarity) you?

Kinsella is not waiting for the asteroid.

Meh, even I can take that Kinsella twerp.

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=warren+kinsella&word2=jim+steele

Heh, reading through the snide cheapness in the lefty troll commentary, I'm not surprised by the sneering pettiness of Letfbot reactionaries... but I do weep for Canada if this is what passes for political ethics/insight/debate for the spinning left.

Such anti-intellectual sophistry is the sign of a dying culture.....a sad reminder that the average colonial parishioner 200 years ago was better read and more literate than what passes as the professional political class the days. One would have to frequent dockside bordellos to hear the invective Kinsella "challenges" his detractors with.

Come on, folks.

"...ugly little dogs..."

Ignore WK and his goading. He's purposely farting in the theatre.

Hey Max
Good one!
"Why don't you post your dogshow earnings and then Kinsella's annual income from his consulting fees"

Lets post Kate's earnings from dog shows.

$0.00
Done.

Now Max, please post how much money Warren made when he was the mouth piece for Chretiens Adscam, Grande Mere, Shawingate etc etc etc.
PLEASE!

Every time I see Kinsella's scribblings on the Internet I shudder to think this country was actually "led" by such juveniles. It's a testament to how safe and prosperous this country is that we can afford to suffer such fools.

The IP address thing, as it turns out, is just a coincidence. While it's true that the Chairman of Pollara, Michael Marzolini, was Chretien's pollster at the time when WK was Chretien's advisor, that doesn't mean there's any connection between WK and Pollara. And although WK and the President and CEO of Pollara, Don Guy -- who the Star described as "arguably the second most important person (in Ontario)" were both campaign managers for McGuinty, that doesn't mean there's any connection between WK and Pollara.

Antonia Zerbesias once said her sources told her that WK was about to "link up" with Marzolini, but she quickly updated, as tends to happen in these sorts of situations: WK, as it turns out, only leased office space from Marzolini. Elsewhere, Daisy is described as being located "in Pollara's offices."

In other words Daisy, is not chained to Pollara. There's no link. Still, Daisy is an odd choice of name, considering.

Pollara's (motto?...slogan?) is "Measuring and Managing Civilization's Most Powerful Currency -- Public Opinion." The "Managing Public Opinion" part seems kind of stinky you look at how connected, or "connecting", to various media the honchos at Pollara are. Robert Hutton, Pollara's Executive Vice President and GM was a member of the Corus Radio team who applied a month ago to the CRTC for a new FM talk radio service for Kelowna. And in 2000, Connie Cheng, Pollara's VP of Western Operations was part of a group that included the (then) President of Pollara, Duncan MacKay, who were applying to the CRTC for an "urban music service", Vancouver, I believe, directed at ethnic communities. It also proposed that the station would have a talk component directed at ethnic urban issues.

"Managing public opinion." Or as TV Ontario's Steve Paikin says, Chairman Michael Marzolini "does amazing things with public opinion."

I read an article in the Guelph Mercury examining a "working families" coalition that was "seen to favour" the Liberals during the Ontario campaign; Don Guy was doing work for the coalition while he was the Liberal campaign director. "Pointing to this and other connections with the Liberals, the Conservatives have suggested that the working families coalition is just a Liberal front created to circumvent campaign spending restrictions."

Come on. As if.

EDB

Plausible deniability? FO.

Syncro

Kinsella would have little time for a pet dog, he's into toy dinosaurs.

Speaking of revisionism, it's the Liberal way.

I kin sella propaganda. Kin you?

its funny watching warren flop about in death throes. hopefully a preamble for the most criminal party in all of canadian history. the liberal cretainites.

I always enjoy the pictures which Kate posts of her dogs. I don't know about Kinsella, who has talent but seems to lack self respect, but I would be delighted to meet Kate's dogs. Among other things, they are very dignified and serious - unlike Kinsella.

Why does a person always feel like they have to wash and clean their keyboards and monitor when Kinsella's name comes on the screen?

rockyt, I know what you mean...links to WK should come with a warning.His band is well named.
I cringe too when his page jumps up...and I don't like to boost his 'count.'

Kate...I do like it when you embarrass him as you have done so graciously today.
How are those puppies?

Whatever you do, don't say anything bad about Chretien or he'll get really mad!

This loser can actually play mary had a little lamb with fuzz tones on his sears electric guitar, what a toronto millie, and to think they actually waste good trees on newsprint for kinsella the counterfeit.

I'm not sure this little google fight thing can be considered anywhere near accurate in terms of indicating a site's relative standing to another's, especially this site. By virtue of SDA's name you have three commonly used words that are going to pick up all kinds of sites that having nothing to do with this place. Warren Kinsella on the other hand is going to be more restricted to the actual individual.

Secondly, you can't really compare traffic stats of a commented blog to an non commented blog. They are two different things that stimulate user behavior in different ways. If you don't agree with me, ask Kate to disable comments for a month and then watch the traffic drop off.

Well, I have to say that SDA is a must read EVERY day-usually the first one I read when I get up in the am.
On the other hand, I quit reading WK 6 months ago.

Nuff said.

Horny Toad

Pollara, eh? Wasn't that a model of Dodge that went extinct?

Funny, I got a call a few hours ago from a woman caller working for Pollara. Obviously not a native English speaker, either.

I asked who had commissioned the poll. "We can't tell you that." I asked what the poll was about, and she responded by quoting the first question, "Are you, or any member of your family, employed in the media or belong to any political party?"

I declined to participate. Managed to waste at least half a minute of her time; wish I'd done better.

Steve, re: "three commonly used word" - that's what I meant by Kinsella being an internet illiterate.

Secondly - yes, commented sites will generate more traffic through repeat visits, though not as effectively as those that update frequently.

However - there are about 200 - 300 comments left here each day. At peak traffic periods on average days, there are 600 Sitemeter (which under counts) visits an hour, and the majority of those come into the site through the main page.

While some of those will be our regular commentors, they represent a tiny fraction of the readership. Like email lists, and other interactive sites, the vast majority of readers never post. Many never click the comments at all.

I wonder what percent of the readership buy newspapers for it's editorial content ?? 2% ?

For the sports page ? 40% ?

For the news ? .... forget it --- the Internet is rapidly attracting most of the news hounds :)

"Isn't Warren Kinsella a best-selling author and well known political pundit?" - No.

KW is only a pundit in the same light as the other "talking heads" the media gobbles up to spice up their coverage of nothing. "WK never was a smart man but he did stay at a Holiday Inn Express once".(apologies to Forrest Gump and Holiday Inn.)

Frankly, I am not surprised anymore at the swiftness and level of personal attacks the trolls and leftoids resort to when a discussion doesn't go their way.

The implication that Kate lives alone so this must mean something bad or that she has dogs and it must mean something even more vile is truly pathetic. This man is a waste of oxygen and not even worth discussing.

steve...I think the techy stuff (google fight) is secondary to the real point here. What good has WK done for any political junkie/info seeker wrt info on his site?
Now compare that to the info and links Kate provides.
The google fight thingy was a convenient toy kate used to rub it in to the guy who needed to be humbled.He thinks he effective. I think not.

I think it worked.

Kate! There are whackos all over the planet!! My Granpa worked for Bell Telephones in rural areas circa 1940. He had to trace phone calls from guys who would wake women up in the middle of the night asking sexual questions.
The Mounties arrested them. In those days, they were sent to a prison near Prince Albert Sask. where they got instant justice from a prison population that was totally intollerent of such morons.